|
Re: bell houseing run out
[Re: cupcake]
#169050
12/16/08 11:53 PM
12/16/08 11:53 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,469 Answering the call of the wild
ThermoQuad
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,469
Answering the call of the wild
|
I am assuming you have a dial indicator mounted on the crank securely and have it fixtured to move around the circle and repeat it's numbers. Be sure to have all the attaching bolts installed and torqued to the proper values to properly check runout. See attachment
|
|
|
Re: bell houseing run out
[Re: ThermoQuad]
#169051
12/17/08 12:31 AM
12/17/08 12:31 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,285 Ohio
64dodge572
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,285
Ohio
|
If you want the bellhousing run-out to be within .005", then the total indicator reading can be no more than 2x that amount (.010"). EX +.007 / -.003, for a difference of .010". Keep in mind that there is around .003" clearance in the main brgs, so a perfect .000 reading is not possible unless you do all this with the engine dis-assembled. Hope this helps. -Dan-
Brewers Performance Inc. 4-speed transmission and parts specialists PH 937-947-4416 or 937-698-4259 FAX 937-947-4419 www.brewersperformance.com
|
|
|
Re: bell houseing run out
[Re: 6T6Cuda]
#169053
12/17/08 07:48 AM
12/17/08 07:48 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345 Marysville, O-H-I-O
70Cuda383
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345
Marysville, O-H-I-O
|
I did mine with a mag base, and getting repeatable numbers was a pain in the rump. I did the check probably 10 times and ended up taking an average of all the checks and got at least the direction I had to move, and the numbers were big enough I went with the .014 dowels.
was it the right way to do it? nope. would I do it that way again? nope.
but, at least it seems to be working as-is!
**Photobucket sucks**
|
|
|
Re: bell houseing run out
[Re: cupcake]
#169054
12/18/08 03:37 PM
12/18/08 03:37 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 227 Tennessee
rj8806
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 227
Tennessee
|
Quote:
im haveing a tough time with this even with off set dowels .i do,nt understand keislers math example 1 positive val +0.002 negative val -0.001 =0.003 example 2 neg val-0.003 = neg val -0.005 runout 0.002 any trick to this needs to be within 0.005
To put it more "plainly" with the dial indicator attached to the crank via the flywheel, the needle probe of the indicator should be resting on and in constant contact with the lip of the register hole opening. I like to start with the needle probe at the 12:00 position and the guage face at zero (0). Now, have a buddy roll the crank in it's normal direction(rotation) while you watch the dial indicator. You're looking for the maximum reading the dial indicator reaches before peeking and going back the other way. Let's say this occurs at the 4:00 position and the reading is .020", once you've completed a 360* rotation and verified that the maximum reading occured at the 4:00(our example) and it was .020, roll the crank around again until the needle reaches the 4:00 position again and is in fact .020". Now, zero out the gauge here at 4:00 and roll the crank until the probe goes 180* from it's maximum point(in this example the max was at 4:00 so 180* from that is 10:00). Whatever the gauge reads at 10:00 is your total indicated reading. Your run out is half of this number. This final number needs to be less than .005 to be in spec. If it is over that, then you'll need offset pins to correct it.
By the way...I have had and seen alot of guys do this test and get a perfect .000. I myself got a perfect .000 on an install I did here in house, so it is possible.
Richard Tech Support
|
|
|
|
|
|