Re: Auto>4speed - is my crank setup for the pilot bushing?
[Re: Mopar72Man]
#100586
08/06/08 11:12 AM
08/06/08 11:12 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,757 Gilbertsville, PA 19525
Pntastar69
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,757
Gilbertsville, PA 19525
|
Quote:
Looking to see if my '72 340 would be 'drilled' or setup for a 4speed conversion? Are they all?'
Thanks!
I believe he is asking about the depth of the hole in the crank for the trans shaft. The roller bearing does not correct for a shallow depth hole in the crank.
Measure, measure, measure, measure, cut once if necessary .
|
|
|
Re: Auto>4speed - is my crank setup for the pilot bushi
[Re: Pntastar69]
#100588
08/06/08 12:01 PM
08/06/08 12:01 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,082 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,082
U.S.S.A.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Looking to see if my '72 340 would be 'drilled' or setup for a 4speed conversion? Are they all?'
Thanks!
I believe he is asking about the depth of the hole in the crank for the trans shaft. The roller bearing does not correct for a shallow depth hole in the crank.
Measure, measure, measure, measure, cut once if necessary .
the 340 was a PERFORMANCE engine , I would be surprised to find one that was not finish reamed .
|
|
|
Re: Auto>4speed - is my crank setup for the pilot bushi
[Re: JohnRR]
#100589
08/06/08 02:47 PM
08/06/08 02:47 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,204 Fort Worth, TX
Clair_Davis
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,204
Fort Worth, TX
|
My 72 340 (steel crank) was finish-reamed, but did not have the bushing installed. It had been turned at some point when the engine was rebuilt, so perhaps they COULD have removed it, but there was no need to unless it's going to be replaced.
I've got a small pile of cranks that are rough-drilled w/o being finish-reamed. These could be used with the Magnum-style roller pilot without any work on the trans input shaft. The only cranks that I've seen that aren't even rough-drilled are some late 70's cast crank 440's. Those WOULD require clipping off a little bit of the trans input to work properly. You COULD do some rough drilling on the crank, but it would take at least a 7/8" drill bit and those aren't easy to come by.
IMHO, If the crank isn't finish reamed, get the Maggie bearing. I've had bad luck with the "special" bushings made for non-finish-reamed cranks. Two have loosened up in the crank allowing the trans input to wobble, wearing out a trans input bearing retainer.
Clair
|
|
|
Re: Auto>4speed - is my crank setup for the pilot bushi
[Re: Clair_Davis]
#100590
08/06/08 02:57 PM
08/06/08 02:57 PM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I don't know about the 340 crank but my 440 crank was drilled to depth but not reamed. It won't accept a standard bushing or an undersized bushing. This is what i'm using.
|
|
|
Re: Auto>4speed - is my crank setup for the pilot bushing?
[Re: dgc333]
#100592
08/06/08 05:43 PM
08/06/08 05:43 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,065 Milwaukee, WI
In_The_Pink
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,065
Milwaukee, WI
|
Quote:
The one thing I noticed putting the car back together was that the snout on my A833 fit into the bearing before the splice reached the disk. This guided the splines into the disk much more precisely making much less wiggling and jiggeling getting the tranny seated into the bellhousing.
The roller bearing in the torque convertor register makes things easier.
Here's what the roller bearing looks like installed:
Back to the original question, as mentioned above, the only way to know for sure is to measure the depth and and hope it's drilled deep enough.
|
|
|
|
|