Re: Hydraulic roller cam for 383 street car
[Re: 7812845]
#1519116
10/18/13 01:43 AM
10/18/13 01:43 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 866 Winnipeg ,Mb. CA.
chryco
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 866
Winnipeg ,Mb. CA.
|
Just what I want to do ! I`ll be watching this thread !! Mines also a 4spd , but with 3.91`s Chryco
Gas is fer washin' parts ....Alky`s fer drinkin' ...Nitro`s fer Racin'!
|
|
|
Re: Hydraulic roller cam for 383 street car
[Re: 7812845]
#1519119
10/18/13 10:43 AM
10/18/13 10:43 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,357 Marion, South Carolina [><]
an8sec70cuda
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,357
Marion, South Carolina [><]
|
Maybe he doesn't want to worry about wiping a lobe. The money spent is worth the peace of mind to some.
CHIP '70 hemicuda, 575" Hemi, 727, Dana 60 '69 road runner, 440-6, 18 spline 4 speed, Dana 60 '71 Demon, 340, low gear 904, 8.75 '73 Chrysler New Yorker, 440, 727, 8.75 '90 Chevy 454SS Silverado, 476" BBC, TH400, 14 bolt '06 GMC 2500HD LBZ Duramax
|
|
|
Re: Hydraulic roller cam for 383 street car
[Re: an8sec70cuda]
#1519121
10/18/13 11:12 AM
10/18/13 11:12 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,160 Texas
dannysbee
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,160
Texas
|
Why not you can't take it with you. A little bowl work on the heads a Dwayne Porter hydraulic roller and a avs off a 440 and bet you can school a few 440's. Ram said on his engine masters thread the Johnson hi lift was a good reasonably priced lifter. I agree with Brad on the 3.91 gear. My first Mopar was a RR with 4 speed and 3.91. Stock except dp4b edelbrock intake. It was quicker than most cars in my town.
Getting old just means you were smarter than some and luckier than others.
|
|
|
Re: Hydraulic roller cam for 383 street car
[Re: an8sec70cuda]
#1519122
10/18/13 11:20 AM
10/18/13 11:20 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439 Val-haul-ass... eventually
BradH
Taking time off to work on my car
|
Taking time off to work on my car
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
|
Quote:
Maybe he doesn't want to worry about wiping a lobe. The money spent is worth the peace of mind to some.
If he's thinking of going more aggressive than OEM, then I agree that does make cam break-in more critical.
But if he's just doing a legit stock-type restoration, that type of cam has pretty gentle lobes and is a lot less of an issue to break in successfully using good lifters w/ the right springs & flat-tappet compatible oil.
The OP needs to realistic about what he wants and what he can budget for. You know as well as anyone that going roller is a lot more $$$.
|
|
|
|
|