Moparts

Proportioning valve question

Posted By: Otherlane

Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 11:38 AM

Ok I know this has been on here before but I have a 4 wheel wilwood disc brake car with the mopar m/c that was brought from a member on here.i get mixed answers but should I use a proportion valve?
Posted By: turbobitt

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 11:44 AM

If you call Wilwood they will tell you to use there adjustable valve in the line going to the rear brakes.
Posted By: MR_P_BODY

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 01:06 PM

Quote:

If you call Wilwood they will tell you to use there adjustable valve in the line going to the rear brakes.




On a race car with big slicks on the rear and skinnies
on the front.... I wouldnt put the adjustable valve
on the rears... front yes... reason why... a adjustable
prop valve is nothing more than a delay, all the pressures
will equalize after a period of time depending on
how the valve is set, so with skinnies up front and
you put the valve in the rear you are slowing the fluid
to the rears and giving full fluid to the front giving
the front all/most of the load on the tires... they
just arent big enough to carry that load
If this was a street car with equal size tires then
yes I would put it on the rears to slow the tires
from locking up as the frontend dives on braking
and the rear gets light
Posted By: Otherlane

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 01:21 PM

Pbody,in your opinion with a car with 3.5 wheels up front and 10 in tires out back would you use one or not?
Posted By: MR_P_BODY

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 01:30 PM

Quote:

Pbody,in your opinion with a car with 3.5 wheels up front and 10 in tires out back would you use one or not?




Yes I would... I'd put it on the front lines to slow
the fronts from locking up under hard braking. The
prop valve is nothing more than a adjustable orifice
and the more you close the valve(less braking on the
initial hit) but after a short period of time the pressure
will equalize (dependent how its set)
Posted By: turbobitt

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 01:49 PM

Quote:

Quote:

If you call Wilwood they will tell you to use there adjustable valve in the line going to the rear brakes.




On a race car with big slicks on the rear and skinnies
on the front.... I wouldnt put the adjustable valve
on the rears... front yes... reason why... a adjustable
prop valve is nothing more than a delay, all the pressures
will equalize after a period of time depending on
how the valve is set, so with skinnies up front and
you put the valve in the rear you are slowing the fluid
to the rears and giving full fluid to the front giving
the front all/most of the load on the tires... they
just arent big enough to carry that load
If this was a street car with equal size tires then
yes I would put it on the rears to slow the tires
from locking up as the frontend dives on braking
and the rear gets light




Makes sense to me.
Posted By: Otherlane

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 01:52 PM

Thanks Pbody you da man
Posted By: Anonymous

Post deleted by Defbob - 07/28/09 03:31 PM

Posted By: MR_P_BODY

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 03:44 PM

and how do you choose your setting?




Do some quick hits on the pedal and make sure that
the fronts dont lock.... start with the valve near
the closed possition(so you dont flat spot the fronts)
then open the valve after each hit till you find the
balance.... just so you dont lock the fronts on a spike
hit
Posted By: B G Racing

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 03:45 PM

We take a diffrent approach similar to Willwoods recommendation.We install them on the back brakes to adjust the pressure to allow a slight nose down during braking.To allow rear brakes with large slicks(with low air pressure) to to grab first can cause out of control skidding and slipping at high speeds since the majority of the weight during decelleration is to the front.This holds true for cars with chutes also,you don't want the back slicks locking and dragging at hi-speeds,use the chute to slow down the initial speed then use the brakes once you have slowed down to a managable speed
Posted By: Locomotion

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 03:49 PM

It was brought up once before but I don't recall what was said:

Does a typical Mopar master cylinder have a certain amount of natural "proportion" built into it? In other words, would there be any difference in front-to-rear pressure without a proportioning valve......and would swapping the lines at the MC change it front-to-rear, if needed?
Posted By: MR_P_BODY

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 03:53 PM

Quote:

It was brought up once before but I don't recall what was said:

Does a typical Mopar master cylinder have a certain amount of natural "proportion" built into it? In other words, would there be any difference in front-to-rear pressure without a proportioning valve......and would swapping the lines at the MC change it front-to-rear, if needed?




I have seen some that did have different prop in the
master but from what I was told the 60/40 is the
volume difference in the reservoir... unknow for fact
Posted By: MR_P_BODY

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 04:01 PM

Quote:

It was brought up once before but I don't recall what was said:

Does a typical Mopar master cylinder have a certain amount of natural "proportion" built into it? In other words, would there be any difference in front-to-rear pressure without a proportioning valve......and would swapping the lines at the MC change it front-to-rear, if needed?




A quick test while bench bleeding would be, once you
get it bled put the 2 lines(that you have going back
into the res) bend them over so you can have them
squirt into 2 measuring beakers... if its a different
volume its a build in prop valve
Posted By: B G Racing

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 04:15 PM

The proportioning in most mopar style master cylinders are a rated volume usually aprox,65%fr-35%r.This is volume only,not pressure.They were set this way for the disc/drum combos since large single piston or daul 4 piston calipers required more fluid volume than the small brake shoe wheel cylinder. Most race proportional valves are adjustable from 0 to 1000psi. most common manual brake systems working range is 400 to 600psi.
Posted By: sshemi

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 07:03 PM

Quote:

The proportioning in most mopar style master cylinders are a rated volume usually aprox,65%fr-35%r.This is volume only,not pressure.They were set this way for the disc/drum combos since large single piston or daul 4 piston calipers required more fluid volume than the small brake shoe wheel cylinder. Most race proportional valves are adjustable from 0 to 1000psi. most common manual brake systems working range is 400 to 600psi.




How can not the preassure differ if the volume does with the same stroke front and rear.
I belive the the mopar MC has different piston sizes front and rear and that would differ the preasure also.
Aldough most aaftermarket MCs like Wilwwod, strange etc have the same piston size front and rear therefore the same preasure.

P-body are you positive with the function of a prop valve?
I thought that a prop valve had two pistons with different sizes to reduce preasure.

Im not very experienced so correct me if im wrong.
Posted By: Ron Silva

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 07:21 PM

Right in the mopar parts catalog when they are describing the MC % they are saying volume or displacement, not pressure.

Think about this. On a mopar MC the front port usually goes to the rear brakes. The only way to have 2 different piston or bore sizes would be for the front piston to be smaller which would generate a higher pressure to the rear brakes. So that would negate your theory, I think.

Attached picture 5381540-MATS.jpg
Posted By: sshemi

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 07:29 PM

Quote:

Right in the mopar parts catalog when they are describing the MC % they are saying volume or displacement, not pressure.

Think about this. On a mopar MC the front port usually goes to the rear brakes. The only way to have 2 different piston or bore sizes would be for the front piston to be smaller which would generate a higher pressure to the rear brakes. So that would negate your theory, I think.




Ok i only slept 3 and ahalf hour last night.
But im really working my brain here trying to figure out how a smaller piston can give you higher pressure.

Posted By: Ron Silva

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 07:29 PM

Here is a picture of a Mopar MC rebuild kit.

Attached picture 5381557-MCREBUILD.jpg
Posted By: sshemi

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 07:33 PM

Ok i see how the fluid volume can differ.

Time to go to bed.

Posted By: justinp61

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 07:36 PM

Quote:

Right in the mopar parts catalog when they are describing the MC % they are saying volume or displacement, not pressure.

Think about this. On a mopar MC the front port usually goes to the rear brakes. The only way to have 2 different piston or bore sizes would be for the front piston to be smaller which would generate a higher pressure to the rear brakes. So that would negate your theory, I think.




There are two pistons of the same diameter on a common rod moving the same distance. They move the same amount of fluid per stroke and have the same pressure potential. It doesn't matter if the front of the reservoir or master cylinder bore holds five gallons and the rear only holds six ounces. They both move the same distance.
Posted By: Ron Silva

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 07:37 PM

Smaller piston = higher brake fluid pressure. It's basic physics. You have the brake pedal, a lever (and leverage ratio), and a piston. Just think if the MC piston were 4" in diameter VS if it was 1/4" in diameter.
Posted By: sshemi

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 07:53 PM

Im almost in bed.

What if you have two different piston sizes with the same stroke like a MC wouldnt the smaller one produce a lower pressure becouse its pushing a smaller volume trough the same orfices?
Posted By: copper67440

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 08:13 PM

[ with the mopar m/c that was brought from a member on here.
Sorry for the hijack but, who was that member?
Posted By: B G Racing

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 08:14 PM

The master cylinder volume is to displace the area of the of the pistons or wheel cylinders.A proportioning valve controls the pressure.A stock valve and a race valve do the same thing they open and close the passing orfice which controls the pressure,ie: putting your finger on a garden hose to increase the pressure.Small race calipers with small pucks can use a small MC(less area,less volume)large street calipers with large or multiple pucks need larger MC bores and resovires. By adjusting the size of the passing orfice(making it smaller) increases the pressure,usually in to increase and out to decrease on the race valves
Posted By: sshemi

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 08:23 PM

Quote:

The master cylinder volume is to displace the area of the of the pistons or wheel cylinders.A proportioning valve controls the pressure.A stock valve and a race valve do the same thing they open and close the passing orfice which controls the pressure,ie: putting your finger on a garden hose to increase the pressure.Small race calipers with small pucks can use a small MC(less area,less volume)large street calipers with large or multiple pucks need larger MC bores and resovires. By adjusting the size of the passing orfice(making it smaller) increases the pressure,usually in to increase and out to decrease on the race valves




So you sre saying that a propvalve is nothing more than a finger on the hose.
Dont get me wrong here i want to learn this but wouldnt the finger keep the caliper pistons from returning and drag the rotors?
Or is it a spring actuated valve of somekind?
Posted By: Quicktree

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 08:27 PM

I bet the majority of the race cars at the track on any given day don't use a prop valve.
Posted By: Otherlane

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 08:35 PM

I got the m/c from a member name rick ehrenberg
Posted By: MR_P_BODY

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 08:37 PM

Quote:

Quote:

The master cylinder volume is to displace the area of the of the pistons or wheel cylinders.A proportioning valve controls the pressure.A stock valve and a race valve do the same thing they open and close the passing orfice which controls the pressure,ie: putting your finger on a garden hose to increase the pressure.Small race calipers with small pucks can use a small MC(less area,less volume)large street calipers with large or multiple pucks need larger MC bores and resovires. By adjusting the size of the passing orfice(making it smaller) increases the pressure,usually in to increase and out to decrease on the race valves




So you sre saying that a propvalve is nothing more than a finger on the hose.
Dont get me wrong here i want to learn this but wouldnt the finger keep the caliper pistons from returning and drag the rotors?
Or is it a spring actuated valve of somekind?




It is like putting your finger over the hose BUT
with the brakes its going into a closed area(line
and caliper) SO the pressure will equalize on both
sides of the valve after a giving period of time.
All that valve is is a delay on the pressure... in
hyd, the pressure will equalize
Posted By: Otherlane

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 08:49 PM

So without a prop valve you will have the same pressure at all 4 corners? the same stopping power at all 4 corners?
Posted By: MR_P_BODY

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 09:05 PM

Quote:

So without a prop valve you will have the same pressure at all 4 corners? the same stopping power at all 4 corners?




Yes if the pistons in the master are the same, the
only difference would be the size of the caliper
pistons or wheel cylinder sizes... but if the master
pistons are the same you have the same PRESSURE
Posted By: Ron Silva

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 09:08 PM

Not necessarily the same stoping power. I have the same calipers at all 4 wheels but my front rotors are 10-1/2" and the rear rotors are 12+" so the rear will have more stopping power. Gee maybe that is why I don't have the need for a porportioning valve since I run big&little tires...........

Attached picture 5381759-MVC-007F.JPG
Posted By: MR_P_BODY

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 09:13 PM

Quote:

Not necessarily the same stoping power. I have the same calipers at all 4 wheels but my front rotors are 10-1/2" and the rear rotors are 12+" so the rear will have more stopping power. Gee maybe that is why I don't have the need for a porportioning valve since I run big&little tires...........




Very true, the farther you get from the centerline
the easier it is to stop the same mass
Posted By: Otherlane

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 09:23 PM

With that being said would it be harder to do a burnout without a prop valve?
Posted By: Quicktree

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 09:25 PM

Quote:

With that being said would it be harder to do a burnout without a prop valve?



has nothing to do with it. only thing is there is not much front tire contact and if you don't get enough water on the slicks it will sometimes push the front tires.
Posted By: MR_P_BODY

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 09:38 PM

Quote:

With that being said would it be harder to do a burnout without a prop valve?




You just have to hold the brake pedal a little longer
for the pressure to get to the fronts(remember it
will equalize)... most people including myself pump
the pedal a few times and hold it then press the line lock
Posted By: Quicktree

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 09:52 PM

Quote:

Quote:

With that being said would it be harder to do a burnout without a prop valve?




You just have to hold the brake pedal a little longer
for the pressure to get to the fronts(remember it
will equalize




huh
Posted By: MR_P_BODY

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 10:20 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

With that being said would it be harder to do a burnout without a prop valve?




You just have to hold the brake pedal a little longer
for the pressure to get to the fronts(remember it
will equalize




huh




Tony.... if you have a prop valve in the fronts the
pressure will be SLOW getting past the prop, then
it will equalize after X period of time
Posted By: B G Racing

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 10:37 PM

Quote:

Quote:

The master cylinder volume is to displace the area of the of the pistons or wheel cylinders.A proportioning valve controls the pressure.A stock valve and a race valve do the same thing they open and close the passing orfice which controls the pressure,ie: putting your finger on a garden hose to increase the pressure.Small race calipers with small pucks can use a small MC(less area,less volume)large street calipers with large or multiple pucks need larger MC bores and resovires. By adjusting the size of the passing orfice(making it smaller) increases the pressure,usually in to increase and out to decrease on the race valves




So you sre saying that a propvalve is nothing more than a finger on the hose.
Dont get me wrong here i want to learn this but wouldnt the finger keep the caliper pistons from returning and drag the rotors?
Or is it a spring actuated valve of somekind?


Your not comprehending this at all,the pressure is only when the piston is depressed in the master cylinder which inturn pushes the fluid through the system pushing the pucks and applying the brakes,when the pedal is released so is the pressure,simply theory of hydraulics pressure applied through the pedal ratio,applied through mc bore/stroke,controlling a given volume at a given pressure.Change in pressure can be regulated by the size of orfice it passes through.The small orfice holds back the volume(under pressure) and the orfice creates the additional pressure.ie: a nozzle on a fire hose or pressure washer.Sorry I can't explain it any simpler,hope it helps you understand.Another example would be a diesal fuel injection system where as a pump generally pumps fuel at 45psi to the injector nozzle the nozzle orfice releases fuel at 1800psi.
Posted By: MR_P_BODY

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/28/09 11:19 PM

Another example would be a diesal fuel injection system where as a pump generally pumps fuel at 45psi to the injector nozzle the nozzle orfice releases fuel at 1800psi.




Actually Bob thats incorrect... the pump is making
the pressure but the small orifice increases velocity
to atomize it... thats why a loose injector line
is bad news(it will cut better than a knife)

Posted By: nosboy

Re: Proportioning valve question - 07/29/09 12:45 PM

I made the switch to 4 wheel disc and bought a kit from strange engineering... They explained the theory about the master sending pressure to the FRONT wheels first and then the rear,, and they also talked about the surface area (footprint) that the front vs rear tires have.. The correct answer was to buy TWO pressure gauges and I FORGOT THE SPEC,,but,, I screwed a pressure gauge in the front and rear bleeder screws and adjusted the proportioning valve accordingly..
© 2024 Moparts Forums