Re: Possible tub job in future. Anyone do this yet?
[Re: TrWaters]
#1334189
11/12/12 06:53 PM
11/12/12 06:53 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,039 Redwood City Ca.
B1arno
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,039
Redwood City Ca.
|
Quote:
If I were going to do it, I would bite the bullet and buy the rear section jig welded. I know....more for the part and more to ship, but ALOT easier to install.
|
|
|
Re: Possible tub job in future. Anyone do this yet?
[Re: ramman16248]
#1334194
11/14/12 02:47 PM
11/14/12 02:47 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,625 Freeport IL USA
poorboy
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,625
Freeport IL USA
|
If you modify the wheel opening of the rear fenders, you can put some pretty wide tires on that body without cutting much. In the past I have simply cut the wheel opening round to clear the tire, and I have cut around the original opening and raised it up on the fender to clear the tire. The width of the rear axle your putting under the car, and how low you want the rear of the car to be, will make a difference how wide of tire will fit. The rear tires on my coupe have 8" tread surface on the road. They are the same 235 R/ 75 x15 Michelin tires as are on the front, mounted on 70s Mopar 15" x 6 1/2" steel wheels (not cop or anything special). The rear axle in my coupe is from the 90 Dakota and has 5 on 4 1/2" bolt pattern with 3:55 limited slip rear gear. I have opened the wheel openings with a round cut slightly larger then the tire diameter. Though my car has the full Dakota frame, the wheel wells are original to the 48 Plymouth (the Dakota rear frame gives a lot of room to move the inner wheel tubs, but requires extensive rear floor modification). I have about 1 3/4" sidewall clearance on the inside of the tire to the inner wheel housing, and there is about 1 1/2" to the widest point on the outer fender. These rear fenders curve in at the bottom quite a bit, so mud flaps would probably be wanted if you were concerned about tire spray, that is not a concern to me. I'll try o post a few pictures later. Gene
Last edited by poorboy; 11/14/12 03:42 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Possible tub job in future. Anyone do this yet?
[Re: poorboy]
#1334195
11/14/12 03:45 PM
11/14/12 03:45 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,625 Freeport IL USA
poorboy
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,625
Freeport IL USA
|
Keep in mind, my car is suppose to represent a mid 60s dirt track car. It was a rusted out pile of scrap I put on a Dakota frame.
Hacked up fender.
Last edited by poorboy; 11/14/12 03:46 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Possible tub job in future. Anyone do this yet?
[Re: ramman16248]
#1334198
11/14/12 11:30 PM
11/14/12 11:30 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,039 Redwood City Ca.
B1arno
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,039
Redwood City Ca.
|
Quote:
I hadn't considered the fender widening. I need about 2 inches. 3 would be safer, but 2 would work. I only have about 1.5 inches on the inside of the wheel to the frame. Only about an inch of that is movable wheel house. The more I think about it, if the rear fenders can be widened, I can do a mini-tub and widen the rear fenders. I could probably play with backspacing of the wheel to get the tire whre I need it to be. The 275-60-15 I have is a good reference. The tires i put on the 20's in the rear wouldn't be much taller and very similar in width.(According to Tire rack's measurements.)
Will the car look ok with widened rear fenders? I don't want it to look like a so-cal beetle with flares.LOL!!
IMHO I think the car would look better with 1" or 2" wider rear fenders. It would be subtle so only the in the know people would see something was different. I would cut them lenghtwise an inch or so from where they attach to the car and add a strip of steel in between the two pieces. The steel would be thin enough that it could be formed pretty easily. The outer contours of the fenders would remain the same. Arno
|
|
|
|
|