Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
440 vs 493 #100758
08/06/08 06:13 PM
08/06/08 06:13 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 692
pa
R
ramman16248 Offline OP
mopar
ramman16248  Offline OP
mopar
R

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 692
pa
I have a .030 440 that has less than 200 miles on it. I made a slight error in my build up. (I used too much gasket maker to hold on my oil pan gasket.) I starved the bottom end for oil and spun a bearing. My cyl. walls are still like new as a normal 200 mile block should be. I am running stock 346 cast heads with a .509 cam. ( Which I may change as well.) Should I put a new "stock" style crank in it, or is the 493 stroker kit from Muscle Motors a better choice? I know there is a cost difference between the two, but will my car run alot better with the 493 kit in it than the .030 normal crank 440? It is a Challenger with 3500 stall, and 3:91 gearing.

Re: 440 vs 493 [Re: ramman16248] #100759
08/06/08 07:36 PM
08/06/08 07:36 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,976
Chilliwack B.C. Canada
R
RUNCHARGER Offline
I Live Here
RUNCHARGER  Offline
I Live Here
R

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,976
Chilliwack B.C. Canada
It really depends on a lot of things. If your pistons are not damaged and you are going to run another stock style head and you have a mild intake setup and mild exhaust setup then another stock crank will work fine for you.
If you have 3 inch exhaust with big headers, a high flowing intake setup and you are going to invest in good flowing heads then the stroker will take better advantage of those items.
I bought a stroker crank for the 440 in my 71 Road Runner but when I decided I wanted a stock six pack intake and stock exhaust manifolds I also decided to go with the stock stroke. With the current price of gas and the fact I like to drive the car alot, I did the right thing.

Sheldon

Re: 440 vs 493 [Re: RUNCHARGER] #100760
08/06/08 09:56 PM
08/06/08 09:56 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 692
pa
R
ramman16248 Offline OP
mopar
ramman16248  Offline OP
mopar
R

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 692
pa
Well, I am looking closely at the 440 source heads. I think they are a good deal for the money. My intake is an M-1, and 1 7/8 headers. The exaust is 2 1/2 inch duals with Flowmaster 50 series SUV mufflers. As far as gas prices go,
I only run it maybe 25 miles a week and those are quick miles. ( 3:91 gears don't make you want to drive to far ) I have to replace the cranck anyhow, I just wondered if a 493 kit would be worthwhile.

Re: 440 vs 493 [Re: ramman16248] #100761
08/06/08 10:35 PM
08/06/08 10:35 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
DaytonaTurbo Offline
Too Many Posts
DaytonaTurbo  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
With stock heads, I'd stay with stock stroke. With ported heads or the 440source heads, I'd go with the stroker if the budget allows. But what you didn't say was what's all damaged? Did you spin a main or a rod bearing? Did you ever have the crank checked out to see if it will still be fine with just being reground for smaller bearings? If I was you, I would try and salvage as much as possible, and if most is going to be usable still, I would just keep the crank you have and put the money into buying the aftermarket heads. If the crank just needs to be reground, you could get out for a lot cheaper than a stroker kit.

But if you're looking for something to spend some more money on, you will make a bunch more torq with the stroker, especially lower down. Won't make much more hp, but again, available at a lower rpm.

Re: 440 vs 493 [Re: ramman16248] #100762
08/07/08 09:59 AM
08/07/08 09:59 AM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,968
North Riverside IL & Lowell IN
GTXKen Offline
super gas
GTXKen  Offline
super gas

Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,968
North Riverside IL & Lowell IN
Quote:

Well, I am looking closely at the 440 source heads. I think they are a good deal for the money. My intake is an M-1, and 1 7/8 headers. The exaust is 2 1/2 inch duals with Flowmaster 50 series SUV mufflers. As far as gas prices go,
I only run it maybe 25 miles a week and those are quick miles. ( 3:91 gears don't make you want to drive to far ) I have to replace the cranck anyhow, I just wondered if a 493 kit would be worthwhile.




I have stealth heads on the GTX and have no complaitts so far, definatly a good investment if you need work on your iron heads.

If you have to replace your crank stroke it, I did. The stroker crank allows you to run less expensive rods and won't hurt drivability.

Ken

Re: 440 vs 493 [Re: RUNCHARGER] #100763
08/07/08 10:11 AM
08/07/08 10:11 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Mr.Yuck  Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Quote:

It really depends on a lot of things. If your pistons are not damaged and you are going to run another stock style head and you have a mild intake setup and mild exhaust setup then another stock crank will work fine for you.
If you have 3 inch exhaust with big headers, a high flowing intake setup and you are going to invest in good flowing heads then the stroker will take better advantage of those items.
I bought a stroker crank for the 440 in my 71 Road Runner but when I decided I wanted a stock six pack intake and stock exhaust manifolds I also decided to go with the stock stroke. With the current price of gas and the fact I like to drive the car alot, I did the right thing.

Sheldon



I'd probably go 440 route. It will be much cheaper. That said if you have the $$$$ go big

Re: 440 vs 493 [Re: Mr.Yuck] #100764
08/07/08 11:53 AM
08/07/08 11:53 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,575
The Netherlands
BigBlockMopar Offline
master
BigBlockMopar  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,575
The Netherlands
Get the stroker kit.
You KNOW you want it! And you'll be sorry you didn't if you don't.

Re: 440 vs 493 [Re: BigBlockMopar] #100765
08/07/08 01:26 PM
08/07/08 01:26 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,665
Milwaukee, WI
Prince_Valiant Offline
top fuel
Prince_Valiant  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,665
Milwaukee, WI
if the pistons are fine/etc then just get the journals ground down as little as you can (say 0.010?) new undersized bearings and go. Swap to a COMP XE 285HL (241/247 @ .050, 110 LSA, .545/.545 lift) or voodoo 60305 cam (242/252, 110 LSA, and .533/.552 lift) and it'll probably run pretty every bit as good as you'd hope a stroker would for a LOT less coin (IE broader powerband, more peak power than the .509 cammed 440, better idle/driveability/etc)

That being said, a stroker would still make for a better engine with some decent heads and an even larger cam...but since you spent the money once, it's up to you to justify spending it again for the benefits.


1979 Dodge Lil' Red Express - 360 rwhp, 13.2 @ 103mph
1968 Coronet: 318, 2.76, 15.2 @ 92mph! (SOLD)
1976 Valiant: 360, 3.90, 12.90 @ 106 (SOLD)
1989 Shelby CSX #500/500
Re: 440 vs 493 [Re: Prince_Valiant] #100766
08/07/08 02:31 PM
08/07/08 02:31 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,141
Central NC
gch Offline
master
gch  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,141
Central NC
Go with the stock stroke and some 440 source alum heads.Sell your stock ones to recoup a few bucks(unless they are matching #/original.The heads will give you excellent power and still work well later if you stroke it.Stock heads on a stroker did'nt perform any better for me.

Re: 440 vs 493 [Re: ramman16248] #100767
08/07/08 02:46 PM
08/07/08 02:46 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 671
Kansas City
M
MOPARHOUND Offline
super gas
MOPARHOUND  Offline
super gas
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 671
Kansas City
I say go for the stroker.

Even if you use the stock heads now, you will have a great short block to bolt on better heads later. I drove mine over 7000 miles on the street with 452's with oversize valves and basic port work, and HP manifolds. Torque city! Then I added Eddy aluminum heads, and TTI header exhaust system.

It's an old cliche', but I'll repeat it, "build the biggest engine you can afford the first time". Now is your chance.

My 440 had a wrist pin knocking. Took it apart, and crank had a crack too. Decision was easy then.


My car club: hpacmopar.com
1971 Charger R/T, 496" RB Stroker, Auto, Driven Daily
Re: 440 vs 493 [Re: MOPARHOUND] #100768
08/07/08 03:08 PM
08/07/08 03:08 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,318
Southern Maryland
klunick Offline
master
klunick  Offline
master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,318
Southern Maryland
Honestly, it all depends on how much money you want to spend. A stroker with new heads is certainly going to make more power. But, that being said, I believe you can probably get new bearings, get the rods correctly sized, and have the crank turned for a huge amount less than going the stroker way.


67 Barracuda FB 69 Superbee "Southern Maryland: If you want a good looking woman, you had better bring her with you"






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1