Question on 1969 440 A-bodies

Print Thread

Re: Question on 1969 440 A-bodies [Re: That AMC Guy] #2976067 10/19/21 12:02 PM 10/19/21 12:02 PM
Joined: Jan 2003 Posts: 21,540 N.E. OHIO, USA A12 Too Many Posts
A12 Too Many Posts Joined: Jan 2003 Posts: 21,540 N.E. OHIO, USA	Originally Posted by That AMC Guy I read the console auto only was due to there being no room for the column shift linkage to fit. Never read that but I figured that was the reason Mike Originally Posted by Diego (not Ted) Do I have this straight? --Built with 383s but special-order M in the VIN, then sent to Hurst in Madison Heights --Limited warranty (12/12) --No PS even though the 383 had it as an option - correct no room for power steering pump and different driver's side engine mount --All console automatics (why console mandatory?) - Probably because no room for column shift linkage to automatic only trans (A12 wrote ) --3.55 standard, 3.91 optional - correct --Manual drum brakes - correct, again no room for power brake booster? Did I miss anything pertinent? Thank you!

Hop To