|
Re: older 1965? drive shaft
[Re: moepwr]
#148383
11/10/08 03:19 PM
11/10/08 03:19 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,697
Andrewh
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,697
|
It sounds like you got a ball and trunion drive shaft. That would be a 64 and older transmission it goes to. Won't work with a 65 and up. You would have to get the end cut off and the regular yoke put on. But it would just be easier to find another drive shaft. http://www.autohobbydigest.com/bntboot/
|
|
|
Re: older 1965? drive shaft
[Re: Andrewh]
#148386
11/10/08 05:58 PM
11/10/08 05:58 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,949 Rio Linda, CA
John_Kunkel
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,949
Rio Linda, CA
|
The 727 went to a slip yoke in '65 but the 833 didn't. First year for as slip yoke 833 was '66.
The INTERNET, the MISinformation superhighway
|
|
|
Re: older 1965? drive shaft
[Re: moepwr]
#148387
11/10/08 07:40 PM
11/10/08 07:40 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,697
Andrewh
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,697
|
there is only one end like that. The part that goes into the rearend is normal. not sure what you mean, but here is an exploded view. The usually eat the spherical bearings pretty quickly. So you will get clunking when you shift into drive and reverse. But they will stand up to a lot of abuse.
|
|
|
Re: older 1965? drive shaft
[Re: Andrewh]
#148388
11/10/08 08:37 PM
11/10/08 08:37 PM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
To put it simply, that shaft does you no good. Those old shafts are expensive to rebuild, and you'd be better off just to sell the shaft and start over.
|
|
|
Re: older 1965? drive shaft
#148389
11/11/08 07:50 AM
11/11/08 07:50 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,083 Niles , Ohio
therocks
oh wait.but hey.lets see.oh yeah.
|
oh wait.but hey.lets see.oh yeah.
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,083
Niles , Ohio
|
As long as the boot is good and it has grease they are almost bullet proof.I still have the OE one in my 65 with a 440 4 speed pushing 600 horse.Ive snapped a lot of rear joints but the B&T is still holding.Your problem is the shaft will probally be too short for a later car as the front spring segment chaned lengths in 67.Rocky
Chrysler Firepower
|
|
|
Re: older 1965? drive shaft
[Re: Bull1tt]
#148392
11/11/08 03:51 PM
11/11/08 03:51 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,083 Niles , Ohio
therocks
oh wait.but hey.lets see.oh yeah.
|
oh wait.but hey.lets see.oh yeah.
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,083
Niles , Ohio
|
Like I said they are pretty much bullet proof.My 57 was still running the OE one as was my kids 62 300.Rocky
Chrysler Firepower
|
|
|
|
|
|