Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: Pro stock block question [Re: 74DusterP457] #230794
02/21/09 09:52 AM
02/21/09 09:52 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 550
Camp Point, IL
G
gofish Offline
mopar
gofish  Offline
mopar
G

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 550
Camp Point, IL
I sure didn't feel sorry for Nickens. He was the one responsible for getting the old Eicke motor combination banned to they could stay ahead of Allen and Roy. That forced Johnsons to play catch up with old hemi parts, since they didn't have factory backing, they had to make do with what they could scrounge off of the factory teams.

Isn't the Eicke head the basis for the NRC head design?

Danny

Re: Pro stock block question [Re: gofish] #230795
02/21/09 09:37 PM
02/21/09 09:37 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 699
Manassas, VA USA
Scamp451 Offline OP
mopar
Scamp451  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 699
Manassas, VA USA
I thought the general idea was (at least at one time) in most sanctioning bodies is that in order to run and X-stock class, a certain number had to be produced and the parts used had to be available to the general public, or have the rules since been "augmented"?

Re: Pro stock block question [Re: AndyF] #230796
02/22/09 12:09 AM
02/22/09 12:09 AM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,340
Pennsylvania
proshiftcharger Offline
pro stock
proshiftcharger  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,340
Pennsylvania
Quote:

When the starter is on the passenger side and there isn't any distributor hole up front you start to think it might not be a Mopar block.




Heres a pic of a HEMI PS motor starter location
(drivers side)

Re: Pro stock block question [Re: proshiftcharger] #230797
02/22/09 12:15 AM
02/22/09 12:15 AM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,340
Pennsylvania
proshiftcharger Offline
pro stock
proshiftcharger  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,340
Pennsylvania
Heres the same HEMI PS motor note the distributor (no hole) small belt drive off of crank.

Re: Pro stock block question [Re: proshiftcharger] #230798
02/22/09 12:35 AM
02/22/09 12:35 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,932
Finalnd, Perkele
J
jyrki Offline
master
jyrki  Offline
master
J

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,932
Finalnd, Perkele
Actually, when NHRA paid attention to blocks used, it was the "factory teams" that suffered, A. Johnsn was using a different block made by a other supplier totally by aftermarket. The problem with the denied block was that it actually came from the same line as GM "factory" PS blocks. In a typical pro stock engine you just don't go to a speed shop and buy a block, it takes A LOT of effort and changes to build one for use. Currently the mopar block is told to be about the "readiest" block on market.
Personally I have not seen anyt Eicke stuff. When they went with the 4.9" bore space, everything used "GM blocks", All the stuff I have seen is B1/TS parts for those. I believe there wasnt much performance difference at that point, but Eicke that co-operated with Steve Schmidt already had a working PS program with the GM, and there was kind of a temptation.... Hasn't been much talk about Eicke lately, was kind of beried with the mopar deal but was a main player before that.
I can have my hands on a pretty late B1/TS engine (Steve Schmidt/Billy Stepp), good power, but pretty "thin" comapred to csame era GM's, narrower powerband.
And you need a guy from Finland to write this.


Plynouth VIP '67 TT IC EFI
Page 2 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1