Re: Need Cam advice - 383
[Re: turbo36]
#1195025
03/11/12 01:32 PM
03/11/12 01:32 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746 Ontario, Canada
Dodgem
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746
Ontario, Canada
|
I would go with this XR280HR-10 especially with a 4 speed. and it will lower the cylinder pressures a bit so a little less chance of detonation!
|
|
|
Re: Need Cam advice - 383
[Re: turbo36]
#1195028
03/11/12 02:36 PM
03/11/12 02:36 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,307 BC, Canada
Black_Bee
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,307
BC, Canada
|
Do you already have the required lifters and rockers? Im sure that you are aware, but these roller cams you have been recommended cost a small fortune and seem really out of place in your build. If you have to buy the lifters and rockers to support the cam, you are looking at an something like $1000! If you just want a fun quick cruiser, why not look at something like a Comp xe268h or even a xe274h for a fraction of the cost?
Paul '69 Super Bee 383 EFI Turbo
|
|
|
Re: Need Cam advice - 383
[Re: Black_Bee]
#1195029
03/11/12 02:45 PM
03/11/12 02:45 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,916 usa
lewtot184
master
|
master
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,916
usa
|
Quote:
Do you already have the required lifters and rockers? Im sure that you are aware, but these roller cams you have been recommended cost a small fortune and seem really out of place in your build. If you have to buy the lifters and rockers to support the cam, you are looking at an something like $1000!
If you just want a fun quick cruiser, why not look at something like a Comp xe268h or even a xe274h for a fraction of the cost?
good advice.
|
|
|
Re: Need Cam advice - 383
[Re: lewtot184]
#1195030
03/11/12 03:28 PM
03/11/12 03:28 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 3 West Michigan
turbo36
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 3
West Michigan
|
Thanks to all the replies, very good advice. The reason I was leaning toward the roller lifters and rockers was to have a reliable cruiser using today's oils, cost wasn't a primary issue for this build. Interesting thing; after reading these replies I went to the Comp Cam calculators to see projected HP and torque for these recommendations and was shocked to see the roller cams were 80-90 HP less then the flat lifter cams. Perhaps I'm missing something or the software is wrong?? I am reconsidering the XE series or the magnum (270H or 280H) series now and running the fortified race oils. I'll save my money for the 440 stroker build
|
|
|
Re: Need Cam advice - 383
[Re: turbo36]
#1195034
03/11/12 09:17 PM
03/11/12 09:17 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,916 usa
lewtot184
master
|
master
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,916
usa
|
Quote:
Thanks to all the replies, very good advice. The reason I was leaning toward the roller lifters and rockers was to have a reliable cruiser using today's oils, cost wasn't a primary issue for this build.
Interesting thing; after reading these replies I went to the Comp Cam calculators to see projected HP and torque for these recommendations and was shocked to see the roller cams were 80-90 HP less then the flat lifter cams. Perhaps I'm missing something or the software is wrong??
I am reconsidering the XE series or the magnum (270H or 280H) series now and running the fortified race oils. I'll save my money for the 440 stroker build
you can buy an awful lot of zinc additive for the extra cost of a hydraulic roller, not to mention that to my knowledge nobody makes a good .904 hydraulic roller tappet. i was just over at the 62-65 mopar site and there's a good article written by don dulmage on building a 383. read it and take special note about cam profiles, piston to valve clearance. they're good engines, i used to hot rod them, but easy to screw up with hot cams.
|
|
|
Re: Need Cam advice - 383
[Re: turbo36]
#1195036
03/12/12 05:08 AM
03/12/12 05:08 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,940 Holly/MI
Dean_Kuzluzski
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,940
Holly/MI
|
Just my opinion but if you're going to run a 4.10 gear and a 26" tire......
then I'd add more cam, carb and intake to make it worth all that wasted rpm on the street.
Or, dial back to a 3.55 to use the low-end torque the milder cam/intake/smallish carb will provide for you.
Add the 1.74 exhaust valve to those 516's, if you haven't already, do a bowl porting to clean them up. Run the thin steel headgaskets to get best compression.
Personally, I'd run a Performer Rpm or an old DP4B, a 700 cfm Holley and a cam with 224-228 @ .050 duration. Once you get into the 230+ duration cams, carb & mech. advance mods, although already required, get pretty intense for best throttle response/driveability.
Your set-up with 3.55 gears would be good spirited driving with some very respectable fuel economy.
Last edited by Dean_Kuzluzski; 03/12/12 05:09 AM.
R.I.P.- Gary "Coop" Davis 02/09/68-05/13/04
|
|
|
Re: Need Cam advice - 383
[Re: Dean_Kuzluzski]
#1195037
03/12/12 10:15 AM
03/12/12 10:15 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 12,291 Kent, Wa
340SHORTY
Truck Nut
|
Truck Nut
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 12,291
Kent, Wa
|
I personally wouldnt run either 1 of those cams. I hope you put larger valves in those 516s. I tried a set and my 383 quit pulling arount the 1000ft mark in the quarter. put a set of 452s and they made a ton of difference..
I am truckless..
|
|
|
|
|