Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: 440 source 1.6 aluminun roller rocker reviews WANTED [Re: Digger73] #1452052
06/17/13 10:43 AM
06/17/13 10:43 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,902
Athens, Greece
Pyper70 Offline
master
Pyper70  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,902
Athens, Greece
I had these rockers...They sat in a box for three years...I asked around because I didnt wanna be a "gambling man". Two words were mentioned to me "needle bearings" and thats all that was said. I sold them. When you put a lot of money into a motor which I have, you don't wanna shortcut the job, save a few extra paychecks instead and get the right parts. I aimed high, I went for Harlands. I find it hard to believe a Hughes engine has CAT (440Source) rockers.

You get what you pay for...


Family owned 1969 Charger R/T DualQuad 440/727/GVO/3.55s
Re: 440 source 1.6 aluminun roller rocker reviews WANTED [Re: Digger73] #1452053
06/17/13 11:04 AM
06/17/13 11:04 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,005
U.S.S.A.
JohnRR Offline
I Win
JohnRR  Offline
I Win

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,005
U.S.S.A.
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Don't know about the 1.6 rockers but, we ran a set of 1.5s on the wife's 'Cuda. We ran them with a Crane solid roller cam for 4 years with no problems. Never any issues with the shafts or the roller tips.
The only reason we are not running them now is that the heavy spring loads caused the bottom side of the rockers to crack. This is the same thing that happened to the Crane gold rockers we first tried.
The engine by the way is a 440 Source stroker 512" that has been running and raced for 6 years now. I am sure there is a good reason to bash 440 Source stuff but, not all of us are made of money and have to try to save money where we can. If that means that I have to go against the popular ideals and buy from someone that I can afford their parts so be it. I normally don't rave on but I just felt I had to vent.
Mike (Digger73)




A solid roller usually is speced for high spring pressure , this is not the place for a solid body unbushed alum. rocker ... or an unbushed iron rocker for that matter. If the Cranes broke I wouldn't have expected a CCJ rocker of the same design to be any better.

That said you must not have had high spring pressures because ccj rockers have failed being run on hyd. flat tappets.



Not sure what is considered to be high spring pressure but the spring loads we run are 223 closed and 576 open.
Mike (Digger73)




I'm surprised those rockers lasted that long with those pressures, do you only start it and let it idle for a minute once a year?


Re: 440 source 1.6 aluminun roller rocker reviews WANTED [Re: JohnRR] #1452054
06/17/13 02:35 PM
06/17/13 02:35 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 304
Portland, Oregon
D
Digger73 Offline
enthusiast
Digger73  Offline
enthusiast
D

Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 304
Portland, Oregon
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Don't know about the 1.6 rockers but, we ran a set of 1.5s on the wife's 'Cuda. We ran them with a Crane solid roller cam for 4 years with no problems. Never any issues with the shafts or the roller tips.
The only reason we are not running them now is that the heavy spring loads caused the bottom side of the rockers to crack. This is the same thing that happened to the Crane gold rockers we first tried.
The engine by the way is a 440 Source stroker 512" that has been running and raced for 6 years now. I am sure there is a good reason to bash 440 Source stuff but, not all of us are made of money and have to try to save money where we can. If that means that I have to go against the popular ideals and buy from someone that I can afford their parts so be it. I normally don't rave on but I just felt I had to vent.
Mike (Digger73)




A solid roller usually is speced for high spring pressure , this is not the place for a solid body unbushed alum. rocker ... or an unbushed iron rocker for that matter. If the Cranes broke I wouldn't have expected a CCJ rocker of the same design to be any better.

That said you must not have had high spring pressures because ccj rockers have failed being run on hyd. flat tappets.



Not sure what is considered to be high spring pressure but the spring loads we run are 223 closed and 576 open.
Mike (Digger73)




I'm surprised those rockers lasted that long with those pressures, do you only start it and let it idle for a minute once a year?





No the Cranes were raced for 3 years in my rear engine dragster. Then they were used in the wife's 'Cuda both street and strip for 1 year. The 440 Source rockers were used both street and strip in the 'Cuda with the 512 for 4 years. We are of the belief that if you have the toys you have to play with them, often.
Mike (Digger73)


I live with fear everyday but, sometimes she lets me race!
Re: 440 source 1.6 aluminun roller rocker reviews WANTED [Re: TooMany62s] #1452055
06/17/13 04:30 PM
06/17/13 04:30 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,544
Syracuse,NY
CompWedgeEngines Offline
master
CompWedgeEngines  Offline
master

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,544
Syracuse,NY
I rarely comment on here about many of these things, only because there is always someone who wants to " challenge" your findings and or experience. I'm too busy for that.

Rocker arms are a component you simply cant skimp on in a performance engine. The lure of offshore and swap meet parts will always be there. I fully understand customers budgetary constraints. I deal with it everyday. One area I always try and sternly suggest wise spending is rocker arms and lifters. Not everyone can always make the decision I would like them to. Its their engine and money, and I cant always " spend it for them". What I CAN say is, no one has ever hated me for making them hold out, or spend a little more for quality rockers. They HAVE kicked themselves in the butt for going with cheaper budget friendly versions.

Go to some race tracks over a season, and watch the cars that show up every week, are in the points hunt, and make run after run after run.These are the guys running 200-400 runs a year. Go ask what they are using, and I bet you'll find a " pattern".With that said, yes, not everyone NEEDS that type of success to simply drive their hydraulic cammed street motor, true for sure.

I dont get into the product bashing, as I understand these people have the right to sell whatever they want. Thats their deal.I also rarley will post unless I have experience with a customers parts or engines that I can comment on first hand. In this case, I have seen the damage done when they fail. If you would like a picture, let me know and I will email you. I actually turned down a job last year on a 528 engine rebuild because the customer insisted on using offshore rockers in a roller cammed bracket motor. I cant sit and watch a guy run down the local track, and wait for an engine to expire, and have everyone know I did the build, but NOT no WHY it grenaded, or had repeated issues. Sure enough, three weeks into his " great buy" rockers, kaboom. He hasnt rebuilt it yet, because he didnt have the money to re-do it after JUST re-building it. So, how much did he save?

So, my comment of " gambling man" comes from about 30 years of engine building everything from farm tractors to blown alky outlaw dragsters. Its simply a case you see a lot fo things in this business, and most often, the failures are either blown up all over the internet, or the owners are too embarrassed and you never hear a thing. I have found with several manufacters and products right here on Moparts, that this is the case. Many people who have problems wont post their bad experiences just because they dont want the attacks afterwards.Suppose I dont blame them.

So after that long babbling explanation, the OP has to determine whats important to him, and make a decision accordingly based on feedback and personal reasoning, both monetary and circumstancial....


RIP Monte Smith

Your work is a reflection of yourself, autograph it with quality.

WD for Diamond Pistons,Sidewinder cylinder heads, Wiseco, K1 rods and cranks,BAM lifters, Morel lifters, Molnar Technologies, Harland Sharp, Pro Gear, Cometic, King Engine Bearings and many others.
Re: 440 source 1.6 aluminun roller rocker reviews WANTED [Re: strokerchall] #1452056
06/17/13 05:55 PM
06/17/13 05:55 PM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 270
Washington, IL
H
Hughes Offline
enthusiast
Hughes  Offline
enthusiast
H

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 270
Washington, IL
We have never installed a set of 440 Source rockers on an engine.

Re: 440 source 1.6 aluminun roller rocker reviews WANTED [Re: Hughes] #1452057
06/17/13 09:12 PM
06/17/13 09:12 PM
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 441
Uranus
S
strokerchall Offline OP
mopar
strokerchall  Offline OP
mopar
S

Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 441
Uranus
Quote:

We have never installed a set of 440 Source rockers on an engine.




Hughes Engines and Machining in Arizona is the one who installed them

Re: 440 source 1.6 aluminun roller rocker reviews WANTED [Re: Jjs72D] #1452058
06/17/13 11:44 PM
06/17/13 11:44 PM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 199
TN Hoosier
J
jb500 Offline
member
jb500  Offline
member
J

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 199
TN Hoosier
An oldie but a goodie.

https://board.moparts.org/ubbthreads/show...rue#Post6426425

They were an older version I used, but I learned the hard way. Quality costs $$$.

Some on here may never have problems and even swear by them. I cursed at them and sent them off to the scrap shredder for about $0.50 a pound...which is about their true worth.

Re: 440 source 1.6 aluminun roller rocker reviews WANTED [Re: strokerchall] #1452059
06/18/13 12:42 AM
06/18/13 12:42 AM
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 146
LA CA
B
bron_engines Offline
member
bron_engines  Offline
member
B

Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 146
LA CA
I have had a few sets of those rockers. Both 1.5 and 1.6's. The last set that I used was on a 440 with a small roller cam with 240 on the seat and 600 open. I drove that car 35 miles to a car show and 35 back a few times, a summer of drag racing and putting around town and the only issue was that there was scuffing on the bottom of the shafts. When I freshened the engine for the guy that bought that car I noticed this so we installed new hard chrome shafts and let it go. The engine has only been on the Dyno since but it seems fine.

Re: 440 source 1.6 aluminun roller rocker reviews WANTED [Re: Pyper70] #1452060
06/21/13 07:00 PM
06/21/13 07:00 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,402
Wichita,KS
B
Blakcharger440 Offline
top fuel
Blakcharger440  Offline
top fuel
B

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,402
Wichita,KS
Quote:

I had these rockers...They sat in a box for three years...I asked around because I didnt wanna be a "gambling man". Two words were mentioned to me "needle bearings" and thats all that was said. I sold them. When you put a lot of money into a motor which I have, you don't wanna shortcut the job, save a few extra paychecks instead and get the right parts. I aimed high, I went for Harlands. I find it hard to believe a Hughes engine has CAT (440Source) rockers.

You get what you pay for...




I have Harland Sharp rockers and I am fairly sure they have needle bearings also? I still wouldn't use those 440source rockers though on anything.

Re: 440 source 1.6 aluminun roller rocker reviews WANTED [Re: Blakcharger440] #1452061
06/22/13 08:34 AM
06/22/13 08:34 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,902
Athens, Greece
Pyper70 Offline
master
Pyper70  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,902
Athens, Greece
They do have needle bearings....but I failed to mention Made in the USA is far superior than Made in China


Family owned 1969 Charger R/T DualQuad 440/727/GVO/3.55s
Re: 440 source 1.6 aluminun roller rocker reviews WANTED [Re: strokerchall] #1452062
06/22/13 01:03 PM
06/22/13 01:03 PM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,399
Aurora, Colorado
451Mopar Offline
master
451Mopar  Offline
master

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,399
Aurora, Colorado
I have used many of the 440 source parts, but not their rocker arms. They may be OK with a mild cam with low spring pressures, but with bigger cams / higher spring pressures I went with T&D rockers on the 500" stroker (0.714" lift solid roller, #700+ open spring pressure), and bronze bushed stainless steel rockers on the 505" stroker with a 0.614" lift hydraulic roller (about #380 open pressure.)

Re: 440 source 1.6 aluminun roller rocker reviews WANTED [Re: Pyper70] #1452063
06/22/13 01:59 PM
06/22/13 01:59 PM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 199
TN Hoosier
J
jb500 Offline
member
jb500  Offline
member
J

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 199
TN Hoosier
Quote:

They do have needle bearings....but I failed to mention Made in the USA is far superior than Made in China




It's not the needles that are the main concern with these time bombs...it is the shafts. Needle bearings regardless of whose rockers they occupy require if not demand a true .8750 55ish+hrc hardened rocker shaft to live.

Re: 440 source 1.6 aluminun roller rocker reviews WANTED [Re: jb500] #1452064
06/23/13 08:32 PM
06/23/13 08:32 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,005
U.S.S.A.
JohnRR Offline
I Win
JohnRR  Offline
I Win

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,005
U.S.S.A.
Quote:

Quote:

They do have needle bearings....but I failed to mention Made in the USA is far superior than Made in China




It's not the needles that are the main concern with these time bombs...it is the shafts. Needle bearings regardless of whose rockers they occupy require if not demand a true .8750 55ish+hrc hardened rocker shaft to live.




that may be the case but the offshore rockers weak point had been the shaft the roller tip rotates on , too brittle and breaking.

Re: 440 source 1.6 aluminun roller rocker reviews WANTED [Re: JohnRR] #1452065
06/23/13 10:51 PM
06/23/13 10:51 PM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 199
TN Hoosier
J
jb500 Offline
member
jb500  Offline
member
J

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 199
TN Hoosier
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

They do have needle bearings....but I failed to mention Made in the USA is far superior than Made in China




It's not the needles that are the main concern with these time bombs...it is the shafts. Needle bearings regardless of whose rockers they occupy require if not demand a true .8750 55ish+hrc hardened rocker shaft to live.




that may be the case but the offshore rockers weak point had been the shaft the roller tip rotates on , too brittle and breaking.




I was "lucky" enough not to have that problem show up as well. I just had the cages blow up due to undersized and soft rocker shafts and send all kinds of fun stuff throughout my block.

Page 2 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1