Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
9.25 vs 8.75 #1609801
04/20/14 03:24 AM
04/20/14 03:24 AM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,064
Iowa
76dodgeboy Offline OP
master
76dodgeboy  Offline OP
master

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,064
Iowa
So what would you rather have under your ride? There's a guy looking for some 8.75 gears on the web and some kid is telling him to use the "Mini Dana" 9.25 claiming its stronger. From that I've heard the 9.25 is kind of a turd when abused too much. The guy wanting a center section has a twin turbo setup currently running 13s but he said he's upgrading turbos to run 10s. The kid that says the 9.25 is a mini Dana said a guy buy him blew his 8.75 a few times than installed a 9.25 with no issues and was in a 600hp D100. So who's been in momies meds ?

Re: 9.25 vs 8.75 [Re: 76dodgeboy] #1609802
04/20/14 03:46 AM
04/20/14 03:46 AM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,906
IL, Aurora
A
ademon Offline
master
ademon  Offline
master
A

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,906
IL, Aurora
If that's the one that is in my 03 Dakota, no thanks I'll take the 8 3/4

Re: 9.25 vs 8.75 [Re: ademon] #1609803
04/20/14 03:58 AM
04/20/14 03:58 AM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,064
Iowa
76dodgeboy Offline OP
master
76dodgeboy  Offline OP
master

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,064
Iowa
12 bolt cover shaped like a stop sign

Re: 9.25 vs 8.75 [Re: ademon] #1609804
04/20/14 07:32 AM
04/20/14 07:32 AM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,847
Oakdale CT
gdonovan Offline
I Live Here
gdonovan  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,847
Oakdale CT
Quote:

If that's the one that is in my 03 Dakota, no thanks I'll take the 8 3/4




Most Dakota's are 8.25" some were built with 9.25"

9.25" is a good unit, I have had no problems with an 8.75" even beating on one with a 440 stick for years.

Usually the factory suregrips are the issue with the 8.25 and 8.25, junky designs.




"I think its got a hemi"
Re: 9.25 vs 8.75 [Re: 76dodgeboy] #1609805
04/20/14 10:04 AM
04/20/14 10:04 AM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,961
Greenville, PA
redraptor Offline
master
redraptor  Offline
master

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,961
Greenville, PA
I consider them nearly equal stock. There is more aftermarket stuff for the 8 3/4. If you're running 10's it will be ALL aftermarket internals.

Re: 9.25 vs 8.75 [Re: redraptor] #1609806
04/20/14 10:14 AM
04/20/14 10:14 AM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,511
AZ
Mike P Offline
pro stock
Mike P  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,511
AZ
I've run several of both in various projects (currenly have a 9 1/4 in the 57 Plymouth with a 1st Gen Hemi and 4 speed).

I personally like the drop out center section of the 8 3/4 but I can find the 9 1/4s for about 1/2 the price of the 8 3/4s.

As far as strength and reliability my experience is that is about a wash.


1957 Plymouth (Hemi, Dual Quads, A833 4 Speed 9 1/4 w 4.10) Sold
1937 Dodge Pickup (Hemi, 6X2 intake, 46RH, Dana 60 w 4.56) Sold
1968 Plymouth Valiant 2dr sedan (354 HEMI, 46RH w/4.30 gears)
Re: 9.25 vs 8.75 [Re: 76dodgeboy] #1609807
04/20/14 10:29 AM
04/20/14 10:29 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,894
Florida
Locomotion Offline
master
Locomotion  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,894
Florida
Doesn't the 9 1/4" have C-clip axle retainers? I don't know what's available, like 10 & 12 bolt GM rears have, but I figure it's not worth the trouble. 8 3/4" would be safer, along with the previously mentioned parts availability and drop-out convenience.

Could do a rear Dana 60 right and just about forget about having any issues!

Re: 9.25 vs 8.75 [Re: Mike P] #1609808
04/20/14 10:32 AM
04/20/14 10:32 AM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,336
South-Central (Sebring), FL
Commando1 Offline
master
Commando1  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,336
South-Central (Sebring), FL
Quote:

The guy wanting a center section has a twin turbo setup currently running 13s but he said he's upgrading turbos to run 10s.



Actually, shame on this guy.
IF he can afford a car like that and run those numbers, he SHOULD have already known the answer and the discussion closed.

Re: 9.25 vs 8.75 [Re: Commando1] #1609809
04/20/14 01:26 PM
04/20/14 01:26 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345
Marysville, O-H-I-O
70Cuda383 Offline
Too Many Posts
70Cuda383  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345
Marysville, O-H-I-O
Lots of 4,000 lb Dakotas with stock 9.25s in them running 11s. And even a handful into the 10s

Seems strong enough to me.


**Photobucket sucks**
Re: 9.25 vs 8.75 [Re: Commando1] #1609810
04/20/14 01:51 PM
04/20/14 01:51 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,064
Iowa
76dodgeboy Offline OP
master
76dodgeboy  Offline OP
master

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,064
Iowa
Quote:

Quote:

The guy wanting a center section has a twin turbo setup currently running 13s but he said he's upgrading turbos to run 10s.



Actually, shame on this guy.
IF he can afford a car like that and run those numbers, he SHOULD have already known the answer and the discussion closed.


He's wanting 8.75 stuff Not 9.25. the kid is the one saying through 9.25 is better.
I mentioned converting a truck D60 over to 5lug and told him to contact DoctorDiff

Re: 9.25 vs 8.75 [Re: 76dodgeboy] #1609811
04/27/14 01:41 PM
04/27/14 01:41 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 792
Earth
R
Rob C Offline
super stock
Rob C  Offline
super stock
R

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 792
Earth
It is a C-clip rear, If you all ready have the 9-1/4, then it is worth an upgrade to better axles. But I would not purchase one to go fast.
I don't know if there are any C-clip eliminator kits for that rear.

Re: 9.25 vs 8.75 [Re: 76dodgeboy] #1609812
04/27/14 01:59 PM
04/27/14 01:59 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,945
WI
Dcuda69 Online content
master
Dcuda69  Online Content
master

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,945
WI
Quote:

The guy wanting a center section has a twin turbo setup currently running 13s




Ummm....am I the only one here that thinks he has more issues than just the rear end???

Re: 9.25 vs 8.75 [Re: Dcuda69] #1609813
04/27/14 02:23 PM
04/27/14 02:23 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 21,822
Kirkland, Washington
Pacnorthcuda Offline
Too Many Posts
Pacnorthcuda  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 21,822
Kirkland, Washington
Quote:

Quote:

The guy wanting a center section has a twin turbo setup currently running 13s




Ummm....am I the only one here that thinks he has more issues than just the rear end???




Maybe it's a twin turbo slant 6 in a C body?

Re: 9.25 vs 8.75 [Re: Pacnorthcuda] #1609814
04/27/14 03:50 PM
04/27/14 03:50 PM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,042
colorado
S
savoy64 Offline
top fuel
savoy64  Offline
top fuel
S

Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,042
colorado
the 9.25 was made to be as strong as the dana 60---putting a c-clip on it was the major mistake---if you want to race one you can do a c-clip elimination with either 8.75 axle ends or a 9" axle end--then have axle shafts made to fit...

Re: 9.25 vs 8.75 [Re: 70Cuda383] #1609815
04/27/14 05:17 PM
04/27/14 05:17 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
Kern Dog Offline
Striving for excellence
Kern Dog  Offline
Striving for excellence

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
Quote:

Lots of 4,000 lb Dakotas with stock 9.25s in them running 11s. And even a handful into the 10s

Seems strong enough to me.




The issue with C clip rearends was made famous by GENERIC Motors. The Mopar 8 1/4" and 9 1/4" axles do not have the same type of failures.

Re: 9.25 vs 8.75 [Re: Kern Dog] #1609816
04/27/14 05:20 PM
04/27/14 05:20 PM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,042
colorado
S
savoy64 Offline
top fuel
savoy64  Offline
top fuel
S

Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,042
colorado
must be on some outlaw tracks....

Re: 9.25 vs 8.75 [Re: Kern Dog] #1609817
04/27/14 05:35 PM
04/27/14 05:35 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,871
Ontario, Canada
S
Stanton Offline
Don't question me!
Stanton  Offline
Don't question me!
S

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,871
Ontario, Canada
Quote:

The issue with C clip rearends was made famous by GENERIC Motors. The Mopar 8 1/4" and 9 1/4" axles do not have the same type of failures.






The only downside to the 9-1/4 is the cost of aftermarket parts - but then if you drive a Mopar you're already used to that! FWIW, the 9-1/4 is a true "Mopar" item - unlike the dana. The strength comes from the ring gear size so the 9-1/4 should be stronger than anything but a dana - given the same quality of gear in each. It is apparently easier to work on than a dana.

If you were going to buy a rear end and then shorten it, swap gears and diff, etc, etc, then there's no excuse not to go with a 9-1/4 versus an 8-3/4.

Re: 9.25 vs 8.75 [Re: Stanton] #1609818
04/27/14 05:45 PM
04/27/14 05:45 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
Kern Dog Offline
Striving for excellence
Kern Dog  Offline
Striving for excellence

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
For an axle that one intends to keep a specific set of gears in, the 9.25 is great. The appeal of easy gear swaps without consulting a gear shop is a major factor in choosing the 8 3/4" axle.

Re: 9.25 vs 8.75 [Re: Kern Dog] #1609819
04/27/14 07:02 PM
04/27/14 07:02 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,048
Back home in PA
B
BulletBob Offline
master
BulletBob  Offline
master
B

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,048
Back home in PA


The issue with C clip rearends was made famous by GENERIC Motors. The Mopar 8 1/4" and 9 1/4" axles do not have the same type of failures.




Chrysler must have put some invisible safety strap that holds a broken axle in in the 8.25 & 9.25 & mine failed when I broke it mud riding an 80' model I had once

That tire/wheel,axle stub & brake drum came out of there just a fast as my old 66 GTO axle did when introduced to slicks & 550 ft lbs of torque & a 4800 rpm clutch dump

I don't see the difference

Re: 9.25 vs 8.75 [Re: BulletBob] #1609820
04/27/14 10:23 PM
04/27/14 10:23 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,871
Ontario, Canada
S
Stanton Offline
Don't question me!
Stanton  Offline
Don't question me!
S

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,871
Ontario, Canada
Quote:

mine failed when I broke it mud riding an 80' model I had once

That tire/wheel,axle stub & brake drum came out of there just a fast as my old 66 GTO axle did when introduced to slicks & 550 ft lbs of torque & a 4800 rpm clutch dump

I don't see the difference




You could take an axle out of a Kenworth big rig and stuff it under your car and in the right circumstances break it! That doesn't mean its a weak rear end !!!

My feeling is that a 9-1/4 would not break under the same circumstances as that POS GM unit. However, the GM unit would not have lasted as long as the 9-1/4 in the mud.

If you're going to compare things, do it on equal terms !!!

Page 1 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1