Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Re: 904 Lockup Trans Question [Re: Supercuda] #1805426
04/17/15 03:47 AM
04/17/15 03:47 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,142
Canada -- Posts: 4034 -Registe...
5
5thAve Offline
Doesn't care what this says anyway
5thAve  Offline
Doesn't care what this says anyway
5

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,142
Canada -- Posts: 4034 -Registe...
Originally Posted By Supercuda
Cop spec M bodies had an electrical part throttle unlock solenoid that allowed the TC to unlock based on throttle input. Lockup functioned just like the civilian version.


This would be the only case in an M body that would have had anything electrical to do with lockup. Right up to 1989 the only thing non-cop ones have is the neutral safety switch and everything else is done within the transmission itself.

Re: 904 Lockup Trans Question [Re: 5thAve] #1805612
04/17/15 02:21 PM
04/17/15 02:21 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
3
383man Offline
Too Many Posts
383man  Offline
Too Many Posts
3

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
Originally Posted By 5thAve
Originally Posted By Supercuda
Cop spec M bodies had an electrical part throttle unlock solenoid that allowed the TC to unlock based on throttle input. Lockup functioned just like the civilian version.


This would be the only case in an M body that would have had anything electrical to do with lockup. Right up to 1989 the only thing non-cop ones have is the neutral safety switch and everything else is done within the transmission itself.


I dont remember on the M body as I would have to look in the service manual and look at the trans flow chart and wireing. They may have still had a carb on them. Pretty much everything fuel injected after 1988 had the electronic solenoid controlled lock-up. It was better to let the controller (PCM) work the solenoid to control lock-up as the PCM could moniter everything real easy like MAP vacum , eng speed and temp , vehicle speed and TPS posistion so it made it easy for the PCM to know when the lock-up should be on and it was just a simple ground the PCM controlled to control the lock-up conveter. Alot of them used the relay that the PCM controlled to send 12 volts to the lock-up solenoid. And it does not matter what the relay was call as.... part throttle unlock or lock-up solenoid as it always controlled turning the lock-up conveter on and off. You can see it very easy if you look at the flow charts I posted. Its really a very simple system. Ron

Last edited by 383man; 04/17/15 02:26 PM.
Re: 904 Lockup Trans Question [Re: 383man] #1805758
04/17/15 06:03 PM
04/17/15 06:03 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,757
Rio Linda, CA
John_Kunkel Offline
Too Many Posts
John_Kunkel  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,757
Rio Linda, CA
Originally Posted By 383man
This page says that the relay which controls the solenoid locks and unlocks the conveter. Ron


I know it's just semantics but, with no power on the solenoid, it locks up...power unlocks it so one (not me) could say that the solenoid locks and unlocks the clutch but in a passive way on the lock and active way on the unlock.


The INTERNET, the MISinformation superhighway
Re: 904 Lockup Trans Question [Re: John_Kunkel] #1805888
04/17/15 09:49 PM
04/17/15 09:49 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
Supercuda Offline
About to go away
Supercuda  Offline
About to go away

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
Originally Posted By John_Kunkel
Originally Posted By 383man
This page says that the relay which controls the solenoid locks and unlocks the conveter. Ron


I know it's just semantics but, with no power on the solenoid, it locks up...power unlocks it so one (not me) could say that the solenoid locks and unlocks the clutch but in a passive way on the lock and active way on the unlock.



Without power it'll unlock too, just not at part throttle. It's a fail safe design.


They say there are no such thing as a stupid question.
They say there is always the exception that proves the rule.
Don't be the exception.
Re: 904 Lockup Trans Question [Re: 383man] #1805890
04/17/15 09:50 PM
04/17/15 09:50 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
Supercuda Offline
About to go away
Supercuda  Offline
About to go away

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
Originally Posted By 383man


I dont remember on the M body as I would have to look in the service manual and look at the trans flow chart and wireing. They may have still had a carb on them.


M bodies has carbs till the end of production.


They say there are no such thing as a stupid question.
They say there is always the exception that proves the rule.
Don't be the exception.
Re: 904 Lockup Trans Question [Re: John_Kunkel] #1805921
04/17/15 10:41 PM
04/17/15 10:41 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
3
383man Offline
Too Many Posts
383man  Offline
Too Many Posts
3

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
Originally Posted By John_Kunkel
Originally Posted By 383man
This page says that the relay which controls the solenoid locks and unlocks the conveter. Ron


I know it's just semantics but, with no power on the solenoid, it locks up...power unlocks it so one (not me) could say that the solenoid locks and unlocks the clutch but in a passive way on the lock and active way on the unlock.




John when I look at the flow charts from my book it says the solenoid is deenergized with lock-up off (venting) and energized (not venting) is when it locks-up which is when the PCM grounds the relay and sends the 12 volts to the solenoid. Ron

Last edited by 383man; 04/17/15 10:43 PM.
Re: 904 Lockup Trans Question [Re: Evil Spirit] #1806447
04/18/15 08:13 PM
04/18/15 08:13 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,699
Newport, Mi
Evil Spirit Offline OP
master
Evil Spirit  Offline OP
master

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,699
Newport, Mi
From a safety standpoint it would make more sense to engineer it to not work if the control circuit fails rather than to not release. Using that logic - if you apply power to close the solenoid (vent) to lock the converter and the control circuit fails, you only have a no apply issue. If you have to apply power to open the solenoid (vent) to release the L/U and the control circuit fails - the converter won't unlock when instructed and could be a safety issue, even if it only happens in 3rd gear.

Kinda like the air bag circuit - would you wire it so you have to apply power to work, or to keep it from working?

Next time I visit my buddy with the trans I'll pull a solenoid off and see if it holds or vents pressure at rest. I think it will vent.


Free advice and worth every penny...
Factory trained Slinky rewinder.........
Re: 904 Lockup Trans Question [Re: Evil Spirit] #1806503
04/18/15 09:48 PM
04/18/15 09:48 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
Supercuda Offline
About to go away
Supercuda  Offline
About to go away

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
Y'all are thinking it only unlocks with the solenoid, at least on the M bodies that is not so, it will unlock hydraulically just like the non cop spec ones.

I think we are really talking about two different systems, one for PCM controlled EFI systems and the other for lean burn carb systems.

Both right, but in different applications.


They say there are no such thing as a stupid question.
They say there is always the exception that proves the rule.
Don't be the exception.
Re: 904 Lockup Trans Question [Re: Supercuda] #1806858
04/19/15 01:15 PM
04/19/15 01:15 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
3
383man Offline
Too Many Posts
383man  Offline
Too Many Posts
3

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
Yes when lock-up first came out they were all hydraulic as they used gov pressure to move one of the valves so the car had to be over a certain speed and it had to be in third gear on them. You could change a spring to raise when it locked up. Then around 1986 they went to the electrical solenoid
since they were now using computers on the cars and it made it easier to have control over when the lock-up came on as the computer (PCM) can moniter all the systems better like eng speed , vehicle speed , eng temp , eng vac and the throttle posistion by the TPS. It is still partial hydraulic as it still has to have shifted into second to feed pressure to the solenoid and it has to be in third so the fail safe valve gets pressure to move. They can still control when it applies by turning on the last item needed to move the lock-up valve over which is the solenoid. It can also be confusing how they word things as they call the relay on some the Part throttle unlock relay but really it dont make sense to me as yes it can unlock the lock-up at any part throttle it likes since the computer knows just where the throttle is and all the other inputs it needs to know. So yes the relay can cause it to unlock at part throttle but it can also loc-up or un-lock the converter when ever it likes. Bottom line is on this system the torque converter can not lock-up without the lock-up solenoid being powered on and it can un-lock the converter whenever the PCM turns the solenoid power off. Thats all I was trying to say is no matter what they call the lock-up solenoid or relay it will control the converter to lock-up or un-lock. Ron

Last edited by 383man; 04/19/15 01:18 PM.
Re: 904 Lockup Trans Question [Re: 383man] #1806868
04/19/15 01:34 PM
04/19/15 01:34 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
Supercuda Offline
About to go away
Supercuda  Offline
About to go away

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
Originally Posted By 383man
Yes when lock-up first came out they were all hydraulic as they used gov pressure to move one of the valves so the car had to be over a certain speed and it had to be in third gear on them. You could change a spring to raise when it locked up. Then around 1986 they went to the electrical solenoid
since they were now using computers on the cars and it made it easier to have control over when the lock-up came on as the computer (PCM) can moniter all the systems better like eng speed , vehicle speed , eng temp , eng vac and the throttle posistion by the TPS. It is still partial hydraulic as it still has to have shifted into second to feed pressure to the solenoid and it has to be in third so the fail safe valve gets pressure to move. They can still control when it applies by turning on the last item needed to move the lock-up valve over which is the solenoid. It can also be confusing how they word things as they call the relay on some the Part throttle unlock relay but really it dont make sense to me as yes it can unlock the lock-up at any part throttle it likes since the computer knows just where the throttle is and all the other inputs it needs to know. So yes the relay can cause it to unlock at part throttle but it can also loc-up or un-lock the converter when ever it likes. Bottom line is on this system the torque converter can not lock-up without the lock-up solenoid being powered on and it can un-lock the converter whenever the PCM turns the solenoid power off. Thats all I was trying to say is no matter what they call the lock-up solenoid or relay it will control the converter to lock-up or un-lock. Ron


W-R-O-N-G

Show me one car with all that on it and an A998 in it.

You cannot as it was never made.

Trucks, yes, cars NO.

That's the point.

The car version does not, nor ever did it, do any of what you say.

Trucks, maybe I do not know trucks.

I have the A998 out of my old 87 Dodge Diplomat and it has NONE of what you claim in it, it's a civilian version.


They say there are no such thing as a stupid question.
They say there is always the exception that proves the rule.
Don't be the exception.
Re: 904 Lockup Trans Question [Re: Supercuda] #1807333
04/19/15 11:23 PM
04/19/15 11:23 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
3
383man Offline
Too Many Posts
383man  Offline
Too Many Posts
3

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
Yes I say cars but trucks is what I worked on 99% of the time as in 1986 Mopar did not make many rear drive cars to be honest as like I said 99% of what I saw was trucks or front drive cars which also had the electronic lock-up that basically works like this. So whether I said cars or trucks I meant that I was talking about any rear drive vehicle with electronic lock-up. I was not debating which models used electronic lock-up but trucks is what I worked on most and what my mind was thinking even if I said cars. We did not not see many rear drive cars even in our Dodge dealer to much in the 80's and 90's as they did not make many. My point was to tell how the electronic lock-up works as Mopar has used other versions since the 80's. In 1989 the 604 trans axle came out which was all electronic shift and uses a LR/Lock-up solenoid along with other solenoids. But the Low Reverse/Lock-up solenoid worked the lock-up converter and the Low/Reverse clutch. It moved a switch valve to determine if it applied the lock-up or low/reverse clutch. It was a little more complicated then the basic electronic lock-up. But as I said my point was not which vehicle used the electronic lock-up it was just to show how they applied the electronic lock-up. About the only M body cars I remember even seeing come in our shop after 1986 was Police cars but we did not see many of them. So I am not wrong on showing how the electronic lock-up works as I am correct about that. The M-bodies may have still used the hydraulic lock-up in the late 80's as I did not work on many of them at all so you may be right about them. The few M-bodies I saw I did not do any trans work on them and I just dont remember what they used so I appoligize if I gave you the wrong impression that I was talking about them. Ron

Last edited by 383man; 04/19/15 11:30 PM.
Re: 904 Lockup Trans Question [Re: 5thAve] #1807506
04/20/15 03:44 AM
04/20/15 03:44 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,699
Newport, Mi
Evil Spirit Offline OP
master
Evil Spirit  Offline OP
master

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,699
Newport, Mi
Originally Posted By 5thAve
Originally Posted By Supercuda
Cop spec M bodies had an electrical part throttle unlock solenoid that allowed the TC to unlock based on throttle input. Lockup functioned just like the civilian version.


This would be the only case in an M body that would have had anything electrical to do with lockup. Right up to 1989 the only thing non-cop ones have is the neutral safety switch and everything else is done within the transmission itself.


Mitchel On Demand wiring diagrams for BOTH '88 and '89 Diplomat SE's show a "Part Throttle Unlock Relay" - receives ground signal from the Spark Control Computer (org/blk wire - plug 1/pin 8), and 3 dark blue wires - 2 provide signal and input 12v+ (same dk blue wire from key that powers the coil, volt reg, alt field, etc.) , and 1 providing the 12v+ output from the relay to the "Part Throttle Unlock Solenoid" in the trans.

So, according to Mitchel, controlling the lock-up electronically started in '88.


Free advice and worth every penny...
Factory trained Slinky rewinder.........
Re: 904 Lockup Trans Question [Re: 383man] #1807583
04/20/15 10:52 AM
04/20/15 10:52 AM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
Supercuda Offline
About to go away
Supercuda  Offline
About to go away

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
Originally Posted By 383man
Yes I say cars but trucks is what I worked on 99% of the time as in 1986 Mopar did not make many rear drive cars to be honest as like I said 99% of what I saw was trucks or front drive cars which also had the electronic lock-up that basically works like this. So whether I said cars or trucks I meant that I was talking about any rear drive vehicle with electronic lock-up. I was not debating which models used electronic lock-up but trucks is what I worked on most and what my mind was thinking even if I said cars. We did not not see many rear drive cars even in our Dodge dealer to much in the 80's and 90's as they did not make many. My point was to tell how the electronic lock-up works as Mopar has used other versions since the 80's. In 1989 the 604 trans axle came out which was all electronic shift and uses a LR/Lock-up solenoid along with other solenoids. But the Low Reverse/Lock-up solenoid worked the lock-up converter and the Low/Reverse clutch. It moved a switch valve to determine if it applied the lock-up or low/reverse clutch. It was a little more complicated then the basic electronic lock-up. But as I said my point was not which vehicle used the electronic lock-up it was just to show how they applied the electronic lock-up. About the only M body cars I remember even seeing come in our shop after 1986 was Police cars but we did not see many of them. So I am not wrong on showing how the electronic lock-up works as I am correct about that. The M-bodies may have still used the hydraulic lock-up in the late 80's as I did not work on many of them at all so you may be right about them. The few M-bodies I saw I did not do any trans work on them and I just dont remember what they used so I appoligize if I gave you the wrong impression that I was talking about them. Ron



Here's the transmission the OP is using

The case he is using is a 999 out of an 83 Imperial. It doesn't have a lock-up solenoid on the valve body.

Not a truck and no unlock solenoid.


They say there are no such thing as a stupid question.
They say there is always the exception that proves the rule.
Don't be the exception.
Re: 904 Lockup Trans Question [Re: Evil Spirit] #1807741
04/20/15 02:17 PM
04/20/15 02:17 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
3
383man Offline
Too Many Posts
383man  Offline
Too Many Posts
3

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
Originally Posted By Evil Spirit
Friend wants to run a 904/998/999 based lock-up trans in a 66 Dart behind a mild 360. Main question is - do all lock-up 904's shift into lock-up "mechanically" - referencing high gear applied and governor input, or are there any lock-up 904's that have an electric solenoid that dictates converter lock-up? I thought I remembered seeing a lock-up 904 with a connector at the left rear of the case for a lock-up solenoid wire. Trans didn't have a trans brake in it, before any one asks. Is there an "electric" lock-up valve body - if so - application?

And does anyone make a "budget" converter for this trans that has a little better stall and would live behind a 350 hp 360?



Here is what the OP asked SuperCuda. I took it as telling him how some of the 900 based tranny's DO have lock-up and how they work. Thats all plain and simple. I did not say all M-bodies have lock-up as I dont remember off the top of my head which body styles did or did not have lock-up. I go to the service manual for the year and body car I work on to determine all the options as you cant remmeber all of them off the top of your head. Get the M-body deal out of your head as I only used what I said as reference about how electronic lock-up works. I could care less what year M-bodies use electronic lock-up. I only wanted to tell the OP how they work and how the solenoid lock and un-locks the converter. Maybe you should worry more about how the electronic lock-up works which is what the OP wants to know instead of whether I know which year M-bodies had electronic lock-up because I dont care what year M-bodies were or were not electronic lock-up. My point was to let the OP know ALL ELECTRONIC LOCK-UP converters are turned on and off by the solenoid when they have the electric solenoid. If you cant understand that then learn how to read a flow chart. Ron

Last edited by 383man; 04/20/15 02:26 PM.
Re: 904 Lockup Trans Question [Re: 383man] #1807787
04/20/15 03:25 PM
04/20/15 03:25 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,757
Rio Linda, CA
John_Kunkel Offline
Too Many Posts
John_Kunkel  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,757
Rio Linda, CA
Originally Posted By 383man
I only wanted to tell the OP how they work and how the solenoid lock and un-locks the converter.


Your interpretation of how it works. The word "unlock" in all the quoted examples is the operative word.


The INTERNET, the MISinformation superhighway
Re: 904 Lockup Trans Question [Re: John_Kunkel] #1808020
04/20/15 08:01 PM
04/20/15 08:01 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
3
383man Offline
Too Many Posts
383man  Offline
Too Many Posts
3

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
Originally Posted By John_Kunkel
Originally Posted By 383man
I only wanted to tell the OP how they work and how the solenoid lock and un-locks the converter.


Your interpretation of how it works. The word "unlock" in all the quoted examples is the operative word.



Unlock means unlocked. Dont know what else it could mean. Ron

Re: 904 Lockup Trans Question [Re: Evil Spirit] #1808050
04/20/15 08:45 PM
04/20/15 08:45 PM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 735
Pa. U.S.A.
moparborn Offline
super stock
moparborn  Offline
super stock

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 735
Pa. U.S.A.
Yes,I bought higher stall lockup convertor,I believe it is around 2200-2600.

Re: 904 Lockup Trans Question [Re: Evil Spirit] #1808081
04/20/15 09:18 PM
04/20/15 09:18 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,142
Canada -- Posts: 4034 -Registe...
5
5thAve Offline
Doesn't care what this says anyway
5thAve  Offline
Doesn't care what this says anyway
5

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,142
Canada -- Posts: 4034 -Registe...
Originally Posted By Evil Spirit
Originally Posted By 5thAve
Originally Posted By Supercuda
Cop spec M bodies had an electrical part throttle unlock solenoid that allowed the TC to unlock based on throttle input. Lockup functioned just like the civilian version.


This would be the only case in an M body that would have had anything electrical to do with lockup. Right up to 1989 the only thing non-cop ones have is the neutral safety switch and everything else is done within the transmission itself.


Mitchel On Demand wiring diagrams for BOTH '88 and '89 Diplomat SE's show a "Part Throttle Unlock Relay" - receives ground signal from the Spark Control Computer (org/blk wire - plug 1/pin 8), and 3 dark blue wires - 2 provide signal and input 12v+ (same dk blue wire from key that powers the coil, volt reg, alt field, etc.) , and 1 providing the 12v+ output from the relay to the "Part Throttle Unlock Solenoid" in the trans.

So, according to Mitchel, controlling the lock-up electronically started in '88.


Mitchell copied the wrong information right out of the factory manuals and it's not the only wrong bit of information in there. Electrical shows that yet the transmission section has the correct information with the valve and pressure spring and no mention of electronic control anywhere. Trucks might have gone that way but the cars never did.

EDIT: THey could have with police to save the lockup cluth. But just because the wiring diagram shows it doesn't mean all models had it, the diagrams don't always distinguish between stock and optional items.

Re: 904 Lockup Trans Question [Re: 5thAve] #1808311
04/21/15 02:08 AM
04/21/15 02:08 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,699
Newport, Mi
Evil Spirit Offline OP
master
Evil Spirit  Offline OP
master

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,699
Newport, Mi
[u][i]
Originally Posted By 5thAve
Originally Posted By Evil Spirit
Originally Posted By 5thAve
Originally Posted By Supercuda
Cop spec M bodies had an electrical part throttle unlock solenoid that allowed the TC to unlock based on throttle input. Lockup functioned just like the civilian version.


This would be the only case in an M body that would have had anything electrical to do with lockup. Right up to 1989 the only thing non-cop ones have is the neutral safety switch and everything else is done within the transmission itself.


Mitchel On Demand wiring diagrams for BOTH '88 and '89 Diplomat SE's show a "Part Throttle Unlock Relay" - receives ground signal from the Spark Control Computer (org/blk wire - plug 1/pin 8), and 3 dark blue wires - 2 provide signal and input 12v+ (same dk blue wire from key that powers the coil, volt reg, alt field, etc.) , and 1 providing the 12v+ output from the relay to the "Part Throttle Unlock Solenoid" in the trans.

So, according to Mitchel, controlling the lock-up electronically started in '88.


Mitchell copied the wrong information right out of the factory manuals and it's not the only wrong bit of information in there. Electrical shows that yet the transmission section has the correct information with the valve and pressure spring and no mention of electronic control anywhere. Trucks might have gone that way but the cars never did.



The Mitchell hydraulic flow chart (Fig 5) also shows the electric lock-up solenoid in the trans in '88.

At this point - my original post was - do electrically controlled lock-up valve bodies exist? YES, THEY DO. Application? NO ONE CAN AGREE (Doesn't matter at this point - we found and bought 2 one wire lock-up V/B's). Better torque converter? NO REPLIES

So our best bet at this point is to just wire a toggle switch to the flippin thing and after we figure out where on and off is, mark it with a sharpie.

Last edited by Evil Spirit; 04/21/15 02:19 AM.

Free advice and worth every penny...
Factory trained Slinky rewinder.........
Re: 904 Lockup Trans Question [Re: 383man] #1808819
04/21/15 07:09 PM
04/21/15 07:09 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,757
Rio Linda, CA
John_Kunkel Offline
Too Many Posts
John_Kunkel  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,757
Rio Linda, CA
Originally Posted By 383man

Unlock means unlocked. Dont know what else it could mean. Ron


You're missing the point, the word "unlock" is used in most of the references to this feature posted here meaning, to me, the solenoid is energized only for unlock.

We both agree that the solenoid valve opens to vent the circuit and unlock the converter but the disagreement is whether the solenoid is energized to close the valve and lock the converter or whether it's energized to open the valve and unlock the converter. I see no absolute proof of either here.

Perhaps I'm too pragmatic but it seems to make more sense to energize the solenoid for a short period of time to part-throttle unlock the converter rather than to have it energized the whole time the converter is locked up.

As noted earlier, before the solenoid valve, the converter locked and unlocked hydraulically based on road speed/throttle only...it would unlock under some heavy throttle activity or when the car slowed enough for it to shift out of third and shut off the fluid source to the converter lockup circuit . To my way of thinking, the solenoid valve was installed to make the unlock at speed more controllable to answer driver complaints that forced unlock wasn't consistent when based solely on road speed/throttle pressure.


The INTERNET, the MISinformation superhighway
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1