Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
cranking compression #1377566
01/28/13 03:08 PM
01/28/13 03:08 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,139
West Tennessee
R
rbstroker Offline OP
super stock
rbstroker  Offline OP
super stock
R

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,139
West Tennessee
I've asked this question before on another forum, but never got an answer. I know that the dynamic compression ratio is what determines what grade fuel is necessary, but what should the DCR and cranking compression be for the different grades of today's gasoline (87, 89, 91 octane)?


This is the land of the free because of the brave
Re: cranking compression [Re: rbstroker] #1377567
01/28/13 03:10 PM
01/28/13 03:10 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746
Ontario, Canada
Dodgem Offline
master
Dodgem  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746
Ontario, Canada
Well aluminum vs iron heads is a huge difference too!

so what do you have for heads and cranking compression??

Re: cranking compression [Re: Dodgem] #1377568
01/28/13 04:27 PM
01/28/13 04:27 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,139
West Tennessee
R
rbstroker Offline OP
super stock
rbstroker  Offline OP
super stock
R

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,139
West Tennessee
I am trying to cam so I can safely use 87 octane with aluminum heads.

Re: cranking compression [Re: rbstroker] #1377569
01/28/13 04:55 PM
01/28/13 04:55 PM
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,855
Pattison Texas
CSK Offline
master
CSK  Offline
master

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,855
Pattison Texas
the gear ratio,converter,weight of car,& the comp ratio also play a role in your question.


1968 Charger COLD A/C Hilborn EFI
512ci 9.7 compression, Stealth heads, 4.10 gear A518 ODtrans 4100lb,10.93 full street car trim
2020 T/A 392 Stock 11.79 @ 114.5

Re: cranking compression [Re: CSK] #1377570
01/28/13 04:57 PM
01/28/13 04:57 PM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,916
usa
L
lewtot184 Offline
master
lewtot184  Offline
master
L

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,916
usa
too many variables.

Re: cranking compression [Re: lewtot184] #1377571
01/28/13 09:28 PM
01/28/13 09:28 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040
Lincoln Nebraska
R
RapidRobert Offline
Circle Track
RapidRobert  Offline
Circle Track
R

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040
Lincoln Nebraska
Is the long block together or are you still in the planning stages? If together what SCR did you measure?


live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
Re: cranking compression [Re: rbstroker] #1377572
01/29/13 12:05 AM
01/29/13 12:05 AM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746
Ontario, Canada
Dodgem Offline
master
Dodgem  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746
Ontario, Canada
Well the stall of your converter comes into play the higher the stall the lower the octane needed to a point. I would say 150 cranking compression with 87 and aluminum heads would be fine. My one combo ran 196 low and 205 high with straight 94 so??

tell us as much detail as you can?? all you have now inclyding staic compression if you know it!

Re: cranking compression [Re: RapidRobert] #1377573
01/29/13 10:53 AM
01/29/13 10:53 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,139
West Tennessee
R
rbstroker Offline OP
super stock
rbstroker  Offline OP
super stock
R

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,139
West Tennessee
Quote:

Is the long block together or are you still in the planning stages? If together what SCR did you measure?




Yep, the engine is together, but I want to do a cam change. The current cam has an intake closing point of 44* ABC (.050 lift) and gives me a 7.31 DCR with 140# cranking (Racer Brown SSH-25). Probably about right for my needs, but I think the overlap is really hurting my bottom end. Also think that I may be able to use a little more DCR and still use 89 octane, which prompted the original question. The MP .528 seems promising, but I'd sure like to get some input from the folks on this site. BTW street driven only, 4 speed, 3.23.


This is the land of the free because of the brave
Re: cranking compression [Re: rbstroker] #1377574
01/29/13 11:58 AM
01/29/13 11:58 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040
Lincoln Nebraska
R
RapidRobert Offline
Circle Track
RapidRobert  Offline
Circle Track
R

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040
Lincoln Nebraska
unfortunately I am not a cam guy so I dont have a specific recommendation but with 7.31 dynamic I sure think you could go milder for more bottom end. I'm not sure the 528 would be a good choice. What was the SCR? & what calculator did you use to get the DCR? You mentioned the .050 lift & reportedly the calculators such as the ones at Wallace racing use lift @ .005 which gives a more accurate DCR figure. Sorry no help but here's a BTT. EDIT just reread & saw the 3.23's & I'll emphatically say avoid the 528 (& I'm not a cam guy)

Last edited by RapidRobert; 01/29/13 01:57 PM.

live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
Re: cranking compression [Re: RapidRobert] #1377575
01/29/13 02:08 PM
01/29/13 02:08 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 12,675
Columbia, CT
M
moper Offline
I Live Here
moper  Offline
I Live Here
M

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 12,675
Columbia, CT
Please be detailed and tell us what your engine is now. Piston choice? deck height? head gasket used? head type (p/n)?


Well, art is art, isn't it? Still, on the other hand, water is water! And east is east and west is west and if you take cranberries and stew them like applesauce they taste much more like prunes than rhubarb does. Now, uh... Now you tell me what you know.
Re: cranking compression [Re: rbstroker] #1377576
01/29/13 03:22 PM
01/29/13 03:22 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746
Ontario, Canada
Dodgem Offline
master
Dodgem  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746
Ontario, Canada
So your saying you have stock stroke 440 with 8.3 to 1 compression giving a dynamic of 7.3 to 1 and 140 cranking with aluminum heads??

I would like to see the total workup on the engine, heads, exhaust and torque converter?


Can't see where a .528 would perform much different maybe a few more ponies but even less bottom end but mostly the same.
If you want more bottom end assuming the racer brown cam is 108 LSA advance the install to 102

Last edited by Dodgem; 01/29/13 03:28 PM.
Re: cranking compression [Re: rbstroker] #1377577
01/29/13 03:43 PM
01/29/13 03:43 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,054
USA
B
b54406barrel Offline
master
b54406barrel  Offline
master
B

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,054
USA
When gas got spendy in the 80's, I rebuilt my 440-6 engine to pretty much stock except with a set of low compression pistons. I measured it up & it was in the 8.5-6 range. I finally used a hughes cam with these specs, after running a tp-238 (230 @.050/480) for several years ;

Camshaft Technical Details
Intake Valve Lift 1.5 .470"
Exhaust Valve Lift 1.5 .506"
Intake Duration at .050" 215°
Exhaust Duration at .050" 223°
Lobe Separation Angle 112º
Intake Opening at .050" -1.5° BTC
Exhaust Opening at .050" 46.5° BBC
Intake Closing at .050" 36.5° ABC
Exhaust Closing at .050" -3.5° ATC

Cranking compression was 150 or so, with the second cam. Runs just fine on 87, total mechanical advance of about 34-6%.

Whoops, I didn't mean spendy in the 80's, I meant crappy!

Last edited by b54406barrel; 01/30/13 07:01 PM.
Re: cranking compression [Re: Dodgem] #1377578
01/29/13 04:55 PM
01/29/13 04:55 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,139
West Tennessee
R
rbstroker Offline OP
super stock
rbstroker  Offline OP
super stock
R

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,139
West Tennessee
Quote:

So your saying you have stock stroke 440 with 8.3 to 1 compression giving a dynamic of 7.3 to 1 and 140 cranking with aluminum heads??

I would like to see the total workup on the engine, heads, exhaust and torque converter?


Can't see where a .528 would perform much different maybe a few more ponies but even less bottom end but mostly the same.
If you want more bottom end assuming the racer brown cam is 108 LSA advance the install to 102





Advancing the Racer Brown is another possibility that I have been mulling over. I think that the 105* intake centerline, 70* overlap and 108* lobe separation may be doing more harm than good with my new low compression ratio. My setup is a stroked (4.15) 440 with MP452 heads (same as Eddy's but straight plug), stock exhaust manifolds and a measured 8.82 static compression ratio. Also, I am running an 833 and 3.23 gear. Street only. I've tried to get some good specs on the .528 cam because of the success that Andy Finkbeiner has had with it in his builds, but so far; no joy.


This is the land of the free because of the brave
Re: cranking compression [Re: rbstroker] #1377579
01/30/13 12:14 AM
01/30/13 12:14 AM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746
Ontario, Canada
Dodgem Offline
master
Dodgem  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746
Ontario, Canada
well the .528 is 112 LSA and 241 @ .050

that racer brown with 238 duration should be fine but with that compression, 4 speed and gear and a 493 inch I would maybe advance it 102 but 105 should work real nice with 89 maybe even 87.

Last edited by Dodgem; 01/30/13 12:20 AM.
Re: cranking compression [Re: rbstroker] #1377580
01/30/13 05:00 PM
01/30/13 05:00 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746
Ontario, Canada
Dodgem Offline
master
Dodgem  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746
Ontario, Canada
On running numbers on My EA dyno I would leave the Racer brown installed where it is on a 383 or 440 maybe more advance but not on a 493.
Should give you 450 foot lb @ 2500 and peak torque 540 @ 3500.
Peak hp at 5000 so a 5500 all out shift point??
the solid .528 would give about 3 to 4 more hp and about the same more in torque not sure the switch to solid would be worth it??

Re: cranking compression [Re: Dodgem] #1377581
01/30/13 07:59 PM
01/30/13 07:59 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,139
West Tennessee
R
rbstroker Offline OP
super stock
rbstroker  Offline OP
super stock
R

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,139
West Tennessee
Quote:

On running numbers on My EA dyno I would leave the Racer brown installed where it is on a 383 or 440 maybe more advance but not on a 493.
Should give you 450 foot lb @ 2500 and peak torque 540 @ 3500.
Peak hp at 5000 so a 5500 all out shift point??
the solid .528 would give about 3 to 4 more hp and about the same more in torque not sure the switch to solid would be worth it??





Exactly the torque peak that I'm looking for. Thank you sir.


This is the land of the free because of the brave
Re: cranking compression [Re: rbstroker] #1377582
01/31/13 12:47 AM
01/31/13 12:47 AM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746
Ontario, Canada
Dodgem Offline
master
Dodgem  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746
Ontario, Canada
sounds good to go to me!








Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1