Any recent experiences between the 2?

In comparing the 2 I see these advantages...

The FBO rev limiter is adjustable in 200 rpm increments and removes the ballast resistor.

The FBO is a bit cheaper.

The Rev A Nator claims a power increase.

It also has a separate ground strap, which makes sense.

Laura at R/T garage is hot.

Has anyone compared the side by side or had any issues?
Wanting to use in conjunction with a MP distributor.

Trying to rectify an ignition breakup over 6k rpm.

http://www.manciniracing.com/fboigboxrevl.html

http://www.manciniracing.com/reeligcoun1.html

http://www.manciniracing.com/fboigboxrevl.html

I'm using Rev-N-Nator... completelly satisfied.

Used the first FBO version on original casing look ( the A688 ) which was more crispy than the Rev-N-Nator and really similar to the MP Chromed one, but Rev-N-Nator is way smoother. Replace it with the Rev-N-Nator due FBO and MP Chromed boxes failure

Both with the MP dist

Can talk about the newer HHR688 aluminium case late version thought... whic in any case I donb't like the look, neither the need to bypass the ballast.