Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Re: What's up with 512" combo's? [Re: Jacob Pitt] #1018033
06/22/11 11:30 AM
06/22/11 11:30 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,011
Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
gregsdart Online content
I Live Here
gregsdart  Online Content
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,011
Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
On top of what is mentioned, a shorter cylinder is a stiffer cylinder, given equal blocks. Don't know how big of a difference it would make, but I am sure there must be some. Plus over all stiffness of the block itself. My mega block won't hold intake gaskets, no matter what I do. Too much flex cylinder bank to cylinder bank.


8..603 156 mph best, 2905 lbs 549, indy 572-13, alky
Re: What's up with 512" combo's? [Re: Jacob Pitt] #1018034
06/22/11 11:53 AM
06/22/11 11:53 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,160
Texas
dannysbee Offline
master
dannysbee  Offline
master

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,160
Texas
1.Block is lighter
2. cylinders are shorter (stronger)
3. Bigger standard bore
4. shorter push rods (Less weight and flex)
5. less main bearing surface area
6. shorter pistons and rods ( lighter reciprocating weight)
Off the top of my head these are a few things a low block has going for it.


Getting old just means you were smarter than some and luckier than others.
Re: What's up with 512" combo's? [Re: 408strokerdart] #1018035
06/22/11 12:08 PM
06/22/11 12:08 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 728
mi usa
O
old yeller Offline
super stock
old yeller  Offline
super stock
O

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 728
mi usa
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

How big can you go with a low deck? After market block and all the good stuff?


572ci




Wow! I would have guessed 540". At 572ci, that is still a 4.5" stroke right? Seems that would take alot of clearancing to work. I still think 4.5" bore is the most using an aftermarket block.


You are correct 4.5 bore is the biggest you can go(low deck motor)

Re: What's up with 512" combo's? [Re: old yeller] #1018036
06/22/11 12:54 PM
06/22/11 12:54 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,456
Out West
4
408strokerdart Offline OP
master
408strokerdart  Offline OP
master
4

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,456
Out West
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

How big can you go with a low deck? After market block and all the good stuff?


572ci




Wow! I would have guessed 540". At 572ci, that is still a 4.5" stroke right? Seems that would take alot of clearancing to work. I still think 4.5" bore is the most using an aftermarket block.


You are correct 4.5 bore is the biggest you can go(low deck motor)




Any issues at that bore size with head gasket sealing? Maybe with 15 psi from a blower?

Re: What's up with 512" combo's? [Re: dannysbee] #1018037
06/22/11 01:27 PM
06/22/11 01:27 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,456
Out West
4
408strokerdart Offline OP
master
408strokerdart  Offline OP
master
4

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,456
Out West
Quote:

1.Block is lighter
2. cylinders are shorter (stronger)
3. Bigger standard bore
4. shorter push rods (Less weight and flex)
5. less main bearing surface area
6. shorter pistons and rods ( lighter reciprocating weight)
Off the top of my head these are a few things a low block has going for it.




I assume the aluminum after market blocks use the same core for both tall deck and low deck. Should make the aluminum block com in about 20 lbs lighter. Looks like an Indymax low deck block might only weigh 112 lbs at 4.375" bore....

Re: What's up with 512" combo's? [Re: tboomer] #1018038
06/22/11 01:31 PM
06/22/11 01:31 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,456
Out West
4
408strokerdart Offline OP
master
408strokerdart  Offline OP
master
4

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,456
Out West
Quote:

My 512 is an RB...Already had the intake and dizzy. It is undercammed and could use better heads. But at this time I am done spending money on it..




Sorry Ted. I was specifically asking about low deck combos.

Re: What's up with 512" combo's? [Re: 408strokerdart] #1018039
06/22/11 01:36 PM
06/22/11 01:36 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,962
United Socialist States of Ame...
T
tboomer Online work
Too Many Posts
tboomer  Online Work
Too Many Posts
T

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,962
United Socialist States of Ame...
Anytime...


Need your rear end checked out? Contact Grizzly!!
Re: What's up with 512" combo's? [Re: 408strokerdart] #1018040
06/22/11 04:13 PM
06/22/11 04:13 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 728
mi usa
O
old yeller Offline
super stock
old yeller  Offline
super stock
O

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 728
mi usa
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

How big can you go with a low deck? After market block and all the good stuff?


572ci




Wow! I would have guessed 540". At 572ci, that is still a 4.5" stroke right? Seems that would take alot of clearancing to work. I still think 4.5" bore is the most using an aftermarket block.


You are correct 4.5 bore is the biggest you can go(low deck motor)




Any issues at that bore size with head gasket sealing? Maybe with 15 psi from a blower?


Don,t know about a blower,but i can say that i have never blown a head gasket spraying 400hp of NOS and thats on one kit...

Re: What's up with 512" combo's? [Re: old yeller] #1018041
06/22/11 06:03 PM
06/22/11 06:03 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,318
State of confusion
T
Thumperdart Offline
I Live Here
Thumperdart  Offline
I Live Here
T

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,318
State of confusion
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

How big can you go with a low deck? After market block and all the good stuff?


572ci




Wow! I would have guessed 540". At 572ci, that is still a 4.5" stroke right? Seems that would take alot of clearancing to work. I still think 4.5" bore is the most using an aftermarket block.


You are correct 4.5 bore is the biggest you can go(low deck motor)




Any issues at that bore size with head gasket sealing? Maybe with 15 psi from a blower?


Don,t know about a blower,but i can say that i have never blown a head gasket spraying 400hp of NOS and thats on one kit...


You one crazy S.O.B.


72 Dart 470 n/a BB stroker street car `THUMPER`...Check me out on FB Dominic Thumper for videos and lots of carb pics......760-900-3895.....
Re: What's up with 512" combo's? [Re: Thumperdart] #1018042
06/22/11 08:14 PM
06/22/11 08:14 PM
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 64
Merrill, WI
440CIVIC Offline
member
440CIVIC  Offline
member

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 64
Merrill, WI
All this low deck stroker talk has me very glad that my buddy and I saved all those "junk 400s" from our demo derby days! We have a couple sheds full of 400s & 383s for up coming builds. How do the stroked 383s work out? Looking to do a low $ build using factory 440 crank in 383 or 400 block. I am a machinist and can do most of the machining at work so that helps alot on keeeping costs down.

Re: What's up with 512" combo's? [Re: 440CIVIC] #1018043
06/22/11 08:31 PM
06/22/11 08:31 PM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,177
ill
D
dennismopar73 Offline
top fuel
dennismopar73  Offline
top fuel
D

Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,177
ill
mine is real cheap!! 750 block 1100 heads, 300 cam ,
i dont think i can outrun any 440 tho HAHAHAH LOL!!

Re: What's up with 512" combo's? [Re: dennismopar73] #1018044
06/23/11 01:11 AM
06/23/11 01:11 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,377
Las Vegas
Al_Alguire Offline
I Live Here
Al_Alguire  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,377
Las Vegas
Dont forget you can get a low deck block from Keith Black as well. That is where mine came from. As for the bore they can obviously go more than 4.500, mine is at 4.501 now but have heard some as big as 4.560 or bigger. As for the stroke I think you can squeeze 4.5" in there. I woudl say with aftermarket stuff which is the only way to go if you are planning on making power 555,565 or 572 are all very doable. However from my experience those 540's sure seem to work well too.

Most of the benefits of a low deck engine have been listed already. The real limit is cubes IMO they can only go so big before you just cant stuff anymore in there. Think outside the bun and you migh tbe surprised what can be done.

Re: What's up with 512" combo's? [Re: 408strokerdart] #1018045
06/23/11 03:31 AM
06/23/11 03:31 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,233
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,233
Bend,OR USA
Quote:

Quote:

Those are all great points. Who on here prefer the low deck over an RB?


I have not seen a low deck split the main webs like the stock RB blocks do If your going to go to a good aftermarket block then the RB is as good as or better than the stock 400 blocks are with all the aftermarket stuff like main caps, girdles and so on. I built my first low deck 512 stroker back in 2002 or 2003 I think, It was a bunch of parts that I threw together without much thought It is a 1972 400 block that ended up needing four sleeves and the deck welded up a 4.250 Ohio Crankshaft CO 8 bolt Hemi stroker crank cut down on the mains for the low deck and cut down to 2.200 on the rods, I used a set of CAT 6.800 long BB chevy style rods, a custom ground(not for that motor ) Comp Cams solid roller cam and set of Ross custom 22 CC dished pistons with 9.25 to 1 comp. ratio, ported big valve 906 heads and a Eddy low deck six pak intake with stock type 1970 440 carbs. I was hoping to make bewtween 550 HP and 575 HP on pump gas, it made 612 HP at 5600 RPM and 644 Ft. Lbs at 4500 RPM on CA pump gas I was (and still am)thrilled with the results. I have since hopped that motor up some more by changing the crank to a Chinese imported 4.300 stroke carnk(to raise the pistons up to zero deck to increase the compression 9.25 to 1 to 10.29 to 1 )and a set of Eddy RPM heads CNC ported by Jeff at MCH along with a set of Harland Sharp 1.6 roller rockers Those three changes raised the HP to 718 at 5800 RPM and 745 Ft Lbs on Oregon pump gas I am building another low deck stroker now, thick main web 400 block(thanks AndyF ) with ductile iron main caps and main studs, the original Ohoi Crankshaft CO. 4.25 stroke crank, a set of RPM brand 6.700 long BB Chevy style rods and a set of custom lightweight high compression(12.8 to 1) Diamond pistons with a custom ground Ultradyne solid roller. I'm not sure which heads I'm going to use yet, either a set of stock 440-1 with Jesel rockers or the Eddy RPM heads with the Harland Sharp rockers that use to be on the 518 motor lots of choices out there, have fun deciding


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: What's up with 512" combo's? [Re: Al_Alguire] #1018046
06/23/11 04:51 AM
06/23/11 04:51 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,667
Arizona
C
Chris'sBarracuda Offline
master
Chris'sBarracuda  Offline
master
C

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,667
Arizona
Quote:

Don't forget you can get a low deck block from Keith Black as well. That is where mine came from. As for the bore they can obviously go more than 4.500, mine is at 4.510 now but have heard some as big as 4.560 or bigger. As for the stroke I think you can squeeze 4.5" in there. I would say with aftermarket stuff which is the only way to go if you are planning on making power 555,565 or 572 are all very doable. However from my experience those 540's sure seem to work well too.

Most of the benefits of a low deck engine have been listed already. The real limit is cubes IMO they can only go so big before you just cant stuff anymore in there. Think outside the bun and you might be surprised what can be done.










Chris..

Re: What's up with 512" combo's? [Re: Chris'sBarracuda] #1018047
06/23/11 05:06 PM
06/23/11 05:06 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,449
nc
E
earthmover Offline
top fuel
earthmover  Offline
top fuel
E

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,449
nc

Re: What's up with 512" combo's? [Re: earthmover] #1018048
06/23/11 05:27 PM
06/23/11 05:27 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 728
mi usa
O
old yeller Offline
super stock
old yeller  Offline
super stock
O

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 728
mi usa
AL,Got me thinking so i pulled out my piston sheets and it says Bore Size 4.506....for are low deck motor.

Re: What's up with 512" combo's? [Re: old yeller] #1018049
06/23/11 06:02 PM
06/23/11 06:02 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,449
nc
E
earthmover Offline
top fuel
earthmover  Offline
top fuel
E

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,449
nc
so nobody likes the rb 512 or bigger is it cause the block(stock)webbing

Re: What's up with 512" combo's? [Re: earthmover] #1018050
06/23/11 07:25 PM
06/23/11 07:25 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 728
mi usa
O
old yeller Offline
super stock
old yeller  Offline
super stock
O

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 728
mi usa
Quote:

so nobody likes the rb 512 or bigger is it cause the block(stock)webbing


about 25 years ago i had a 440 motor that had cracked webbing and i didn,t even know till i tore the motor apart for a fresh rebuild,when i pulled the crank out part of the webbing came out with it,myself i go with the low decks cause you can wing em like a small block chevy and rpm,s make hp,on motor i shift around 7,800 rpm,s, on spray its close to 9 grand,and i have yet to throw a rod(not saying it won,t happen)it just hasen,t happened to me in the last 5 years

Re: What's up with 512" combo's? [Re: old yeller] #1018051
06/23/11 08:39 PM
06/23/11 08:39 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,233
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,233
Bend,OR USA
Quote:

AL,Got me thinking so i pulled out my piston sheets and it says Bore Size 4.506....for are low deck motor.


Is this a aluminum block or a stock block


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: What's up with 512" combo's? [Re: Cab_Burge] #1018052
06/23/11 08:59 PM
06/23/11 08:59 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 728
mi usa
O
old yeller Offline
super stock
old yeller  Offline
super stock
O

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 728
mi usa
Quote:

Quote:

AL,Got me thinking so i pulled out my piston sheets and it says Bore Size 4.506....for are low deck motor.


Is this a aluminum block or a stock block


Its a aluminum block you can,t do this with a stock block.

Page 2 of 3 1 2 3






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1