Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Once again, the great refrigerant debate #1226610
05/03/12 01:53 AM
05/03/12 01:53 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,069
Irving, TX
feets Offline OP
Senior Management
feets  Offline OP
Senior Management

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,069
Irving, TX
ASSuming the small amount of pressure I found in the Imperial's A/C system is a sign the car will actually hold a charge, what refrigerant should I use?

I have 4 cans of R12. This system holds 4 lbs 6 oz (dual evaporator two row condenser). In the perfect world that's 5 cans. In the real world, I'll never get full cans in there because of equalizing pressure. I could pick up a 5th can off Craigslist for less than $30.

I have 134a readily available and dirt cheap at work. I did convert my 92 D250 but can't get it to hold a charge for very long.

I know a bunch of "drop in" refrigerants are out there, many of them based on butane or other volatile gasses.

I'd sure hate to dump a the R12 in the system and have it blow out through a leak or rupture.


BTW... I brought home a Robinair vacuum pump to pull down what's currently in the system and verify it will hold. Once that's done, I'll try to evacuate the remaining compressor oil and replace it with new stuff.


We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind.
- Stu Harmon
Re: Once again, the great refrigerant debate [Re: feets] #1226611
05/03/12 02:06 AM
05/03/12 02:06 AM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,848
Memphis
HemiRick Offline
master
HemiRick  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,848
Memphis
If it will hold a vacuum, that's a good sign it will hold the freon. From my understanding the old style compressor doesnt pump R136a for long before dying. Since you have the R12 all ready I;d use it, assuming the system will hold a vacuum for 12 hours.


Take care,
Rick
68 Coronet R/T 440 & 68 Charger 528 Hemi,and 5 Challengers! 6 cyl, 318, 360, 383, 451
Re: Once again, the great refrigerant debate [Re: HemiRick] #1226612
05/03/12 05:15 AM
05/03/12 05:15 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 12,291
Kent, Wa
340SHORTY Offline
Truck Nut
340SHORTY  Offline
Truck Nut

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 12,291
Kent, Wa
put the can in a bucket of hot water when you install the R-12. I guarante all of it will go in.


I am truckless..
Re: Once again, the great refrigerant debate [Re: HemiRick] #1226613
05/03/12 08:37 AM
05/03/12 08:37 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,083
Niles , Ohio
T
therocks Offline
oh wait.but hey.lets see.oh yeah.
therocks  Offline
oh wait.but hey.lets see.oh yeah.
T

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,083
Niles , Ohio
Empting the cans is why you charge thru the low side.Thats why it called suction.That being said I changed a bunch to 134 at work.Most there were no problems.I like to change all the O rings I can get to.Than and a new dryer and adding the proper oil.Then with a good machine you can add a partial charge with dye and most now have sealers in them.If no leaks fully charge.I still have a new can of 12 in the garage I had for my 57.I changed it to 134.Ran it for 5 years.It did have a small leak so I added about a pound every spring.Rocky


Chrysler Firepower
Re: Once again, the great refrigerant debate [Re: therocks] #1226614
05/03/12 10:40 AM
05/03/12 10:40 AM
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 965
S.W. Pennsylvania
M
markrr Offline
super stock
markrr  Offline
super stock
M

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 965
S.W. Pennsylvania
I would do what you said and put the R-12 in if your system holds the vacuum. That's quick and easy. If the system leaks in the future or does not hold the vacuum then change the system over to 134a. Be sure to change the oil.

Re: Once again, the great refrigerant debate [Re: markrr] #1226615
05/03/12 11:40 AM
05/03/12 11:40 AM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,305
Lakewood, Colorado
herkamer Offline
pro stock
herkamer  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,305
Lakewood, Colorado
I went with the Envirosafe Industrial 12a when I put my Dakota together. Works great, blows mid 30's at the center vent. And it's compatible with all of the oils.

http://autorefrigerants.com/co00033.htm

$180 plus free shipping for the equivelant of 63 lbs of R12 made the choice pretty easy. Yes, it's hydrocarbon based but think about carrying 20 gallons of gas around. I'm not worried about it.

Tech info: http://autorefrigerants.com/Envirotechnical.htm


Matt
69 Dart Swinger 340
83 W350, Megasquirted with 46RH
Old news: 72 Demon street/race mobile
Latest: 70 Duster backhalf car
and even more
Re: Once again, the great refrigerant debate [Re: herkamer] #1226616
05/03/12 01:22 PM
05/03/12 01:22 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,423
Kalispell Mt.
H
HotRodDave Offline
I Live Here
HotRodDave  Offline
I Live Here
H

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,423
Kalispell Mt.
There is a shop in town that swears by the HC freons and I have replaced many condensors that exploded as a result. Don't use any HC freon!

Pull a good vaccume, if it holds, fill with your R-12. Heating the cans is a good way to get the last little bit out of them. I ususlly dangle them on the ex manifold. Always atatch them to the low side and after the first can is in start it and turn on the compressor so it actually pulls lowest preasure on that low line, then heat the can to get the most out of it.

PS technically the low side is not really a suction, it still will have much higher preasure than the atmosphere, it is just not as high as the high side


I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!



Re: Once again, the great refrigerant debate [Re: HotRodDave] #1226617
05/03/12 02:14 PM
05/03/12 02:14 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,875
communist bloc of new jersey
J
jamesc Offline
master
jamesc  Offline
master
J

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,875
communist bloc of new jersey
Quote:

Don't use any HC freon





Freon is a Dupont trademark for chlorofluorocarbon refrigerant.

the vast majority of refrigerants are "HC".

as an example R-12 is dichlorodifluoromethane, methane is a HC (natural gas). r-134a is tetrafluoroethane, ethane is the next heaviest hydrocarbon to methane.

incidentally some of these can thermally decompose into phosgene gas...which just happens to be a chemical weapon

Re: Once again, the great refrigerant debate [Re: jamesc] #1226618
05/03/12 03:03 PM
05/03/12 03:03 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 954
garnett kansas
rhad Offline
super stock
rhad  Offline
super stock

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 954
garnett kansas
i changed over my 92 dakota a couple of yrs ago,i DID NOT drain out the old oil,just added the new type oil and 134,NO problems,no leaks

Re: Once again, the great refrigerant debate [Re: jamesc] #1226619
05/03/12 03:06 PM
05/03/12 03:06 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,030
The Grand State of Confusion-O...
SKR8PN Offline
master
SKR8PN  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,030
The Grand State of Confusion-O...
Quote:

Quote:

Don't use any HC freon





Freon is a Dupont trademark for chlorofluorocarbon refrigerant.

the vast majority of refrigerants are "HC".

as an example R-12 is dichlorodifluoromethane, methane is a HC (natural gas). r-134a is tetrafluoroethane, ethane is the next heaviest hydrocarbon to methane.

incidentally some of these can thermally decompose into phosgene gas...which just happens to be a chemical weapon





Yup. That's why they did away with the old fl;ame leak detectors. When you burn dichlorodifluoromethane is turns into phosgene, which is a nerve agent.


Karma has no menu. You get served what you deserve.
Re: Once again, the great refrigerant debate [Re: rhad] #1226620
05/03/12 03:43 PM
05/03/12 03:43 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,703
A
Andrewh Offline
master
Andrewh  Offline
master
A

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,703
Quote:

i changed over my 92 dakota a couple of yrs ago,i DID NOT drain out the old oil,just added the new type oil and 134,NO problems,no leaks




it isn't leaks that are the issue. the new oil turns the old dryer material into goo as I understand it.

at some point it may clog something if it circulates.

Re: Once again, the great refrigerant debate [Re: feets] #1226621
05/03/12 10:47 PM
05/03/12 10:47 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,069
Irving, TX
feets Offline OP
Senior Management
feets  Offline OP
Senior Management

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,069
Irving, TX
Good news. The car appears to have held a vacuum.
Since my gauges only go up and don't have a vacuum scale, I didn't bother with them. I drew a vacuum on the car for 20 minutes this morning. When I got home from work I connected the vacuum pump again. It started working hard immediately. I poked the schrader valve stem on the high side and the vacuum pump rpm shot up.
After drawing a vacuum again I went ahead and connected my gauges to the high side. It drew the needle below zero. I put the pump away but left the gauge on the car. I'll check it in the morning to see if it reads the same.
If so, it's time to change the compressor oil and charge it.


We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind.
- Stu Harmon






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1