dyno results... not happy diagnosis please
#1063086
08/26/11 01:11 AM
08/26/11 01:11 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,732 Watertown, WI
MikeyT
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,732
Watertown, WI
|
Hi guys I was excited last week took the car to the dyno to see what result happened from my changes to the car. Ok here is car last year 4040 with me in it 440 40 over 9.5:1 compression ratio 440stealth heads comp cam XE 268 degreed to 107 LSA 770 street avenger carb street dominator intake shorty style headers 727 2600 stall converter 3:23 gears uncapped headers thru 2.5 inch cutouts HP 327 Torque 404 Ok tonight 4040 with me in it 440 40 over 9.5:1 compression ratio 440stealth heads comp cam XE 274 put in straight up at 110 LSa 750 Holley Double pumper 76/78 street dominator intake shorty style headers 727 4200 stall converter 3:91 gears uncapped headers thru 2.5 inch cutouts HP 311 Torque 334! ok, I'm down 16 HP and 70 lb of torque! It doesn't make sense! The car runs beautifully, pulls strong now all the way up to 5800 rpms! It is a blast to drive. It comes out of the hole like its on fire now. Why would I be down? Thanks for any info Ok for the record temp and humidity for pretty similar! Take it away fella's Mike
1969 Dodge Dart Swinger
|
|
|
Re: dyno results... not happy diagnosis please
[Re: MR_P_BODY]
#1063089
08/26/11 01:50 AM
08/26/11 01:50 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,732 Watertown, WI
MikeyT
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,732
Watertown, WI
|
Afr's were good most of pull around 12.5 and at about 5600 started to richen up a bit.
Things I did, were jet it up, up front to 76 and backed off a bit in back 78 jets, which was a 2 jet sized up and one down in back
Timing was 36 all in At 3000 rpms
Mike
1969 Dodge Dart Swinger
|
|
|
Re: dyno results... not happy diagnosis please
[Re: MikeyT]
#1063090
08/26/11 02:11 AM
08/26/11 02:11 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972 Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY
Master
|
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
|
Quote:
Afr's were good most of pull around 12.5 and at about 5600 started to richen up a bit.
Things I did, were jet it up, up front to 76 and backed off a bit in back 78 jets, which was a 2 jet sized up and one down in back
Timing was 36 all in At 3000 rpms
Mike
Check your fuel supply that its doing proper(flow test)... start a process of eliminations to what is holding it back... simple things first... testing can be fun... dont let it get you down
|
|
|
Re: dyno results... not happy diagnosis please
[Re: MR_P_BODY]
#1063093
08/26/11 02:24 AM
08/26/11 02:24 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,697 Renton Wa
topfueldart
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,697
Renton Wa
|
Firstly... Bigger converters tend to soften number on wheel dynos. Lots of times cars with big converters give off weaker numbers, especially if they have a hard time calibrating the load correctly. Where was peak torque RPM wise both times?
11.48 @ 120 with a 1.80 60' 318, stock 1.88 heads, stock 904, Pump Gas, 13 lbs of boost.
9.94 @ 134, 318 on pump gas, 14 lbs w/ Eddies, transbrake 727, 3600 lbs, 3.54 gear and 28's.
|
|
|
Re: dyno results... not happy diagnosis please
[Re: Charger VJ RB]
#1063095
08/26/11 07:18 AM
08/26/11 07:18 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,732 Watertown, WI
MikeyT
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,732
Watertown, WI
|
Thanks guys! These are great ideas. To answer the question.
Torque wise it looked like converter came in at 4200 peak!
Cab great idea. I'm pretty sure it was opening all the way, but I'll check it. I do have access to the old 770 street avenger carb. Thanks for the support. I'll look into these things and get back to you.
Mike
1969 Dodge Dart Swinger
|
|
|
Re: dyno results... not happy diagnosis please
[Re: Charger VJ RB]
#1063096
08/26/11 08:57 AM
08/26/11 08:57 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 176 NC USA
ultimatelenny
member
|
member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 176
NC USA
|
Quote:
Don't worry about the dynos especially chassis ones they are just a tuning device for the track, run it and see what time it makes then you will know actual HP.
X2 Get your tune up close on the dyno then get to the track and get some real track data. The track will be the determining factor to dailing your combo in under real world conditions
|
|
|
Re: dyno results... not happy diagnosis please
[Re: ultimatelenny]
#1063097
08/26/11 09:21 AM
08/26/11 09:21 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,495 Shelby mi.
JAKE68
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,495
Shelby mi.
|
Two things. First I like the evenger carb. It runs real clean and has a great fuel curve. Was your cruise a/f way lean that you had to richen the primaries? If that was good I would not have richen up the primaries. Also was the dyno a dynojet type that is a fixed wieght or was it a eddy curent type? The fix wieght type are more repeatable. Also you would really need to see the acual resaults at the track. The dyno is only a tuning tool. I am surprised that the no. went down with the gear change ussaully they go up with more gear. Put the other carb on and see what happens. Jake
JAKES AUTOMOTIVE
|
|
|
Re: dyno results... not happy diagnosis please
[Re: sixpackgut]
#1063099
08/26/11 09:29 AM
08/26/11 09:29 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,495 Shelby mi.
JAKE68
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,495
Shelby mi.
|
Just went back and read your post and realized that you changed converters. That is a big difference on the dyno. Also it seams to be to much converter for that combo.imo
JAKES AUTOMOTIVE
|
|
|
Re: dyno results... not happy diagnosis please
[Re: JAKE68]
#1063100
08/26/11 09:55 AM
08/26/11 09:55 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,732 Watertown, WI
MikeyT
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,732
Watertown, WI
|
Opps sorry, it had been a long day! I had a 4200 converter, but we pulled it and had it tightened up to 3800, sorry for the confusion. So scratch that 3800 stall, not 4200. Mike
1969 Dodge Dart Swinger
|
|
|
Re: dyno results... not happy diagnosis please
[Re: Mr.Yuck]
#1063102
08/26/11 03:59 PM
08/26/11 03:59 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,221 Branson, Mo.
joedust451
super gas
|
super gas
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,221
Branson, Mo.
|
If your happy with its perf. who cares what ANY dyno tells you, just a waiste of $$$ IMO, I never use them & never will, just take it to the track & tune there, thats "real world". If i had a $1.00 for everytime someone ask me how much HP i was running in my duster i'd have a pocket full of $$$ & would pay for my entry fees each time , I would always tell them "enough to run 10s" LOL, it runs good & i'm very happy with it & thats that .
|
|
|
Re: dyno results... not happy diagnosis please
[Re: Dodgem]
#1063104
08/26/11 05:18 PM
08/26/11 05:18 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,841 S.E. Michigan
ZIPPY
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,841
S.E. Michigan
|
Not every converter has exactly the same torque multiplication.
Testing multiple changes to the engine is fine, but the converter swap did away with any chance of comparing last week's results to the new results.
Rich H.
Esse Quam Videri
|
|
|
Re: dyno results... not happy diagnosis please
[Re: MikeyT]
#1063105
08/26/11 05:22 PM
08/26/11 05:22 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972 Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY
Master
|
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
|
Quote:
Afr's were good most of pull around 12.5 and at about 5600 started to richen up a bit.
Things I did, were jet it up, up front to 76 and backed off a bit in back 78 jets, which was a 2 jet sized up and one down in back
Timing was 36 all in At 3000 rpms
Mike
At 12.5 I would try to lean it down just a bit to try and get 12.8 to 13.... then try it at the track to get the best MPH on jetting
|
|
|
|
|