Originally Posted by 360view
Originally Posted by Mr PotatoHead
Many understand ticking differently.

I have several 2.4s and have had zero problems and not even the oil use problem where they have the recall for a flash that makes less vacuum on deceleration.




Has it been your experience that the fuel economy of the 2.4L is near “World’s Best” ?

Fiat made a big deal of MultiAir when it first came out.

Then the MultiAir - II system was bragged on by Chrysler and Fiat:

https://www.wardsauto.com/technology/chrysler-s-new-multiair-ii-engine-put-test

sample quote

There are four valves per cylinder, and the electro-hydraulic MultiAir system, pioneered by Fiat for infinite variability in controlling the intake valves, has been optimized for fuel economy and performance, MacFarlane says.

The intake valve event now allows more internal exhaust gas recirculation, he says,
“so we have a longer duration in that inlet on the opening side;
you get more internal EGR for fuel economy.”

MultiAir II “simultaneously controls the opening and the closing point for the valve event,” MacFarlane says.

“With MultiAir I, you had to pick the opening or the closing – you couldn’t pick both.
So this allows what we call hybrid mode,
where you control both the opening and the closing of the inlet for a very short duration,
and you can put that inlet anywhere in the cycle.”

end quote

Is it a really thrifty engine
compared to prior 2.2L to 2.5L engines?



My wifes 2016 Chrysler 200 can pull low 30s mpg on trips. 2.4 auto .
IF I keep my foot out of it. But even at 80 mph plus over long distances I can get upper 20s with no problem. At 100mph the car rolls easily .

Ive never had a 2.2 / 2.5 get anything over mid 20s tops

Last edited by gtx6970; 12/09/23 09:12 PM.