Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Got the Cal Tracks... #1764168
02/27/15 06:24 AM
02/27/15 06:24 AM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 258
Stockholm, Sweden
T
TomsCharger70 Offline OP
enthusiast
TomsCharger70  Offline OP
enthusiast
T

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 258
Stockholm, Sweden
Its feels like Christmas when opening up packages with carparts



The springs are the -1". I just hope the wheel/tire combo will fit when eveything is bolted.

May be a dumb question, but which way have you mounted the AFCO shocks, if I understand it correct, the Afco´s can be mounted any way.. It also seems I need to make some spacers when bolting the shocks to the mounts.

When reading the instruction from Calvert they say to mount the Transfer Link in the lower hole, BUT the "instruction setup" from YellowBullet says mount the transfer link in the upper hole.. -How have you done this, just followed the instructions per Calvert or...

If everything fits after al is bolted, I am planing on adding sliders, but Ill start with the stock rear hangers...

Thanks for the interest..

/Tom

Re: Got the Cal Tracks... [Re: TomsCharger70] #1764169
02/27/15 08:38 AM
02/27/15 08:38 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,915
A shed in England
Tig Offline
master
Tig  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,915
A shed in England
We've had Caltracs for many years. They work well for us but remember to include the front set up in the equation. We mounted the shocks with the body at the bottom, makes adjusting the extension a pain on an E body but do able. Starting from scratch I would look to mounting the shock in front of the axle, it will help control axle rotation better.
What H/P, Tq, weight are you at? and what tyre, 'box and rear ratio are you using?
Edit: Bars are on the bottom hole here too.

Last edited by Tig; 02/27/15 12:46 PM.

'74 Challenger..9.46 @ 145.9 1/4, 6.001 @ 118 1/8 so far. 4023lb !!! # N/A, Marsh performance 655ci, Indy Maxx, T/R, Indy 600-13 X's, Street legal, pump gas, full interior, Cal-Tracs, mufflers, 3:73's and real 10.5 radials.
9.51 @ 142.4 1/4, 6.003 @ 114 1/8 with our old mule KB, 572-13, 580 wedge.
RHD '68 Barracuda Fastback 323ci street/strip. Best ET 13.88 @ 99.03
Re: Got the Cal Tracks... [Re: TomsCharger70] #1764170
02/27/15 08:59 AM
02/27/15 08:59 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,207
Menomonee Falls
DemonDust Offline
master
DemonDust  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,207
Menomonee Falls
I'm tossing the ss springs on my car this winter and going with the -1 as well.

Looks nice can't wait to get mine.


SDG Motorsports
Hellcat Demon and Redeye Supercharger CNC Porting
https://www.sdgmotorsports.com/
Re: Got the Cal Tracks... [Re: TomsCharger70] #1764171
02/27/15 12:42 PM
02/27/15 12:42 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,357
Marion, South Carolina [><]
an8sec70cuda Offline
I Live Here
an8sec70cuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,357
Marion, South Carolina [><]
Typically, use the front mount hole that puts the bar close to parallel w/ the ground.


CHIP
'70 hemicuda, 575" Hemi, 727, Dana 60
'69 road runner, 440-6, 18 spline 4 speed, Dana 60
'71 Demon, 340, low gear 904, 8.75
'73 Chrysler New Yorker, 440, 727, 8.75
'90 Chevy 454SS Silverado, 476" BBC, TH400, 14 bolt
'06 GMC 2500HD LBZ Duramax
Re: Got the Cal Tracks... [Re: an8sec70cuda] #1764172
02/27/15 04:31 PM
02/27/15 04:31 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 258
Stockholm, Sweden
T
TomsCharger70 Offline OP
enthusiast
TomsCharger70  Offline OP
enthusiast
T

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 258
Stockholm, Sweden
Quote:

We've had Caltracs for many years. They work well for us but remember to include the front set up in the equation. We mounted the shocks with the body at the bottom, makes adjusting the extension a pain on an E body but do able. Starting from scratch I would look to mounting the shock in front of the axle, it will help control axle rotation better.
What H/P, Tq, weight are you at? and what tyre, 'box and rear ratio are you using?
Edit: Bars are on the bottom hole here too.




Ill just see what way the shocks mounts the best.. Ive seen pics of the shocks mounted infront of the axel, at the moment I feel that a little overkill for my combo. Im not gonna break any records with my car. I race in a Streetcar class with a 9.99sec break out time. My best so far is 10.74@200mph, 1.57sec 60ft time. SS springs, Mopar DR shocks... In other words, nothing special.. Front end loose, I have the 5" of travel, poly bushings, 90/10 cheap Energy Suspension shocks.. Planing on adding Afco DA shocks in the front to..

My 496cid makes 770Hp, 670clb-ft tq. Weight is something like 3750lbs. Hoosier QTP 29x11.5-15, 727 from CRT and 4.56 ratio. Clicking 6900Rpm at the finnish line. May change the rearend ratio to 4.10 or 4.30, that way I could use 28" tires and also get the car to sit a bit lower in the rear.

Quote:

Typically, use the front mount hole that puts the bar close to parallel w/ the ground.




OK, Ill mount the transfer link according to Calvert instructions and go from there..

Re: Got the Cal Tracks... [Re: TomsCharger70] #1764173
02/28/15 01:20 AM
02/28/15 01:20 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
3
383man Offline
Too Many Posts
383man  Offline
Too Many Posts
3

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
Quote:

Quote:

We've had Caltracs for many years. They work well for us but remember to include the front set up in the equation. We mounted the shocks with the body at the bottom, makes adjusting the extension a pain on an E body but do able. Starting from scratch I would look to mounting the shock in front of the axle, it will help control axle rotation better.
What H/P, Tq, weight are you at? and what tyre, 'box and rear ratio are you using?
Edit: Bars are on the bottom hole here too.




Ill just see what way the shocks mounts the best.. Ive seen pics of the shocks mounted infront of the axel, at the moment I feel that a little overkill for my combo. Im not gonna break any records with my car. I race in a Streetcar class with a 9.99sec break out time. My best so far is [Email]10.74@200mph[/Email], 1.57sec 60ft time. SS springs, Mopar DR shocks... In other words, nothing special.. Front end loose, I have the 5" of travel, poly bushings, 90/10 cheap Energy Suspension shocks.. Planing on adding Afco DA shocks in the front to..

My 496cid makes 770Hp, 670clb-ft tq. Weight is something like 3750lbs. Hoosier QTP 29x11.5-15, 727 from CRT and 4.56 ratio. Clicking 6900Rpm at the finnish line. May change the rearend ratio to 4.10 or 4.30, that way I could use 28" tires and also get the car to sit a bit lower in the rear.

Quote:

Typically, use the front mount hole that puts the bar close to parallel w/ the ground.




OK, Ill mount the transfer link according to Calvert instructions and go from there..





I was curious to see how much these help you as I run just SS springs and have run 10.76 @ 124.49 with a 1.50 sixty. I was looking at your et and mph and think the 200 mph with the 10.74 ET is wrong ?? Curious what your mph is with the 10.70 et's. Ron

Re: Got the Cal Tracks... [Re: 383man] #1764174
02/28/15 07:07 AM
02/28/15 07:07 AM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 258
Stockholm, Sweden
T
TomsCharger70 Offline OP
enthusiast
TomsCharger70  Offline OP
enthusiast
T

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 258
Stockholm, Sweden
Quote:

I was curious to see how much these help you as I run just SS springs and have run 10.76 @ 124.49 with a 1.50 sixty. I was looking at your et and mph and think the 200 mph with the 10.74 ET is wrong ?? Curious what your mph is with the 10.70 et's. Ron




Sorry, its 200KPH, not MPH, so 120Mph for you colonials on that side of the ocean...

And just for your info, I have never really succeeded to run the car with out some issue that messed up my race weekend. That 10.74 run was followed with a 10.90 run with a messed up transmission (lost 1st gear). That run ended season 2013 with a trans failure. Then in 2014 I managed to mess up one of the front wheels just a day before the first race weekend.. Then I broke my wrist (motorbike accident) and missed out on the two following race weekends. 3 messed up rockers put an end to the 2nd to last race weekend.. Last but not least, come last race weekend got an oil leak, more or less like the Exxon Valdes.. So season 2014 was a

Ive ownded the Charger since 2003 and I have pushed that MF.... car more than actually driven it under its own power.. so, I have never found out what it could/can run... I have counted that I have in total 9 runs on the car, of those runs about 4-5 something happend... What I really should do, if I was smart, is to sell the car, tools and even the garage and start playing Golf or something, car racing does not seem to be working out for me...

Have a
/Tom

PS. Just to let you know. During the years Ive owned the Charger I have "destroyed" one 440 engine, got close to destroying a 426 Hemi, messed up and rebuilt the 727 trans two times, as I write this, its waiting on its 3rd rebuild (In 2013 I bought a CRT trans that seems to hold up)... Burned 3 starters, busted up converter ringgears, droped a muffler on my head and got to wisit the ER with a concussion, had more carburetor fires than I care to remember (tried to run the Hemi on E85 when E85 first came out on the market)...etc...etc.... Its a never ending struggle, I cant seem to win, the car is just posessed. I thought of having a Priest come and sprinkle Holy water on it, but thought better of it, my guess is that the car would just burst into flames....

Last edited by TomsCharger70; 02/28/15 07:24 AM.
Re: Got the Cal Tracks... [Re: TomsCharger70] #1764175
02/28/15 07:54 AM
02/28/15 07:54 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,915
A shed in England
Tig Offline
master
Tig  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,915
A shed in England
200 Kph is a tickle over 124mph to be pedantic so very similar times.
These cars can throw a few curve balls but you seem to have had more than your fair share Keep plugging away and all will come good eventually (I've considered the chicken bone witchdoctor thing on a couple of occasions too )
Tig.


'74 Challenger..9.46 @ 145.9 1/4, 6.001 @ 118 1/8 so far. 4023lb !!! # N/A, Marsh performance 655ci, Indy Maxx, T/R, Indy 600-13 X's, Street legal, pump gas, full interior, Cal-Tracs, mufflers, 3:73's and real 10.5 radials.
9.51 @ 142.4 1/4, 6.003 @ 114 1/8 with our old mule KB, 572-13, 580 wedge.
RHD '68 Barracuda Fastback 323ci street/strip. Best ET 13.88 @ 99.03
Re: Got the Cal Tracks... [Re: Tig] #1764176
02/28/15 10:49 AM
02/28/15 10:49 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,270
Morrow, OH
markz528 Offline
master
markz528  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,270
Morrow, OH
I got my Caltracs last week also for my GTX build. I went with neutral height and am really wondering if I shouldn't have gone with -1" I was worried that the 30 inch tires would rub on the the top of the wheelhouse. In retrospect we are tubbing the wheelhouse to fit the tire anyway.


67 Coronet 500 9.610 @ 139.20 mph
67 Coronet 500 (street car) 14.82 @ 94 mph
69 GTX (clone) - build in progress......
Re: Got the Cal Tracks... [Re: TomsCharger70] #1764177
02/28/15 11:12 AM
02/28/15 11:12 AM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 361
Canada
onig Offline
enthusiast
onig  Offline
enthusiast

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 361
Canada
Quote:

Quote:


PS. Just to let you know. During the years Ive owned the Charger I have "destroyed" one 440 engine, got close to destroying a 426 Hemi, messed up and rebuilt the 727 trans two times, as I write this, its waiting on its 3rd rebuild (In 2013 I bought a CRT trans that seems to hold up)... Burned 3 starters, busted up converter ringgears, droped a muffler on my head and got to wisit the ER with a concussion, had more carburetor fires than I care to remember (tried to run the Hemi on E85 when E85 first came out on the market)...etc...etc.... Its a never ending struggle, I cant seem to win, the car is just posessed. I thought of having a Priest come and sprinkle Holy water on it, but thought better of it, my guess is that the car would just burst into flames....




Do NOT sell the car or give up.
Make sure you continue to update us.
Recount your experiences and thoughts on here as I love to read about your feelings, they are HILARIOUS! No disrespect or ill-intent, but your wording is just too funny.
Good Luck.


69 Dart
Re: Got the Cal Tracks... [Re: onig] #1764178
02/28/15 03:05 PM
02/28/15 03:05 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
3
383man Offline
Too Many Posts
383man  Offline
Too Many Posts
3

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
Wow Tom you have had your share of problems. Sorry to hear about all them problems but I know you know how much its worth it in the end. I would say I must have good luck as I have not broke anything big on my 63. I only had an axle gear break a few teeth some years back and I was able to drive it home from the track like that. Heck I still run stock axles in my 63 but I only race once or twice a year. I do plan to upgrade my axles real soon though. But I have always been very happy with how well everyhing has held together and how well the wedge eng in my 63 drives and runs. Good luck with everything this year and keep us posted on how it goes. Ron

Last edited by 383man; 02/28/15 03:06 PM.
Re: Got the Cal Tracks... [Re: 383man] #1764179
03/14/15 01:51 AM
03/14/15 01:51 AM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 258
Stockholm, Sweden
T
TomsCharger70 Offline OP
enthusiast
TomsCharger70  Offline OP
enthusiast
T

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 258
Stockholm, Sweden
Update...

Everything is now bolted to the car. I have to say I had a good time with this project, everything went so smooth ... -Yeah, right

The car looks good with the -1" springs, the 30" tire really fills up the wheelwell.





Things look good under the car to...



..Mounted the shocks and everything looked great, then I let the car down and noticed that the shocks are to long ...about 20 minutes of cursing followed.. I ordered the wrong length shocks. These are AFCO #3890, these would be OK if Id run SS springs, but to long with the -1" Calvert springs...



..what I should have done is waited untill I had mounted the Cal-Tracks, then checked the ridehight and decided what shocks to buy



Measured the bolt to bolt lenght and its 17.7", so my question is now, should I order the 7" or the 8" stroke shock

7" AFCO # 3870 Extended Length (in):20.900 in.
Collapsed Length (in):13.900 in.

or

8" AFCO # 3880 Extended Length (in):22.900 in.
Collapsed Length (in):14.900 in.

-What do I need to do to get and understanding of what extended length shock I need? Do I just jack up the rear of the car and... -What?

Thanks and for the interest..
/Tom

Last edited by TomsCharger70; 03/14/15 01:56 AM.
Re: Got the Cal Tracks... [Re: TomsCharger70] #1764180
03/14/15 02:24 AM
03/14/15 02:24 AM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,550
baldwinsville new york
A
a493demon Offline
pro stock
a493demon  Offline
pro stock
A

Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,550
baldwinsville new york
Not that I am anybody but here is my for what it's worth .
My shock's are on the same as yours . (some will say they are on wrong but afco's can be mounted either way )
My shock's are about that close to the bumpers also .
I have the cal's in the bottom hole with a 1/16 gap on the bar's .
I have the shock's on the stiff side.(don't remember how many click )
I run a 28x10.5 stiff slick .
Foot braking.

8459403-wheelie.jpg (168 downloads)
Re: Got the Cal Tracks... [Re: a493demon] #1764181
03/14/15 02:28 AM
03/14/15 02:28 AM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,550
baldwinsville new york
A
a493demon Offline
pro stock
a493demon  Offline
pro stock
A

Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,550
baldwinsville new york
My shocks

8459404-on002.JPG (202 downloads)
Re: Got the Cal Tracks... [Re: TomsCharger70] #1764182
03/14/15 02:51 AM
03/14/15 02:51 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Being that your on the other side of the pond it might
be cheaper if you lower the bottom stud 1"

Re: Got the Cal Tracks... [Re: MR_P_BODY] #1764183
03/14/15 07:11 AM
03/14/15 07:11 AM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,210
robin hood country
deaks Offline
master
deaks  Offline
master

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,210
robin hood country
I remounted my afcos vertical in front of the axle and they were too short, so i extended the lower mounting down an inch and gusseted it. When they were in the same position as yours, i had a similar amount of travel to you and it worked fine, the rubber bumpers dont last five minutes though.
Mick


69 Dart GTS 440 mopar .590 cam, Edelbrock heads, 3200#
best et 6.45, 106.78, 10.14, 132.88 mph, 1.47 60ft
best 60ft 1.36
Re: Got the Cal Tracks... [Re: MR_P_BODY] #1764184
03/14/15 07:28 AM
03/14/15 07:28 AM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 258
Stockholm, Sweden
T
TomsCharger70 Offline OP
enthusiast
TomsCharger70  Offline OP
enthusiast
T

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 258
Stockholm, Sweden
Quote:

Not that I am anybody but here is my for what it's worth . My shock's are on the same as yours . (some will say they are on wrong but afco's can be mounted either way ) My shock's are about that close to the bumpers also . I have the cal's in the bottom hole with a 1/16 gap on the bar's . I have the shock's on the stiff side.(don't remember how many click )
I run a 28x10.5 stiff slick. Foot braking.





I thought about this If my ride was a racecar only deal, I would not worry, Id just drive it, but my ride is also a streetcar, that makes me worry about messing up the shocks, because the roads over here are what they are and it probably would not take long untill the shocks got messed up because of bottoming out to hard...


Quote:

Being that your on the other side of the pond it might be cheaper if you lower the bottom stud 1"




I thought about this to. Problem then is this project will escalate quickly. The "body" of the shock, both the lower and upper part of it, is so wide that it would begin to interfere with/hit the bracket (lower part of shockbody is close already to the bracket). Welding a pice to the bracket (make it lower) would not work out that good because of how the shock is built. Thought about adding something, like a 1" spacer between the spring and lower bracket. That would be and easy solution. The problem is doing that, it would also change the transfer link angle and the tranfer link pipe might also end up to short

I hope to sell the shocks to someone, already made a 4 sale add on them.. I dont really like to engineer my way out of a problem, when the problem can easily be corrected by just getting the correct part.

-Any one out there have any idea on how to measure a correct shock extension hight, when running Calvert rear springs

Thanks
/Tom

Last edited by TomsCharger70; 03/14/15 07:30 AM.
Re: Got the Cal Tracks... [Re: deaks] #1764185
03/14/15 07:33 AM
03/14/15 07:33 AM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 258
Stockholm, Sweden
T
TomsCharger70 Offline OP
enthusiast
TomsCharger70  Offline OP
enthusiast
T

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 258
Stockholm, Sweden
Quote:

I remounted my afcos vertical in front of the axle and they were too short, so i extended the lower mounting down an inch and gusseted it. When they were in the same position as yours, i had a similar amount of travel to you and it worked fine, the rubber bumpers dont last five minutes though.
Mick




Did you drive your ride on the street to when you had the shocks in the same position as I have them now???

-You wouldnt have a picture on how the brackets and front mounted shock look? Id like to see how you did this.

Thanks!
/Tom

Last edited by TomsCharger70; 03/14/15 07:35 AM.
Re: Got the Cal Tracks... [Re: deaks] #1764186
03/14/15 07:35 AM
03/14/15 07:35 AM
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 240
Ft. Wayne, IN.
Q
QTR MILR Offline
enthusiast
QTR MILR  Offline
enthusiast
Q

Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 240
Ft. Wayne, IN.
I say run the shocks you have. For racing you want 1-1/2 inches sticking out at rest. You need the rest of the travel for extension. If the rear shocks top out when you launch the suspension will unload.


Scott

69 Satellite, 3650lb street car... Dunnuck Racing pump gas 440. Best of 10:60@127...
Re: Got the Cal Tracks... [Re: QTR MILR] #1764187
03/14/15 10:53 AM
03/14/15 10:53 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,466
malvern, ohio
3
3ddart Offline
pro stock
3ddart  Offline
pro stock
3

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,466
malvern, ohio
I agree with the above post, 1.5 to 2 inches is what you want. There is a Hugh blog on yellow bullet and too much extension and binding seem to be the common problem with cal- tracs.

Page 1 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1