Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Re: 440 source roller rockers [Re: 493_DART] #1357066
12/25/12 03:53 AM
12/25/12 03:53 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,766
Central Valley, CA.
Quicksilver440 Offline
I Live Here
Quicksilver440  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,766
Central Valley, CA.
Quote:

If you cant quite afford the Harlands...the next step would be Dove or Hughes . I ran used Doves for several years with now problem and I "think" they still make them in Ohio ?

Either one is around $425 last time I looked.




I agree..those are all decent depending on the application. Rockers are not a place to go cheap.....only exception is ISKY or Crane ductile iron rockers for non-roller cam applications are a cheaper but decent option. I bought a brand new set in the box of old (from the 80's) crane ducticle rockers for like $100 a few years ago on ebay. They are just fine for my solid cam under .600 lift. Even came with the original receipt...lol.

Re: 440 source roller rockers [Re: VernMotor] #1357067
12/25/12 01:00 PM
12/25/12 01:00 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,940
Holly/MI
D
Dean_Kuzluzski Offline
master
Dean_Kuzluzski  Offline
master
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,940
Holly/MI
Quote:

Quote:

Soooooo, I just got some Harland Sharps from Mancini Racing. These are the "Exclusive" ones, supposedly, only available from them. They advertise them as a "bushed type" but there's NO bushing just a "non-roller" set-up.






So did you call them and ask where your bushing are ? If they are advertise that they are. I would been upset if they did't come that way. I been thinking about buying a set of them.. But this might change my mind.




Uhhhhh, NO! I knew they didn't have actual bushings when I read the statement "bushed type" in the sale flyer rather than "bushed". Azzzzzzz I said, for the price of new Crane Golds (not bushed either) and used/old iron ductile (not bushed,). And then the rocker rails. The budget HS's are a feasible upgrade. Next up from there would be the Hughes and that would be another $100 (They're not stated as "bushed" either so caveat emptor!!). Got to stop the bleeding somewhere.

Racing & Mopars is just a hobby for me. I have the better HS rollers for my Indy EZ-1's. These budget rockers are for a MP 484 cam'd 440 that will go into a street/strip car that either my son or I will drive. When I do a stroker 400/451 with Stage VI'ers I have they may get transfered over..........or not.

Feel free to throw any extra/surplus cash my way if you really feel I need to upgrade now!

Last edited by Dean_Kuzluzski; 12/25/12 01:08 PM.

R.I.P.- Gary "Coop" Davis 02/09/68-05/13/04
Re: 440 source roller rockers [Re: buck440] #1357068
12/25/12 11:36 PM
12/25/12 11:36 PM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 199
TN Hoosier
J
jb500 Offline
member
jb500  Offline
member
J

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 199
TN Hoosier
Posted this pic before and it's worth a 1000 words....or in my case a $1000.

Granted it was with their older rockers 06, but their customer service was horrible and that has not seemed to have changed based on the amount of negative posts on this site.

Spend your money elsewhere!

7518665-IMG_0435.JPG (439 downloads)
Re: 440 source roller rockers [Re: buck440] #1357069
12/26/12 12:06 AM
12/26/12 12:06 AM
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 75
North Carolina
M
Mopar dragster Offline
member
Mopar dragster  Offline
member
M

Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 75
North Carolina
I LOVE the Crane Gold race rockers. I still have three brand new kits on the shelves waiting for their turn in the sun. I haven't been able to tear them up.


Please see my brother Darrell Kiger at Wyo Racing and Rods for all of your drag car fabrication and restoration needs. From Pro Mod to concours restorations, he is the man. (336)463-4309.
Re: 440 source roller rockers [Re: Mopar dragster] #1357070
12/26/12 01:35 AM
12/26/12 01:35 AM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 506
Utah, USA
1
1964superstock Offline
mopar
1964superstock  Offline
mopar
1

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 506
Utah, USA
Have you considered using Comp Cams Ultra Pro Magnum™ Rocker Arms?

Has anyone tried these with a large solid flat tappet or hydraulic/solid roller cam?

They look like a high quality part, and they come bushed. Not cheap.

http://www.compcams.com/ultrapromagnum/

http://www.compperformancegroupstores.co...;Category_Code=

http://www.compperformancegroupstores.co...;Category_Code=

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/cca-1621-16 Big Block Mopar

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/cca-1622-16 Small Block Mopar

Re: 440 source roller rockers [Re: 1964superstock] #1357071
12/26/12 01:42 AM
12/26/12 01:42 AM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 506
Utah, USA
1
1964superstock Offline
mopar
1964superstock  Offline
mopar
1

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 506
Utah, USA
Close up view of Comp Cams Ultra Pro Magnum showing the bushing.

Re: 440 source roller rockers [Re: 1964superstock] #1357072
12/26/12 02:49 AM
12/26/12 02:49 AM
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,541
USA
H
hudsonhornet7x Offline
pro stock
hudsonhornet7x  Offline
pro stock
H

Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,541
USA
How about the ones rocker arm specialties sells. Arent they stainless? I read about them in Andy's book but I really do not know much about them.

Re: 440 source roller rockers [Re: Dean_Kuzluzski] #1357073
12/26/12 08:01 AM
12/26/12 08:01 AM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,847
Oakdale CT
gdonovan Offline
I Live Here
gdonovan  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,847
Oakdale CT
Quote:

Soooooo, I just got some Harland Sharps from Mancini Racing. These are the "Exclusive" ones, supposedly, only available from them. They advertise them as a "bushed type" but there's NO bushing just a "non-roller" set-up.





That's just plain deceptive then, thanks for the heads up.

I was considering buying a set for my big block but will pass now.

How can you use the term "bushed type" without a bushing being present?

Re: 440 source roller rockers [Re: gdonovan] #1357074
12/26/12 11:48 AM
12/26/12 11:48 AM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,780
Alabama
Mopar-Al Offline
master
Mopar-Al  Offline
master

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,780
Alabama
comps warranty says

This warranty is voided on any part used in racing applications or any cam part ending in -5, -6, -7, -8, or -9


Bushed means covered. Bushing is a differnt definition.

I only see 1.5 ratio in the comp site. Also, how do you figure out load strength on a rocker? I never noticed.

Re: 440 source roller rockers [Re: 1964superstock] #1357075
12/26/12 11:54 AM
12/26/12 11:54 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
DJVCuda Offline
I Live Here
DJVCuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
Quote:

Have you considered using Comp Cams Ultra Pro Magnum™ Rocker Arms?

Has anyone tried these with a large solid flat tappet or hydraulic/solid roller cam?

They look like a high quality part, and they come bushed. Not cheap.

http://www.compcams.com/ultrapromagnum/

http://www.compperformancegroupstores.co...;Category_Code=

http://www.compperformancegroupstores.co...;Category_Code=

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/cca-1621-16 Big Block Mopar

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/cca-1622-16 Small Block Mopar




use them in my small block mopar 430 build
very happy with them - alignment was best out of all the rockers I tested - HS, crane gold and these.

The sweep was the best also - they even allowed a 3.8 pushrod in the eddy head without grinding. The HS and cranes did not allow this -

this was for my application and another 408 with a similar setup - same results.

close up you can see there is a proprietary coating on them - some dimpled coating that is very slick.

Re: 440 source roller rockers [Re: gdonovan] #1357076
12/26/12 12:01 PM
12/26/12 12:01 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,940
Holly/MI
D
Dean_Kuzluzski Offline
master
Dean_Kuzluzski  Offline
master
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,940
Holly/MI
Quote:

That's just plain deceptive then, thanks for the heads up.


How can you use the term "bushed type" without a bushing being present?





They should have stated something like "shaft type non-bushed" to be perfectly clear. Yes, it is a bit decepetive but at that price range I haven't found any others that are bushed. Or state that they are.

I tend to look at it like this............the non-bushed type may actually have more "loadbearing" ability than the bushed rockers that use two narrow bushings like the Comp Cams rockers I've seen. Roller fulcrum rockers are actually harder on the shafts due to the needlebearings having a finer load specifically focused where each needlebearing touches than the way a bushing spreads it out. That's when the loose tolerances of poor manufacturing and poor metal quality breaks down those import rockers so quickly. AND the stock set-up never had bushings due to the system having a direct oil fed system pushing oil on them. They don't usually gall until dirt or metal is in the motor.

So, you either pay the big $$ and get HS, T&D or Jesel.........or mid-to low end hobby guys like myself buy the non-roller extruded Hughes, Dove or budget HS's.

The Doves do look like a nice product and American made!!

http://www.4secondsflat.com/Dove%20Rocker%20Arms.htm

Last edited by Dean_Kuzluzski; 12/26/12 12:05 PM.

R.I.P.- Gary "Coop" Davis 02/09/68-05/13/04
Re: 440 source roller rockers [Re: Dean_Kuzluzski] #1357077
12/26/12 12:11 PM
12/26/12 12:11 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Quote:

Quote:

That's just plain deceptive then, thanks for the heads up.


How can you use the term "bushed type" without a bushing being present?





They should have stated something like "shaft type non-bushed" to be perfectly clear. Yes, it is a bit decepetive but at that price range I haven't found any others that are bushed. Or state that they are.

I tend to look at it like this............the non-bushed type may actually have more "loadbearing" ability than the bushed rockers that use two narrow bushings like the Comp Cams rockers I've seen. Roller fulcrum rockers are actually harder on the shafts due to the needlebearings having a finer load specifically focused where each needlebearing touches than the way a bushing spreads it out. That's when the loose tolerances of poor manufacturing and poor metal quality breaks down those import rockers so quickly. AND the stock set-up never had bushings due to the system having a direct oil fed system pushing oil on them. They don't usually gall until dirt or metal is in the motor.

So, you either pay the big $$ and get HS, T&D or Jesel.........or mid-to low end hobby guys like myself buy the non-roller extruded Hughes, Dove or budget HS's.

The Doves do look like a nice product and American made!!

http://www.4secondsflat.com/Dove%20Rocker%20Arms.htm




There is a reason that the roller rockers use the
bearings... its to get oil to the shaft area... if
you run a bushed style rocker with big spring pressure
it doesnt get oil on the shaft.. yes it will get oil
on it at low RPM... thats why they say dont use them
on high RPM engines(it doesnt have time to get the
oil to slide back down to the bottom load area)

Re: 440 source roller rockers [Re: hudsonhornet7x] #1357078
12/26/12 03:25 PM
12/26/12 03:25 PM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 506
Utah, USA
1
1964superstock Offline
mopar
1964superstock  Offline
mopar
1

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 506
Utah, USA
Quote:

How about the ones rocker arm specialties sells. Arent they stainless? I read about them in Andy's book but I really do not know much about them.




Here are a few recent posts here on Moparts about Rocker Arm Specialties (RAS). They did make a good quality product, but the company was sold a while back, and things changed. I'm not sure if they are still in business?? Anyone have a news update on RAS?

https://board.moparts.org/ubbthreads/showflat.php?Cat=0&Number=5679328&Main=5679045


https://board.moparts.org/ubbthreads/show...&PHPSESSID=


https://board.moparts.org/ubbthreads/show...&PHPSESSID=


https://board.moparts.org/ubbthreads/showflat.php?Cat=0&Number=7118502&page=0&vc=1

7519238-RAS.jpg (427 downloads)
Re: 440 source roller rockers *DELETED* [Re: buck440] #1357079
12/26/12 03:32 PM
12/26/12 03:32 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,590
Indy
J
joshking440 Offline
Lunch is on me!
joshking440  Offline
Lunch is on me!
J

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,590
Indy
Post deleted by moparts

Re: 440 source roller rockers [Re: joshking440] #1357080
12/26/12 03:53 PM
12/26/12 03:53 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,348
Mt.Vernon ,Ohio
VernMotor Offline
master
VernMotor  Offline
master

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,348
Mt.Vernon ,Ohio
You got a link to these Josh ?

Re: 440 source roller rockers [Re: VernMotor] #1357081
12/26/12 07:48 PM
12/26/12 07:48 PM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,169
Virginia Beach, VA
O
Old School Offline
super stock
Old School  Offline
super stock
O

Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,169
Virginia Beach, VA
Quote:

You got a link to these Josh ?



they are dove rocker arms. i have broke every set i have used. not good for roller cams..... again, when rockers cost that little, you will get what you pay for.

Last edited by Old School; 12/26/12 07:51 PM.

68 cuda formula S 588" bb 5sp
70 CUDA CONVERT 500" 5SP (SUBLIME)
70 CUDA CONVERT 500" 5SP (PLUMCRAZY):TOO MUCH HORSEPOWER, IS ALMOST ENOUGH!
Re: 440 source roller rockers [Re: Old School] #1357082
12/26/12 08:20 PM
12/26/12 08:20 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,348
Mt.Vernon ,Ohio
VernMotor Offline
master
VernMotor  Offline
master

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,348
Mt.Vernon ,Ohio
I have seen a lot of post about Indy rockers ..being Bad..I only run a .590 lift cam with 325 open pressures and have run crane iron rockers for years I have 2-3 of them galling. on the inside. I have good shafts. it cleans right off the shafts .but I need to do something. I wish I could have then bushed. But not sure it is worth the money to do. or who to get to do it. I don't think R.A.S is doing anything.

Re: 440 source roller rockers [Re: VernMotor] #1357083
12/27/12 01:19 AM
12/27/12 01:19 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,766
Central Valley, CA.
Quicksilver440 Offline
I Live Here
Quicksilver440  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,766
Central Valley, CA.
Quote:

I have seen a lot of post about Indy rockers ..being Bad..I only run a .590 lift cam with 325 open pressures and have run crane iron rockers for years I have 2-3 of them galling. on the inside. I have good shafts. it cleans right off the shafts .but I need to do something. I wish I could have then bushed. But not sure it is worth the money to do. or who to get to do it. I don't think R.A.S is doing anything.




I'd love to have my ductiles bushed too if it isn't too expensive.

Re: 440 source roller rockers [Re: MR_P_BODY] #1357084
12/27/12 01:22 PM
12/27/12 01:22 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,317
State of confusion
T
Thumperdart Offline
I Live Here
Thumperdart  Offline
I Live Here
T

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,317
State of confusion
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

That's just plain deceptive then, thanks for the heads up.


How can you use the term "bushed type" without a bushing being present?





They should have stated something like "shaft type non-bushed" to be perfectly clear. Yes, it is a bit decepetive but at that price range I haven't found any others that are bushed. Or state that they are.

I tend to look at it like this............the non-bushed type may actually have more "loadbearing" ability than the bushed rockers that use two narrow bushings like the Comp Cams rockers I've seen. Roller fulcrum rockers are actually harder on the shafts due to the needlebearings having a finer load specifically focused where each needlebearing touches than the way a bushing spreads it out. That's when the loose tolerances of poor manufacturing and poor metal quality breaks down those import rockers so quickly. AND the stock set-up never had bushings due to the system having a direct oil fed system pushing oil on them. They don't usually gall until dirt or metal is in the motor.

So, you either pay the big $$ and get HS, T&D or Jesel.........or mid-to low end hobby guys like myself buy the non-roller extruded Hughes, Dove or budget HS's.

The Doves do look like a nice product and American made!!

http://www.4secondsflat.com/Dove%20Rocker%20Arms.htm




There is a reason that the roller rockers use the
bearings... its to get oil to the shaft area... if
you run a bushed style rocker with big spring pressure
it doesnt get oil on the shaft.. yes it will get oil
on it at low RPM... thats why they say dont use them
on high RPM engines(it doesnt have time to get the
oil to slide back down to the bottom load area)



If that`s the case then what about the hemi bushed rockers I`ve seen and those motors went well past 7500 rpm`s.


72 Dart 470 n/a BB stroker street car `THUMPER`...Check me out on FB Dominic Thumper for videos and lots of carb pics......760-900-3895.....
Re: 440 source roller rockers [Re: Quicksilver440] #1357085
12/27/12 01:35 PM
12/27/12 01:35 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,008
U.S.S.A.
JohnRR Offline
I Win
JohnRR  Offline
I Win

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,008
U.S.S.A.
I think it runs over 300, maybe 400 ??, to bush them. I bought a fresh set of RAS bushed crane rockers with shafts off a member in the last year or so, can't remember if he was selling them for just the cost of having them done including shafts and billet holdowns ...

Page 2 of 3 1 2 3






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1