Posted By: sam64
harmonic balancer - 11/21/11 01:12 AM
what is the preferred balancer for a 400 based 512,tci,fluid damper,etc?will be under 7,000 rpm,thank,sam.
Quote:
I have had this one on my street eng for years with no problems. Ron
http://chucker54.stores.yahoo.net/prosport1.html
Quote:Quote:
I have had this one on my street eng for years with no problems. Ron
http://chucker54.stores.yahoo.net/prosport1.html
Any one else on this one? It looks like a good price?
Quote:
Quote:Quote:Quote:
I have had this one on my street eng for years with no problems. Ron
http://chucker54.stores.yahoo.net/prosport1.html
Any one else on this one? It looks like a good price?
I can also tell you it is made in Australia and not China.
Here it is on my eng. And all the belts line up fine. Ron
Quote:Quote:Quote:
I have had this one on my street eng for years with no problems. Ron
http://chucker54.stores.yahoo.net/prosport1.html
Any one else on this one? It looks like a good price?
I can also tell you it is made in Australia and not China.
Here it is on my eng. And all the belts line up fine. Ron
Quote:Quote:
I thought the Professional Products dampers had a reputation for the outer ring spinning on the hub. Isn't that the brand that board member "RAMM" had fail during their EMC pulls a couple of years ago, or am I mistaken as to which damper they were using? Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Quote:Quote:Quote:Quote:
I have had this one on my street eng for years with no problems. Ron
http://chucker54.stores.yahoo.net/prosport1.html
Any one else on this one? It looks like a good price?
I can also tell you it is made in Australia and not China.
Here it is on my eng. And all the belts line up fine. Ron
That looks a lot like this one from Summit ?!?!? What do you think?
Mark
Quote:Quote:Quote:
I thought the Professional Products dampers had a reputation for the outer ring spinning on the hub. Isn't that the brand that board member "RAMM" had fail during their EMC pulls a couple of years ago, or am I mistaken as to which damper they were using? Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Perhaps that's the reason Scott said to add the Loctite to each of the screws
Quote:
ATI is the best ......
Quote:I`ve heard this a few times and it boils down to quality controll plain and simple or mine and many others that use Fluidampr`s would be breaking cranks too.
It's been about 3 years since I've posted here but I just thought I'd check it out for old times sake. I USED to use Fluidampers and I also USED to break crankshafts regularly. Since I switched to ATI in 2002 I haven't broken a single crank. My engines are 511 B-1's which I run in Super Gas.
Ken Bowers
Quote:What I mean is that EVERYTHING fails as long as man has his hands on it at one point or another. We`ve heard from some that Harland-Sharp`s suck cos a few had issues, or this or that. Mine is 13 years old and my motor is smooth as glass even above 7500 rpm`s. Not pointing a finger just stating facts.............
Hmm ... Who's quality control, mine or Fluidamper? I had two of 'em and I broke cranks with both of them. None with ATI. If you'd like to buy them I'd sell 'em CHEAP!
K.B.
Quote:Quote:
ATI is the best ......
Agreed, but they are also the most expensive.
If I had a more serious effort race engine with 20-25k in it, I would. But instead I spent the difference on a distributor.
I just have a street engine and I felt the ATI might be overkill on it, so I got the same one as the guys above, but for a smallblock.
It's nicely made, looks nice and people seem happy with them.