|
|
1990 Dakota trans rebuild
#2255800
02/19/17 01:18 AM
02/19/17 01:18 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 614
Id
mopeman
OP
mopar
|
OP
mopar
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 614
Id
|
Ok, so I got the trans from my son's 1990 4x4 Dakota torn down and the small accumulator spring was missing. Is this something I need to worry about?
Mopar or no car
MoPar=Massivly Over Powered And Respected!
'93 W250 Ram
'68 Charger
'67 Coronet 500 my steet/strip rod-now a 6BBL!
|
|
|
Re: 1990 Dakota trans rebuild
[Re: volaredon]
#2256467
02/20/17 06:20 AM
02/20/17 06:20 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 614
Id
mopeman
OP
mopar
|
OP
mopar
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 614
Id
|
Yup, that's what my research showed. The FSM doesn't show it, but the FPM does.
Mopar or no car
MoPar=Massivly Over Powered And Respected!
'93 W250 Ram
'68 Charger
'67 Coronet 500 my steet/strip rod-now a 6BBL!
|
|
|
Re: 1990 Dakota trans rebuild
[Re: ojcool]
#2256497
02/20/17 11:10 AM
02/20/17 11:10 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,237
ILLINOIS
volaredon
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,237
ILLINOIS
|
Is it a 42rh or 46rh. Is it a V8 or V6? Not that any of this matters to your question. I'm still just trying to nail down which trans I have in my 91 V8 truck. 91 was still the LA series engine probably an A500. does pan look like the older 904 or does it look like 727 pan?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
