Re: 2:76 to a 3:23 ratio, make a noticable difference?
[Re: DaytonaTurbo]
#203146
01/24/09 10:03 PM
01/24/09 10:03 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,123 Grand Haven, MI
patrick
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,123
Grand Haven, MI
|
Quote:
Go to 3.55 instead of 3.23. Penalty on the highway is only a hundred or two rpm but it'll make your step much more worthwhile IMO.
I HATED 3.55's in my car...was too buzzy, I like to keep up with traffic on the freeway, and I didn't enjoy 3K RPM at 70 MPH...I actually kept the 3.55's, just added a .69 OD
1976 Spinnaker White Plymouth Duster, /6 A833OD 1986 Silver/Twilight Blue Chrysler 5th Ave HotRod **SOLD!*** 2011 Toxic Orange Dodge Charger R/T 2017 Grand Cherokee Overland 2014 Jeep Cherokee Latitude (holy crap, my daughter is driving)
|
|
|
Re: 2:76 to a 3:23 ratio, make a noticable difference?
[Re: patrick]
#203147
01/24/09 10:32 PM
01/24/09 10:32 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 910 Southern Oregon
toyotajeep
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 910
Southern Oregon
|
I know that years ago when I ran a SB Mustang with 2.79's it was OK. Being a college kid I tried to save money by running them until I came across a set of 3.55's. After that, the 2.79's stayed on the shelf.
Gears made a lot of difference....
It was a bit buzzier for sure, but in my case it was worth it.
ROB
1989 Dodge Cummins & 1989 Dodge W-250
|
|
|
Re: 2:76 to a 3:23 ratio, make a noticable difference?
[Re: toyotajeep]
#203148
01/24/09 11:44 PM
01/24/09 11:44 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419 Kalispell Mt.
HotRodDave
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
|
I had 3.23s on my old valiant and hated them, tires were 225-75-14s so not too big but it was miserable. 2.94s are the lowest I would want on my street car, I would rather build the engine for more tq than gear it down for tq. Mabey if you had a pretty tall tire then 3.23s would be bearable.
I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!
|
|
|
|
|