Moparts

SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank?

Posted By: justinp61

SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? - 04/08/15 03:09 AM

Getting ready to start my pump gas street/strip R1 build. I have a .010/.010 3.79" crank but I'm considering buying a Scat lightweight 4" crank. The pistons are going to be customs so the price will be the same.

Experiences, thoughts or opinions?
Posted By: SpareParts

Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? - 04/08/15 03:33 AM

What bore?
Posted By: Hot 340

Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? - 04/08/15 03:35 AM

40+ years of 3.xxx stroke cranks otta be enough for us...4.00 for max effort and 4.250 max effort street. Jmo
Posted By: J_BODY

Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? - 04/08/15 03:47 AM

"Small Block Rated to 600 Max HP"..... what I read in one of the descriptions. Guess the price reflects that.
Posted By: justinp61

Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? - 04/08/15 03:54 AM

Originally Posted By SpareParts
What bore?


4.09"
Posted By: SpareParts

Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? - 04/08/15 06:47 AM

I'm biased but I like a short stroke combo personally.
Posted By: D-50

Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? - 04/09/15 12:11 AM

I have been pleased so far with my 3.79 stroke crank in a stock 340 block. Ran a new best last weekend even though I have lost over a 1/2 tenth in the 60 ft. for some reason and it is sputtering around the mph lights.
Posted By: justinp61

Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? - 04/09/15 04:21 AM

I'm 3260# with a 4.10 gear and figured the 4" stroke might be a little help.
Posted By: MR_P_BODY

Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? - 04/09/15 04:44 AM

Originally Posted By justinp61
I'm 3260# with a 4.10 gear and figured the 4" stroke might be a little help.


I've got both and I am big on revs but my junk is light
and in my street rod its a 4" for the added torque.. that
torque is nice and it still revs decent... I take it to
7500 rpm... the 3.79 goes way higher but if you stay with
4.10 gears you will never reach the high revs... I use 4.56
gears in the smaller engine and 4.10 on the 416 engine
wave
Posted By: Streetwize

Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? - 04/09/15 03:44 PM

3.79" can make as much or more power by trading RPM for torque, great for lighter combos and/or tigher gears. The problem with the 4" is only on the top because it's tough/expensive to get enough Head flow. A 4" (generally) will ET an automatic car quicker all else being equal though, plus it's so well proven and sorted out, it's tough to make a rational argument against just going for cubes. 3.79" even with a longer 6.200 or so rod still winds up with a fairly heavy piston due the tall 9.58-ish deck height. 9.200 deck blocks are a natural for the 3.79 though
Posted By: 408strokerdart

Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? - 04/09/15 03:50 PM

I like the 3.79" stroke if you have limited deck height, but there is little substitute for cid on a naturally aspirated engine. If it is a tall deck application I would go 4" crank all day long.
Posted By: justinp61

Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? - 04/09/15 04:25 PM

Thanks Brian. The deck is 9.58".
Posted By: dogdays

Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? - 04/09/15 08:31 PM

If you're buying a crank, may I suggest BPE's 4.25" crank? He's a board member and posters here rave.

Bigger cubic inches moves the torque and horsepower curves to the left. It'll make the same power but at a lower more usable rpm. Plus you may be able to save money on valvegear due to lower redline.

R.
Posted By: dizuster

Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? - 04/09/15 08:55 PM

More CID = more low end torque. Means less rpm, less gear, less valve train strain, less cam required, etc... All good things. 4"+ is a no brainer on a tall deck.

That being said... If you already have the 3.79“ your not going to build a worthless combo by using it. It all comes down to budget at that point.
Posted By: Streetwize

Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? - 04/09/15 09:39 PM

You could save some bucks vs a 4" crank by offset grinding the rod Journals to the popular 2" "327 SBC" size and find anywhere from a 6.125" to 6.3" .927 pin SBC rod and get to about 3.90" stroke PLUS get a lighter bobweight. If I already had the crank I'd probably look at doing that...or sell it to offset the cost of the 4" to 4.25"

I have a 4.25" BPE in my 440" W2, it's a BEAST but very docile

Attached picture IMG_8081.jpeg
Posted By: Streetwize

Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? - 04/09/15 09:40 PM

another Pic

Attached picture 440shortnotches.jpg
Posted By: justinp61

Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? - 04/09/15 11:21 PM

Thanks guys for the input, 4" is probably max I'll go as already I have 2.125"/6.123" and 2.100"/6.125" rods. An entire 4.125" kit is around $2800 and I can buy a 4" crank for less then $1000. The 3.79" will either go in my 340 block sometime or be sold.
Posted By: littleVAL

Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? - 04/11/15 11:26 PM

I bought a K1 crank 4" 360 mains and chevy rods for $500 to the door last year and a set of k1 chevy h beem rods (645grams) for $226 I think. Was checking out some of the new SRP pro pistons for around $650 with rings and pin (422grams plus pin 106grams). I think that the 4" stroke is a better alternative for what I am going to use it for which is mostly street use. You can see that with balancing will be around $2000. For a couple of hundred more in gaskets, bearings and machining it is a good start on a short shortblock
Posted By: justinp61

Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? - 04/11/15 11:58 PM

Where did you find the crank and pistons that cheap?
Posted By: littleVAL

Re: SB 3.79" or 4.00" crank? - 04/12/15 12:43 AM

I found a couple of options on ebay for the pistons that I was wanting. T believe it is around MSRP for them considering they are an off the shelf chevy size. The crank I got from a company in texas. I believe it was part of the k1 clearance last year like the rods. I would give them a call and see if they still have them it is possible because they were not advertising the crank.
© 2024 Moparts Forums