Question on 1967 B body rear end width vs. 68-70

Print Thread

Re: Question on 1967 B body rear end width vs. 68-70 [Re: KillerBee] #376815 07/16/09 12:00 AM 07/16/09 12:00 AM
Joined: Jan 2003 Posts: 75,082 U.S.S.A. JohnRR I Win
JohnRR I Win Joined: Jan 2003 Posts: 75,082 U.S.S.A.	It's shorter in overall width , perch to perch dimension is the same so yes it's the distance from the pad to the end flange

Entire Thread
Subject	Posted By	Posted
Question on 1967 B body rear end width vs. 68-70	KillerBee	07/16/09 03:23 AM
Re: Question on 1967 B body rear end width vs. 68-70	JohnRR	07/16/09 04:00 AM
Re: Question on 1967 B body rear end width vs. 68-70	KillerBee	07/16/09 05:10 AM
Re: Question on 1967 B body rear end width vs. 68-70	JohnRR	07/16/09 12:26 PM

Hop To