Re: EFI duty cycle question
[Re: MR_P_BODY]
#1649488
07/23/14 10:49 AM
07/23/14 10:49 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,696 Bitopia
jcc
OP
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
|
OP
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,696
Bitopia
|
Quote:
Quote:
You mentioned different spray patterns, is there an injector that sprays at closer to a 90 degree angle,ie downstream, instead of the floor of the intake opposite of the injector?
None that I have heard of EDIT also in the way a injector is designed it would be real are to get one to fire at 90*.. if you look at it, its got a long needle and seat per say.. the needle is called the pintle which is pulled upward by the electro magnet when fired and if the fuel touches anything it would puddle so you cant just put a 90* on the end of the injector
I agree, it would be hard to get a functioning design to emit fuel properly at 90 deg, but if you could, would it be much of a plus?
Reality check, that half the population is smarter then 50% of the people and it's a constantly contested fact.
|
|
|
Re: EFI duty cycle question
[Re: jcc]
#1649489
07/23/14 10:56 AM
07/23/14 10:56 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972 Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY
Master
|
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You mentioned different spray patterns, is there an injector that sprays at closer to a 90 degree angle,ie downstream, instead of the floor of the intake opposite of the injector?
None that I have heard of EDIT also in the way a injector is designed it would be real are to get one to fire at 90*.. if you look at it, its got a long needle and seat per say.. the needle is called the pintle which is pulled upward by the electro magnet when fired and if the fuel touches anything it would puddle so you cant just put a 90* on the end of the injector
I agree, it would be hard to get a functioning design to emit fuel properly at 90 deg, but if you could, would it be much of a plus?
Sure it would.. it would be directed at the valve and it would already have velocity
|
|
|
Re: EFI duty cycle question
[Re: redmist]
#1649491
07/23/14 04:59 PM
07/23/14 04:59 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972 Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY
Master
|
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
|
Quote:
I have found that my car likes injector phasing to fire at the back of the closed valve just before it opens, instead of firing as it opens.
It's a difference you can feel.
I am using off the shelf Mustang GT-500 injectors, @ $24 a piece. The spray pattern is setup for a dual valve design, but they work better than my old non-split injectors I had in it.
My duty cycle is 65% at WOT, on a car with 500 HP, and 542 Ft-Lbs.
Those injectors are probably split cone for the dual valve
|
|
|
Re: EFI duty cycle question
[Re: ntstlgl1970]
#1649493
07/24/14 11:32 AM
07/24/14 11:32 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,165 Left Coast
BobR
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,165
Left Coast
|
Quote:
the injectors edelbrock supplies have 4 spray nozzles, not sure it's any better or worse than others just interesting. Pretty sure they are magneti marelli. The cam sensor allows you to do individual cylinder mixture if your controller supports that with sequential....
With BS3 you can do individuals without a cam sensor.
|
|
|
Re: EFI duty cycle question
[Re: TRENDZ]
#1649495
07/24/14 03:26 PM
07/24/14 03:26 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,696 Bitopia
jcc
OP
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
|
OP
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,696
Bitopia
|
I have no idea, but does the cam sensor only really matter and reference upon start up, or does it verify cyl #1? every time?
Reality check, that half the population is smarter then 50% of the people and it's a constantly contested fact.
|
|
|
Re: EFI duty cycle question
[Re: jcc]
#1649496
07/24/14 04:07 PM
07/24/14 04:07 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,165 Left Coast
BobR
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,165
Left Coast
|
Quote:
I have no idea, but does the cam sensor only really matter and reference upon start up, or does it verify cyl #1? every time?
At about 5000 RPM it matters ZERO and very little at any speed. We used one until it took a crap and prevented our engine from starting. On the advice of a very knowledgeable heads up racing tuner we disconnected it. Engine started and idled fine. Threw the sensor in the trash. This is not direct injection. When the injector fires means little-especially as the RPM climbs. It all happens so fast it just doesn't matter.
|
|
|
Re: EFI duty cycle question
[Re: OUTLAWD]
#1649498
07/24/14 04:41 PM
07/24/14 04:41 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,165 Plymouth, MI
Blusmbl
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,165
Plymouth, MI
|
For something other than a 100% race motor it is best to inject on a closed intake valve. Depending on spray pattern and orientation you can run into bore wash issues and have long term ring durability issues.
'18 Ford Raptor, random motorcycles, 1968 Plymouth Fury III - 11.37 @ 118
|
|
|
Re: EFI duty cycle question
[Re: Blusmbl]
#1649499
07/24/14 05:06 PM
07/24/14 05:06 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421 Balt. Md
383man
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
|
Mopar used a few different injection systems as some had to have the cam sensor to run and some would run without it. I know on V/8's with a dist it used the dist hall effect as the cam sensor and it only looked at it while starting as once it started you could unhook the dist and it would run fine. Some 4 bangers use the same basic type as if you cranked them with no cam sensor the PCM would start trying different firing orders until it got it right and it started. The V/8's and V/6's cranked longer then the 4 cyl did when trying to start with no cam sensor signal because of the longer firing order. Course these are ported or sequential inj as throttle body inj does not need a cam sensor at all. Ron
Last edited by 383man; 07/25/14 01:00 AM.
|
|
|
Re: EFI duty cycle question
[Re: TRENDZ]
#1649501
07/24/14 06:28 PM
07/24/14 06:28 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,165 Left Coast
BobR
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,165
Left Coast
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I have no idea, but does the cam sensor only really matter and reference upon start up, or does it verify cyl #1? every time?
At about 5000 RPM it matters ZERO and very little at any speed. We used one until it took a crap and prevented our engine from starting. On the advice of a very knowledgeable heads up racing tuner we disconnected it. Engine started and idled fine. Threw the sensor in the trash. This is not direct injection. When the injector fires means little-especially as the RPM climbs. It all happens so fast it just doesn't matter.
My question was how you do individual cylinder tuning with no cam sensor. As far as injection timing events.... No system is capable of spraying on an open intake at all rpms.
As I stated before with BS3 you can. It doesn't matter where the valve is when the event occurs. You just add or subtract fuel from the appropriate runner at any given RPM. Believe me...it works.
|
|
|
Re: EFI duty cycle question
[Re: TRENDZ]
#1649503
07/25/14 11:36 AM
07/25/14 11:36 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,165 Left Coast
BobR
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,165
Left Coast
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I have no idea, but does the cam sensor only really matter and reference upon start up, or does it verify cyl #1? every time?
At about 5000 RPM it matters ZERO and very little at any speed. We used one until it took a crap and prevented our engine from starting. On the advice of a very knowledgeable heads up racing tuner we disconnected it. Engine started and idled fine. Threw the sensor in the trash. This is not direct injection. When the injector fires means little-especially as the RPM climbs. It all happens so fast it just doesn't matter.
My question was how you do individual cylinder tuning with no cam sensor. As far as injection timing events.... No system is capable of spraying on an open intake at all rpms.
As I stated before with BS3 you can. It doesn't matter where the valve is when the event occurs. You just add or subtract fuel from the appropriate runner at any given RPM. Believe me...it works.
OK, so you have 8 injector channels. without a cam sensor you are still controlling the channel that is hard wired to the cylinder you want to change, but the injection event could happen at any point in the cycle. I get it now, but this must not work for ignition events. So I see how fuel trimming would work, you just loose individual ignition control.
You've got it!
|
|
|
|
|