Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Acceptable Converter slip numbers *DELETED* #1526083
10/30/13 10:49 PM
10/30/13 10:49 PM
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,416
Toronto
M
mshred Offline OP
master
mshred  Offline OP
master
M

Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,416
Toronto
Post deleted by mshred

Re: Acceptable Converter slip numbers [Re: mshred] #1526084
10/31/13 06:48 AM
10/31/13 06:48 AM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,608
Rudolph, Ohio
moparguy7074 Offline
top fuel
moparguy7074  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,608
Rudolph, Ohio
I just figured up mine, and got 8.88%. It's an old Turbo Action 9" J converter. It stalls around 5000, I normally run around 10.70@123.5.

Re: Acceptable Converter slip numbers [Re: moparguy7074] #1526085
10/31/13 09:13 AM
10/31/13 09:13 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,275
Morrow, OH
markz528 Offline
master
markz528  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,275
Morrow, OH
9" Dynamic flashes 5800 to 6000 rpm. best 9.61 @ 193.2 mph.

Slips less than 5% per data recorder.


67 Coronet 500 9.610 @ 139.20 mph
67 Coronet 500 (street car) 14.82 @ 94 mph
69 GTX (clone) - build in progress......
Re: Acceptable Converter slip numbers [Re: markz528] #1526086
10/31/13 10:39 AM
10/31/13 10:39 AM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,552
Michigan
K
Kiddart Offline
pro stock
Kiddart  Offline
pro stock
K

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,552
Michigan
run your numbers thru the wallace calculator
www.wallaceracing.com

There is a magic number i was told 5% anything over that you are leaving ET on the table


Thank you
Kiddart
Re: Acceptable Converter slip numbers [Re: mshred] #1526087
10/31/13 10:42 AM
10/31/13 10:42 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,969
Chandler, AZ
Duner Offline
top fuel
Duner  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,969
Chandler, AZ
9.5" Precision Industries Viper
I think it's slipping too much at 10%.
Flashes to 4800 in my 4,000# pig
10.63 @ 128.33 mph last outing. (spinning - 1.60 60')

When viewing the logs - my trap rpm should have been 143 mph if completely locked-up. 15 mph is a lot to give away at the stripe.

Re: Acceptable Converter slip numbers [Re: Duner] #1526088
10/31/13 11:55 AM
10/31/13 11:55 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,635
Oakland, MI
D
dizuster Offline
master
dizuster  Offline
master
D

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,635
Oakland, MI
You shouldn’t get too hung up on converter slip numbers. Slip isn’t always a bad thing… Remember, slip is often times just a result of the components needed in the converter to make it work right on the front half of the track.

I made 3 converter changes this summer in my turbo car. I’ve seen it slip everywhere from 27% all the way down to 6%. Pump change, stator change, etc… But always the same 9.5" PTC.

The best apples to apples I can give is that I ran the car at 10~11psi the first night out, and then again this summer (on accident) with a different converter. First time went 123mph with 20% slip (2.76 gear). This summer it only went 121mph but with 6% slip (3.23 gear).

Even though this summer it had more gear in it and less slip, it actually hurt the acceleration of the car a bit because it locked up in high gear so hard that it pulled the motor down. The motor didn’t have enough “grunt” through the middle/top of the track to work at the lower RPM. Letting it sing a little bit from the slipping converter actually made the car faster.

Re: Acceptable Converter slip numbers [Re: dizuster] #1526089
10/31/13 12:25 PM
10/31/13 12:25 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,266
Renton Washington
T
Triple Threat Offline
master
Triple Threat  Offline
master
T

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,266
Renton Washington
My 8" Ultimate converter slips 12% ish can't get too exact without a data logger.


-Dustin
67 Dart, 9 second, 392" G3 Hemi
68 Barracuda 340 F/SA
Re: Acceptable Converter slip numbers [Re: mshred] #1526090
10/31/13 12:26 PM
10/31/13 12:26 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,292
Tucson AZ,
M
MadMopars Online content
pro stock
MadMopars  Online Content
pro stock
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,292
Tucson AZ,
I figured my JW converter at about 7% last time out while chasing a problem. That's with a 30" tire, 4:30 gears, 5500 RPM at the traps. 12.58 @ 106.5 MPH. My understanding is 5% to 7% is typical.


[img]https://s9.postimg.cc/6fbjxzfvv/48-2016-_Drag-_Weekend-_Best-_Burnouts-lpr.jpg[/img]


73 GTX *440*727*8 3/4*
69 DART GT *440*4 SPEED*DANA*
73 ROAD RUNNER *451*4 SPEED*DANA*
64 F100 *383*4 SPEED*9"*
75 DODGE D300 *440*4 SPEED*DANA*
99 DODGE RAM 3500 4X4 DUALLY... ON 38"s
Re: Acceptable Converter slip numbers [Re: MadMopars] #1526091
10/31/13 12:37 PM
10/31/13 12:37 PM
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 240
Ft. Wayne, IN.
Q
QTR MILR Offline
enthusiast
QTR MILR  Offline
enthusiast
Q

Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 240
Ft. Wayne, IN.
Mine figured out to 5.33%. Turbo Action 10" conveter. The car is a 69 Satellite. 3850lbs with driver. 411 gears, 27" tire. Flashes to 3800rpm, 6000rpm at the stripe. Runs 12.10 at 111mph....

Last edited by QTR MILR; 10/31/13 02:07 PM.
Re: Acceptable Converter slip numbers [Re: dizuster] #1526092
10/31/13 01:17 PM
10/31/13 01:17 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,486
SoCal
Brian Hafliger Offline
master
Brian Hafliger  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,486
SoCal
Quote:

You shouldn’t get too hung up on converter slip numbers. Slip isn’t always a bad thing… Remember, slip is often times just a result of the components needed in the converter to make it work right on the front half of the track.

I made 3 converter changes this summer in my turbo car. I’ve seen it slip everywhere from 27% all the way down to 6%. Pump change, stator change, etc… But always the same 9.5" PTC.

The best apples to apples I can give is that I ran the car at 10~11psi the first night out, and then again this summer (on accident) with a different converter. First time went 123mph with 20% slip (2.76 gear). This summer it only went 121mph but with 6% slip (3.23 gear).

Even though this summer it had more gear in it and less slip, it actually hurt the acceleration of the car a bit because it locked up in high gear so hard that it pulled the motor down. The motor didn’t have enough “grunt” through the middle/top of the track to work at the lower RPM. Letting it sing a little bit from the slipping converter actually made the car faster.




I see this alot, where a converter goes through many changes, but the outcome does not.
I'm a big believer in changing the converter out with another unit...never have changes made to the same converter...JMO.
Brian


Brian Hafliger
Re: Acceptable Converter slip numbers [Re: Brian Hafliger] #1526093
10/31/13 01:41 PM
10/31/13 01:41 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,635
Oakland, MI
D
dizuster Offline
master
dizuster  Offline
master
D

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,635
Oakland, MI
I should elaborate. I wasn't chasing converter slip...

I kept adding more and more boost over the last year, and the car kept making more torque.

As it made more torque, the stall kept going up, so I had to take it out a few times to keep tightening it.

A converter that works at 10psi of boost, doesn't work very good at 20psi. No blame to PTC at all for my changes, the car actually picked up 1 full second and 13mph since last year.

Re: Acceptable Converter slip numbers [Re: dizuster] #1526094
10/31/13 03:02 PM
10/31/13 03:02 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,875
communist bloc of new jersey
J
jamesc Offline
master
jamesc  Offline
master
J

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,875
communist bloc of new jersey
are you guys calculating converter slip taking into account tire growth?

Re: Acceptable Converter slip numbers [Re: jamesc] #1526095
10/31/13 03:57 PM
10/31/13 03:57 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
B
BradH Offline
Taking time off to work on my car
BradH  Offline
Taking time off to work on my car
B

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
Quote:

are you guys calculating converter slip taking into account tire growth?



Or, in the case of radial tire users, that the "squat" they have under load actually reduces the effective radius, even at speed?

FWIW, my 9.5" Dynamic advertised as a 4200-stall unit flashed to ~ 4500 w/ my last 440 and calc'd slippage in the 7-8% range.

Re: Acceptable Converter slip numbers [Re: jamesc] #1526096
10/31/13 04:58 PM
10/31/13 04:58 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,275
Morrow, OH
markz528 Offline
master
markz528  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,275
Morrow, OH
Quote:

are you guys calculating converter slip taking into account tire growth?




Mine is driveshaft rpm divided by engine rpm off the data logger. So yes.


67 Coronet 500 9.610 @ 139.20 mph
67 Coronet 500 (street car) 14.82 @ 94 mph
69 GTX (clone) - build in progress......
Re: Acceptable Converter slip numbers [Re: markz528] #1526097
10/31/13 05:27 PM
10/31/13 05:27 PM
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,416
Toronto
M
mshred Offline OP
master
mshred  Offline OP
master
M

Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,416
Toronto
I run radial tires, so I have never accounted for tire growth.

See, I always hear different things about converter slip. I have heard MANY say that under 5% slip is what you want....but then others say that 9-13% is acceptable if its what the car needs...Including the converter company who I bought mine from, who says anything under 10% is acceptable.

I have calculated mine on the wallace calcs and come up with close to 10% (it was like 9.7 or 8 or something)...I have eliminated a TON of variables for my setup, and the only thing I have not changed yet is converter. I think it is slipping too much, but then others say its not...Thats why I wanted to hear from you guys what yours are like.

Re: Acceptable Converter slip numbers [Re: mshred] #1526098
10/31/13 06:24 PM
10/31/13 06:24 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,028
Tulsa OK
Bad340fish Offline
master
Bad340fish  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,028
Tulsa OK
My Turbo Action 8" slips 6% according to Wallace. I think it needs to be loosened up to help my launch, its a 4500 and I think a 5000 would do my 360 some good.

I run a radial tire and while they are not supposed to grow I have a pic of mine on the top end and they visually look to have grown some and its not even that fast...117mph on that run.


68 Barracuda Formula S 340
Re: Acceptable Converter slip numbers [Re: Bad340fish] #1526099
10/31/13 07:04 PM
10/31/13 07:04 PM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,210
robin hood country
deaks Offline
master
deaks  Offline
master

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,210
robin hood country
Mine says 2.89% according to wallace.
Mick


69 Dart GTS 440 mopar .590 cam, Edelbrock heads, 3200#
best et 6.45, 106.78, 10.14, 132.88 mph, 1.47 60ft
best 60ft 1.36
Re: Acceptable Converter slip numbers [Re: deaks] #1526100
10/31/13 07:19 PM
10/31/13 07:19 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 487
D
Dyno1 Offline
mopar
Dyno1  Offline
mopar
D

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 487
In my SS/AH car, slip is 6% according to the Race Pak. Dyno

Re: Acceptable Converter slip numbers [Re: dizuster] #1526101
10/31/13 08:54 PM
10/31/13 08:54 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,969
Chandler, AZ
Duner Offline
top fuel
Duner  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,969
Chandler, AZ
I'm thinking about swapping out my PI converter and seeing what my Hughes does for it. It's got a much lower stall - but maybe it won't even matter since traction is always such an issue. Come to think of it... It DID go 5 mph faster with the tighter convertor, I just didn't have a 2-step at the time to build boost at the line.

Re: Acceptable Converter slip numbers [Re: mshred] #1526102
10/31/13 09:11 PM
10/31/13 09:11 PM
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 656
Kokomo, IN
540dust Offline
mopar
540dust  Offline
mopar

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 656
Kokomo, IN
Keep in mind more slip isn't necessarily bad. My fastest converter was 87% but the one I have now made things more docile on launch at about 92%. It's all what you are trying to do with your combination.

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1