Re: Collectors .. 70 T/A v 70 440-6 Chall.
[Re: Diego (not Ted)]
#253735
03/15/09 11:38 PM
03/15/09 11:38 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,468 So Cal
autoxcuda
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,468
So Cal
|
Quote:
Wow, never would I have expected it to be so slanted towards the T/A. Learn something new every day!
I think the price gap between the T/A-AAR's and their respective 440-6 Challenger-'Cuda siblings has narrowed over the past 10-15 years.
Anyone else's opinion on 340-6 car values relative to 440-6 values??
|
|
|
Re: Collectors .. 70 T/A v 70 440-6 Chall.
[Re: Diego (not Ted)]
#253736
03/15/09 11:57 PM
03/15/09 11:57 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,516 Las Vegas, NV
6bblgt
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,516
Las Vegas, NV
|
1970 Challengers2400 US total T/A Challengers, but only 989 with 4-speed (41%). 2035 US total 440+6 Challengers (1640 R/Ts & 296 R/T SEs & 99 R/T 'verts), but only 793 440+6 auto R/Ts (39%). - T/A vs. R/T- 340+6 vs. 440+6 ~~~~ R/Tnumbers vs. non-#s ---- T/A4-spd vs.auto --------- T/A3.91 vs. 4.10 ~~~~~~ even EB5 vs. EV2 ~~~~~~~ even resto vs. sitting ------- T/Ahood ------------------ T/Aspoiler ---------------- T/AThe T/A has too much high-performance eye-candy going for it, the R/T would need some major factory options to catch up to the cool factor! (sunroof, SHAKER, spoilers, louvers, etc.)
|
|
|
Re: Collectors .. 70 T/A v 70 440-6 Chall.
[Re: 6bblgt]
#253737
03/16/09 12:06 AM
03/16/09 12:06 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 29,652 Hamtramck, PA
Alaskan_TA
Fluffy Balladeer
|
Fluffy Balladeer
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 29,652
Hamtramck, PA
|
The easier to read version; T/A T/A T/A T/A T/A T/A T/A T/A T/A T/A T/A T/A T/A T/A T/A T/A T/A T/A
|
|
|
Re: Collectors .. 70 T/A v 70 440-6 Chall.
[Re: 6bblgt]
#253739
03/16/09 01:15 AM
03/16/09 01:15 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,468 So Cal
autoxcuda
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,468
So Cal
|
Quote:
1970 Challengers 2400 US total T/A Challengers, but only 989 with 4-speed (41%). 2035 US total 440+6 Challengers (1640 R/Ts & 296 R/T SEs & 99 R/T 'verts), but only 793 440+6 auto R/Ts (39%).
-T/A vs. R/T- 340+6 vs. 440+6 ~~~~ R/T numbers vs. non-#s ---- T/A 4-spd vs.auto --------- T/A 3.91 vs. 4.10 ~~~~~~ even EB5 vs. EV2 ~~~~~~~ even resto vs. sitting ------- T/A hood ------------------ T/A spoiler ---------------- T/A
The T/A has too much high-performance eye-candy going for it, the R/T would need some major factory options to catch up to the cool factor! (sunroof, SHAKER, spoilers, louvers, etc.)
"but only 793 440+6 auto R/Ts (39%)." Did you mean 4 speed instead of auto? I would have thought they made less 4spd than autos. . . . But from what you wrote all else equal you think a 70 440-6 non shaker (very few shaker 70's) is worth more than a 340-6 T/A? A typical T/A to typical R/T with same trans, paint and no spoilers/louvers/etc on the R/T?
Last edited by autoxcuda; 03/16/09 01:36 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Collectors .. 70 T/A v 70 440-6 Chall.
[Re: 6pacdave]
#253741
03/16/09 10:24 AM
03/16/09 10:24 AM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quote:
Thanks for the input guys, sometimes you just need to be set straight!
cheers Dave
Your welcome. That'll be $50 per response for advice and counseling. j/k.
|
|
|
|
|