Moparts

Triangulated four link question

Posted By: Dabee

Triangulated four link question - 12/04/12 03:53 PM

I have a triangulated four link question for you guys. I’m installing a triangulated four link on a 55 Dodge PU street rod. I know on a parallel drag race style four link the bottom bar needs to be parallel with the ground and the top bar is angled down to set the instant center. This is done to get the car to hook. On a triangulated setup for the street can the bottom bar be installed angled up and the top bar parallel to the bottom bar and will this negatively affect the handling?
Posted By: Supercuda

Re: Triangulated four link question - 12/04/12 05:52 PM

handling and triangulated four link.

Interesting juxtaposition.
Posted By: OzHemi

Re: Triangulated four link question - 12/04/12 06:00 PM

Quote:

handling and triangulated four link.

Interesting juxtaposition.




Sure works well for cars like mine.

Holden Torana's dominated racing in Australia, and uses a triangulated 4 link factory...

Attached picture 7488799-bathursta9x.jpg
Posted By: feets

Re: Triangulated four link question - 12/04/12 07:49 PM

Millions of GM cars were built with a triangulated four link suspension.
Posted By: Supercuda

Re: Triangulated four link question - 12/04/12 11:34 PM

Quote:

Millions of GM cars were built with a triangulated four link suspension.




The go buy one. Just cause millions of wiggly butt GM's have it doesn't mean it's a good thing.

In order to get a triangulated fourlink to handle you have to use a lateral locating device, making in somerthing other than a four link.

So OZ, your Torana running a panhard or watts? Bet it is.
Posted By: OzHemi

Re: Triangulated four link question - 12/04/12 11:48 PM

Quote:



So OZ, your Torana running a panhard or watts? Bet it is.




That is a bet you would not win then...

And plenty of them being raced without them too.
Posted By: OzHemi

Re: Triangulated four link question - 12/04/12 11:55 PM

And...running a panhard with a triangulated 4 link induces binding anyways from what I believe. Since the panhard moves in an arc differently from the one moving by the differential itself.

A 3 link with watts link would probably be a better way to go from what I have read now and then..
Posted By: amxautox

Re: Triangulated four link question - 12/05/12 12:05 AM

Trianglated means the uppers, or maybe lowers if those are the ones that are at an angle, keep the rearend centered, no need for a panhard bar or Watts linkage.

Straight bars would probably need a panhard bar or Watts link, depends on how good the installation is, and how hard/soft rubber/metal the bushings are.

Along with the shock mount and spring mount, etc.
Posted By: Supercuda

Re: Triangulated four link question - 12/05/12 12:14 AM

Quote:

Trianglated means the uppers, or maybe lowers if those are the ones that are at an angle, keep the rearend centered, no need for a panhard bar or Watts linkage.





That's the theory, in reality I have yet to drive a production triangulated four link that wasn't wiggly in the rear.

The only reason the triangulated four link was developed was to provide a cheap, soft ride. Adapting it to any performance aspect requires a lot of stock parts replacements and redesign. Something not necessarily needed with the Chrysler based leaf setup.
Posted By: amxautox

Re: Triangulated four link question - 12/05/12 12:29 AM

They wiggle because they have soft rubber bushings for comfort off the showroom floor/dealer lot. Not to mention the weak U shaped bars that really can't support much side load. THATS why the bars need to be replaced with solid/hollow bars, and use heim/saphirical ends for the best results/adjustability/handling.
Posted By: blown71duster

Re: Triangulated four link question - 12/05/12 02:08 AM

Art morrison recommends the lower bar level or slightly down.

http://www.artmorrison.com/instructions/tri4-bar1-Model.pdf

They use this setup in their max-g chassis. I also heard good feedback on the RMS and its a triangulated 4 bar.

http://www.artmorrison.com/2006cat/31.pdf
Posted By: mopardude318

Re: Triangulated four link question - 12/05/12 03:15 AM

RMS Street Linx here.



Posted By: Dabee

Re: Triangulated four link question - 12/05/12 06:10 AM

Blowen 71 duster, Thanks for the links. They answered my question. I currently have the top bars tacked in about 2 degrees up. I’ll move the brackets down to get 1 degree down before I weld them in place. I was thinking they should be parallel. The bottom bars are level.
For supercuda, lots of street rods use triangulated four links with great success. This is not a production GM set up so you are comparing apples to oranges here. The aftermarket set ups have stiff bushings in the links. Ozhemi is correct a triangulated four link doesn’t use a pan hard bar or diagonal link to keep the axle centered like on a parallel four link. This is a street cruiser not a drag set up.
Posted By: topbrent

Re: Triangulated four link question - 12/05/12 09:15 AM

Here is a good read on the fabrication/installation of a triangulated 4 link setup on a 67 Dart. Same basic design as the Reilly Street-Lynx setup, just beefier DIY.

http://www.forabodiesonly.com/mopar/showthread.php?t=101437&highlight=triangulated
Posted By: Supercuda

Re: Triangulated four link question - 12/06/12 12:30 AM

Quote:

They wiggle because they have soft rubber bushings for comfort off the showroom floor/dealer lot. Not to mention the weak U shaped bars that really can't support much side load. THATS why the bars need to be replaced with solid/hollow bars, and use heim/saphirical ends for the best results/adjustability/handling.




I know all that and have gone through most of it with the 96 Stang I had. Still had a wiggly butt compared to my Cuda or Dart. I have yet to be impressed with any production triangulated 4 link, an Oz that Torana of yours looks to be a corporate GM setup so I imagine I wouldn't be impressed there either.

Once you get into heim joints and spherical bearings to make it work you have less a street car but more of a race car. If that's what you want fine, but it's not my bag of goodies.

If I were going to put all this effort into a rear suspension I would skip over any four link and go independent

I do not think the "benefits' of a triangulated four link even match the costs involved, let alone exceed them.
© 2024 Moparts Forums