What I think gets lost in these 'discussions' is how do the Magnums get away with the roller camshafts? I don't know of anything special with the distributor drive gears in them?
I dove into this for awhile, maybe 12 years ago.
The earliest 3.9s ate distributor gears and timing chains.
Before leaving the big blue m in 2013 I never had access to the development info...as that was
well above my pay grade and it happened several years in the past... but in the field the failures were often believed to be due to harmonics because of the firing order,
since they started off as the same parts as a 318/lifespan was generally good in a 318..
After a certain model year, the intermediate shaft part number for the 3.9 mysteriously changed.
I requested a print pull for the newer gear, and the spec was on the print. It had to have been a fix for the previous failures.
The fix was melonized gear which I believe then carried over to 5.2-5.9, and also the famous timing chain tensioner was added/subject of another debate.
Many of the aftermarket 5.2Magnum roller cams were ground on Crane cores which had a cast gear pressed on to a billet steel front.
The MP 380HP 360 and variants that used the same 501/513 lift cam had this arrangement.
Both the melonized gear and a regular gear could be used on those, but I believe the crate engine was the melonized part sourced from the
5.9L OE parts bin, as it would be the least expensive/best supply during that time period (which now feels like 100 years ago instead of 12).