Re: what engine would it take to put this car on the 8s?
[Re: domingo]
#1562640
01/13/14 01:26 PM
01/13/14 01:26 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,494 Minnesota
Hemi_Joel
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,494
Minnesota
|
950 horse at the flywheel, Domingo. How about a milenium headed 572 aluminum Hemi?
[img]http://i.imgur.com/boeexFms.jpg[/img]31 Plymouth Coupe, 392 Hemi, T56 magnum RS23J71 RS27J77 RP23J71 RO23J71 WM21J8A I don't regret the things I've done. I only regret the things I didn't do. "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools because they have to say something. ~ Plato"
|
|
|
Re: what engine would it take to put this car on the 8s?
[Re: domingo]
#1562647
01/13/14 07:23 PM
01/13/14 07:23 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,373 Las Vegas
Al_Alguire
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,373
Las Vegas
|
Well on Caltracs with a TF I am gonna say have fun Having said that obviously weather conditions play a role. I mean running 8.99 at 0' DA is a lot easier than doing it at 4500' DA is. My Cuda was a high 8 second car in Northern CA with about an 880HP Hemi. But it is a fairly good working car. However bringing it here to Vegas transformed it into a 9.20 car pretty quickly. The same car now weighs a bit less at about 2920 and can go 8.30's here in Vegas on a good day. It now has 180 more HP than it did then. Another way to look at it is the better and more efficient the chassis is the less HP it will take to get the job done. Just look at the Super Stock guys. Very efficient chassis and geared to the moon for ET not MPH. A car like mine is chasing MPH more than ET. I am still under geared and using a tight converter to chase MPH on the stop rather than ET on the track. In an SS or Comp type car you can likely run high 8's with 800ish HP properly geared.
"I am not ashamed to confess I am ignorant of what I do not know."
"It's never wrong to do the right thing"
|
|
|
Re: what engine would it take to put this car on the 8s?
[Re: fishy340]
#1562649
01/13/14 08:06 PM
01/13/14 08:06 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,028 Trumbull,CT.
jim sciortino
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,028
Trumbull,CT.
|
Quote:
800hp and a car that 60's 1.23 to 1.25.I know 2 that do it one is 3000lb camaro and the other is 2800+ mustang..both made 800hp give or take 10.A small block is 100lbs lighter.
I agree.....
If it takes much better than 800hp, a 1.25 60ft and 7800/8000 cross rpm, it needs a better car and converter.
|
|
|
Re: what engine would it take to put this car on the 8s?
[Re: domingo]
#1562650
01/13/14 09:39 PM
01/13/14 09:39 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,848 MI, usa
dvw
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,848
MI, usa
|
In good air it needs about 820 hp to go 8.9@151. This is assuming the chassis is dead on. Better have a good converter cause 5% slip is about 7900 rpm w/33"&4.88. Weather gets below perfect, more HP. Track less than perfect, more HP. Car less than perfect, more hp. my bet is you want closer to 900. I'd say a good set of ported -1 Indys, dominator, 280@.050 roller the more compression the better. Cu in? How tight do you want to twist it? 512@8200-572@6800, either will get you there Doug
|
|
|
Re: what engine would it take to put this car on the 8s?
[Re: DodgeCharger]
#1562652
01/13/14 09:47 PM
01/13/14 09:47 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,330 Lynchburg, VA
Leon441
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,330
Lynchburg, VA
|
One of my little 358 R5P7 engines with a torqueflite. Maybe with a glide and a perfect converter. You are stating your car is 2,900. It will be lighter with one of these engines too.
Leon
Career best 8.02 @ 169 at 3050# and 10" tires small block power.
|
|
|
Re: what engine would it take to put this car on the 8s?
[Re: plycuda]
#1562655
01/13/14 11:20 PM
01/13/14 11:20 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,448 Phoenix, AZ
MoparBilly
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,448
Phoenix, AZ
|
.030 over flat top piston 440. Pocket ported Edelbrock rpm's. .640 lift flat tappet cam. M-1 intake and a dominator. 2 stage nitrous system, hit it with 225 30 ft. out, then stack 175 on it when you shift to second. With that much gear in the car, you will probably have to lift off the 2nd stage at about 1100 ft., but it will pull hard enough in the middle to get you an 8.90 at about 145.
Since you saved so much on the engine, you will be able to upgrade the converter a few times until it can handle the abuse.
"Livin' in a powder keg and givin' off sparks"
4 Street cars, 5 Race engines
|
|
|
Re: what engine would it take to put this car on the 8s?
[Re: Leon441]
#1562657
01/14/14 09:57 AM
01/14/14 09:57 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,563 Janesville, WI
SpareParts
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,563
Janesville, WI
|
Quote:
One of my little 358 R5P7 engines with a torqueflite. Maybe with a glide and a perfect converter. You are stating your car is 2,900. It will be lighter with one of these engines too.
Leon
I plan to take this route and spray a little. Just one last LA motor and then it's all going away to start the swap
|
|
|
Re: what engine would it take to put this car on the 8s?
[Re: domingo]
#1562658
01/14/14 11:24 AM
01/14/14 11:24 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,953 Houston, Texas
TheOtherDodge
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,953
Houston, Texas
|
After thinking about this, I over shot big time... My motor, which is a stock block with home ported Eddy heads, 389 inches, .520 hydraulic cam would run mid 9's at 2900 lbs. To lose the additional .5 seconds, all it would take would be a race block, slightly bigger cam and 88 mm turbo...
|
|
|
|
|