Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
383 Pistons: L2315 or stock? #1197557
03/15/12 05:13 PM
03/15/12 05:13 PM
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 460
Oklahoma
V
VoodooCLD Offline OP
mopar
VoodooCLD  Offline OP
mopar
V

Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 460
Oklahoma
I'm going through my 1970 383 due to main bearing failure. The taper is within spec so i'm going to hone, and buy new rings. I have a chance to buy some vintage TRW L2315 pistons that are brand new for $200. I have 906 Heads that are not cut and one of the chambers checked out to 92cc.

Is it worth buying these pistons, or just sticking my .040 stock ones back in? (the trw are .040 also)

I've heard about issues with bad quench, but would it be a worthwhile improvement for the engine? I'm curious because i'm fresh out of college and money is really tight.

its going in a 73 challenger with open rear engine and 833 4 speed. Its only used for street driving, but its just my toy and i like to drive it hard.
I'm going to need to buy a cam as well, so have any reccomendations if i stay stock, or if i go with L2315's?

Any help would be great, as i've done all the reading i can, but most post's about 383 pistons end with "man the piston selection for 383's sucks"

My situation is a little different since money is definitely a factor.

Re: 383 Pistons: L2315 or stock? [Re: VoodooCLD] #1197558
03/15/12 07:57 PM
03/15/12 07:57 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,978
U.S.S.A.
JohnRR Offline
I Win
JohnRR  Offline
I Win

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,978
U.S.S.A.
How far are your current pistons in the hole ? forget about quench , you'll have none with 906 heads unless they have been cut, at 92 cc yours have not. 2315's with be .015 in the hole on a stock deack block , these will be very close to what actually was installed in your 1970 383 .

The downside to what you currently have is your compression ratio is going to barely be 9.0 , probably less , use the stock .021 steel shim head gasket or it will be even lower .

Re: 383 Pistons: L2315 or stock? [Re: VoodooCLD] #1197559
03/15/12 08:03 PM
03/15/12 08:03 PM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,035
Missouri U.S.A.
7
71yelladustr Offline
super stock
71yelladustr  Offline
super stock
7

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,035
Missouri U.S.A.
I say go for it. Forged pisons are always a good upgrade in a performance application. Even if they are boat anchor TRWs. Just make sure you got enough skirt clearance. Use a steel shim headgasket to help the quench issue.


392 gen III hemi on E-85 727 trans Dana 60
10.02@134
Re: 383 Pistons: L2315 or stock? [Re: VoodooCLD] #1197560
03/15/12 08:30 PM
03/15/12 08:30 PM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,565
tennessee
P
pushbutton Offline
pro stock
pushbutton  Offline
pro stock
P

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,565
tennessee
For the cam I'd go with a Comp XE-268-H or something around 224-230 @ 50.

Last edited by pushbutton; 03/15/12 08:32 PM.
Re: 383 Pistons: L2315 or stock? [Re: JohnRR] #1197561
03/15/12 09:06 PM
03/15/12 09:06 PM
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 460
Oklahoma
V
VoodooCLD Offline OP
mopar
VoodooCLD  Offline OP
mopar
V

Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 460
Oklahoma
Quote:

How far are your current pistons in the hole ? forget about quench , you'll have none with 906 heads unless they have been cut, at 92 cc yours have not. 2315's with be .015 in the hole on a stock deack block , these will be very close to what actually was installed in your 1970 383 .

The downside to what you currently have is your compression ratio is going to barely be 9.0 , probably less , use the stock .021 steel shim head gasket or it will be even lower .




The pistons arn't in the engine for me to measure how deep they set, but how do you figure the L2315's are closer to what the stock pistons were? I thought the original (real) compression ratio of those engines was like 8.1 or 8.2.

Re: 383 Pistons: L2315 or stock? [Re: VoodooCLD] #1197562
03/16/12 12:15 PM
03/16/12 12:15 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,978
U.S.S.A.
JohnRR Offline
I Win
JohnRR  Offline
I Win

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,978
U.S.S.A.
Quote:

Quote:

How far are your current pistons in the hole ? forget about quench , you'll have none with 906 heads unless they have been cut, at 92 cc yours have not. 2315's with be .015 in the hole on a stock deack block , these will be very close to what actually was installed in your 1970 383 .

The downside to what you currently have is your compression ratio is going to barely be 9.0 , probably less , use the stock .021 steel shim head gasket or it will be even lower .




The pistons arn't in the engine for me to measure how deep they set, but how do you figure the L2315's are closer to what the stock pistons were? I thought the original (real) compression ratio of those engines was like 8.1 or 8.2.




The 71 383 has a LOWER advertised compression ratio than the 68-69 which I am well versed in , I could probably recite it's specs in my sleep , Chrysler adjusted compression ratio by sinking the piston in the bore , lower compression ratio means a piston deeper in the hole . Remember 383 piston selection sucks , the different aftermarket makers each basically sell ONE piston to cover all years of the B deck 383 even though these engines came with different compression ratios and different cylinder head configurations .

Re: 383 Pistons: L2315 or stock? [Re: JohnRR] #1197563
03/16/12 07:45 PM
03/16/12 07:45 PM
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 460
Oklahoma
V
VoodooCLD Offline OP
mopar
VoodooCLD  Offline OP
mopar
V

Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 460
Oklahoma
ahhh, i see. So stock for 68-69, not for 71

Re: 383 Pistons: L2315 or stock? [Re: VoodooCLD] #1197564
03/17/12 01:54 AM
03/17/12 01:54 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,978
U.S.S.A.
JohnRR Offline
I Win
JohnRR  Offline
I Win

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,978
U.S.S.A.
Quote:

ahhh, i see. So stock for 68-69, not for 71




No they are a compromise. I don't think they are stock for any particular era , a compromise to cover them all . Maybe stock for the early closed chambered head engines ??







Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1