Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Combo changed, but ET still the same? #2146590
09/03/16 02:05 AM
09/03/16 02:05 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,760
Windsor, ON, Canada
D
Diplomat360 Offline OP
top fuel
Diplomat360  Offline OP
top fuel
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,760
Windsor, ON, Canada
As you read this post please keep in mind I very much am an amateur at the drag racing "thing". My car is primarily a street weekend toy, but of course I want to eek out the max performance out of it.

OK, so over the winter I made some changes to the top-end of my 360 motor. Kept the same cam (hydraulic flat tappet, 238/244@0.050, .535/.540 lift, 108 LSA - Hughes HE3844AL) but bumped the static CR from 9.7 to 10.7 (head re-surface), my cranking compression went from 165 to 185-190 psi. Did some additional work on the heads, minimal really, removed the left-over (from original porting job) guide boss casting. This time I went back to running a Perfomer RPM intake instead of the Holley Strip Dominator single plane.

My ride is about 3600 lbs race weight, 360 motor, 4K stall converter, 727 trans, 3.91 gear on Nitto NT555R drag radials, Carter TQ 1-3/8" primary bore carb, 35deg total mech advance, 21 initial, all in by 2K RPM.

Now here is where I need your help. I did a few passes at Milan Dragway this past Wednesday and my times with the current combo are nearly identical to the old combo. What I am really floored by is that the Perfomer RPM intake did not seem to improve the 60' times (even though in normal city driving this intake is a clear winner as compared to the Holley). In addition, the bump 10.7:1 CR did not appear to improve anything either...I figured even a low end estimate of hp improvement due to higher CR would have been worth something.

Soooo....any guesses as to where I'm getting stuck with this?

Here are my run LOG contents for several runs:

REACTION - 60 FT - 330 FT - 1/8 ET - 1/8 MPH - 1000 FT - 1/4 ET - 1/4 MPH - TIRE PSI - LAUNCH RPM - COMMENTS

2014 Season runs (single plane Holley Strip Dominator intake with 9.6 CR)
0.460 - 2.006 - 5.580 - 8.571 - 80.65 - 11.262 - 13.533 - 99.62 - 32 - 3000
0.449 - 2.660 - 6.579 - 9.609 - 81.51 - 12.248 - 14.482 - 101.15 - 32 - 3000
0.603 - 2.333 - 6.119 - 9.132 - 81.96 - 11.749 - 13.966 - 102.08 - 32 - 3000
0.100 - 1.870 - 5.379 - 8.341 - 82.40 - 10.937 - 13.138 - 102.33 - 32 - 3000 - BEST TIME
0.153 - 1.973 - 5.519 - 8.473 - 83.17 - 11.056 - 13.254 - 102.54 - 32 - 3000

2016 Season runs (dual plane Performer RPM intake with 10.7 CR)
0.120 - 2.180 - 5.779 - 8.759 - 82.57 - 11.357 - 13.568 - 101.68 - 25 - 3000
0.520 - 2.356 - 6.386 - 9.450 - 80.89 - 12.081 - 14.314 - 100.99 - 25 - 3500
0.041 - 2.098 - 5.624 - 8.561 - xx.xx - xx.xxx - 13.316 - 102.75 - 19 - 3500
-0.126 - 2.034 - 5.515 - 8.440 - 83.76 - 11.006 - 13.188 - 102.98 - 19 - 3500 - RED LIGHTED
0.189 - 2.069 - 5.559 - 8.484 - 83.94 - 11.043 - 13.218 - 103.27 - 19 - 4000 - BEST TIME

Burnouts were good, lower tire PSI showed no tire spin at launch, shifted into 2nd @ 6500, 3rd @ 6300 and crossing the finish line around 5700 RPM.

Did I expect too much from this change?

If I am blatantly going wrong somewhere here by all means please tell me...I do not know how to interpret what the 1/4 mile slips tell me.

Thanks!

Re: Combo changed, but ET still the same? [Re: Diplomat360] #2146601
09/03/16 02:40 AM
09/03/16 02:40 AM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,139
my own world
theraif Offline
master
theraif  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,139
my own world
at 1st i would say tire spin you said no spin. 2nd your trans.
also are you doing every thing the same ie,, burn out and engine temp ect ect ??

Re: Combo changed, but ET still the same? [Re: Diplomat360] #2146635
09/03/16 08:17 AM
09/03/16 08:17 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,026
Tulsa OK
Bad340fish Offline
master
Bad340fish  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,026
Tulsa OK
Just my opinion but I would try swapping the intake back. I think you made lots of positive changes but the intake was a step back.


68 Barracuda Formula S 340
Re: Combo changed, but ET still the same? [Re: Diplomat360] #2146698
09/03/16 11:04 AM
09/03/16 11:04 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,243
Charlotte, North Carolina
sgcuda Offline
master
sgcuda  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,243
Charlotte, North Carolina
I'm in agreement with trying the old intake again. Also, how did you obtain a whole point of compression increase. That doesn't happen with a clean mill. Won't even happen with a .060" mill.


[image][/image]
Re: Combo changed, but ET still the same? [Re: Diplomat360] #2146703
09/03/16 11:26 AM
09/03/16 11:26 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,997
Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
gregsdart Offline
master
gregsdart  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,997
Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
The 60 fts won't vary more than .01 unless you have tire spin, or a problem like no jet extensions, which can let air enter the rear jets. I agree on trying the other intake again. You have enough converter to make use of the upper end power, I believe.


8..603 156 mph best, 2905 lbs 549, indy 572-13, alky
Re: Combo changed, but ET still the same? [Re: Diplomat360] #2146710
09/03/16 11:38 AM
09/03/16 11:38 AM
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 5,183
P
Porter67 Offline
master
Porter67  Offline
master
P

Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 5,183
Possibly the added work on the heads really netted next to nothing.

How much of an improvement were you expecting?

So really at the end of the day, you only cleaned the heads up to what you thought they should be, maybe swapped head gaskets and went with a semi similar intake, yes alot of work but for all that I might of just tried a bit different cam as well or the cam would of been the only change.

Re: Combo changed, but ET still the same? [Re: Diplomat360] #2146739
09/03/16 12:45 PM
09/03/16 12:45 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,139
my own world
theraif Offline
master
theraif  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,139
my own world
didnt think there would be a jet issue with a Carter TQ

Re: Combo changed, but ET still the same? [Re: Diplomat360] #2146740
09/03/16 12:48 PM
09/03/16 12:48 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,009
Richmond Twp. Mi.
Mr340 Offline
super stock
Mr340  Offline
super stock

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,009
Richmond Twp. Mi.
You didn't mention what heads you have. If they are cast iron at 10.7 cr I would recommend mixing some 100 or 110 octane fuel with your 93 pump gas.
Also If you compare MPH @ the 1/8 and 1/4 you are slightly faster. Looks like you need to improve you 60' you ran almost the same et 13.138 vs 13.188 with a 1.87 vs 2.034 60. looks like some tire spin is in there.

Gary

Re: Combo changed, but ET still the same? [Re: Diplomat360] #2146741
09/03/16 12:49 PM
09/03/16 12:49 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,942
Metro Detroit
OUTLAWD Offline
top fuel
OUTLAWD  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,942
Metro Detroit
Good to meet you, again! Very clean car you have there. The times are all over the place, so it will be a bit difficult to compare.

Do you happen to know the weather from the 2014 runs? The DA was 2000-2500' on Wednesday, so not great by any means, but average for Milan it seems.

A helpful link that will look up historical weather at the track you ran:
http://www.dragtimes.com/da-density-altitude-calculator.php

Sorry I didn't get much of a chance to chat, but the couple runs I witnessed (which you weren't driving) it seemed to kill the tires off the line. With that gear and converter you should be able to manage better short times if its hooking, easily along the lines of the 1.87 from 2014. For comparison, my Dart with a stock converter and 3.23's pulled 1.9 with similar ET.

Also, the track prep was typical Milan that night, i.e. no prep. I struggled with tire spin all night, and only managed a 1.63, with a worst of 1.73 (normal "dead hook" is 1.60).

I think you may still need to work on tire pressures. I'm not familiar with the Nittos, but a co-worker used to race for Nitto and helped with their early drag radial development, he indicated you could run the pressure much lower. I would start at 20psi and work down in 1 psi steps until it hooks, keeping everything else consistent. I think most radial guys end up in the 15-17 psi range.

Other tricks for the stock spring are clamping the front segment, unclamping the rear segment, ensuring you have adequate shock travel (not topping out the shock). Even single adjustable ranchos would be a good step up from stock replacement style.

The performer RPM should be a fine intake. That, the RPM AirGap and the LD340, are among the more well regarded street intakes. Is the divider cut down at all? It could want more plenum volume. Maybe you can fit a carb spacer and keep everything under the hood?

Good luck with it! Let me know if you plan to head out again and I can try to make it out myself.


Faster, Faster until the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death...

71 Swinger - slowly collecting dust/parts
66 Belv. II - just a streetcar
88 Mustang - turbo LS beater
Re: Combo changed, but ET still the same? [Re: Diplomat360] #2146753
09/03/16 01:07 PM
09/03/16 01:07 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 22,873
Chicken coop
dustergirl340 Offline
Chicken Little
dustergirl340  Offline
Chicken Little

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 22,873
Chicken coop
Work on that sixty foot...you are losing a lot of ET there.

Different tire pressures, and try launching at different RPM's, or even off idle. It's harder when the track prep is little to non-existent.

Try different shift points too. I think you may be shifting too high.

Re: Combo changed, but ET still the same? [Re: Diplomat360] #2146775
09/03/16 01:45 PM
09/03/16 01:45 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,173
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,173
Bend,OR USA
Two things come into my mind, one is lack of consistency, work on fixing that first so yo can do some valid testing up
Second thing is fuel delivery, can you jet that carb. up enough to slow the 1/4 mile per hour down? scope If not fix that next up
Have you played with the squirter sizes yet? If not do that also thumbs

Last edited by Cab_Burge; 09/03/16 01:46 PM.

Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: Combo changed, but ET still the same? [Re: Diplomat360] #2146811
09/03/16 02:58 PM
09/03/16 02:58 PM
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 200
midwest
S
superchuck Offline
On thin ice
superchuck  Offline
On thin ice
S

Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 200
midwest
Shift points are too high IMHO. Buy a stand alone shift light set it for 6000 and start a base line.
Are you using SS springs? if so, take your pinion snubber off and toss it

Last edited by superchuck; 09/03/16 03:02 PM.
Re: Combo changed, but ET still the same? [Re: Diplomat360] #2146840
09/03/16 04:14 PM
09/03/16 04:14 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,760
Windsor, ON, Canada
D
Diplomat360 Offline OP
top fuel
Diplomat360  Offline OP
top fuel
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,760
Windsor, ON, Canada
Guys!

Thanks for the all feedback. I will provide some general responses in this post and will do a one-by-one specific post responses next.

Alright...so consistency...yeah, absolutely dismal, but that is party due to my complete lack of experience and party due to trying too many things in one session. I agree that next time out I need to focus on specific "configuration" and stick with it. Meanwhile, this outing was still a bit like throwing a dart in the dark. I tried a number of different things (given my previous 2014 session results, I tried to stay consistent there) with the goal of identifying a working combination.

Some of you pointed to shift-points. The motor seems to pull up to that 6300-6500 point. I am running my lifters with a zero pre-load, they are the HT2011R anti pump-up pieces. When I had put on a bit more pre-load (1/2 turn on the rocker adjuster screw) I could tell then the motor dropped about 200 RPM. But...excellent point, I will aim for a 6000 RPM shif-point next time out.

Tire spin, maybe I was over-optimistic in thinking I was free of this issue...LOL. There was a real difference going from the street 25 psi to 19 psi, and as the burnouts got better the tires got sticker. But I will start off with 18 psi next and watch this closely. Great advice re: 60ft times and the consistency that I should be after. Here is a question: for this type of a setup (street car after all) what would be considered a respectable 60 ft time?

Once again, thank you...appreciate all the responses. I have a set of custom pushrods (Smith Bros) coming to me so that I can try my Crane 1.6 ratio rocker arms...so hopefully a couple more test sessions still remain in this season.

Re: Combo changed, but ET still the same? [Re: sgcuda] #2146844
09/03/16 04:22 PM
09/03/16 04:22 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,760
Windsor, ON, Canada
D
Diplomat360 Offline OP
top fuel
Diplomat360  Offline OP
top fuel
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,760
Windsor, ON, Canada
Originally Posted By sgcuda
...how did you obtain a whole point of compression increase. That doesn't happen with a clean mill. Won't even happen with a .060" mill.


Well, my heads are stock 596 castings. The chamber diameter is 4.075-4.100 one way (top to bottom) and 4.130 across the intake/exhaust valve centerline at the widest (side to side @ valve de-shrouding cut) point.

I started off with a 68 cc size...the head cut was 0.030" which got me down to a 61 cc camber (I actually cc'ed them).

Using these numbers I went from m previous baseline of 9.8 to the new number of 10.5 (not 10.7, thanks, I went back to my spreadsheet to re-calculate and realized the 10.7 number was coming from several of "what-if" scenarios I ran through).

Re: Combo changed, but ET still the same? [Re: gregsdart] #2146848
09/03/16 04:30 PM
09/03/16 04:30 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,760
Windsor, ON, Canada
D
Diplomat360 Offline OP
top fuel
Diplomat360  Offline OP
top fuel
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,760
Windsor, ON, Canada
Originally Posted By gregsdart
...or a problem like no jet extensions, which can let air enter the rear jets. I agree on trying the other intake again...


I am running a Carter TQ 9800 series carb (electric choke) with the following setups:

PRIMARY JET = 98
SEC JET= 143
METERING ROD = 2004 (0.067,0.058, 0.040)
SEC AIR DOOR TENSION = 2 turns
SEC AIR DOOR OPENNING (back of throat) = .850"

For street manners the 98 primary jet and 2004 metering rods give me a very nice AFR reading of IDLE=14.2-5, CRUISE=13.7@110km/h, SEC_POWER=13.5.

Should I be aiming for a richer WOT reading?

I have been pretty lucky to assemble a great mix of jets and metering rods, so I can easily go up to something like 149 on secondary jets and play around with the sec air door openning.

Re: Combo changed, but ET still the same? [Re: Porter67] #2146852
09/03/16 04:37 PM
09/03/16 04:37 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,760
Windsor, ON, Canada
D
Diplomat360 Offline OP
top fuel
Diplomat360  Offline OP
top fuel
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,760
Windsor, ON, Canada
Originally Posted By EV2Bird
Possibly the added work on the heads really netted next to nothing.

How much of an improvement were you expecting?..


Fair question...per the compression ratio change => hp/torque increase estimates the implied single point of static CR should equal to about 1.5% improvement (see David Vizard's " How to Port & Flow TestCylinder Heads" book).

I figured on my motor that woudl equal to approx 3-4hp increase...I agree, all math numbers, but that's all I got.

Re: Combo changed, but ET still the same? [Re: Mr340] #2146853
09/03/16 04:42 PM
09/03/16 04:42 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,760
Windsor, ON, Canada
D
Diplomat360 Offline OP
top fuel
Diplomat360  Offline OP
top fuel
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,760
Windsor, ON, Canada
Originally Posted By Mr340
You didn't mention what heads you have. If they are cast iron at 10.7 cr I would recommend mixing some 100 or 110 octane fuel with your 93 pump gas...


Yes, these are factory 596 castings, somewhat heavily re-worked (porting mostly, see this other post for some specifics) but with 2.02 and 1.60 valves. I never thought of going beyond the 94 octane if that octane level was not causing me detonation issues...wouldn't higher octane atually burn slower?

Re: Combo changed, but ET still the same? [Re: OUTLAWD] #2146860
09/03/16 04:53 PM
09/03/16 04:53 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,760
Windsor, ON, Canada
D
Diplomat360 Offline OP
top fuel
Diplomat360  Offline OP
top fuel
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,760
Windsor, ON, Canada
Originally Posted By OUTLAWD
Good to meet you, again! Very clean car you have there. The times are all over the place, so it will be a bit difficult to compare.


Likewise, I was very happy to see you there. Thanks for the great conversation and the tips regarding the tire pressure.

Originally Posted By OUTLAWD
...Do you happen to know the weather from the 2014 runs? The DA was 2000-2500' on Wednesday, so not great by any means, but average for Milan it seems...


Nah, but I do have the specific dates, so I will try to a baseline the measurements using the link you provided.

Originally Posted By OUTLAWD
..Sorry I didn't get much of a chance to chat, but the couple runs I witnessed (which you weren't driving) it seemed to kill the tires off the line. With that gear and converter you should be able to manage better short times if its hooking, easily along the lines of the 1.87 from 2014. For comparison, my Dart with a stock converter and 3.23's pulled 1.9 with similar ET.


Ahh..yes, those runs were made by my buddy who's been part of this Mopar project of mine for many years. To give him credit, both times he spun tires pretty badly, but he did mange to go from an initial 15 sec pass to a final of 14.1...so he was pretty happy with that!

Originally Posted By OUTLAWD
...Other tricks for the stock spring are clamping the front segment, unclamping the rear segment, ensuring you have adequate shock travel (not topping out the shock)...


My hands are pretty tied here. I am actually running a set of KONI adjustables all around (front & rear). They are set pretty stiff for minimal chassis movement. The car handles great with the HD sway bars both front and rear. So very little chassis weight shift to the back. The springs are replacement M-body 5 leaf setups, clamped in factory locations. I do not want to play around with this due to the road-handling characteristics.

Originally Posted By OUTLAWD
...The performer RPM should be a fine intake. That, the RPM AirGap and the LD340, are among the more well regarded street intakes. Is the divider cut down at all? It could want more plenum volume. Maybe you can fit a carb spacer and keep everything under the hood?


Because I run a TQ on that intake (which is a square bore) I have a 3/4" adapter already in place. I did mill the divider wall in the intake itself down another 1/2"...but certainly nowhere as far as what MP books recommend. I would prefer to keep this dual plane since it does have great street manners.

Originally Posted By OUTLAWD
...Good luck with it! Let me know if you plan to head out again and I can try to make it out myself..


Absolutely will do, as you can tell I certainly could use a pair of "supervisory eyes" on things...LOL!

Re: Combo changed, but ET still the same? [Re: Cab_Burge] #2146864
09/03/16 05:00 PM
09/03/16 05:00 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,760
Windsor, ON, Canada
D
Diplomat360 Offline OP
top fuel
Diplomat360  Offline OP
top fuel
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,760
Windsor, ON, Canada
Originally Posted By Cab_Burge
...Second thing is fuel delivery, can you jet that carb. up enough to slow the 1/4 mile per hour down? scope If not fix that next up
Have you played with the squirter sizes yet? If not do that also thumbs


I am running a 3/8" line from the tank, mechanical Carter M6902 high-volume pump through pressure adjuster (6 psi) to the carb.

Comment regarding slowing down the 1/4 mph...seems counter-intuitive? Do I not actually want to go faster?

I thought faster mph implied the motor is making more hp, so if I jet up and the mph picks up I am moving in the right direction, of course the caveat being my ET may suffer if I'm not hooking the tires properly.

The squirter I have is 0.037, but I do have a 0.040 available as well. Will try that out next. When I ran the 0.040 on the street the motor did not like it...maybe it was the small primary-bore TQ I am using?

Re: Combo changed, but ET still the same? [Re: superchuck] #2146865
09/03/16 05:01 PM
09/03/16 05:01 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,760
Windsor, ON, Canada
D
Diplomat360 Offline OP
top fuel
Diplomat360  Offline OP
top fuel
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,760
Windsor, ON, Canada
Originally Posted By superchuck
...Are you using SS springs? if so, take your pinion snubber off and toss it


No, not using SS springs, just replacement 5 leaf pack for M-body cars.

I do have an adjustable pinion snubber set up with about 1" movement. Haven't climbed under the car yet to see if I was getting any hits or not though.

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1