Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: Effect of wheel weight [Re: B G Racing] #1443276
06/01/13 10:29 PM
06/01/13 10:29 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,696
Bitopia
J
jcc Offline
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
jcc  Offline
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
J

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,696
Bitopia
Quote:

This topic can be debated untill the cows or sheep come home.





Stating the obvious?


Reality check, that half the population is smarter then 50% of the people and it's a constantly contested fact.
Re: Effect of wheel weight [Re: John_T_Brown] #1443277
06/01/13 10:52 PM
06/01/13 10:52 PM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,522
Ste-Sophie, Quebec, Canada
W
Wedgeman Offline OP
pro stock
Wedgeman  Offline OP
pro stock
W

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,522
Ste-Sophie, Quebec, Canada
Very interesting answers !

A good thinking tells me that a lighter wheel is easier to turn than a heavier one...which means more energy is transferred to the body to break the inertia..

It takes energy to break inertia of the rotating parts, and again some energy to break inertia of the body and keep the rotating going

Hard to quantify !

Re: Effect of wheel weight [Re: Wedgeman] #1443278
06/01/13 11:33 PM
06/01/13 11:33 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,468
So Cal
autoxcuda Offline
Too Many Posts
autoxcuda  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,468
So Cal
Quote:

Very interesting answers !

A good thinking tells me that a lighter wheel is easier to turn than a heavier one...which means more energy is transferred to the body to break the inertia..

It takes energy to break inertia of the rotating parts, and again some energy to break inertia of the body and keep the rotating going

Hard to quantify !




Actually easy to quantify. With measurement tool or calculating.

Maybe tedious to calculate depending on the physical features of the part and the changes in accelerations.

Getting your findings, if small, to corralate perfectly 100% with measured ET's is tough.

Last edited by autoxcuda; 06/01/13 11:43 PM.
Re: Effect of wheel weight [Re: Wedgeman] #1443279
06/02/13 12:52 AM
06/02/13 12:52 AM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,206
New York
polyspheric Offline
master
polyspheric  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,206
New York


Boffin Emeritus
Re: Effect of wheel weight [Re: polyspheric] #1443280
06/02/13 02:51 AM
06/02/13 02:51 AM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,730
Red Deer, Alberta
B
bill_greenwood Offline
top fuel
bill_greenwood  Offline
top fuel
B

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,730
Red Deer, Alberta
Think of wheel weight in this fashion: You're not just accelerating the wheel/tire from 0 mph to trap speed in 1320 feet, you are accelerating that rotational assembly from 0 rpm to trap speed axle rpm in the span of your ET. If you're running 120 mph with a 30" tire, that wheel is turning 1200-1300 rpm. It takes a lot less energy to get a 10-12 pound assembly to accelerate from rest to 1200 rpm in 11.5 seconds than it does a 20 lb wheel.
I've been told, for example, that torque challenged small block stockers can easily pick up a tenth just by changing to tubeless slicks and losing a couple pounds per tire.
I've also seen anecdotal evidence that the 03-06 Ram pickups with the 20" rims (the heavy suckers) get noticeably poorer fuel economy in urban driving than ones equipped with lighter 17" rubber.
When I used to run a lathe all day long, I was very aware that it took less effort for my lathe to spool a 75 lb solid bar that was 6" dia up to speed than a 75 lb ring that was 20" in dia.

Re: Effect of wheel weight [Re: bill_greenwood] #1443281
06/02/13 06:58 AM
06/02/13 06:58 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,924
A shed in England
Tig Offline
master
Tig  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,924
A shed in England
Back in the day, our car was running mid 12's with steel chrome 5 spokes. We swapped to convo-pros on all 4 corners with a skinnier front. Went to the track expecting to pick up a tenth and it was still running mid 12's. No real change for us


'74 Challenger..9.46 @ 145.9 1/4, 6.001 @ 118 1/8 so far. 4023lb !!! # N/A, Marsh performance 655ci, Indy Maxx, T/R, Indy 600-13 X's, Street legal, pump gas, full interior, Cal-Tracs, mufflers, 3:73's and real 10.5 radials.
9.51 @ 142.4 1/4, 6.003 @ 114 1/8 with our old mule KB, 572-13, 580 wedge.
RHD '68 Barracuda Fastback 323ci street/strip. Best ET 13.88 @ 99.03
Re: Effect of wheel weight [Re: Tig] #1443282
06/02/13 09:35 AM
06/02/13 09:35 AM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,093
oberlin, Ohio
Rapid340 Offline
top fuel
Rapid340  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,093
oberlin, Ohio
The mass is more significant as it moves away from the center of rotation. This inertia effect increases with the square of the radius. But, the negative effect of inertia is perportional to change of rotational speed (acceleration).

Anyone that spends big dollars on gun drilled axles will likely be disappointed and wont pick up more than the actual weight removed.

Going from new street tires to close to bald (may drop quite a bit of weight in some cases) is weight where it is more significant. A pound of tread verses a pound of lug nuts has 38 times more effect one the overall inertia of the wheel/tire (given a 28 inch tire. and 4.5 in. bolt circle). In fact, the total weight of a wheel/tire combo could be less than another but still result in more loss due to increased inertia.

Running a smaller/lighter converter or damper (or even paying the extra to have the crank turned down when you have a bunch of material to remove) could payoff.


Last edited by Rapid340; 06/05/13 09:10 AM.

1971 Factory Appearing Duster 340 11.000 @ 122 mph
Re: Effect of wheel weight [Re: CHAPPER] #1443283
06/02/13 10:42 AM
06/02/13 10:42 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,696
Bitopia
J
jcc Offline
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
jcc  Offline
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
J

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,696
Bitopia


Reality check, that half the population is smarter then 50% of the people and it's a constantly contested fact.
Re: Effect of wheel weight [Re: jcc] #1443284
06/02/13 11:15 AM
06/02/13 11:15 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

8 lbs even

The idea of testing wheel weight, would seem like a good and easy tech article for one of the car mags, just come up with a system to SECURELY bolt on some balanced wheel weight, and make runs.





Maybe fluid in the tires..??




Interesting idea for a test and worthy of a reply.
The first problem I see would judging how fast the fluid due to inner tire friction would match the actual tire revolutions, not likely very quick. Second problem would be the liquid would also likely due to its considerable mass distort the tire as it reached higher speed, which would change its rolling radius, and traction footprint, and last and likely not a real issue for drag use, but if temps inside ever reached 212F if using any water, you have steam related issues. I suspect the test would become a fluid in the tire test at the drags rather then test of wheel inertia at the drags.




All I see with this type of testing is a REALLY out
of balance tire and if enough was added you would
just destroy the tire due to bouncing due to balance

Re: Effect of wheel weight [Re: B G Racing] #1443285
06/02/13 12:29 PM
06/02/13 12:29 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,942
Metro Detroit
OUTLAWD Offline
top fuel
OUTLAWD  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,942
Metro Detroit
Not back to back, but I picked up ~.15 in the 1/4 by replacing my cop wheels with drag lites. Same tires, saved 15# per wheel.


Faster, Faster until the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death...

71 Swinger - slowly collecting dust/parts
66 Belv. II - just a streetcar
88 Mustang - turbo LS beater
Re: Effect of wheel weight [Re: Wedgeman] #1443286
06/02/13 12:49 PM
06/02/13 12:49 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,591
Canton, Ohio
S
Sport440 Offline
master
Sport440  Offline
master
S

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,591
Canton, Ohio
Quote:

Can someone tell me the gain of going to lighter wheel on the back vs ET ?

...........I mean what gain in time for every pound lighter

Dan





I can tell you! The gain will will be equal to a dead weight loss rule of thumb .1 et per 100 lbs.

The rotational effect wont come into play because the tire will gain rotational speed the whole 1/4 mile. the car just sees the weight as dead weight.

I did the tests many years ago Hoping I would see 1# rotational = 3# of dead weight.

The theoretical gain never occured. The gain was that of the weight alone that was lost as per the old rule of thumb.

I also went as far as removing the rear drums and tested The drums were 40# Guess what 40# of rotational weight was worth ET wise. It was the same as 40# of dead weight.

I did that test over and over a few times.40# on ,40# off, The rotational gain never showed its effect, MEASURABLY!!!

My speculation again was that it was because the tire slowly gains rotation across the whole 1/4 mile ,thus the car sees the weight just the same as dead weight because of that.


Page 2 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1