Re: 470 to 512
[Re: fattire]
#1712407
12/22/14 05:03 PM
12/22/14 05:03 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972 Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY
Master
|
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
|
Whats your 60' now... yeah cubes are nice but if your chassis isnt working right with what you have now you MIGHT end up going slower with the cubes.. I loaned my buddy my 1050 that was dialed in for my engine and we put it on his car... the ET was slower but the MPH was up 2 mph.. his chassis didnt like more power
|
|
|
Re: 470 to 512
[Re: Thumperdart]
#1712409
12/22/14 05:12 PM
12/22/14 05:12 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972 Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY
Master
|
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
|
Quote:
OR, The carb was like EVERY one I`ve seen where it was soft down low(rich)and cleaned up as they do.............
His problem was it made more torque and spun off the line and with the 850 it just barely spun.. this was on the same day
|
|
|
Re: 470 to 512
[Re: Thumperdart]
#1712411
12/22/14 05:34 PM
12/22/14 05:34 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972 Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY
Master
|
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
|
Quote:
Torque good...................no traction bad.............
Aient that the truth
|
|
|
|
|