Moparts

Hemi vs Wedge

Posted By: Sixgun

Hemi vs Wedge - 07/06/12 06:24 AM

Very briefly, as you are all busy people.
Yes this is "race only", but who better to ask?
I am a big Wedge guy.Always have been.440/906s,446/max wedge heads,
500 siamese w/bulldog track dawgs (yeah,I know,
452/906s 6bbl
they run hard, they run good, easy to maintain and work on.Stay in tune well.(basic street/strip cars, not full race)
I always have thought if and when I ever get to a Hemi, with a stock 426 style head,even based on that alone, I would think with all the air a Hemi head can flow ,anything less than 500 cubes would not be worth the switch from a wedge.That and alloy heads to make up for some of the weight penalty.Don't want to tie up your forum, but
how about a few pointers, so I can try to be right
in my mind on this?
Thanks, Bear
Posted By: Cab_Burge

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/06/12 06:51 AM

I'v made more HP per C.I. with a good aluminum M.W. port size wedge head than I have with a Mullins ported D4 aluminum race hemi head I like wedge motors way more then Hemiriods motors
Posted By: Dan Halen

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/06/12 01:18 PM

Keep in mind Hemis LOVE compression and RPM. The cost between a 426

and a 500+ is minimal, you need lots of air movement to make those

heads perform.

Posted By: Dragula

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/06/12 02:03 PM

I am a Hemi guy, and the wedge is easier to maintain for racing. Now a days, the wedge heads flow pretty good. We have a set that flow a little over 360cfm and we are running 10.0's on pump gas with a wedge. Yeah the Hemi heads flow, but stock heads need work. The valve guides are over size, and the seats can be an issue as well. You will be better off with a set of Stage V heads and go from there.

With a Hemi, oiling is critical. If your going to build one, run the oiling on the stand and get it sorted out before it goes in the car.
Posted By: HPMike

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/06/12 02:06 PM

This debate will rage on forever...

They both make good power. All Ill say is this, and I drive and build a lot of brandX stuff, too. All things being equal(like dont compare a full boogie B-1 with a stock street hemi), nothing feels like a hemi up top. It turns on when the others are turning off. Period...

MB
Posted By: Mr.Yuck

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/06/12 03:11 PM

$ for $ a wedge is hard to beat.
Posted By: rickseeman

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/06/12 03:27 PM

A wedge will work but a hemi is prettier. Hemi's used to be expensive so I understand why people drove wedges but today if you are building from new parts the cost is the same nearly to the penny. (If you want to go thru the price list item by item we will.) I will never figure out why someone would drive a wedge.
Posted By: Mr.Yuck

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/06/12 03:39 PM

Quote:

A wedge will work but a hemi is prettier. Hemi's used to be expensive so I understand why people drove wedges but today if you are building from new parts the cost is the same nearly to the penny. (If you want to go thru the price list item by item we will.) I will never figure out why someone would drive a wedge.




really? crank, rods, pistons, cam maybe but blocks, heads and valve train? no way. Hemi headers and intake are also more expensive. You'll spend 2x as much (maybe more) building a 600hp hemi vs wedge.
Posted By: 340B5

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/06/12 03:46 PM

Quote:

This debate will rage on forever...

They both make good power. All Ill say is this, and I drive and build a lot of brandX stuff, too. All things being equal(like dont compare a full boogie B-1 with a stock street hemi), nothing feels like a hemi up top. It turns on when the others are turning off. Period...

MB




Exactly that: I just switched tow vehicles last year and just 2 weeks ago opened up the 5.7 hemi on the highway. The old truck was a 5.9 and would start to lay over around 90-95 mph and the 5.7 started really moving about 80 and didn't quit until I did @110mph. I'd say that's an equal comparison.
Posted By: Sixgun

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/06/12 05:13 PM

Cab,Mr Yuck,340B5,Mr Seeman,HPMike,Dragula,StreetVanDan,
thank you all,I am not being a pot stirrer, but this is EXACTLY what I was asking for.
I am a little clearer on the whole thing,as it would apply to ME, here and now.
I sure do appreciate first hand information/opinion.
Great day to you all,and whoever else has anything to add later.
Bear
Posted By: Tig

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/06/12 06:32 PM

We moved up from a small block to a big block wedge for cost reasons many years ago. Back then Hemi's were way more expensive, nowadays I'd guess it's a lot closer but the Hemi's are still more expensive.
Posted By: RUNCHARGER

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/06/12 10:47 PM

Stock castings the 426 has almost unlimited horsepower, the wedge not so much, the heads just do not flow anywhere near what the Hemi's do. Wedge block is good for what, 600HP before it breaks, 426 Hemi at least double that.
So you want your wedge to make big power so you need an aftermarket block, heads, rocker gear etc. Same cost as Hemi aftermarket parts.
They're both great engines but different.
Most people have never driven a Hemi, a stock 440 car still pulls okay when you punch it in high gear, a stock 426 Hemi pulls like gangbusters in high gear and feels like that wedge does in low gear. 440 is a great torque engine, the 426 Hemi is a great horsepower engine.

Sheldon
Posted By: quickd100

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/07/12 01:36 AM

Where the wedges start to nose over the Hemi will be just starting to pull hard. For you wedge guys, don't buy or build a Hemi. Once bitten by the Hemi bug you'll forget all about running a wedge. Dave
Posted By: Twin Turbo Mower

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/07/12 03:40 AM

Always liked wedges for street motors.

Attached picture 7280685-100_2490.JPG
Posted By: mopartoby

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/07/12 04:15 AM

Nowadays hemi is just a word. Stick with the wedge!
Posted By: cudacustoms1

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/07/12 12:06 PM

To me it really depends on amount of HP/cash. Lower dollar/HP weadge all the way. Hemi can't be done on the cheap. When you start ordering new everything then parts cost very close to the same.
Posted By: Tig

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/07/12 01:30 PM

Pro: That Hemi top end charge
Con: The combo to make it possible
If I were to start over again?
Posted By: Scott58

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/07/12 01:50 PM

When we were discussing a new big cube build, this topic came up and we spent quite a bit of time discussing it. For a high-end NA street/strip engine, the performance difference between hemi and wedge is almost non-existent now with the big B1 and Predator products. Hemi is still a bit more expensive. The tie breakers for me? Resale value and "wow" factor. As somebody said, "Hemi" may just be a word, but it's a word that always draws a crowd when the hood comes off, and its worth another $5-$10K in resale value at the engine or car level when it's time to sell. Hemi's definitely hold value better than wedges.

I came across a used set of Millennium heads for a good price, so the cost difference was eliminated. I'm building a hemi!
Posted By: racerx

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/07/12 02:00 PM

Quote:

This debate will rage on forever...

They both make good power. All Ill say is this, and I drive and build a lot of brandX stuff, too. All things being equal(like dont compare a full boogie B-1 with a stock street hemi), nothing feels like a hemi up top. It turns on when the others are turning off. Period...

MB


Hmm.r we talking about top end charge in the 1/4 mi or highway
Posted By: Mr.Yuck

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/07/12 02:12 PM

Quote:

Stock castings the 426 has almost unlimited horsepower, the wedge not so much, the heads just do not flow anywhere near what the Hemi's do. Wedge block is good for what, 600HP before it breaks, 426 Hemi at least double that.
So you want your wedge to make big power so you need an aftermarket block, heads, rocker gear etc. Same cost as Hemi aftermarket parts.
They're both great engines but different.
Most people have never driven a Hemi, a stock 440 car still pulls okay when you punch it in high gear, a stock 426 Hemi pulls like gangbusters in high gear and feels like that wedge does in low gear. 440 is a great torque engine, the 426 Hemi is a great horsepower engine.

Sheldon




plenty of 600+ wedges out there. Not sure why 600 hp or 6500 are peoples #'s for a wedge. I guess it all depends on the budget. You can make cheaper, more dependable 10 second wedge that a Hemi. If you want more "top end" w/ a wedge all you need to do is add a little boost. FWIW my 440-6 is still pulling hard at the stripe, it's no where close to "done"
Posted By: B G Racing

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/07/12 03:33 PM

Both engines preform comparable at even rpm up to 7500 after that the Hemi will take the lead.Budget,purpose and desire dictates which engine to choose.If your interest is the bling or resale value,then the Hemi is a no brainer.If I had a choise on which engine I want,it would always be a HEMI
Posted By: HPMike

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/07/12 10:56 PM

Quote:

Quote:

This debate will rage on forever...

They both make good power. All Ill say is this, and I drive and build a lot of brandX stuff, too. All things being equal(like dont compare a full boogie B-1 with a stock street hemi), nothing feels like a hemi up top. It turns on when the others are turning off. Period...

MB


Hmm.r we talking about top end charge in the 1/4 mi or highway




Either one!


Quick story,,,One of the first experiences I had driving a hemi car was back in the late 80's. Challenger with a Racer Brown cam, Competition Series carbs, and headers, but not much else. The car had 4.88 gears. Well, that thing pulled like nothing else I had ever driven. You would think with that much gear it would nose over quick...nope!

MB
Posted By: MRMOPAR622

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/08/12 02:23 PM

Can you afford ($$$) to build a Hemi and all the additional up keep that a Hemi requires? If so a Hemi is the #1 choice.
Posted By: smokinwoody

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/08/12 02:29 PM

my wedge is in getting re-built for pump gas and street action....
Posted By: moparniac

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/08/12 02:40 PM

I think I have a decent pump gas wedge street engine... I would love to have a HEMI but it would have to be aluminum! Last time I was at Ray Barton's he said about the bottom end is the same! Everything up top the HEMI gets costly quick! either way its still a MOPAR
Posted By: rumblefish72

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/09/12 06:50 PM

I'm going to second the post from BG Racing ... if your #1 goal is NOT HP per dollar spent and you want to have a legendary engine design sitting between your fenderwells ... then you should build up a Hemi. I've been a Mopar Man since 1979 and have always run Wedge motors. All through the 80's and into the 90's, the Hemi option was just too expensive because of the limited supply of blocks and heads. I started buying parts for a Hemi back in 2008. Now it's 2012 and I'm pretty close to having everything I need. I hope to have the Hemi installed and running by summer 2013. Why a Hemi? ... well they never did a TV commercial with the Tag Line "that thing got a Wedge in it?".

My only second thought is the Predator Head option ... that wasn't available when I started buying parts and I put down a deposit on some Stage V heads from MCH back in 2008.


I was up at the Curt George Memorial Race at Pgh Raceway Park a few weeks ago ... while strolling the pits, I walked past lots of Indy headed wedges and barely took a second look. I did stop to look at all the Hemis and I think I saw one Predator headed car there. Hemi's have "gravity" they just pull you over to take a closer look. And to think that the Gen II 426 design came out in 1964ish and we're still talking about it almost 50 years later ... WOW!

Attached picture 7284464-120619HemiMockUpSmaller.jpg
Posted By: 67HEMI

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/09/12 08:30 PM

Plus the "Mopar Wedge Challenge" sounds like a contest to get your underwear unbunched. Mopar HEMI Challenge sounds better!
Hopefully I like my new HEMI because the wedge is going in the Duster!
Posted By: Dragula

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/09/12 08:50 PM

Quote:

Can you afford ($$$) to build a Hemi and all the additional up keep that a Hemi requires? If so a Hemi is the #1 choice.




Exactly like my first time driving one. They rev, and just keep pulling. Just amazing the first time you drive one all set-up and running like it should.

I would like to see what a Gen3 Hemi drives like. This 484 Hemi might be my last Gen2 if I get an up close look and drive in one of the G3's, we will see. I like all the numbers people are posting out of the Gen3 stuff, so the old elephant now has some competition and I don't think they need a ton of cubes to do it either.
Posted By: rickseeman

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/10/12 02:30 PM

Ok, you are going to force me to tell you a story.

In 2004 I was sitting at a stoplight in my Superbird. (Of course when you look at a Superbird it looks like a fast car.) A woman and her 5 year old son pulled up beside me. The kids tells his momma, "Roll down the window and ask him if it's got a Hemi in it". Think about that a minute. He is a 5 year old kid. A five year old knows nothing in the world except that you get a happy meal at the place with the golden arches. But even a five year old kid knows if it looks that fast it must have a hemi in it.

Of course it had a hemi in it.
Posted By: 383man

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/10/12 09:05 PM

I really dont know right now which is actually better but I will say the Hemi is the eng that made Mopar dominate the early years of Pro Stock and its the only eng all the nitro cars run as it owns them classes. But that said I feel the Wedge is the eng that carried Mopar on the street mostly as back in the 60's and 70's you just did not see many Hemi's on the street but there were Wedge engines everywhere and they won alot of street races. And lets not forget how the Max Wedge dominated for 2 years in the early 60's. I know I cannot afford to build a Hemi as my wedge eng took most of what I had but I am glad Mopar has them both. Honestly I just want to have a fast Mopar street car for what it is and Hemi or Wedge would not matter to me. I am just glad a cheap guy like me could afford to build a mild Wedge (by todays standards) to put my 3700 lb car in the 10's on pump through the pipes. Wonder how fast I would go with a Hemi of about the same build ? Hemi or Wedge you gotta love it if your a Mopar person. Ron
Posted By: Mr.Yuck

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/10/12 09:52 PM

Quote:

Ok, you are going to force me to tell you a story.

In 2004 I was sitting at a stoplight in my Superbird. (Of course when you look at a Superbird it looks like a fast car.) A woman and her 5 year old son pulled up beside me. The kids tells his momma, "Roll down the window and ask him if it's got a Hemi in it". Think about that a minute. He is a 5 year old kid. A five year old knows nothing in the world except that you get a happy meal at the place with the golden arches. But even a five year old kid knows if it looks that fast it must have a hemi in it.

Of course it had a hemi in it. [/quote

you should have said no...it has a 440-6 pack, a much better engine.
Posted By: cudaman1969

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/10/12 10:43 PM

You never hear a hemi owner say " someday i'll own a wedge"
Posted By: SCATPACK 1

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/10/12 11:08 PM

Quote:

Can you afford ($$$) to build a Hemi and all the additional up keep that a Hemi requires? If so a Hemi is the #1 choice.




Please explain What is the additional up keep on a HEMI???
I have raced for over 40 years and do not understand what people are refering to when they say additional up keep on a HEMI. Sometimes you have to adjust the carb and the valves but that is on any solid lift motor, wedge included.
This is a term that some Mopar hating Chevy magazine editor coined back in the 60's. Back then, the Hemi had dual points, solid lifters and 2 fours from the factory, just like some of the Z-28's had, but supposedly there was extra up keep to a Hemi. I never understood what this was supposed to be but everyone says it so it must be true. LOL.
Posted By: W.I.N. Racing

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/10/12 11:12 PM

Quote:

Quote:

This debate will rage on forever...

They both make good power. All Ill say is this, and I drive and build a lot of brandX stuff, too. All things being equal(like dont compare a full boogie B-1 with a stock street hemi), nothing feels like a hemi up top. It turns on when the others are turning off. Period...

MB



Exactly that: I just switched tow vehicles last year and just 2 weeks ago opened up the 5.7 hemi on the highway. The old truck was a 5.9 and would start to lay over around 90-95 mph and the 5.7 started really moving about 80 and didn't quit until I did @110mph. I'd say that's an equal comparison.




I think we are talking real Hemis here...
Posted By: W.I.N. Racing

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/10/12 11:20 PM

Quote:

You never hear a hemi owner say " someday i'll own a wedge"




Thats a fact!!!
Two kinds of people in this world...those who have Hemis and those who want Hemis
Never heard that said about wedges!
Also as far as additional maintence being required, if you just want to put gas in it and go a Hemi probaly isnt for you, but what real race motor doesnt require so occasional TLC. Those who say Wedges and Hemis are equal, havent learned how to tune a Hemi.
Posted By: 572_HEMI_Cuda

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/11/12 12:14 AM

I just put gas in mine. Maybe work on a launch timing curve once in a while.
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/11/12 02:54 AM

Quote:

Quote:

You never hear a hemi owner say " someday i'll own a wedge"




Thats a fact!!!
Two kinds of people in this world...those who have Hemis and those who want Hemis
Never heard that said about wedges!
Also as far as additional maintence being required, if you just want to put gas in it and go a Hemi probaly isnt for you, but what real race motor doesnt require so occasional TLC. Those who say Wedges and Hemis are equal, havent learned how to tune a Hemi.




"Here's the BOOMERANG, comin' back at ya !"

Wedges, since the first ram-inducted big block, have always been easier to tune than HEMIS. FACT IS that wedges offer better tractability for "street wars" and moderate strip work in comparison to the HEMIS. Sure the HEMI needs sharp
tuning to run well and it's a bit more costly to run on the street, BUT.. it offers much MORE raw performance than the wedge in upper classes of NHRA/IHRA and brackets. They are running on the streets with good success since the 60's and the costs are slightly higher than a wedge (stroker) motor. Tuning them (HEMIS), are a little easier now, than in the 60's, due to more information on them as well as the improved parts available for them. Basically it boils down to the "age old" question - "How fast do you really want to go ?". You want to run 8.90's, or faster with ease, few engine problems and have the money - go with the HEMI. 9.00's or slower, the lower operating cost/performance advantage is on the wedge side The performance margin ALWAYS slides to the HEMI as you pass BELOW the 9 sec barrier. No disrespect intended, but IMO, a well-tuned 440 (whether 6-pack or 4bbl) or a HOT MAX WEDGE motor, CAN and HAS beaten a HEMI (unless the HEMI is in full race trim).
'Nuff said and that's MY cents!

Posted By: HemiRick

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/11/12 06:05 AM

Try adjusting the valves on a solid lifter long ram wedge sometime and tell me it's easy.
Posted By: MoparBilly

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/11/12 02:18 PM

Wedge racer and driver...by choice! always have been, always will be. I have no problem with the Hemi, it's a fine engine, just not impressed with Hemi owners who think everyone should bow down and ooh and aah over thier car because they have an engine that other people have done amazing things with.

Attached picture 7287303-summer_027.JPG
Posted By: Dean_Kuzluzski

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/11/12 02:30 PM

Quote:

just not impressed with Hemi owners who think everyone should bow down and ooh and aah over thier car because they have an engine that other people have done amazing things with.




Posted By: Mr.Yuck

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/11/12 02:44 PM

Quote:

Wedge racer and driver...by choice! always have been, always will be. I have no problem with the Hemi, it's a fine engine, just not impressed with Hemi owners who think everyone should bow down and ooh and aah over thier car because they have an engine that other people have done amazing things with.




Thats funny, not true of all but funny anyway. I think the OP needs to state his desires for the car..then one can get a better idea of what direction to steer him. If it's a 10.0 bracket car a Hemi would be a complete waste of money, but if it's a 8 second door slammer a Hemi would be the way to go...or just add about 14psi of boost to the 10 second wedge.
Posted By: mickm

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/11/12 06:31 PM

Quote:

Wedge racer and driver...by choice! always have been, always will be. I have no problem with the Hemi, it's a fine engine, just not impressed with Hemi owners who think everyone should bow down and ooh and aah over thier car because they have an engine that other people have done amazing things with.




of my 4 mopars, 2 have been (and 1 still is) a hemi. to me, it's just the ultimate engine. but i agree totally with that statement, whether it's a hemi or a BBC or a Boss 429, doesn't matter, it's the attitude.

i think it's a kick owning, working on (well, most of the time anyway), and driving a hemi. it's fun when people ooh and ahh over it, but it's not like i created the damn thing from my loins, it's just an engine!

and the main theme of this thread i think it right on; they are both great engines, but when you get into the mega horsepower, the hemi has the edge.
Posted By: DaveRS23

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/12/12 02:10 AM

Isn't this sport about having fun? It is for me anyway.

You don't have to have an E body or a Hemi or an original Super Stocker to have fun. BUT, there is a reason that some spend the coin to have one of them. And there is a reason that some of the rest of us gravitate towards them.

If nothing else, seeing a Hemi is still rare enough to be an event for some of us.
Posted By: RUNCHARGER

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/12/12 02:58 AM

As a Hemi owner since 1980 and a fan since 1964 let me say I do NOT hate wedges. They're great engines and it isn't a Hemi vs. Wedge deal like some guys make it out to be. They're both terrific engines but they were engineered for different uses and both have way overachieved what was expected of them when designed.

Sheldon
Posted By: steeldust

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/12/12 03:32 AM

I have WEDGE motors and i LOVE them but if your looking for REAL BIG HORSE POWER and if you are a MOPAR GUY do i have to say HEMI that`s what it was made for

Attached picture 7288441-750_popeye_the_sailor_man.jpg
Posted By: W.I.N. Racing

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/12/12 08:05 PM

Quote:

As a Hemi owner since 1980 and a fan since 1964 let me say I do NOT hate wedges. They're great engines and it isn't a Hemi vs. Wedge deal like some guys make it out to be. They're both terrific engines but they were engineered for different uses and both have way overachieved what was expected of them when designed.

Sheldon





I go nothing agaist the wedge either...before the Cummins came along for our trucks they were great for towing our Hemi Race cars around!
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/13/12 12:16 AM

Quote:

Try adjusting the valves on a solid lifter long ram wedge sometime and tell me it's easy.




There is no QUICK way about adjusting them, IF that's what you mean. They are all in a row on a wedge. Adjustment IS easy!! Getting in to do it and pulling/putting everything (intake setup and linkages, maybe exhaust manifolds) off/on IS what isn't EASY - on your back!! Still well worth the performance netted after it's all done!!

Posted By: BobR

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/13/12 12:49 AM

For a no budget no holds barred engine the hemi is the best. Even the best brand x engine builders know that now. However, if your budget isn't in the 6 figure range a good wedge will suffice.
Posted By: Sixgun

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/15/12 04:29 AM

Quote:

You never hear a hemi owner say " someday i'll own a wedge"



Well put.
I hate you.
But well put
Posted By: viperblue72

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/15/12 05:31 AM

I bet if it costed the same to build a hemi as a wedge, and parts were just as plentiful for both, there wouldn't be too many people running a wedge.
Posted By: DARTH V8Я

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/15/12 05:57 AM

Quote:

This debate will rage on forever...




Too add to the debate, the Hemi is ONLY good with a screw on top of it (or in front incase of Paxton/Turbos), otherwise its a piece of junk..
Posted By: astjp2

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/15/12 06:00 AM

Did they ever make a bumper sticker that said, "My other car is a WEDGE!"
Posted By: hudsonhornet7x

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/15/12 06:15 AM

I have always heard that a hemi was better up top but gave up some power to the wedge at lower rpm. What if you built a large stroke hemi ( 540-572)? How would it compare to a 572 Wedge?
Posted By: 383man

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/15/12 12:57 PM

They are both Mopar so I like them both. But I know the 63 Max Wedge cars were street legal as anyone could buy one. I honestly feel in stock trim the Max Wedge was the fastest Mopar street muscle car sold in the muscle car era. Sure the Hemi was a race eng and would kick but when setup right but on the street in stock form it was held back and the wedge carried the banner for Mopar on the street most of the time. You have to ask yourself.........how many Hemi's did you see on the street in the 60's ? A stock Maxie 62 Dart 413 went 13.44 @ 109 for M/T. Good mph for a stock eng in 1962. 426 Maxie in 63 ran 12.60's @ almost 112 mph with just the cutouts open and Atlas tires. The Hemi to me was like Fords Boss 429 as it was choked out in stock form but was the king of all race engines where it dominated. The wedge had its place in Mopar history for sure and even ran good when prepped out. I dont know if my 63 would go any faster with a Hemi equipped the same as my wedge and thats because of the good heads out there for the wedge today. And everyone knows how well the 440 six pack cars ran on the street. And the Hemi dominated the first 2 years of Pro Stock so much they had to restrict it so GM and Ford could catch up. Ron
Posted By: quickd100

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/15/12 01:59 PM

Quote:

I have always heard that a hemi was better up top but gave up some power to the wedge at lower rpm. What if you built a large stroke hemi ( 540-572)? How would it compare to a 572 Wedge?




I wish I had a scanner but he's some numbers from my 605 Hemi. 10.4-1 compression, heads are pretty small by most standards 386.2@.700 lift. headers are 2 sizes to small also.Dave

RPM.....HP....Tq
3600 521.8 759.0
3743 544.8 764.4
3830 560.3 768.3
3938 583.8 778.6
4003 600.8 788.2
4111 630.8 805.9
4202 643.5 804.2
4327 667.7 810.4
4421 685.9 814.8
4501 699.7 816.5
4612 712.2 811.1
4702 727.8 813.0
4818 750.8 818.4 Torque peak
4906 760.7 814.4
5029 776.8 811.3
5110 782.6 804.4
5234 802.7 805.5
5302 814.4 806.8
5401 825.4 802.7
5512 840.4 800.8
5634 847.0 789.6
5716 852.4 783.3
5782 852.8 774.6 HP peak
5803 852.2 771.3
5929 844.0 747.6
6025 841.5 733.6
6106 837.1 720.0
6207 827.3 700.1
6315 822.0 683.6
6414 821.5 672.6
6507 815.8 658.5
6612 812.3 645.2
Posted By: hudsonhornet7x

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/15/12 02:38 PM

WOW! It does not look like you are giving anything up down low in the rpm range. What is that engine like to drive on the street?
Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/15/12 03:02 PM

It is far easier to CORRECTLY build a wedge engine. The difference in cylinder head layout makes these two designs COMPLETELY different animals.

Most HEMI engines are built along common engine building lines and this gives up chunks of power. Proper intakes, camshaft, headers, etc., are CRITICAL to maximize the HEMI design and the information is very limited and those that have advanced information, don't just throw it out there.

Camshaft and header design alone, because of the scavenging effects of the opposed valve layout is so far from wedge requirments it's not funny. Make a mistake with overlap, for example and your HEMI will be very unhappy.

The top SS/AH HEMIs are OVER 2.3hp per cube with heavily worked production style heads. Try getting that out of a Max wedge and tell me how you make out.

Plus......what would you rather look at when you pop the hood???
Posted By: HPMike

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/15/12 03:03 PM

Quote:

They are both Mopar so I like them both. But I know the 63 Max Wedge cars were street legal as anyone could buy one. I honestly feel in stock trim the Max Wedge was the fastest Mopar street muscle car sold in the muscle car era. Sure the Hemi was a race eng and would kick but when setup right but on the street in stock form it was held back and the wedge carried the banner for Mopar on the street most of the time. You have to ask yourself.........how many Hemi's did you see on the street in the 60's ? A stock Maxie 62 Dart 413 went 13.44 @ 109 for M/T. Good mph for a stock eng in 1962. 426 Maxie in 63 ran 12.60's @ almost 112 mph with just the cutouts open and Atlas tires. The Hemi to me was like Fords Boss 429 as it was choked out in stock form but was the king of all race engines where it dominated. The wedge had its place in Mopar history for sure and even ran good when prepped out. I dont know if my 63 would go any faster with a Hemi equipped the same as my wedge and thats because of the good heads out there for the wedge today. And everyone knows how well the 440 six pack cars ran on the street. And the Hemi dominated the first 2 years of Pro Stock so much they had to restrict it so GM and Ford could catch up. Ron




Well put, Ron.. and I agree..

Here is something else to think about.

My 71 Hemi Challenger was bought new by a guy with limited skills.

All he did was.

-Install headers.
-12.5:1 pitons.
-A Rat Roaster(unmodified)
-Carter Competition series carbs
-A Holley Red pump.
-A Racer Brown solid cam
-4.88 gears.

Car went 10.30's@134MPH. All stock suspension. Stock unmodded 4 speed, No spool. No headwork. Other than a big block Vette there probably isnt any musclecar that could go that fast with such relatively minor mods. Even ran the stock dual point distributor. No Chrysler wedge could do that, that I am aware of.

The Hemi really had it..

MB
Posted By: Mr.Yuck

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/15/12 03:11 PM

Quote:

Quote:

They are both Mopar so I like them both. But I know the 63 Max Wedge cars were street legal as anyone could buy one. I honestly feel in stock trim the Max Wedge was the fastest Mopar street muscle car sold in the muscle car era. Sure the Hemi was a race eng and would kick but when setup right but on the street in stock form it was held back and the wedge carried the banner for Mopar on the street most of the time. You have to ask yourself.........how many Hemi's did you see on the street in the 60's ? A stock Maxie 62 Dart 413 went 13.44 @ 109 for M/T. Good mph for a stock eng in 1962. 426 Maxie in 63 ran 12.60's @ almost 112 mph with just the cutouts open and Atlas tires. The Hemi to me was like Fords Boss 429 as it was choked out in stock form but was the king of all race engines where it dominated. The wedge had its place in Mopar history for sure and even ran good when prepped out. I dont know if my 63 would go any faster with a Hemi equipped the same as my wedge and thats because of the good heads out there for the wedge today. And everyone knows how well the 440 six pack cars ran on the street. And the Hemi dominated the first 2 years of Pro Stock so much they had to restrict it so GM and Ford could catch up. Ron




Well put, Ron.. and I agree..

Here is something else to think about.

My 71 Hemi Challenger was bought new by a guy with limited skills.

All he did was.

-Install headers.
-12.5:1 pitons.
-A Rat Roaster(unmodified)
-Carter Competition series carbs
-A Holley Red pump.
-A Racer Brown solid cam
-4.88 gears.

Car went 10.30's@134MPH. All stock suspension. Stock unmodded 4 speed, No spool. No headwork. Other than a big block Vette there probably isnt any musclecar that could go that fast with such relatively minor mods. Even ran the stock dual point distributor. No Chrysler wedge could do that, that I am aware of.

The Hemi really had it..

MB




sorry but a a 12.5:1 440 w/ a good inatke and carb(s) would run just as well... That's more than just a few bolt ons and far from the hemi's "stock" build. I'd probably run less gear w/ a 440 thou
Posted By: quickd100

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/15/12 05:54 PM

Quote:

WOW! It does not look like you are giving anything up down low in the rpm range. What is that engine like to drive on the street?




I might be able to let you know by this evening. I can't give you any numbers lower than 3600rpm, the dyno didn't want to hold the motor under 3600 as it was configured. Dave
Posted By: 383man

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/15/12 07:06 PM

You know I did not even think about the FAST cars. Of course they are not stock but do run stock intake , carbs and exh manifolds. Dave Dudeks Hemi has gone 9.90's in his Roadrunner for the fastest Hemi and I believe Ed Cooks Max Wedge 63 Plymouth has run 10.30's for the fastest wedge. I know some 440 six pack cars are also in the 10's. Thats about where I would think they would be performance wise. The Hemi is the baddest but the wedge is not far behind. I used to always feel that the Hemi's were for the top racers with money who want to be the fastest and the Wedges are for the average Joe (or Ron ) like me on a limited budget that will run respectable. I always here the Hemi parts cost more then the Wedge eng parts but I really never checked into that. Ron
Posted By: 540challenger

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/15/12 07:17 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

They are both Mopar so I like them both. But I know the 63 Max Wedge cars were street legal as anyone could buy one. I honestly feel in stock trim the Max Wedge was the fastest Mopar street muscle car sold in the muscle car era. Sure the Hemi was a race eng and would kick but when setup right but on the street in stock form it was held back and the wedge carried the banner for Mopar on the street most of the time. You have to ask yourself.........how many Hemi's did you see on the street in the 60's ? A stock Maxie 62 Dart 413 went 13.44 @ 109 for M/T. Good mph for a stock eng in 1962. 426 Maxie in 63 ran 12.60's @ almost 112 mph with just the cutouts open and Atlas tires. The Hemi to me was like Fords Boss 429 as it was choked out in stock form but was the king of all race engines where it dominated. The wedge had its place in Mopar history for sure and even ran good when prepped out. I dont know if my 63 would go any faster with a Hemi equipped the same as my wedge and thats because of the good heads out there for the wedge today. And everyone knows how well the 440 six pack cars ran on the street. And the Hemi dominated the first 2 years of Pro Stock so much they had to restrict it so GM and Ford could catch up. Ron




Well put, Ron.. and I agree..

Here is something else to think about.

My 71 Hemi Challenger was bought new by a guy with limited skills.

All he did was.

-Install headers.
-12.5:1 pitons.
-A Rat Roaster(unmodified)
-Carter Competition series carbs
-A Holley Red pump.
-A Racer Brown solid cam
-4.88 gears.

Car went 10.30's@134MPH. All stock suspension. Stock unmodded 4 speed, No spool. No headwork. Other than a big block Vette there probably isnt any musclecar that could go that fast with such relatively minor mods. Even ran the stock dual point distributor. No Chrysler wedge could do that, that I am aware of.

The Hemi really had it..

MB




sorry but a a 12.5:1 440 w/ a good inatke and carb(s) would run just as well... That's more than just a few bolt ons and far from the hemi's "stock" build. I'd probably run less gear w/ a 440 thou


I would like to see a 440 with stock heads run those numbers not a chance IMO. However with as cheap as aftermarket heads head go for a wedge you should be able to build one cheaper then a hemi. Dollar for HP i would pick a wedge hands done but Iam building myself a 3rd Gen hemi as we speak
Posted By: HPMike

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/15/12 09:18 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

They are both Mopar so I like them both. But I know the 63 Max Wedge cars were street legal as anyone could buy one. I honestly feel in stock trim the Max Wedge was the fastest Mopar street muscle car sold in the muscle car era. Sure the Hemi was a race eng and would kick but when setup right but on the street in stock form it was held back and the wedge carried the banner for Mopar on the street most of the time. You have to ask yourself.........how many Hemi's did you see on the street in the 60's ? A stock Maxie 62 Dart 413 went 13.44 @ 109 for M/T. Good mph for a stock eng in 1962. 426 Maxie in 63 ran 12.60's @ almost 112 mph with just the cutouts open and Atlas tires. The Hemi to me was like Fords Boss 429 as it was choked out in stock form but was the king of all race engines where it dominated. The wedge had its place in Mopar history for sure and even ran good when prepped out. I dont know if my 63 would go any faster with a Hemi equipped the same as my wedge and thats because of the good heads out there for the wedge today. And everyone knows how well the 440 six pack cars ran on the street. And the Hemi dominated the first 2 years of Pro Stock so much they had to restrict it so GM and Ford could catch up. Ron




Well put, Ron.. and I agree..

Here is something else to think about.

My 71 Hemi Challenger was bought new by a guy with limited skills.

All he did was.

-Install headers.
-12.5:1 pitons.
-A Rat Roaster(unmodified)
-Carter Competition series carbs
-A Holley Red pump.
-A Racer Brown solid cam
-4.88 gears.

Car went 10.30's@134MPH. All stock suspension. Stock unmodded 4 speed, No spool. No headwork. Other than a big block Vette there probably isnt any musclecar that could go that fast with such relatively minor mods. Even ran the stock dual point distributor. No Chrysler wedge could do that, that I am aware of.

The Hemi really had it..

MB




sorry but a a 12.5:1 440 w/ a good inatke and carb(s) would run just as well... That's more than just a few bolt ons and far from the hemi's "stock" build. I'd probably run less gear w/ a 440 thou




OK...So with your theory.

Take a stock full bodied 3,600# 440 Challenger with a non tricked stock 4 speed.

Put 12.5:1 pistons
A set of headers.
Lets say a Torker intake.
An electric fuel pump.
A solid cam with mid 70's technology, like the Racer Brown.
An Edelbrock carb(just because the Competition Series Carters were just fancy versions of the original AFB's and were of the exact same design).
Any gears you want.
Dual point distributor.
100% stock suspension.
Untouched 906 heads and the stock valvetrain.

With that recipe you are saying you would run 10.30's at 134?? Lets not forget, this was done in 1975 with just a regular guy building/tuning the car, not some guru....

MB
Posted By: Dean_Kuzluzski

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/15/12 10:10 PM

As true as ever...........

as the old saying goes "it's hard to be humble when you own a Hemi".

Undeniable, they 1st and 2nd Gen had their virtues. The 2nd being a race bred animal from its incarnation.

But the wedges were the ones that the average masses massaged to defend the pentastar on the street as daily drivers back in the day.

Never heard "Shoulda gotta Wedge" over the Hemi, but have heard "I can build several wedges for the cost of a Hemi" before!

It's all good folks!
Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/15/12 10:20 PM

I like em' all but, one thing to remember.....

Lobster costs more than a can of tuna fish.....for a reason.
Posted By: RSNOMO

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/16/12 12:08 AM

'But the wedges were the ones that the average masses massaged to defend the pentastar on the street as daily drivers back in the day.'

Absolutely...

The elephant mighta been the glory-hound, but the wedges were the foot-soldiers...
Posted By: dmking

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/16/12 02:38 AM

imagin what life would be like if the max wedge heads were the normal head and not the 906.
it is no suprise the hemi made more hp easier with the better head flow over a 906.
it still wonder what a 440 six pack would of run with a max wedge head on it. maybe stepped on the hemis toes.
Posted By: JackGTX440

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/16/12 02:53 AM

Quote:

OK...So with your theory.

Take a stock full bodied 3,600# 440 Challenger with a non tricked stock 4 speed.

Put 12.5:1 pistons
A set of headers.
Lets say a Torker intake.
An electric fuel pump.
A solid cam with mid 70's technology, like the Racer Brown.
An Edelbrock carb(just because the Competition Series Carters were just fancy versions of the original AFB's and were of the exact same design).
Any gears you want.
Dual point distributor.
100% stock suspension.
Untouched 906 heads and the stock valvetrain.

With that recipe you are saying you would run 10.30's at 134?? Lets not forget, this was done in 1975 with just a regular guy building/tuning the car, not some guru....

MB




I agree, this sounds almost 2 seconds off... And about 16 mph... Just sayin'

I could however, see a HEMI car getting close to that.

Cost NOT included, the pros for the design of the HEMI FAR outweigh the cons.
Posted By: jamesc

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/16/12 03:04 AM

Quote:

Wedge racer and driver...by choice! always have been, always will be. I have no problem with the Hemi, it's a fine engine, just not impressed with Hemi owners who think everyone should bow down and ooh and aah over their car because they have an engine that other people have done amazing things with.




agreed, they're ok but imho the hype outweighs the output. the SSH cars are impressive but as a general rule if you want to run a chrysler most are better off with a wedge. as for the newer PS type engine i think calling that a hemi is a bit of a stretch
Posted By: Mr.Yuck

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/16/12 02:15 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

They are both Mopar so I like them both. But I know the 63 Max Wedge cars were street legal as anyone could buy one. I honestly feel in stock trim the Max Wedge was the fastest Mopar street muscle car sold in the muscle car era. Sure the Hemi was a race eng and would kick but when setup right but on the street in stock form it was held back and the wedge carried the banner for Mopar on the street most of the time. You have to ask yourself.........how many Hemi's did you see on the street in the 60's ? A stock Maxie 62 Dart 413 went 13.44 @ 109 for M/T. Good mph for a stock eng in 1962. 426 Maxie in 63 ran 12.60's @ almost 112 mph with just the cutouts open and Atlas tires. The Hemi to me was like Fords Boss 429 as it was choked out in stock form but was the king of all race engines where it dominated. The wedge had its place in Mopar history for sure and even ran good when prepped out. I dont know if my 63 would go any faster with a Hemi equipped the same as my wedge and thats because of the good heads out there for the wedge today. And everyone knows how well the 440 six pack cars ran on the street. And the Hemi dominated the first 2 years of Pro Stock so much they had to restrict it so GM and Ford could catch up. Ron




Well put, Ron.. and I agree..

Here is something else to think about.

My 71 Hemi Challenger was bought new by a guy with limited skills.

All he did was.

-Install headers.
-12.5:1 pitons.
-A Rat Roaster(unmodified)
-Carter Competition series carbs
-A Holley Red pump.
-A Racer Brown solid cam
-4.88 gears.

Car went 10.30's@134MPH. All stock suspension. Stock unmodded 4 speed, No spool. No headwork. Other than a big block Vette there probably isnt any musclecar that could go that fast with such relatively minor mods. Even ran the stock dual point distributor. No Chrysler wedge could do that, that I am aware of.

The Hemi really had it..

MB




sorry but a a 12.5:1 440 w/ a good inatke and carb(s) would run just as well... That's more than just a few bolt ons and far from the hemi's "stock" build. I'd probably run less gear w/ a 440 thou




OK...So with your theory.

Take a stock full bodied 3,600# 440 Challenger with a non tricked stock 4 speed.

Put 12.5:1 pistons
A set of headers.
Lets say a Torker intake.
An electric fuel pump.
A solid cam with mid 70's technology, like the Racer Brown.
An Edelbrock carb(just because the Competition Series Carters were just fancy versions of the original AFB's and were of the exact same design).
Any gears you want.
Dual point distributor.
100% stock suspension.
Untouched 906 heads and the stock valvetrain.

With that recipe you are saying you would run 10.30's at 134?? Lets not forget, this was done in 1975 with just a regular guy building/tuning the car, not some guru....

MB




So you get 2 carbs and I'm stuck w/ one pitiful carter? How about a short Ram w/ 2 holleys or a factory 6-pack? Probably do at least a home port job on the heads and run old isky rockers...I mean you're tearing the motor apart anyway right. My main point was your hemi was not stock. And the wedge might not be at 10.30 but It wouldn't be too far behind. Remember it doesn't need to see 7000rpm.
Posted By: HPMike

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/16/12 03:10 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

They are both Mopar so I like them both. But I know the 63 Max Wedge cars were street legal as anyone could buy one. I honestly feel in stock trim the Max Wedge was the fastest Mopar street muscle car sold in the muscle car era. Sure the Hemi was a race eng and would kick but when setup right but on the street in stock form it was held back and the wedge carried the banner for Mopar on the street most of the time. You have to ask yourself.........how many Hemi's did you see on the street in the 60's ? A stock Maxie 62 Dart 413 went 13.44 @ 109 for M/T. Good mph for a stock eng in 1962. 426 Maxie in 63 ran 12.60's @ almost 112 mph with just the cutouts open and Atlas tires. The Hemi to me was like Fords Boss 429 as it was choked out in stock form but was the king of all race engines where it dominated. The wedge had its place in Mopar history for sure and even ran good when prepped out. I dont know if my 63 would go any faster with a Hemi equipped the same as my wedge and thats because of the good heads out there for the wedge today. And everyone knows how well the 440 six pack cars ran on the street. And the Hemi dominated the first 2 years of Pro Stock so much they had to restrict it so GM and Ford could catch up. Ron




Well put, Ron.. and I agree..

Here is something else to think about.

My 71 Hemi Challenger was bought new by a guy with limited skills.

All he did was.

-Install headers.
-12.5:1 pitons.
-A Rat Roaster(unmodified)
-Carter Competition series carbs
-A Holley Red pump.
-A Racer Brown solid cam
-4.88 gears.

Car went 10.30's@134MPH. All stock suspension. Stock unmodded 4 speed, No spool. No headwork. Other than a big block Vette there probably isnt any musclecar that could go that fast with such relatively minor mods. Even ran the stock dual point distributor. No Chrysler wedge could do that, that I am aware of.

The Hemi really had it..

MB




sorry but a a 12.5:1 440 w/ a good inatke and carb(s) would run just as well... That's more than just a few bolt ons and far from the hemi's "stock" build. I'd probably run less gear w/ a 440 thou




OK...So with your theory.

Take a stock full bodied 3,600# 440 Challenger with a non tricked stock 4 speed.

Put 12.5:1 pistons
A set of headers.
Lets say a Torker intake.
An electric fuel pump.
A solid cam with mid 70's technology, like the Racer Brown.
An Edelbrock carb(just because the Competition Series Carters were just fancy versions of the original AFB's and were of the exact same design).
Any gears you want.
Dual point distributor.
100% stock suspension.
Untouched 906 heads and the stock valvetrain.

With that recipe you are saying you would run 10.30's at 134?? Lets not forget, this was done in 1975 with just a regular guy building/tuning the car, not some guru....

MB




So you get 2 carbs and I'm stuck w/ one pitiful carter? How about a short Ram w/ 2 holleys or a factory 6-pack? Probably do at least a home port job on the heads and run old isky rockers...I mean you're tearing the motor apart anyway right. My main point was your hemi was not stock. And the wedge might not be at 10.30 but It wouldn't be too far behind. Remember it doesn't need to see 7000rpm.




Who said the Hemi was stock??

But my comparison is "apples to apples". The hemi comes from the factory with two carbs, so you arent adding anything. Add carbs to your wedge and you are. All I am trying to illustrate is that you arent going to get nearly as far with the equivalent work on a wedge as you would a Hemi. Period. And when you start really turning up the heat, then the wedge really gets left behind. The wedge then needs serious aftermarket parts. There is a reason these cars got their own classification in Super Stock. It was otherwise an unfair advantage to anything else. And the wedge is actually a "bigger" engine technically speaking.



MB
Posted By: RUNCHARGER

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/16/12 03:19 PM

We all know an engine is just an air compressor right? Look at those 426 Hemi intake ports, then at your wedge ports (max wedge ports if that makes you happy), Tell me which one is going to pump the most air through them.
I don't know any street racer back then that just kept adding camshaft to his 440 and went faster and faster. But that's what works in a 426 Hemi (and big block Chevy for that matter).

Sheldon
Posted By: 383man

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/16/12 08:00 PM

Stock heads would hold the wedge back for sure. We have very good aftermarket and MP wedge heads but you cant consider it stock anymore once you put Indy's or Eddy heads on a 440. You have to add a good head to the wedge to try and stay even close to the Hemi. Ron
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/16/12 10:36 PM

Quote:

Stock heads would hold the wedge back for sure. We have very good aftermarket and MP wedge heads but you cant consider it stock anymore once you put Indy's or Eddy heads on a 440. You have to add a good head to the wedge to try and stay even close to the Hemi. Ron




Great points, Ron!! But...there IS enough
factory and aftermarket performance goodies for the wedge to "do battle" with the HEMI. Biggest problem is not the power, nor the breathing capabilities as much as everyone believes. It's the engine reliability and hi-rpm potential. The wedge is bit behind in both areas. The HEMI heads are simply "free-breathers" at higher rpms, netting MORE hp than the wedge. Not to say the wedge cannot attain high levels of hp, they simply do it at a lower rpm level than the HEMI. That's why I believe the wedges NEED the added preventative measures and parts (precise lower end clearances, billet/steel main bearing caps, main bearing/block girdles, cross-bolted
main cap engine blocks), to complete with the HEMI
and it's reliability/power output. Again, simply put (and without insult to ANYONE), wedges (max or
not) RULE the 8.90's (oops SS wedges are near 8.60-8.50 now?)and slower brackets and classes, while the HEMIS dominate everything else. Except the STREETS, where the CROWN can go to either motor, if it's fair. But..who knows what IS fair!!

Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/16/12 11:17 PM

Quote:

Quote:

They are both Mopar so I like them both. But I know the 63 Max Wedge cars were street legal as anyone could buy one. I honestly feel in stock trim the Max Wedge was the fastest Mopar street muscle car sold in the muscle car era. Sure the Hemi was a race eng and would kick but when setup right but on the street in stock form it was held back and the wedge carried the banner for Mopar on the street most of the time. You have to ask yourself.........how many Hemi's did you see on the street in the 60's ? A stock Maxie 62 Dart 413 went 13.44 @ 109 for M/T. Good mph for a stock eng in 1962. 426 Maxie in 63 ran 12.60's @ almost 112 mph with just the cutouts open and Atlas tires. The Hemi to me was like Fords Boss 429 as it was choked out in stock form but was the king of all race engines where it dominated. The wedge had its place in Mopar history for sure and even ran good when prepped out. I dont know if my 63 would go any faster with a Hemi equipped the same as my wedge and thats because of the good heads out there for the wedge today. And everyone knows how well the 440 six pack cars ran on the street. And the Hemi dominated the first 2 years of Pro Stock so much they had to restrict it so GM and Ford could catch up. Ron




Well put, Ron.. and I agree..

Here is something else to think about.

My 71 Hemi Challenger was bought new by a guy with limited skills.

All he did was.

-Install headers.
-12.5:1 pitons.
-A Rat Roaster(unmodified)
-Carter Competition series carbs
-A Holley Red pump.
-A Racer Brown solid cam
-4.88 gears.

Car went 10.30's@134MPH. All stock suspension. Stock unmodded 4 speed, No spool. No headwork. Other than a big block Vette there probably isnt any musclecar that could go that fast with such relatively minor mods. Even ran the stock dual point distributor. No Chrysler wedge could do that, that I am aware of.

The Hemi really had it..

MB




Mike, all that your friend did was "UNCORK" the power output of the HEMI. It (Street Hemi) was ALREADY fortified and de-tuned (set up for lesser
power output) for street use from the factory. Compared to a 440 6 pack and 4-bbl Magnum motors it's a production "race piece" for the street, along with the Stage I 413, Stage II 413/426 and the legendary Stage III 426
MaxWedge motor (dubbed:"The Orange Monster") and the ACTUAL 426 Race HEMI of '64. Umm..Hemi power
pulling through a (now vintage) Rat Roaster intake to a 4speed and 4.88 gears on stock HEMI springs, no snubber. Any problems off the line hooking up?

Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/17/12 12:36 AM

There is an "easy" way to settle this discussion if there is a millionare (or 2) out there looking to drop about 250K into a fun shootout.

4 engines total, dyno sessions to maximize the combinations and I'll supply the car put em' in, to avoid the "we don't race dyno" arguement.

2 engines with stock blocks, heads and strokes......anything else goes. Max Wedge head vs HEMI head.

2 engines with aftermarket blocks (4.800BS), best straight head for the wedge (raw PSO) and best conventional HEMI head (raw Millennium).

Billet intakes, dual doms, dry sump, lobe relocation, anything and everything......max N/A on all 4 engines.

Have two top builders assemble the 2 engines they specialize in.....say Best Machine for the wedge and Ray Barton for the HEMI.


Come on millionares......step up and let's settle this age old question.
Posted By: RSNOMO

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/17/12 12:46 AM

If'n it was gonna be a wedge, I'd have to go with Jim Hale, or Dan Dvorak...
Posted By: Ari440

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/17/12 12:57 AM

I like the fact that you are trying to compare a wedge to a hemi

two diffrent motors
Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/17/12 12:58 AM

Quote:

If'n it was gonna be a wedge, I'd have to go with Jim Hale, or Dan Dvorak...


I have no preference, but Best Machine knows those PSO heads pretty well.
Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/17/12 01:07 AM

Quote:

I like the fact that you are trying to compare a wedge to a hemi

two diffrent motors


I'm not.....I know quite well just how different the requirements are for a good HEMI build and I know how easy it is to apply conventional wedge style procedures that turn HEMIs into toilet bowls.

I have a W-8 and a HEMI and had a 440-1. They all run/ran fine.......I like em' all.


I just think a shootout like this would be a ton-o-fun for the MOPAR crowd. Albeit a bit pricey.
Posted By: RSNOMO

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/17/12 01:11 AM

I'll stick with my previous statement...

And leave it at that...
Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/17/12 01:23 AM

Quote:

I'll stick with my previous statement...

And leave it at that...


Fair enough....
Posted By: Bishop

HEMI - 07/17/12 01:31 AM

The King says HEMI

Attached picture 7295380-572Hemi.jpg
Posted By: viperblue72

Re: HEMI - 07/17/12 04:53 AM

Anybody that says the wedge has the potential of a hemi has a complex. That's all there is to it.
Posted By: Edge

Re: HEMI - 07/17/12 05:46 AM

For n/a application hard to beat a wedge for a boosted motor hemi all the way
Posted By: 572_HEMI_Cuda

Re: HEMI - 07/17/12 12:22 PM

For n/a application hard to beat a HEMI for a boosted motor hemi all the way.
just sayin...
Posted By: scatpacktom

Re: HEMI - 07/17/12 01:09 PM

Reading over this thread I am amazed how many people have their head in the dirt. One engine was built for the purpose of racing and the other was to move the station wagon around. I will say that a stock hemi head outflows my best ported wedge heads and I can't recall seeing a wedge on the back of any top fuel car lately or ever for that matter.

One is simply better for racing, it is a fact. Seems silly to debate to me.
Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: HEMI - 07/17/12 01:33 PM

Quote:

Reading over this thread I am amazed how many people have their head in the dirt. One engine was built for the purpose of racing and the other was to move the station wagon around. I will say that a stock hemi head outflows my best ported wedge heads and I can't recall seeing a wedge on the back of any top fuel car lately or ever for that matter.

One is simply better for racing, it is a fact. Seems silly to debate to me.


Hush!!!

Don't be a party pooper.
Posted By: Mr.Yuck

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/17/12 02:31 PM

"The hemi comes from the factory with two carbs, so you arent adding anything. Add carbs to your wedge and you are."

440 comes with 3??? not saying a hemi isn't a better engine at all, just saying for 90% of us it's not financially practical. Even if it's going in a race car unless the OP wants to go 8's a wedge now a days is going to be much cheaper. You can build a real nice wedge for under 10k.... you can't build a Hemi for that. If you can you already have half the parts on your shelf.
Posted By: scatpacktom

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/17/12 04:21 PM

Quote:

"The hemi comes from the factory with two carbs, so you arent adding anything. Add carbs to your wedge and you are."

440 comes with 3??? not saying a hemi isn't a better engine at all, just saying for 90% of us it's not financially practical. Even if it's going in a race car unless the OP wants to go 8's a wedge now a days is going to be much cheaper. You can build a real nice wedge for under 10k.... you can't build a Hemi for that. If you can you already have half the parts on your shelf.




The thing is once you own the parts there is no engine easier to make power with. You can make more power by mistake with a hemi. Its no problem at all to make 7 or 800 hp with all the stock castings, stock rocker arms for crying out loud. Try that with a wedge.
Posted By: HPMike

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/17/12 04:39 PM

Quote:

Quote:

"The hemi comes from the factory with two carbs, so you arent adding anything. Add carbs to your wedge and you are."

440 comes with 3??? not saying a hemi isn't a better engine at all, just saying for 90% of us it's not financially practical. Even if it's going in a race car unless the OP wants to go 8's a wedge now a days is going to be much cheaper. You can build a real nice wedge for under 10k.... you can't build a Hemi for that. If you can you already have half the parts on your shelf.




The thing is once you own the parts there is no engine easier to make power with. You can make more power by mistake. Its no problem at all to make 7 or 800 hp with all the stock castings, stock rocker arms for crying out loud. Try that with a wedge.




Thanks Tommy. thats kinda what I have been trying to say...

Mr Y, not saying wedges suck, its just that my original point was that with relatively minimal mods and caveman technology these things made tons of steam. Apply the same level of mods to the wedge and you arent getting the same results-not even close. We all know you can make a B-1 or Predator headed "wedge" motor thgt hauls the mail, but thats a discussion for another thread.

MB
Posted By: pittsburghracer

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/17/12 05:05 PM

You HEMI guys are funny.
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/19/12 02:53 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

"The hemi comes from the factory with two carbs, so you arent adding anything. Add carbs to your wedge and you are."

440 comes with 3??? not saying a hemi isn't a better engine at all, just saying for 90% of us it's not financially practical. Even if it's going in a race car unless the OP wants to go 8's a wedge now a days is going to be much cheaper. You can build a real nice wedge for under 10k.... you can't build a Hemi for that. If you can you already have half the parts on your shelf.




The thing is once you own the parts there is no engine easier to make power with. You can make more power by mistake. Its no problem at all to make 7 or 800 hp with all the stock castings, stock rocker arms for crying out loud. Try that with a wedge.




Thanks Tommy. thats kinda what I have been trying to say...

Mr Y, not saying wedges suck, its just that my original point was that with relatively minimal mods and caveman technology these things made tons of steam. Apply the same level of mods to the wedge and you arent getting the same results-not even close. We all know you can make a B-1 or Predator headed "wedge" motor thgt hauls the mail, but thats a discussion for another thread.

MB




It's just nice to know that you can get BOTH a "full race-orientated" motor (HEMI), and a "Super Street" type motor
(Wedge) on the SAME big block platform from MA MOPAR.

Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/19/12 03:17 AM

Quote:

I like the fact that you are trying to compare a wedge to a hemi

two diffrent motors




Two different motors, yes...but from the SAME
basic foundation or block dimensions.
HEMI - High rpm powerhouse.
WEDGE - Lower rpm torque monster.
Best battleground is between the 220ft and 1000ft marks (1/4 mi). A good lead margin there, you've won.

Posted By: Ari440

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/19/12 03:37 AM

Quote:

Quote:

I like the fact that you are trying to compare a wedge to a hemi

two diffrent motors




Two different motors, yes...but from the SAME
basic foundation or block dimensions.
HEMI - High rpm powerhouse.
WEDGE - Lower rpm torque monster.
Best battleground is between the 220ft and 1000ft marks (1/4 mi). A good lead margin there, you've won.









the blocks are not the same


if the wedge block was like the hemi block (4 )cross bolt mains


and they kept the max wedge port or even bigger / diffrent head (none hemi )


maybe the wedge would have been better than it is


if you where to compare the hemi to big block chevy it would be intresting
Posted By: scatpacktom

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/19/12 05:23 AM

How long after the first Hemi dyno pull did it take Chrysler to discontinue the Max Wedge program?
Posted By: RSNOMO

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/19/12 06:31 AM

Run that question by Tom Hoover...
Posted By: HPMike

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/19/12 06:37 AM

It's been said before and it is kind of a silly "argument". While the Chrysler wedge was/is ia very durable and capable design, to compare the two is kind of ridiculous.

It would have been interesting if Ford had developed some of their max effort stuff to be more mainstream, like the SOHC and Boss motors. There was some real potential there and Ford had some dedicated people working there at the time that were very race oriented.

GM had the resources at the time to probably bury both Ford and Chrysler during that era and had some exotic stuff in prototype form, but because they didnt place enough emphasis on high performance/ max effort race stuff and were selling cars at a ridiculous pace, it never came to fruition. Why mess with success? The purpose of all of this was to sell more cars, so they didnt bother. It might have gotten more interesting if John DeLorean had more influence. And while they still managed to create some hot machinery, at the end of the day they dont compare to the Hemi in terms of max performance...

Let's just rejoice as fans of this marque that the hemi has the status that it has and earned. I like the line someone else posted earlier. No one ever looks at a Hemi and says, "too bad it's not a wedge"...that says it all...

MB
Posted By: HEMIFRED

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/19/12 02:19 PM

you need not ask "WHY" a HEMI

BG RACING'S 588" now passing the 250 run mark

Attached picture 7299016-059.JPG
Posted By: HEMIFRED

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/19/12 02:21 PM

604" 1178 HP all motor by DTHEMI

Attached picture 7299019-A.JPG
Posted By: 572_HEMI_Cuda

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/19/12 02:53 PM

Quote:

Quote:

I like the fact that you are trying to compare a wedge to a hemi

two diffrent motors




Two different motors, yes...but from the SAME
basic foundation or block dimensions.
HEMI - High rpm powerhouse.
WEDGE - Lower rpm torque monster.
Best battleground is between the 220ft and 1000ft marks (1/4 mi). A good lead margin there, you've won.






I shift my HEMI at 7,300 and cross the line at 7,600. Car has been 8.46 @ 161 all motor 2 small carbs at 3200 lbs.
just sayin...
Posted By: JackGTX440

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/19/12 03:46 PM

Quote:

How long after the first Hemi dyno pull did it take Chrysler to discontinue the Max Wedge program?




This ^^^
Posted By: Tig

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/19/12 04:08 PM

Quote:



I shift my HEMI at 7,300 and cross the line at 7,600. Car has been 8.46 @ 161 all motor 2 small carbs at 3200 lbs.
just sayin...



Good going Out of interest I shift @ 6700 and cross the line @ 6900 on a good run. Big single Dominator, Car has been 9.57 @ 142.5. Still wouldn't go 8.4,s 600lb lighter though.
Just thought this illustrated the rpm/torque characteristics of the two types of engines. Though I know there is more to it than just head design.
Posted By: 383man

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/19/12 05:24 PM

Quote:

Quote:

I like the fact that you are trying to compare a wedge to a hemi

two diffrent motors




Two different motors, yes...but from the SAME
basic foundation or block dimensions.
HEMI - High rpm powerhouse.
WEDGE - Lower rpm torque monster.
Best battleground is between the 220ft and 1000ft marks (1/4 mi). A good lead margin there, you've won.







I think what this poster means is that basically they took the 426 Max Wedge block and adapted Hemi heads to it. Yes they had to change the block as it would not hold up at first and was craking cylinders I believe. And they went to 4 bolt mains and have the Head bolts come from underneath. But it was developed from the wedge block. Ron
Posted By: scatpacktom

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/19/12 09:21 PM

Something interesting about the blocks, Mr Hoover told me that when Packard went out of business Chrysler bought a bunch of tooling and the bore spacing of the B engine actually came from Packard. Thank God they were big powerful cars or we would all be screwed.
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/19/12 09:35 PM

Quote:

Something interesting about the blocks, Mr Hoover told me that when Packard went out of business Chrysler bought a bunch of tooling and the bore spacing of the B engine actually came from Packard. Thank God they were big powerful cars or we would all be screwed.




Bore spacing of the Packard V-8 was 5 inches; big-block/hemi mopar is 4.80

I have several Packard V-8's; their general layout is more closely related to the early Olds/Cadillac/Studebaker V-8's than to the Mopar wedge V-8's. I can't imagine what Packard V-8 tooling could have been used on any Mopar engine.
Posted By: scatpacktom

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/20/12 12:24 AM

About ten of us had dinner at the Pure Stock Drags. I took his word for it, they must have used something. Maybe it was something they were working on, but that's what he said.
Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/20/12 01:30 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Something interesting about the blocks, Mr Hoover told me that when Packard went out of business Chrysler bought a bunch of tooling and the bore spacing of the B engine actually came from Packard. Thank God they were big powerful cars or we would all be screwed.




Bore spacing of the Packard V-8 was 5 inches; big-block/hemi mopar is 4.80

I have several Packard V-8's; their general layout is more closely related to the early Olds/Cadillac/Studebaker V-8's than to the Mopar wedge V-8's. I can't imagine what Packard V-8 tooling could have been used on any Mopar engine.


What a pity the big MOPARS weren't blessed with a 5.00 bore space.....

What a different world it would be.
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/20/12 01:40 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

I like the fact that you are trying to compare a wedge to a hemi

two diffrent motors




Two different motors, yes...but from the SAME
basic foundation or block dimensions.
HEMI - High rpm powerhouse.
WEDGE - Lower rpm torque monster.
Best battleground is between the 220ft and 1000ft marks (1/4 mi). A good lead margin there, you've won.







I think what this poster means is that basically they took the 426 Max Wedge block and adapted Hemi heads to it. Yes they had to change the block as it would not hold up at first and was craking cylinders I believe. And they went to 4 bolt mains and have the Head bolts come from underneath. But it was developed from the wedge block. Ron




Thank you Ron, for the careful observation! That's EXACTLY what they (Chrysler engineers) did for the high output/high rpm characteristics of this motor. "Fortification" to say the LEAST. I believe the main caps were "cross-bolted" into the block at #2,#3 and #4
main caps. The 64' Stage III 426 Max-Wedge motors might have been setup the same way. They also had the conventional 2 bolt setup on all 5 caps.

Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/20/12 01:48 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

I like the fact that you are trying to compare a wedge to a hemi

two diffrent motors




Two different motors, yes...but from the SAME
basic foundation or block dimensions.
HEMI - High rpm powerhouse.
WEDGE - Lower rpm torque monster.
Best battleground is between the 220ft and 1000ft marks (1/4 mi). A good lead margin there, you've won.






I shift my HEMI at 7,300 and cross the line at 7,600. Car has been 8.46 @ 161 all motor 2 small carbs at 3200 lbs.
just sayin...




Power to weight, my friend!
Lighter weight always helps (free hp).

Posted By: Mr.Yuck

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/20/12 01:53 AM

Quote:

604" 1178 HP all motor by DTHEMI




what's that cost??? 80k? Still comes down to your wallet. Hemi is a great motor but a wedge will get it done on a budget.
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/20/12 02:08 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

I like the fact that you are trying to compare a wedge to a hemi

two diffrent motors




Two different motors, yes...but from the SAME
basic foundation or block dimensions.
HEMI - High rpm powerhouse.
WEDGE - Lower rpm torque monster.
Best battleground is between the 220ft and 1000ft marks (1/4 mi). A good lead margin there, you've won.









the blocks are not the same


if the wedge block was like the hemi block (4 )cross bolt mains


and they kept the max wedge port or even bigger / diffrent head (none hemi )


maybe the wedge would have been better than it is


if you where to compare the hemi to big block chevy it would be intresting





Let's unravel your statements here:

Block dimensions and BORE spacing is exactly the same. They are NOT built on the SAME block!!

They have THREE (3) cross-bolted main caps.

Maxie heads are fine up to 450 ci, maybe 470. 500
or more cubes, think about aftermarket and/or "fully ported" Maxies with bigger valves. Wedges have a WIDE selection of cylinder heads.

Chrysler Wedges are getting BETTER as each year passes.

Comparing a Big-Block Chevy to a HEMI? No comparision ( sorry chevy guys). HEMI can and will
rpm in places where "Rat Motors" will never go to.
Funny thing though, Ford's 427 SOHC motor could do
major strip damage to a Chevy Big Block also! 600+
horses "out-the-box"! After all, it IS a hemi (head type) motor!

Posted By: HPMike

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/20/12 03:12 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

I like the fact that you are trying to compare a wedge to a hemi

two diffrent motors




Two different motors, yes...but from the SAME
basic foundation or block dimensions.
HEMI - High rpm powerhouse.
WEDGE - Lower rpm torque monster.
Best battleground is between the 220ft and 1000ft marks (1/4 mi). A good lead margin there, you've won.









the blocks are not the same


if the wedge block was like the hemi block (4 )cross bolt mains


and they kept the max wedge port or even bigger / diffrent head (none hemi )


maybe the wedge would have been better than it is


if you where to compare the hemi to big block chevy it would be intresting





Let's unravel your statements here:

Block dimensions and BORE spacing is exactly the same. They are NOT built on the SAME block!!

They have THREE (3) cross-bolted main caps.

Maxie heads are fine up to 450 ci, maybe 470. 500
or more cubes, think about aftermarket and/or "fully ported" Maxies with bigger valves. Wedges have a WIDE selection of cylinder heads.

Chrysler Wedges are getting BETTER as each year passes.

Comparing a Big-Block Chevy to a HEMI? No comparision ( sorry chevy guys). HEMI can and will
rpm in places where "Rat Motors" will never go to.
Funny thing though, Ford's 427 SOHC motor could do
major strip damage to a Chevy Big Block also! 600+
horses "out-the-box"! After all, it IS a hemi (head type) motor!






If you have ever seen a "Ball Stud" Hemi it was for all intents and purposes a knock off of the Chevrolet Big Block. The design was proven and while it didnt offer the true "maximum performance" of the 426Hemi, the big chevrolet made tons of power and was a far more uncomplicated and cheaper design. Probably the best overall high performance engine ever produced when you take everything into account...

MB
Posted By: RUNCHARGER

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/20/12 04:39 AM

Square port BBC gaskets are a perfect fit on the 426 Hemi head. I have to admit for cheap power the BBC is hard to beat. There are Mopar advantages like the deep skirt block, external oil pump, long rods etc. but if you want lots of power cheap, the BBC will do it. The 426 Hemi and the BBC just make more power as you add camshaft and better breathing on the intake and header side. The BBD needs careful selection of camshaft to work with the small heads.

Sheldon
Posted By: Hemi Allstate

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/20/12 04:44 AM





Comparing a Big-Block Chevy to a HEMI? No comparision ( sorry chevy guys). HEMI can and will
rpm in places where "Rat Motors" will never go to.
Funny thing though, Ford's 427 SOHC motor could do
major strip damage to a Chevy Big Block also! 600+
horses "out-the-box"! After all, it IS a hemi (head type) motor!






If you have ever seen a "Ball Stud" Hemi it was for all intents and purposes a knock off of the Chevrolet Big Block. The design was proven and while it didnt offer the true "maximum performance" of the 426Hemi, the big chevrolet made tons of power and was a far more uncomplicated and cheaper design. Probably the best overall high performance engine ever produced when you take everything into account...

MB




BBC is a heck of an engine. Can we say that here?:o

Ball Stud Hemi,

Attached picture 7300112-A279_BallStudHemi_1_Lg.jpg
Posted By: HEMIFRED

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/20/12 07:24 AM

Quote:

Quote:

604" 1178 HP all motor by DTHEMI




what's that cost??? 80k? Still comes down to your wallet. Hemi is a great motor but a wedge will get it done on a budget.




no where near that

when Darrin agreed to build mine.price was never a factor. his E85 653" made 1261 HP and 1,000 lb torque. I believe that's more HP than any others made using a 4.8 bore center.
at 604 and 1178 mine makes .01 more per cube
What I learned from discussions with Darren as he worked on mine is worth more than money can buy.
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/21/12 12:40 AM

Quote:





Comparing a Big-Block Chevy to a HEMI? No comparision ( sorry chevy guys). HEMI can and will
rpm in places where "Rat Motors" will never go to.
Funny thing though, Ford's 427 SOHC motor could do
major strip damage to a Chevy Big Block also! 600+
horses "out-the-box"! After all, it IS a hemi (head type) motor!






If you have ever seen a "Ball Stud" Hemi it was for all intents and purposes a knock off of the Chevrolet Big Block. The design was proven and while it didnt offer the true "maximum performance" of the 426Hemi, the big chevrolet made tons of power and was a far more uncomplicated and cheaper design. Probably the best overall high performance engine ever produced when you take everything into account...

MB




BBC is a heck of an engine. Can we say that here?:o

Ball Stud Hemi,





SURE, you can say it here! The BBC is a fine engine from the "General's Army", but it lacks the overall "ruggedness and dependability" that the HEMI has as a sheer advantage. The HEMI has "overengineered and weighty" engine/cylinder head components, it still delivers solid performance. The chamber/port combination of the HEMI head is responsible for it's "UNLIMITED" top end charge. The shaft-type rocker arms (heavy) are a bit stronger in material and keeps the rocker/valve tip alignment, while ball-stud, although lighter (a GREAT plus for rpms), may pull through the pushrod end. Still a WORTHY adversary!!

Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: HEMI - 07/21/12 12:58 AM

Quote:

The King says HEMI




Whoa NOW!! The King LOVES both types of motors!! Started with Chrysler WEDGES, won BIG with the HEMI for years, went to a Ford
wedge motor (429 "tunnel-port" NASCAR motor) for a season, (in 1969 I believe), then went back
to the Dodge WEDGE (426 version) before going to GM and retiring in the early 90's.

Posted By: RUNCHARGER

Re: HEMI - 07/21/12 01:14 AM

Actually did you ever read what Petty said after he drove the 426 Hemi for the first time in 63 or early 64? It was so much stronger than the wedges (like 10 or 15 MPH faster) he figured it had to be illegal.

Sheldon
Posted By: ScatPackNick

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/21/12 04:20 AM




Posted By: racer_amx

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/21/12 04:20 PM

Wedge hands down,for the simple fact that it makes similiar power to a hemi and its wayyy cheaper to build
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: HEMI - 07/21/12 04:50 PM

Quote:

Actually did you ever read what Petty said after he drove the 426 Hemi for the first time in 63 or early 64? It was so much stronger than the wedges (like 10 or 15 MPH faster) he figured it had to be illegal.

Sheldon





I'm quite sure that "The King" , knew he was headed to major success, after running that first
race HEMI in NASCAR. But.. the wedges did "pave" the way for the HEMI.

Posted By: RSNOMO

Re: HEMI - 07/21/12 10:13 PM

Mr. Petty went to the General because of the beginning of the 'Chrysler doldrums'...
Posted By: 383man

Re: HEMI - 07/21/12 10:22 PM

From I understand when the 426 Hemi first came out in 64 it did dominate NASCAR but in drag racing it was no faster then the wedge cars at first. So they did not drag race it right away as the Ramchargers worked with the Hemi and changed cams I believe to really wake it up for drag racing. The wedge really did not do to bad in NASCAR as I think Petty finished 3rd in points in 63 running the wedge. But the higher up wanted a guarantee to win Daytona in 64 and they did not feel the wedge could guarantee a win. So of course they adapted the Hemi heads to the reworked wedge block and did guarantee a win. It would have been cool if they had kept the Max Wedge in production also and update it over the years. I could see it now that along with the 383 , 440-6pk and Hemi you can also get a Max Wedge in the Roadrunner. Ron
Posted By: Steve1118

Re: HEMI - 07/21/12 11:58 PM

The initial problem in 64 was carburetion on the cross ram. The initial runs were with the same AFB's the wedge cars ran, and for some reason the AFB's did not work well on the Hemi. The mid 64 switch to the Holleys is what woke them up.

We've tried for years to make AFB's work on a Hemi crossram, and we never could. I don't know if it's the extremely big plenum or what it is, but we found the same thing. When Gary Conditt of the Ramchargers told me they never could, either, and that is why the mid year switch to Holleys, I didn't feel quite so stupid.

We run both Indy headed wedges, and a couple of Hemi cars. There ain't nothin' like a Hemi.
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: HEMI - 07/22/12 02:20 AM

Quote:

From I understand when the 426 Hemi first came out in 64 it did dominate NASCAR but in drag racing it was no faster then the wedge cars at first. So they did not drag race it right away as the Ramchargers worked with the Hemi and changed cams I believe to really wake it up for drag racing. The wedge really did not do to bad in NASCAR as I think Petty finished 3rd in points in 63 running the wedge. But the higher up wanted a guarantee to win Daytona in 64 and they did not feel the wedge could guarantee a win. So of course they adapted the Hemi heads to the reworked wedge block and did guarantee a win. It would have been cool if they had kept the Max Wedge in production also and update it over the years. I could see it now that along with the 383 , 440-6pk and Hemi you can also get a Max Wedge in the Roadrunner. Ron




The first HEMIS in 64' did have tuning problems, not so much as the components they had, but getting them to work right. To tune a 426 Hemi like the 426
Max-Wedge would NOT work, simply because of each engines different "breathing" characteristics. It
took the talented hands and minds of Tom Hoover and other Ramcharger members and notable racers to bring the HEMI to a "user-friendly" status. AS they have done with the Max-Wedge engines. Yes Ron, it DEFINITELY would have been a very good option in the later years, if time and money allowed!!

Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: HEMI - 07/22/12 02:32 AM

Quote:

Mr. Petty went to the General because of the beginning of the 'Chrysler doldrums'...




That could be putting things mildly, as Chryslers' rear-wheel drive cars were phased out by approx. 82', and the front-wheelers were coming by the truckload!

Posted By: robnbird

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/22/12 03:54 AM

Quote:

Quote:

A wedge will work but a hemi is prettier. Hemi's used to be expensive so I understand why people drove wedges but today if you are building from new parts the cost is the same nearly to the penny. (If you want to go thru the price list item by item we will.) I will never figure out why someone would drive a wedge.




really? crank, rods, pistons, cam maybe but blocks, heads and valve train? no way. Hemi headers and intake are also more expensive. You'll spend 2x as much (maybe more) building a 600hp hemi vs wedge.


I have built both the 542ci 440-1/indy 542ci hemi/indy head. every part on both motors new. everything. And neither are 600hp closer to 900hp. the Hemi maby $1600. more. the wedge is a great way to go. but for me that little extra $1600, its HEMI all the way. I actually paid more for a set of headman hustlers for the 440-1' that I did for a set of tti' for the hemi.

Attached picture 7302427-hemiin0708-12.jpg
Posted By: 383man

Re: HEMI - 07/22/12 04:30 AM

Quote:

The initial problem in 64 was carburetion on the cross ram. The initial runs were with the same AFB's the wedge cars ran, and for some reason the AFB's did not work well on the Hemi. The mid 64 switch to the Holleys is what woke them up.

We've tried for years to make AFB's work on a Hemi crossram, and we never could. I don't know if it's the extremely big plenum or what it is, but we found the same thing. When Gary Conditt of the Ramchargers told me they never could, either, and that is why the mid year switch to Holleys, I didn't feel quite so stupid.

We run both Indy headed wedges, and a couple of Hemi cars. There ain't nothin' like a Hemi.




You are correct as I forgot about switching to the Holley carbs. I had also read they changed the cam in the Hemi's from the one that was in it first. The Ramcharges figured out how to get the most out of the Hemi and the rest is history. Ron
Posted By: Mr.Yuck

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/22/12 03:17 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

A wedge will work but a hemi is prettier. Hemi's used to be expensive so I understand why people drove wedges but today if you are building from new parts the cost is the same nearly to the penny. (If you want to go thru the price list item by item we will.) I will never figure out why someone would drive a wedge.




really? crank, rods, pistons, cam maybe but blocks, heads and valve train? no way. Hemi headers and intake are also more expensive. You'll spend 2x as much (maybe more) building a 600hp hemi vs wedge.


I have built both the 542ci 440-1/indy 542ci hemi/indy head. every part on both motors new. everything. And neither are 600hp closer to 900hp. the Hemi maby $1600. more. the wedge is a great way to go. but for me that little extra $1600, its HEMI all the way. I actually paid more for a set of headman hustlers for the 440-1' that I did for a set of tti' for the hemi.




I'm not talking about a 900hp motor. I'm talking 6-700 local track bracket motor. Of course when you get up there w/ the wedge (or any motor) the cost jumps a ton.
Posted By: HotRodDave

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/22/12 04:06 PM

If the Hemi had been produced with 440 inches under it then no one would have ever accused it of haveing less TQ than the 440 wedge. Just like how the 426 wedge or max wedge is no comparison for the 426 hemi.
Posted By: RUNCHARGER

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/22/12 05:10 PM

I love the Street Hemi but I have often wondered if the factory had optimized the 69 A12 with Max Wedge heads with a matching camshaft and exhaust manifolds that thing would have been even more unreal on the streets, it probably would have been a turn key 12.5 car even with a bad driver. But that's not what happened.

Sheldon
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/22/12 05:13 PM

Quote:

If the Hemi had been produced with 440 inches under it then no one would have ever accused it of haveing less TQ than the 440 wedge. Just like how the 426 wedge or max wedge is no comparison for the 426 hemi.




That may be a VERY GOOD observation, Dave! But, history does serve well, since Michigan bred "street racer/class racer" Jimmy Addison has proven that
theory with the famed "Silver Bullet" (67' 480+ cube HEMI powered GTX). And as for a comparision between the two types of 426 cube motors, again it depends on how quick you want to run. On the street, wedge motors are cheap to build and they do RUN HARD. But for the "upper" brackets and
class racing ("for the money"), the HEMI will get you the green and the respect ...all for a small
investment though. IMO, a BIG CUBE Maxie Wedge would be far MORE FUN to drive on the street and race at the track. Best of both worlds, and can do it on "pump gas"!! That is my

Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/22/12 05:45 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

A wedge will work but a hemi is prettier. Hemi's used to be expensive so I understand why people drove wedges but today if you are building from new parts the cost is the same nearly to the penny. (If you want to go thru the price list item by item we will.) I will never figure out why someone would drive a wedge.




really? crank, rods, pistons, cam maybe but blocks, heads and valve train? no way. Hemi headers and intake are also more expensive. You'll spend 2x as much (maybe more) building a 600hp hemi vs wedge.


I have built both the 542ci 440-1/indy 542ci hemi/indy head. every part on both motors new. everything. And neither are 600hp closer to 900hp. the Hemi maby $1600. more. the wedge is a great way to go. but for me that little extra $1600, its HEMI all the way. I actually paid more for a set of headman hustlers for the 440-1' that I did for a set of tti' for the hemi.




I'm not talking about a 900hp motor. I'm talking 6-700 local track bracket motor. Of course when you get up there w/ the wedge (or any motor) the cost jumps a ton.




From approx. 650-700 hp (RB motor) and up the induction/heads are good part of your money spent. Stronger bottom end components and race balanced rotating assembilies, drive up the cost, adding to the above, with a stock 440 block. For the ultimate strength and longevity, a aftermarket block is the way to go, maybe a little cheaper. Gets pretty pricey as you "dial in more "HP". But still cheaper than a HEMI, in the long run.

Posted By: Jessie1

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/25/12 05:42 PM

From my understanding, computer designed modifications, completed on a state of the art CNC head porting machine, are able to port a 906 cast iron head to flow similar to a stock 2780559/2468016 cast iron hemi head. 49 years ago, Chrysler achieved what is now achieveable with computers on a 906 head by adopting the Hemi head. No wonder they went the Hemi route.....

Sure, you can put free flowing aluminum heads on that wedge, but again, you can't compare aluminum heads on a wedge to aluminum heads on a Gen II Hemi.

The wedge is a great motor, but it's no Hemi. We may as well be debating a 383 Magnum vs. a 440 Magnum.....

Attached picture 7307261-Valvetrain.jpg
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/27/12 10:05 PM

Quote:

From my understanding, computer designed modifications, completed on a state of the art CNC head porting machine, are able to port a 906 cast iron head to flow similar to a stock 2780559/2468016 cast iron hemi head. 49 years ago, Chrysler achieved what is now achieveable with computers on a 906 head by adopting the Hemi head. No wonder they went the Hemi route.....

Sure, you can put free flowing aluminum heads on that wedge, but again, you can't compare aluminum heads on a wedge to aluminum heads on a Gen II Hemi.

The wedge is a great motor, but it's no Hemi. We may as well be debating a 383 Magnum vs. a 440 Magnum.....




You're right about the differences - "Wedge a great motor, but it's no HEMI". A Wedge is a wedge-headed motor and a HEMI is a Hemispherical-headed (meaning half-ball, or half-moon shaped chambers) motor. Nothing special between the two except the "top-end" pieces (carbs, heads valvetrain and camshaft). The blocks are different because of the HEMIS' hi-rpm, high torque output range, versus the WEDGES low to mid rpm, high torque output range. Just pick what range you want to run in - a HIGH-RPM screamer, or
a low-end "stump-pulling" super torque monster. Both EQUALLY run hard in their effective "ranges".

Posted By: quickd100

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/28/12 03:32 AM

Quote:

Quote:

From my understanding, computer designed modifications, completed on a state of the art CNC head porting machine, are able to port a 906 cast iron head to flow similar to a stock 2780559/2468016 cast iron hemi head. 49 years ago, Chrysler achieved what is now achieveable with computers on a 906 head by adopting the Hemi head. No wonder they went the Hemi route.....

Sure, you can put free flowing aluminum heads on that wedge, but again, you can't compare aluminum heads on a wedge to aluminum heads on a Gen II Hemi.

The wedge is a great motor, but it's no Hemi. We may as well be debating a 383 Magnum vs. a 440 Magnum.....




You're right about the differences - "Wedge a great motor, but it's no HEMI". A Wedge is a wedge-headed motor and a HEMI is a Hemispherical-headed (meaning half-ball, or half-moon shaped chambers) motor. Nothing special between the two except the "top-end" pieces (carbs, heads valvetrain and camshaft). The blocks are different because of the HEMIS' hi-rpm, high torque output range, versus the WEDGES low to mid rpm, high torque output range. Just pick what range you want to run in - a HIGH-RPM screamer, or
a low-end "stump-pulling" super torque monster. Both EQUALLY run hard in their effective "ranges".






Go back a few pages and read my dyno figures on my 89.5 octane pumpgas Hemi. 818ftlbs.@4800. 852hp@ under 5900rpm. You can have your cake and eat it too.Dave
Posted By: HPMike

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/28/12 07:23 AM

Can't believe people are still "debating" this topic. The Hemi is better...Period...And its not even close..

MB
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/28/12 01:46 PM

Go back a few pages and read my dyno figures on my 89.5 octane pumpgas Hemi. [Email]818ftlbs.@4800.[/Email] 852hp@ under 5900rpm. You can have your cake and eat it too.Dave




Okay...again the debate over the better motor. Your dyno figures ARE impressive and I give you Kudos for achieving this feat on pump gas. But.. in reality this just tells me that you wanted to run a HEMI on pump gas for everyday use...midgrade gas at that!! The idea is very smart and IF the motor is efficient running at that octane level of gas.. then I'd say you DO have your cake and are eating it too!! BUT...how much did that cake COST!! Not everyone eats EXPENSIVE "cake", some of us love "pie" instead. Simple, inexpensive. easy-to-build, but very FULFILLING (performance wise)!!

A worth of "PIE":

www.popularhotrodding.com/enginemasters/articles/mopar/bigblock/

Titled: "The Big Wedge"
Built on the "smaller" Magnum platform!!
Impressive.

Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/28/12 01:58 PM

Quote:

Can't believe people are still "debating" this topic. The Hemi is better...Period...And its not even close..

MB




This debate may indeed go on forever,
Mike!! The HEMI may be the better engine in YOUR eyesight, BUT there are a LOT of WEDGE motor racers who say different. And they aren't backing off!! In fact, this thead may "eclipse" the ol' "413 vs. 440" thread.

Posted By: W.I.N. Racing

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/28/12 05:31 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Can't believe people are still "debating" this topic. The Hemi is better...Period...And its not even close..

MB




: BUT there are a LOT of WEDGE motor racers who say different. And they aren't backing off!!



I can understand that...nobody
likes to openly admit to being wrong!
Posted By: Dean_Kuzluzski

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/28/12 06:22 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Can't believe people are still "debating" this topic. The Hemi is better...Period...And its not even close..

MB




: BUT there are a LOT of WEDGE motor racers who say different. And they aren't backing off!!



I can understand that...nobody
likes to openly admit to being wrong!




I can't believe this thread is still going.............

clearly some need to compensate for apparent shortcomings by flaunting a Hemi when a wedge can be sufficient. Wedge motors make great Rv/truck grunt motors and cruiser/street machine/bracket racers. Why spend money where it doesn't need to be spent?

I clearly recall a certain member on here that sold his Hemi to go faster with a B1 Wedge in a very nice 70 Challenger.

The wedge was for the masses and the Hemi was the elite race motor that was flown for its glory. Get over it.
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/28/12 08:31 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Can't believe people are still "debating" this topic. The Hemi is better...Period...And its not even close..

MB




: BUT there are a LOT of WEDGE motor racers who say different. And they aren't backing off!!




I can understand that...nobody
likes to openly admit to being wrong!




I can understand that too..... by being WRONG means you run FAST for LESS (like most of the members here) To be RIGHT means you're WELL-OFF or "financially secure" to run the HEMI, I guess. Must be nice!!

Posted By: Ari440

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/28/12 09:02 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Can't believe people are still "debating" this topic. The Hemi is better...Period...And its not even close..

MB




: BUT there are a LOT of WEDGE motor racers who say different. And they aren't backing off!!




I can understand that...nobody
likes to openly admit to being wrong!




I can understand that too..... by being WRONG means you run FAST for LESS (like most of the members here) To be RIGHT means you're WELL-OFF or "financially secure" to run the HEMI, I guess. Must be nice!!





















the truth is : YOU SCARED OF THE WEDGE MOTOR

TO COMPARE THE WEDGE TO THE HEMI MAKES YOU FEEL DOMINATE OVER THE WEDGE MOTOR


YOU NEED $80.000 RACE SS/HA HEMIS TO BEAT A WEDGE MOTOR


DONT BE SCARED


Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/29/12 03:22 AM

Respectfully, HEMI owners you do have a RIGHT to BOAST ... but don't beat up the WEDGE owners in the process. They defended the Mopar legacy for decades. I wonder how you guys would "fare" against the 427 SOHC "Cammer" or the Boss 429? Or the Cleveland-head motors? Do "Supersized" Rat motors pose more OR less of a threat these "days"? How about the deadly 430 and 455 Buick torque monsters? Nobody wants to talk about that (the above motors)!! Yeah, it's EASIER to "pick" on your siblings, BUT.. harder for you to BEAT the "Brand X" (no not Russell Brand ) rivals!! Say it isn't so.

Posted By: W.I.N. Racing

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/29/12 02:26 PM

My comments are in line with absurdity of the "Argument". Meaning that opinions vary from one person to the next on just about everything, Small block vs. Big Block, Mopar vs Chevy vs. Ford, cars vs. boats etc...but as the original posted said STOCK HEAD Hemi vs. STOCK HEAD BB would not be worth the effort unless it was 500". That would be incorrect and proven so time and time again, just look back to the early days of pro-stock for examples.
Now as for where this post has turned to, once you (as others have said prior to me) go to aftermarket "race" heads all bets are off. When it comes to MAX performance ($$ is not an issue) they become more equally paired. but the Hemi still cost a little more...that's done to keep out the riff-raff
As for the Hemi in stock configuration compared to the Cammer or Boss...History has proven again the superior motor all things considered.
Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/29/12 03:03 PM

Quote:

Respectfully, HEMI owners you do have a RIGHT to BOAST ... but don't beat up the WEDGE owners in the process. They defended the Mopar legacy for decades. I wonder how you guys would "fare" against the 427 SOHC "Cammer" or the Boss 429? Or the Cleveland-head motors? Do "Supersized" Rat motors pose more OR less of a threat these "days"? How about the deadly 430 and 455 Buick torque monsters? Nobody wants to talk about that (the above motors)!! Yeah, it's EASIER to "pick" on your siblings, BUT.. harder for you to BEAT the "Brand X" (no not Russell Brand ) rivals!! Say it isn't so.




First off, only 3 people on planet Earth have ever seen a 427 SOHC and none of those were ever at a traffic light, while 4 people have seen a dinosaur. Have you ever been in cars with Boss 429, or Cleveland headed engines??? They have trouble falling out of a tree with their poorly balanced factory heads.

The big block chevy in stock iron head configuration is not the killer it is when you throw as much "chevy" as possible in the dumpster and bolt on as much aftermarket as possible.

And......I'll take my chances with a HEMI done right vs the um'.......Buick done right.

When it comes to stock blocks and heads, the ceiling is quite high compared to the "Brand X" crowd. A HEMI on "kill" (beyond a SS/AH build) with a factory block, heads and stroke can push the 2.5hp per inch range. Try that with a Max Wedge. As for the aftermarket....well, that's a whole different ballgame.

But of course you do realize that a HEMI engine also sits at the top of the aftermarket food chain, do you not???
Posted By: HPMike

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/29/12 03:46 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Respectfully, HEMI owners you do have a RIGHT to BOAST ... but don't beat up the WEDGE owners in the process. They defended the Mopar legacy for decades. I wonder how you guys would "fare" against the 427 SOHC "Cammer" or the Boss 429? Or the Cleveland-head motors? Do "Supersized" Rat motors pose more OR less of a threat these "days"? How about the deadly 430 and 455 Buick torque monsters? Nobody wants to talk about that (the above motors)!! Yeah, it's EASIER to "pick" on your siblings, BUT.. harder for you to BEAT the "Brand X" (no not Russell Brand ) rivals!! Say it isn't so.




First off, only 3 people on planet Earth have ever seen a 427 SOHC and none of those were ever at a traffic light, while 4 people have seen a dinosaur. Have you ever been in cars with Boss 429, or Cleveland headed engines??? They have trouble falling out of a tree with their poorly balanced factory heads.

The big block chevy in stock iron head configuration is not the killer it is when you throw as much "chevy" as possible in the dumpster and bolt on as much aftermarket as possible.

And......I'll take my chances with a HEMI done right vs the um'.......Buick done right.

When it comes to stock blocks and heads, the ceiling is quite high compared to the "Brand X" crowd. A HEMI on "kill" (beyond a SS/AH build) with a factory block, heads and stroke can push the 2.5hp per inch range. Try that with a Max Wedge. As for the aftermarket....well, that's a whole different ballgame.

But of course you do realize that a HEMI engine also sits at the top of the aftermarket food chain, do you not???




Forget it, Jim... Don't bother wasting your time arguing about it. Seems like the wedge guys just think the Hemi devotees are nothing but a bunch of elitist snobs with small manhood syndrome. It has absolutely nothing to do with the fact the its just plain a better design!! And all along I thought we were on the same team?

MB
Posted By: Ari440

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/29/12 04:27 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Respectfully, HEMI owners you do have a RIGHT to BOAST ... but don't beat up the WEDGE owners in the process. They defended the Mopar legacy for decades. I wonder how you guys would "fare" against the 427 SOHC "Cammer" or the Boss 429? Or the Cleveland-head motors? Do "Supersized" Rat motors pose more OR less of a threat these "days"? How about the deadly 430 and 455 Buick torque monsters? Nobody wants to talk about that (the above motors)!! Yeah, it's EASIER to "pick" on your siblings, BUT.. harder for you to BEAT the "Brand X" (no not Russell Brand ) rivals!! Say it isn't so.




First off, only 3 people on planet Earth have ever seen a 427 SOHC and none of those were ever at a traffic light, while 4 people have seen a dinosaur. Have you ever been in cars with Boss 429, or Cleveland headed engines??? They have trouble falling out of a tree with their poorly balanced factory heads.

The big block chevy in stock iron head configuration is not the killer it is when you throw as much "chevy" as possible in the dumpster and bolt on as much aftermarket as possible.

And......I'll take my chances with a HEMI done right vs the um'.......Buick done right.

When it comes to stock blocks and heads, the ceiling is quite high compared to the "Brand X" crowd. A HEMI on "kill" (beyond a SS/AH build) with a factory block, heads and stroke can push the 2.5hp per inch range. Try that with a Max Wedge. As for the aftermarket....well, that's a whole different ballgame.

But of course you do realize that a HEMI engine also sits at the top of the aftermarket food chain, do you not???




Forget it, Jim... Don't bother wasting your time arguing about it. Seems like the wedge guys just think the Hemi devotees are nothing but a bunch of elitist snobs with small manhood syndrome. It has absolutely nothing to do with the fact the its just plain a better design!! And all along I thought we were on the same team?

MB








we all know of the HEMI and its history

no one can deny (sp) it


the hemi from day one was a race motor and detuned to to drive on the street



but to compare a wedge to the hemi is just wrong
Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/29/12 07:01 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Respectfully, HEMI owners you do have a RIGHT to BOAST ... but don't beat up the WEDGE owners in the process. They defended the Mopar legacy for decades. I wonder how you guys would "fare" against the 427 SOHC "Cammer" or the Boss 429? Or the Cleveland-head motors? Do "Supersized" Rat motors pose more OR less of a threat these "days"? How about the deadly 430 and 455 Buick torque monsters? Nobody wants to talk about that (the above motors)!! Yeah, it's EASIER to "pick" on your siblings, BUT.. harder for you to BEAT the "Brand X" (no not Russell Brand ) rivals!! Say it isn't so.




First off, only 3 people on planet Earth have ever seen a 427 SOHC and none of those were ever at a traffic light, while 4 people have seen a dinosaur. Have you ever been in cars with Boss 429, or Cleveland headed engines??? They have trouble falling out of a tree with their poorly balanced factory heads.

The big block chevy in stock iron head configuration is not the killer it is when you throw as much "chevy" as possible in the dumpster and bolt on as much aftermarket as possible.

And......I'll take my chances with a HEMI done right vs the um'.......Buick done right.

When it comes to stock blocks and heads, the ceiling is quite high compared to the "Brand X" crowd. A HEMI on "kill" (beyond a SS/AH build) with a factory block, heads and stroke can push the 2.5hp per inch range. Try that with a Max Wedge. As for the aftermarket....well, that's a whole different ballgame.

But of course you do realize that a HEMI engine also sits at the top of the aftermarket food chain, do you not???




Forget it, Jim... Don't bother wasting your time arguing about it. Seems like the wedge guys just think the Hemi devotees are nothing but a bunch of elitist snobs with small manhood syndrome. It has absolutely nothing to do with the fact the its just plain a better design!! And all along I thought we were on the same team?

MB


I hear ya.....

Thing is, I love me some wedge engine. The most fun car I've owned was a 69' Barracuda with a 499ci Indy 440-1, but to compare the different designs on a performance level borders on foolishness. From stock factory iron to a "fuel" head, the HEMI is the big dog.

In a world with budgets and options, the Indy and B1 stuff are quality pieces and are capable of big power, so maybe we should be happy there are choices.

Although it would be nice to have a HEMI head that bridges the gap between the Millennium and the "pro" stuff.......something along the lines of what the chevy guys have with Raptors, Big Chiefs and Profilers.

Mr. Ray Barton and Mr. Eric Hansen.....are ya listening???
Posted By: hemi-itis

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/29/12 11:11 PM



Attached picture 7312660-IMG_2243.JPG
Posted By: W.I.N. Racing

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/30/12 03:48 AM




First off, only 3 people on planet Earth have ever seen a 427 SOHC



I just found out that Im one of three people(I've seen three of them) AND a Hemi owner..and proud of it!
I must be truely special!
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/30/12 08:30 AM

First off, only 3 people on planet Earth have ever seen a 427 SOHC and none of those were ever at a traffic light, while 4 people have seen a dinosaur. Have you ever been in cars with Boss 429, or Cleveland headed engines???

Tab Talmage (one of Ronnie Lyles friend/rival), had one (427 SOHC) in a Mustang, on the streets of New York City circa mid to late 60's. I guess the other two were split between the owners of the "Gas Ronda" Mustang and Dyno Don Nicholsons' strip rides. (In reality, there were actually MORE owners/racers) The 4 people who saw the dinosaur probably were out "west" (in Texas or Arizona somewhere)
and saw some roadside attraction . And yes,
I have been in cars with Cleveland-head (351's) motors and one with a Boss 429. They ARE fast, once setup RIGHT. Needs gears to get them going. Fortunately, I am a Mopar guy that respects the HEMI, but LOVES the Max-Wedge!! There is NOTHING like the grunt and sound of a multi-carbed Mopar wedge head big block going through the 1/8, 1/4 or on the boulevard. Nothing personal AGAINST the HEMI, Wedge is just my choice of Mopower but DON"T tell me that it's not worthy of it's place in performance history (or...worthless in comparision to other motors).

Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/30/12 08:41 AM

Quote:






Nice touch on the plate holder.

Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/30/12 02:00 PM

Quote:




First off, only 3 people on planet Earth have ever seen a 427 SOHC



I just found out that Im one of three people(I've seen three of them) AND a Hemi owner..and proud of it!
I must be truely special!


Next you're gonna tell me you've seen the elusive dinosaur!!!
Posted By: B G Racing

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/30/12 02:08 PM

Quote:

Quote:




First off, only 3 people on planet Earth have ever seen a 427 SOHC



I just found out that Im one of three people(I've seen three of them) AND a Hemi owner..and proud of it!
I must be truely special!


Next you're gonna tell me you've seen the elusive dinosaur!!!





To quote Connie Kalitta:The 427 SOHC is a great design for a "handgranade".The concept was great but development was not carried to profection for long term production.The cost and inherant design flaws made it short lived as a viable alternative to the Chrysler Hemis.
Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/30/12 02:43 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:




First off, only 3 people on planet Earth have ever seen a 427 SOHC



I just found out that Im one of three people(I've seen three of them) AND a Hemi owner..and proud of it!
I must be truely special!


Next you're gonna tell me you've seen the elusive dinosaur!!!





To quote Connie Kalitta:The 427 SOHC is a great design for a "handgranade".The concept was great but development was not carried to profection for long term production.The cost and inherant design flaws made it short lived as a viable alternative to the Chrysler Hemis.


This was exactly the problem with the SOHC...

Most of the unfortunate souls that actually got to see one in the flesh were killed in the inevitable explosion.
Posted By: 383man

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/30/12 05:42 PM

Quote:

Quote:




First off, only 3 people on planet Earth have ever seen a 427 SOHC



I just found out that Im one of three people(I've seen three of them) AND a Hemi owner..and proud of it!
I must be truely special!


Next you're gonna tell me you've seen the elusive dinosaur!!!




There are two cars with the 427 SOHC in my area that I see. One is a 63 Galaxy that is done right as it looks like it came from the factory with it as the guy did a nice job with it. The other is an old hot rod as it looks to be about a 34 or so Ford with the Cammer. Let me tell you I was surprised to see that Cammer in that hot rod as thats the first time I have ever seen one in a hot rod and it got alot of attention. They did run strong when running right. Don Nicholsons Maverick in the 70 to 73 Era of Pro Stock could run with any of them when they had that cammer running right and not breaking parts. You gotta remember its a hemi with overhead cams. Here is a pic of the eng in the 63 Galaxy. Ron

Posted By: RSNOMO

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/30/12 06:10 PM

Together with the 6-foot long timing chain...
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/30/12 07:01 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:




First off, only 3 people on planet Earth have ever seen a 427 SOHC



I just found out that Im one of three people(I've seen three of them) AND a Hemi owner..and proud of it!
I must be truely special!


Next you're gonna tell me you've seen the elusive dinosaur!!!




There are two cars with the 427 SOHC in my area that I see. One is a 63 Galaxy that is done right as it looks like it came from the factory with it as the guy did a nice job with it. The other is an old hot rod as it looks to be about a 34 or so Ford with the Cammer. Let me tell you I was surprised to see that Cammer in that hot rod as thats the first time I have ever seen one in a hot rod and it got alot of attention. They did run strong when running right. Don Nicholsons Maverick in the 70 to 73 Era of Pro Stock could run with any of them when they had that cammer running right and not breaking parts. You gotta remember its a hemi with overhead cams. Here is a pic of the eng in the 63 Galaxy. Ron






Im digging that GM alternator
Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/30/12 07:27 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:




First off, only 3 people on planet Earth have ever seen a 427 SOHC



I just found out that Im one of three people(I've seen three of them) AND a Hemi owner..and proud of it!
I must be truely special!


Next you're gonna tell me you've seen the elusive dinosaur!!!




There are two cars with the 427 SOHC in my area that I see. One is a 63 Galaxy that is done right as it looks like it came from the factory with it as the guy did a nice job with it. The other is an old hot rod as it looks to be about a 34 or so Ford with the Cammer. Let me tell you I was surprised to see that Cammer in that hot rod as thats the first time I have ever seen one in a hot rod and it got alot of attention. They did run strong when running right. Don Nicholsons Maverick in the 70 to 73 Era of Pro Stock could run with any of them when they had that cammer running right and not breaking parts. You gotta remember its a hemi with overhead cams. Here is a pic of the eng in the 63 Galaxy. Ron




Very cool car.
Posted By: GTX MATT

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/30/12 08:31 PM

Quote:

Have you ever been in cars with Boss 429, or Cleveland headed engines??? They have trouble falling out of a tree with their poorly balanced factory heads.

The big block chevy in stock iron head configuration is not the killer it is when you throw as much "chevy" as possible in the dumpster and bolt on as much aftermarket as possible.

And......I'll take my chances with a HEMI done right vs the um'.......Buick done right.

When it comes to stock blocks and heads, the ceiling is quite high compared to the "Brand X" crowd. A HEMI on "kill" (beyond a SS/AH build) with a factory block, heads and stroke can push the 2.5hp per inch range. Try that with a Max Wedge. As for the aftermarket....well, that's a whole different ballgame.

But of course you do realize that a HEMI engine also sits at the top of the aftermarket food chain, do you not???




Well you see in the 50s and 60s Ford had a reputation for being an affordable but luxurious car. Good door close quality and craftsmanship were key selling points.

Many people concerned with such things don't enjoy the feel of torque. It pushes you around and gets rid of the smoothness. Ford attempted to compensate for this with goofy suspension compenents, such as 10 feet tall coil springs to absorb as much of the shock of the surrounding environment as possible, as well as the forces of acceleration.

But goofy suspension setups can only do so much. Their brilliant team of engineers turned to good old fashioned component mismatching to produce poorer throttle response than had ever been seen before (that is until the 302 powered Crown Victoria's of the late 70s).

With HUGE ports matched to the lower displacement engines, small ports matched to the larger engines, big cams with two barrel carburetors, huge carbs on small engines, low compression, small carbs on their hotest engines, single exhaust, and tall gears, Ford got the lack of throttle response they were after.

And the Windsor series of engines not only accomplished terrible throttle response, but it has an astounding ability to absolutely annihilate gasoline more inefficiently than any other machine ever produced by man.

But back to the main topic, HEMI IS KING.
Posted By: B G Racing

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/30/12 08:33 PM

The Ford "hemi" combustion chamber was not a true hemispherical chamber but was a slightly curved chamber with multiple angles.
Posted By: GTX MATT

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/30/12 08:52 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:




First off, only 3 people on planet Earth have ever seen a 427 SOHC



I just found out that Im one of three people(I've seen three of them) AND a Hemi owner..and proud of it!
I must be truely special!


Next you're gonna tell me you've seen the elusive dinosaur!!!




There are two cars with the 427 SOHC in my area that I see. One is a 63 Galaxy that is done right as it looks like it came from the factory with it as the guy did a nice job with it. The other is an old hot rod as it looks to be about a 34 or so Ford with the Cammer. Let me tell you I was surprised to see that Cammer in that hot rod as thats the first time I have ever seen one in a hot rod and it got alot of attention. They did run strong when running right. Don Nicholsons Maverick in the 70 to 73 Era of Pro Stock could run with any of them when they had that cammer running right and not breaking parts. You gotta remember its a hemi with overhead cams. Here is a pic of the eng in the 63 Galaxy. Ron




Very cool car.




I'm in Danbury but I've never seen that thing running around, thats pretty cool though. I spend a lot of time down your way, you should come over to Bills Drive In on 111 on a Saturday night, small cruise but we get a fair amount of cool MoPars there.
Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/31/12 12:34 AM






I'm in Danbury but I've never seen that thing running around, thats pretty cool though. I spend a lot of time down your way, you should come over to Bills Drive In on 111 on a Saturday night, small cruise but we get a fair amount of cool MoPars there.


I'm about 3 miles from Bill's....

I was down there with my black Dart maybe a couple months ago. I might make it down Saturday if I have nothing on the calendar.

Some nice MOPARs always show up.
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/31/12 02:07 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:




First off, only 3 people on planet Earth have ever seen a 427 SOHC



I just found out that Im one of three people(I've seen three of them) AND a Hemi owner..and proud of it!
I must be truely special!


Next you're gonna tell me you've seen the elusive dinosaur!!!





To quote Connie Kalitta:The 427 SOHC is a great design for a "handgranade".The concept was great but development was not carried to profection for long term production.The cost and inherant design flaws made it short lived as a viable alternative to the Chrysler Hemis.






Was a GREAT attempt from the FORD camp and it would have made for "severe" rivalry on both the tracks and the streets. NASCAR killed it from the left side and the LACK of ongoing development (on the block itself) killed it from the right side. The people who still run them successfully, had done their homework and do have techniques and improved designs to overcome the "flaws". But again ... it boils down to the money issue.

Posted By: RSNOMO

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/31/12 02:26 AM

There is one in these parts that's been around for years...

It's in a Starliner...

The owner is not altogether unfamiliar with a 'SOCK'...
Posted By: W.I.N. Racing

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/31/12 02:29 AM

Wow ...whats the chances that all three of us(383 man, GTX Matt and myself) are all on the same web board... truely amazing as for seeing a dinosaur...who hasnt?
Posted By: RUNCHARGER

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/31/12 02:55 AM

I live in the sticks basically and I've seen and have photos of at least two SOHC engines,it must be like all the extra HemiCuda convts that have been discovered I suppose.

Sheldon
Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/31/12 03:06 AM

Quote:

Wow ...whats the chances that all three of us(383 man, GTX Matt and myself) are all on the same web board... truely amazing as for seeing a dinosaur...who hasnt?


This joint is special.

I'm callin' Guinness!!!
Posted By: 383man

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/31/12 04:34 AM

Quote:






I'm in Danbury but I've never seen that thing running around, thats pretty cool though. I spend a lot of time down your way, you should come over to Bills Drive In on 111 on a Saturday night, small cruise but we get a fair amount of cool MoPars there.


I'm about 3 miles from Bill's....

I was down there with my black Dart maybe a couple months ago. I might make it down Saturday if I have nothing on the calendar.

Some nice MOPARs always show up.




I have seen it twice at Marley Station in Glen Burnie. Course I only get down there about 4 times a summer. Ron
Posted By: GTX MATT

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 07/31/12 06:04 AM

Quote:

Wow ...whats the chances that all three of us(383 man, GTX Matt and myself) are all on the same web board... truely amazing as for seeing a dinosaur...who hasnt?




Well that was actually Jim with the picture of that Galaxy running around, I've never seen that car but it is local. I HAVE seen the 34 Ford with the Cammer engine though, so that actually makes 4 of us who have seen one.
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/01/12 01:51 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Have you ever been in cars with Boss 429, or Cleveland headed engines??? They have trouble falling out of a tree with their poorly balanced factory heads.

The big block chevy in stock iron head configuration is not the killer it is when you throw as much "chevy" as possible in the dumpster and bolt on as much aftermarket as possible.

And......I'll take my chances with a HEMI done right vs the um'.......Buick done right.

When it comes to stock blocks and heads, the ceiling is quite high compared to the "Brand X" crowd. A HEMI on "kill" (beyond a SS/AH build) with a factory block, heads and stroke can push the 2.5hp per inch range. Try that with a Max Wedge. As for the aftermarket....well, that's a whole different ballgame.

But of course you do realize that a HEMI engine also sits at the top of the aftermarket food chain, do you not???




Well you see in the 50s and 60s Ford had a reputation for being an affordable but luxurious car. Good door close quality and craftsmanship were key selling points.

Many people concerned with such things don't enjoy the feel of torque. It pushes you around and gets rid of the smoothness. Ford attempted to compensate for this with goofy suspension compenents, such as 10 feet tall coil springs to absorb as much of the shock of the surrounding environment as possible, as well as the forces of acceleration.

But goofy suspension setups can only do so much. Their brilliant team of engineers turned to good old fashioned component mismatching to produce poorer throttle response than had ever been seen before (that is until the 302 powered Crown Victoria's of the late 70s).

With HUGE ports matched to the lower displacement engines, small ports matched to the larger engines, big cams with two barrel carburetors, huge carbs on small engines, low compression, small carbs on their hotest engines, single exhaust, and tall gears, Ford got the lack of throttle response they were after.

And the Windsor series of engines not only accomplished terrible throttle response, but it has an astounding ability to absolutely annihilate gasoline more inefficiently than any other machine ever produced by man.

But back to the main topic, HEMI IS KING.







OK.. I'll humor your "humor"! After ALL in the end, we're Moparites HERE. Hmm... Your HUMOR:

#1 Why would you DRIVE a "Cleveland or Boss 429 powered car up a tree? Driving skills must be that of a kid with a 3hp go-kart. Lot of hp and torque, can't fool around with it.

#2 to a point! It takes a very-skilled mind and top notch machine work to make power with a mostly stock Chevy engine.

#3 Buick engines get better and BIGGER every year!
And they ARE "right". Been giving the Mopar HEMI and WEDGE engines "headaches" for YEARS!

#4 Stock stroke, heads and factory block HEMI engine pushing 2.5 hp per ci? I believe the "production" RACE HEMI was rated in the 550-575 hp range, maybe 600 at it's absolute best. Max-wedges were
probably down 50-75 hp from the above figure...BUT they had ample mid range torque to run against the HEMI. On the track or street, the HEMI may get there first, but NOT BY MUCH!

#5 As far as being "at the top of of the aftermarket food chain" , the HEMI is surpassed by CHEVROLET!!

#6 AS far as the FORD issues are concerned, Fords TRUE "drawbacks" lie within three problem areas:

In the 50's, their cars had some power but most models were unattractive to buyers looking for performance sedans.

During the 60's' again they had performance but the cars were too large and weighty (most of their "hot" motors were in full size sedans). They did start the ponycar "trend" which is STILL successful today!




As far as their motor design flaws there are some BUT most, if not all, can be corrected with factory parts or the aftermarket. Ford is VERY close to CHEVY in terms of "aftermarket usage". And yes, despite their "shortcomings", MOST FORD
engines DO make power! The "Windsor-head" motor has become an excellent "base" for serious stroker motors. Just as the Mopar 340/360 is. Ok, it's gas guzzler , but I believe that "works" for ANYTHING "out-of-tune"!

Now, as far as the TOPIC is concerned, "HEMI IS KING"! I thought that it was read "HEMI VS WEDGE"! I don't remember ANY "landslide" victories, HERE!
Posted By: HPMike

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/01/12 03:26 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Have you ever been in cars with Boss 429, or Cleveland headed engines??? They have trouble falling out of a tree with their poorly balanced factory heads.

The big block chevy in stock iron head configuration is not the killer it is when you throw as much "chevy" as possible in the dumpster and bolt on as much aftermarket as possible.

And......I'll take my chances with a HEMI done right vs the um'.......Buick done right.

When it comes to stock blocks and heads, the ceiling is quite high compared to the "Brand X" crowd. A HEMI on "kill" (beyond a SS/AH build) with a factory block, heads and stroke can push the 2.5hp per inch range. Try that with a Max Wedge. As for the aftermarket....well, that's a whole different ballgame.

But of course you do realize that a HEMI engine also sits at the top of the aftermarket food chain, do you not???




Well you see in the 50s and 60s Ford had a reputation for being an affordable but luxurious car. Good door close quality and craftsmanship were key selling points.

Many people concerned with such things don't enjoy the feel of torque. It pushes you around and gets rid of the smoothness. Ford attempted to compensate for this with goofy suspension compenents, such as 10 feet tall coil springs to absorb as much of the shock of the surrounding environment as possible, as well as the forces of acceleration.

But goofy suspension setups can only do so much. Their brilliant team of engineers turned to good old fashioned component mismatching to produce poorer throttle response than had ever been seen before (that is until the 302 powered Crown Victoria's of the late 70s).

With HUGE ports matched to the lower displacement engines, small ports matched to the larger engines, big cams with two barrel carburetors, huge carbs on small engines, low compression, small carbs on their hotest engines, single exhaust, and tall gears, Ford got the lack of throttle response they were after.

And the Windsor series of engines not only accomplished terrible throttle response, but it has an astounding ability to absolutely annihilate gasoline more inefficiently than any other machine ever produced by man.

But back to the main topic, HEMI IS KING.







OK.. I'll humor your "humor"! After ALL in the end, we're Moparites HERE. Hmm... Your HUMOR:

#1 Why would you DRIVE a "Cleveland or Boss 429 powered car up a tree? Driving skills must be that of a kid with a 3hp go-kart. Lot of hp and torque, can't fool around with it.

#2 to a point! It takes a very-skilled mind and top notch machine work to make power with a mostly stock Chevy engine.

#3 Buick engines get better and BIGGER every year!
And they ARE "right". Been giving the Mopar HEMI and WEDGE engines "headaches" for YEARS!

#4 Stock stroke, heads and factory block HEMI engine pushing 2.5 hp per ci? I believe the "production" RACE HEMI was rated in the 550-575 hp range, maybe 600 at it's absolute best. Max-wedges were
probably down 50-75 hp from the above figure...BUT they had ample mid range torque to run against the HEMI. On the track or street, the HEMI may get there first, but NOT BY MUCH!

#5 As far as being "at the top of of the aftermarket food chain" , the HEMI is surpassed by CHEVROLET!!

#6 AS far as the FORD issues are concerned, Fords TRUE "drawbacks" lie within three problem areas:

In the 50's, their cars had some power but most models were unattractive to buyers looking for performance sedans.

During the 60's' again they had performance but the cars were too large and weighty (most of their "hot" motors were in full size sedans). They did start the ponycar "trend" which is STILL successful today!




As far as their motor design flaws there are some BUT most, if not all, can be corrected with factory parts or the aftermarket. Ford is VERY close to CHEVY in terms of "aftermarket usage". And yes, despite their "shortcomings", MOST FORD
engines DO make power! The "Windsor-head" motor has become an excellent "base" for serious stroker motors. Just as the Mopar 340/360 is. Ok, it's gas guzzler , but I believe that "works" for ANYTHING "out-of-tune"!

Now, as far as the TOPIC is concerned, "HEMI IS KING"! I thought that it was read "HEMI VS WEDGE"! I don't remember ANY "landslide" victories, HERE!




OK, lets go over this again, because its been a while now...

What production engine could you name me that in 1975, with an unlightened car(3500#) could run a best of 10.30's@134MPH with the following mods.

Non stroke 426ci
stock block
stock oil system
untouched heads.
stock rockers.
stock crank & rods
stock 4 speed trans -no slick shift
stock Dana 60.

Mods limiited to:
-12.5:1 pistons. Balance assembly.
-Aftermarket intake(Rat Roaster-No mods)
-reworked stock carbs
-Racer Brown solid cam 70's technology.
-Headers 2-1/8 tube.
-Dual point distributor
-Holley Red pump.
-4.88 Gears.


Those mods on any of the other brand X stuff might get you into the 11's if you are lucky. A 427 Corvette would get you into the 10's, but we all know how many inherent advantages the actual "car" has so its more the car than the motor there.

MB
Posted By: Mr.Yuck

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/01/12 03:33 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Have you ever been in cars with Boss 429, or Cleveland headed engines??? They have trouble falling out of a tree with their poorly balanced factory heads.

The big block chevy in stock iron head configuration is not the killer it is when you throw as much "chevy" as possible in the dumpster and bolt on as much aftermarket as possible.

And......I'll take my chances with a HEMI done right vs the um'.......Buick done right.

When it comes to stock blocks and heads, the ceiling is quite high compared to the "Brand X" crowd. A HEMI on "kill" (beyond a SS/AH build) with a factory block, heads and stroke can push the 2.5hp per inch range. Try that with a Max Wedge. As for the aftermarket....well, that's a whole different ballgame.

But of course you do realize that a HEMI engine also sits at the top of the aftermarket food chain, do you not???




Well you see in the 50s and 60s Ford had a reputation for being an affordable but luxurious car. Good door close quality and craftsmanship were key selling points.

Many people concerned with such things don't enjoy the feel of torque. It pushes you around and gets rid of the smoothness. Ford attempted to compensate for this with goofy suspension compenents, such as 10 feet tall coil springs to absorb as much of the shock of the surrounding environment as possible, as well as the forces of acceleration.

But goofy suspension setups can only do so much. Their brilliant team of engineers turned to good old fashioned component mismatching to produce poorer throttle response than had ever been seen before (that is until the 302 powered Crown Victoria's of the late 70s).

With HUGE ports matched to the lower displacement engines, small ports matched to the larger engines, big cams with two barrel carburetors, huge carbs on small engines, low compression, small carbs on their hotest engines, single exhaust, and tall gears, Ford got the lack of throttle response they were after.

And the Windsor series of engines not only accomplished terrible throttle response, but it has an astounding ability to absolutely annihilate gasoline more inefficiently than any other machine ever produced by man.

But back to the main topic, HEMI IS KING.







OK.. I'll humor your "humor"! After ALL in the end, we're Moparites HERE. Hmm... Your HUMOR:

#1 Why would you DRIVE a "Cleveland or Boss 429 powered car up a tree? Driving skills must be that of a kid with a 3hp go-kart. Lot of hp and torque, can't fool around with it.

#2 to a point! It takes a very-skilled mind and top notch machine work to make power with a mostly stock Chevy engine.

#3 Buick engines get better and BIGGER every year!
And they ARE "right". Been giving the Mopar HEMI and WEDGE engines "headaches" for YEARS!

#4 Stock stroke, heads and factory block HEMI engine pushing 2.5 hp per ci? I believe the "production" RACE HEMI was rated in the 550-575 hp range, maybe 600 at it's absolute best. Max-wedges were
probably down 50-75 hp from the above figure...BUT they had ample mid range torque to run against the HEMI. On the track or street, the HEMI may get there first, but NOT BY MUCH!

#5 As far as being "at the top of of the aftermarket food chain" , the HEMI is surpassed by CHEVROLET!!

#6 AS far as the FORD issues are concerned, Fords TRUE "drawbacks" lie within three problem areas:

In the 50's, their cars had some power but most models were unattractive to buyers looking for performance sedans.

During the 60's' again they had performance but the cars were too large and weighty (most of their "hot" motors were in full size sedans). They did start the ponycar "trend" which is STILL successful today!




As far as their motor design flaws there are some BUT most, if not all, can be corrected with factory parts or the aftermarket. Ford is VERY close to CHEVY in terms of "aftermarket usage". And yes, despite their "shortcomings", MOST FORD
engines DO make power! The "Windsor-head" motor has become an excellent "base" for serious stroker motors. Just as the Mopar 340/360 is. Ok, it's gas guzzler , but I believe that "works" for ANYTHING "out-of-tune"!

Now, as far as the TOPIC is concerned, "HEMI IS KING"! I thought that it was read "HEMI VS WEDGE"! I don't remember ANY "landslide" victories, HERE!




OK, lets go over this again, because its been a while now...

What production engine could you name me that in 1975, with an unlightened car(3500#) could run a best of 10.30's@134MPH with the following mods.

Non stroke 426ci
stock block
stock oil system
untouched heads.
stock rockers.
stock crank & rods
stock 4 speed trans -no slick shift
stock Dana 60.

Mods limiited to:
-12.5:1 pistons. Balance assembly.
-Aftermarket intake(Rat Roaster-No mods)
-reworked stock carbs
-Racer Brown solid cam 70's technology.
-Headers 2-1/8 tube.
-Dual point distributor
-Holley Red pump.
-4.88 Gears.


Those mods on any of the other brand X stuff might get you into the 11's if you are lucky. A 427 Corvette would get you into the 10's, but we all know how many inherent advantages the actual "car" has so its more the car than the motor there.

MB




well it's NOT 1975 and when you bring your $5500 (what I have in my 440) Hemi to the track let me know, I'll line up w/ you.
Posted By: HPMike

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/01/12 04:33 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Have you ever been in cars with Boss 429, or Cleveland headed engines??? They have trouble falling out of a tree with their poorly balanced factory heads.

The big block chevy in stock iron head configuration is not the killer it is when you throw as much "chevy" as possible in the dumpster and bolt on as much aftermarket as possible.

And......I'll take my chances with a HEMI done right vs the um'.......Buick done right.

When it comes to stock blocks and heads, the ceiling is quite high compared to the "Brand X" crowd. A HEMI on "kill" (beyond a SS/AH build) with a factory block, heads and stroke can push the 2.5hp per inch range. Try that with a Max Wedge. As for the aftermarket....well, that's a whole different ballgame.

But of course you do realize that a HEMI engine also sits at the top of the aftermarket food chain, do you not???




Well you see in the 50s and 60s Ford had a reputation for being an affordable but luxurious car. Good door close quality and craftsmanship were key selling points.

Many people concerned with such things don't enjoy the feel of torque. It pushes you around and gets rid of the smoothness. Ford attempted to compensate for this with goofy suspension compenents, such as 10 feet tall coil springs to absorb as much of the shock of the surrounding environment as possible, as well as the forces of acceleration.

But goofy suspension setups can only do so much. Their brilliant team of engineers turned to good old fashioned component mismatching to produce poorer throttle response than had ever been seen before (that is until the 302 powered Crown Victoria's of the late 70s).

With HUGE ports matched to the lower displacement engines, small ports matched to the larger engines, big cams with two barrel carburetors, huge carbs on small engines, low compression, small carbs on their hotest engines, single exhaust, and tall gears, Ford got the lack of throttle response they were after.

And the Windsor series of engines not only accomplished terrible throttle response, but it has an astounding ability to absolutely annihilate gasoline more inefficiently than any other machine ever produced by man.

But back to the main topic, HEMI IS KING.







OK.. I'll humor your "humor"! After ALL in the end, we're Moparites HERE. Hmm... Your HUMOR:

#1 Why would you DRIVE a "Cleveland or Boss 429 powered car up a tree? Driving skills must be that of a kid with a 3hp go-kart. Lot of hp and torque, can't fool around with it.

#2 to a point! It takes a very-skilled mind and top notch machine work to make power with a mostly stock Chevy engine.

#3 Buick engines get better and BIGGER every year!
And they ARE "right". Been giving the Mopar HEMI and WEDGE engines "headaches" for YEARS!

#4 Stock stroke, heads and factory block HEMI engine pushing 2.5 hp per ci? I believe the "production" RACE HEMI was rated in the 550-575 hp range, maybe 600 at it's absolute best. Max-wedges were
probably down 50-75 hp from the above figure...BUT they had ample mid range torque to run against the HEMI. On the track or street, the HEMI may get there first, but NOT BY MUCH!

#5 As far as being "at the top of of the aftermarket food chain" , the HEMI is surpassed by CHEVROLET!!

#6 AS far as the FORD issues are concerned, Fords TRUE "drawbacks" lie within three problem areas:

In the 50's, their cars had some power but most models were unattractive to buyers looking for performance sedans.

During the 60's' again they had performance but the cars were too large and weighty (most of their "hot" motors were in full size sedans). They did start the ponycar "trend" which is STILL successful today!




As far as their motor design flaws there are some BUT most, if not all, can be corrected with factory parts or the aftermarket. Ford is VERY close to CHEVY in terms of "aftermarket usage". And yes, despite their "shortcomings", MOST FORD
engines DO make power! The "Windsor-head" motor has become an excellent "base" for serious stroker motors. Just as the Mopar 340/360 is. Ok, it's gas guzzler , but I believe that "works" for ANYTHING "out-of-tune"!

Now, as far as the TOPIC is concerned, "HEMI IS KING"! I thought that it was read "HEMI VS WEDGE"! I don't remember ANY "landslide" victories, HERE!




OK, lets go over this again, because its been a while now...

What production engine could you name me that in 1975, with an unlightened car(3500#) could run a best of 10.30's@134MPH with the following mods.

Non stroke 426ci
stock block
stock oil system
untouched heads.
stock rockers.
stock crank & rods
stock 4 speed trans -no slick shift
stock Dana 60.

Mods limiited to:
-12.5:1 pistons. Balance assembly.
-Aftermarket intake(Rat Roaster-No mods)
-reworked stock carbs
-Racer Brown solid cam 70's technology.
-Headers 2-1/8 tube.
-Dual point distributor
-Holley Red pump.
-4.88 Gears.


Those mods on any of the other brand X stuff might get you into the 11's if you are lucky. A 427 Corvette would get you into the 10's, but we all know how many inherent advantages the actual "car" has so its more the car than the motor there.

MB




well it's NOT 1975 and when you bring your $5500 (what I have in my 440) Hemi to the track let me know, I'll line up w/ you.




Whats your point? Everyone knows Hemi's are more expensive up front. So are Boss 9's over 390's. And L88's over 396's.

I dont care if its 1975 or 2020. Point is do the same level of mods to your stock 440 and I'd have you covered by 1.5 seconds and 12-14 MPH. Thats if your stock valvtrain doesn't crap the bed or your 906 heads dont crack.

If the question was I need to make 600 horse and I only have 7 grand to spend, then the clear answer is go wedge.

Sheesh...

MB
Posted By: Hemi Allstate

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/01/12 05:18 PM

If Chrysler engineers thought that the "wedge" would "get the job done" the 426 Hemi would not exist.
Posted By: d-150

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/01/12 05:25 PM

Aftermarket equalled the playing field with wedge motor. in 1970 hemi. today pretty much equal
Posted By: 383man

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/01/12 06:19 PM

Also remember in the 90's Alderman used a wedge in his Pro Stocker to win the championship. I believe it was a type of B-1 head on it ? Ron
Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/01/12 11:44 PM





OK.. I'll humor your "humor"! After ALL in the end, we're Moparites HERE. Hmm... Your HUMOR:

#1 Why would you DRIVE a "Cleveland or Boss 429 powered car up a tree? Driving skills must be that of a kid with a 3hp go-kart. Lot of hp and torque, can't fool around with it.

#2 to a point! It takes a very-skilled mind and top notch machine work to make power with a mostly stock Chevy engine.

#3 Buick engines get better and BIGGER every year!
And they ARE "right". Been giving the Mopar HEMI and WEDGE engines "headaches" for YEARS!

#4 Stock stroke, heads and factory block HEMI engine pushing 2.5 hp per ci? I believe the "production" RACE HEMI was rated in the 550-575 hp range, maybe 600 at it's absolute best. Max-wedges were
probably down 50-75 hp from the above figure...BUT they had ample mid range torque to run against the HEMI. On the track or street, the HEMI may get there first, but NOT BY MUCH!

#5 As far as being "at the top of of the aftermarket food chain" , the HEMI is surpassed by CHEVROLET!!

#6 AS far as the FORD issues are concerned, Fords TRUE "drawbacks" lie within three problem areas:

In the 50's, their cars had some power but most models were unattractive to buyers looking for performance sedans.

During the 60's' again they had performance but the cars were too large and weighty (most of their "hot" motors were in full size sedans). They did start the ponycar "trend" which is STILL successful today!




As far as their motor design flaws there are some BUT most, if not all, can be corrected with factory parts or the aftermarket. Ford is VERY close to CHEVY in terms of "aftermarket usage". And yes, despite their "shortcomings", MOST FORD
engines DO make power! The "Windsor-head" motor has become an excellent "base" for serious stroker motors. Just as the Mopar 340/360 is. Ok, it's gas guzzler , but I believe that "works" for ANYTHING "out-of-tune"!

Now, as far as the TOPIC is concerned, "HEMI IS KING"! I thought that it was read "HEMI VS WEDGE"! I don't remember ANY "landslide" victories, HERE!




OK, lets go over this again, because its been a while now...

What production engine could you name me that in 1975, with an unlightened car(3500#) could run a best of 10.30's@134MPH with the following mods.

Non stroke 426ci
stock block
stock oil system
untouched heads.
stock rockers.
stock crank & rods
stock 4 speed trans -no slick shift
stock Dana 60.

Mods limiited to:
-12.5:1 pistons. Balance assembly.
-Aftermarket intake(Rat Roaster-No mods)
-reworked stock carbs
-Racer Brown solid cam 70's technology.
-Headers 2-1/8 tube.
-Dual point distributor
-Holley Red pump.
-4.88 Gears.


Those mods on any of the other brand X stuff might get you into the 11's if you are lucky. A 427 Corvette would get you into the 10's, but we all know how many inherent advantages the actual "car" has so its more the car than the motor there.

MB




well it's NOT 1975 and when you bring your $5500 (what I have in my 440) Hemi to the track let me know, I'll line up w/ you.


Hmmmmmm.....interesting retort.

My turn.....

1. I know a little about torque.....my HEMI has about 1200tq. Lo and behold, I haven't put it in a tree......yet.

2. You take an factory BBC iron head and factory block.....I'll take a factory iron HEMI head and block. Max effort engines and lets see which one has a higher ceiling. I know where my money will be.

3. Buick??? "Shirly" you jest??? I ain't talkin' bout some stock style "rules" class.....I'm taking about serious engines built for racing.

4. Reading is FUNdamental. Go back and re-read what I said and you'll see I was speaking of a REAL N/A deal, beyond a SS/AH build. A top of the hill SS HEMI makes 1000+. Do you not think without the restrictions of SS, it wouldn't make more??? A RAW Millennium head as the foundation, dry sump, "trick" crankshaft, light rods, piston guided rods, any piston/ring combination w/max vac, Ti valve, two dominators, etc. and development time. You don't believe that would approach 2.5???

5. The HEMI is surpassed by the chevy on the aftermarket food chain??? Not on my planet. Last I checked the top aftermarket HEMI engines were in the 10,000hp range....running 320+ to 1000ft. You do realize that an AJ, or BAE is aftermarket HEMI......do you not???

6. As far as fords go, they have the same support as chey does in the aftermarket. You can build a killer with either one. The stock ford big dog heads flowed like the Mississippi river on the intake side, (with slow airspeed)...which is where the "port plugs" and "port plates" came in handy, but a crushed garden hose on the exhaust side, in a number of instances. I've seen it on the bench. Can all these engines make power??? Sure they can.....I ain't here to poop on anyone's stuff.

Now for the good stuff.....

I don't care what happened in 1975 and I don't care that a HEMI cost more to build than a 440. We all know that. What we all should also know, is the HEMI has a higher ceiling than the wedge when both engines are topped out.

It would seem after reading the last sentence, that I've just been challenged to an acceleration contest, sooooooooo.......let me say this......

Unfortunately, I don't have 5500 clams in my HEMI engine. I have more than that in the PSI screw that sit atop it.

!!!BUT!!!

I have $5499.99 invested in a lowly smallblock (wedge) MOPAR with factory heads, intake and block sitting in my barn door shaped 70' Dart, that I drive regularly on the street. Would you like to "line up w/me" with that.....for a few coins???

I don't care what you have as long as it's a registered, street driven car, on motor.

Is ya in???
Posted By: pittsburghracer

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/02/12 02:53 AM

Now you are going to have the GRUNGY racers joining this pissing contest.
Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/02/12 03:53 AM

Quote:

Now you are going to have the GRUNGY racers joining this pissing contest.


I'm just a street sap who minds his own beeswax, but if I'm gonna get called out, I have a nice connecter 2 miles away that I have no problem showing up at with my boxy Dart, complete with a mild smallblock, loaded with old discontinued factory hardware.

The time to trounce me is now, cuz the next engine won't be so mild.
Posted By: GTX MATT

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/02/12 06:43 AM

Jim, is your dart the black 70 Dart with the (if I remember right) green tail stripe?
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/02/12 12:50 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Now you are going to have the GRUNGY racers joining this pissing contest.


I'm just a street sap who minds his own beeswax, but if I'm gonna get called out, I have a nice connecter 2 miles away that I have no problem showing up at with my boxy Dart, complete with a mild smallblock, loaded with old discontinued factory hardware.

The time to trounce me is now, cuz the next engine won't be so mild. [/quote}

Umm...Jim, that's MY kinda racing!! Old School at it's BEST! Gotta keep 'em guessing. Something tells me that SB isn't too mild.

Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/02/12 12:59 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Now you are going to have the GRUNGY racers joining this pissing contest.


I'm just a street sap who minds his own beeswax, but if I'm gonna get called out, I have a nice connecter 2 miles away that I have no problem showing up at with my boxy Dart, complete with a mild smallblock, loaded with old discontinued factory hardware.

The time to trounce me is now, cuz the next engine won't be so mild. [/quote}

Umm...Jim, that's MY kinda racing!! Old School at it's BEST! Gotta keep 'em guessing. Something tells me that SB isn't too mild.




Well......it's knida mild, compared to what's up next.
Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/02/12 01:00 PM

Quote:

Jim, is your dart the black 70 Dart with the (if I remember right) green tail stripe?


Yeah.....that's the one.
Posted By: Mr.Yuck

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/02/12 01:20 PM

"I have $5499.99 invested in a lowly smallblock (wedge) MOPAR with factory heads, intake and block sitting in my barn door shaped 70' Dart, that I drive regularly on the street. Would you like to "line up w/me" with that.....for a few coins???
I don't care what you have as long as it's a registered, street driven car, on motor.
Is ya in???"

Sure I'll bring my heap... I guess my point is sure the Hemi is a better motor, but it's a more expensive motor. Today you have more financially practical options. If you are building a weekend warrior and looking to do it on a budget a wedge will do just fine. If you need to go really fast or like the WOW factor a Hemi is the way to go.
Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/02/12 01:43 PM

Quote:

"I have $5499.99 invested in a lowly smallblock (wedge) MOPAR with factory heads, intake and block sitting in my barn door shaped 70' Dart, that I drive regularly on the street. Would you like to "line up w/me" with that.....for a few coins???
I don't care what you have as long as it's a registered, street driven car, on motor.
Is ya in???"

Sure I'll bring my heap... I guess my point is sure the Hemi is a better motor, but it's a more expensive motor. Today you have more financially practical options. If you are building a weekend warrior and looking to do it on a budget a wedge will do just fine. If you need to go really fast or like the WOW factor a Hemi is the way to go.


"Better" is a very subjective word.....one size doesn't fit all.

For some guys, the wedge is better and for others, the HEMI is. It's really no big deal in the grand scheme. My only point is, the HEMI has a higher ceiling....IMO.




Now, lemme know when you're comin' up.....I'll give ya directions to a real good spot.
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/02/12 01:55 PM





Hmmmmmm.....interesting retort.

My turn.....

1. I know a little about torque.....my HEMI has about 1200tq. Lo and behold, I haven't put it in a tree......yet.

2. You take an factory BBC iron head and factory block.....I'll take a factory iron HEMI head and block. Max effort engines and lets see which one has a higher ceiling. I know where my money will be.

3. Buick??? "Shirly" you jest??? I ain't talkin' bout some stock style "rules" class.....I'm taking about serious engines built for racing.

4. Reading is FUNdamental. Go back and re-read what I said and you'll see I was speaking of a REAL N/A deal, beyond a SS/AH build. A top of the hill SS HEMI makes 1000+. Do you not think without the restrictions of SS, it wouldn't make more??? A RAW Millennium head as the foundation, dry sump, "trick" crankshaft, light rods, piston guided rods, any piston/ring combination w/max vac, Ti valve, two dominators, etc. and development time. You don't believe that would approach 2.5???

5. The HEMI is surpassed by the chevy on the aftermarket food chain??? Not on my planet. Last I checked the top aftermarket HEMI engines were in the 10,000hp range....running 320+ to 1000ft. You do realize that an AJ, or BAE is aftermarket HEMI......do you not???

6. As far as fords go, they have the same support as chey does in the aftermarket. You can build a killer with either one. The stock ford big dog heads flowed like the Mississippi river on the intake side, (with slow airspeed)...which is where the "port plugs" and "port plates" came in handy, but a crushed garden hose on the exhaust side, in a number of instances. I've seen it on the bench. Can all these engines make power??? Sure they can.....I ain't here to poop on anyone's stuff.

Now for the good stuff.....

I don't care what happened in 1975 and I don't care that a HEMI cost more to build than a 440. We all know that. What we all should also know, is the HEMI has a higher ceiling than the wedge when both engines are topped out.

It would seem after reading the last sentence, that I've just been challenged to an acceleration contest, sooooooooo.......let me say this......

Unfortunately, I don't have 5500 clams in my HEMI engine. I have more than that in the PSI screw that sit atop it.

!!!BUT!!!

I have $5499.99 invested in a lowly smallblock (wedge) MOPAR with factory heads, intake and block sitting in my barn door shaped 70' Dart, that I drive regularly on the street. Would you like to "line up w/me" with that.....for a few coins???

I don't care what you have as long as it's a registered, street driven car, on motor.

Is ya in???




Two points I'll make here:

I don't think that I would be "STUPID" enough to run a 600+ "street driven" Maxie against a HEMI that has TWICE the HP! Ain't gonna happen! I'll take my chances against Mikes' 12.5 to 1 comp HEMI Challenger. Running against a "HEMI" with a "aluminum lung" on top? You will be RUNNING
against YOURSELF!

And yes, the CHEVROLET and FORD engines DO surpass the HEMI, in the aftermarket. As the years
go by, NEW products come down the line for these two brands before any other! They have cornered the "mail order" parts system, as well as the auto part store inventory and their "respective" factory motorsports divisions. It's getting to the point, where, you spend a grand-and-a-half and can get a "top end" kit (less carbs) for them!! Try that with a HEMI.

And your #4 reply is NON-STREETABLE. 95% SS/A cars
are trailered, unless you are talking about a "as delivered" factory condition HEMI Super Stock car.
The other "5%", I reserve for the "super bold" owner/drivers who (have the HEART to) run them on the street! Which SOME do!!
And IMO, the Buick big block, HAS been and will
always be Mopars' NEMESIS . The "few" and dedicated that DO run them (Buick racers) know that "rpm's" DO get the job done UPSTAIRS. BUT...heaping amounts of torque at a LOWER rpm, will get you "out-of-the-gate" FIRST and (majority of the time) the WIN!!

Posted By: HPMike

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/02/12 01:57 PM

Y'know. This debate got me to thinking....

I built a couple of the engines running in the FAST racing series. All wedges, . The Maxie that I did for Ed Cook made really good power. High 700's through the stock manifolds. Ed has run a best of 10.30 @134MPH. 1.56 60' on the G70 bias tires at a car weight with driver of around 3750. I've had it on the dyno countless times and can tell you when you compare his dyno sheet to Dave Dudek's Hemi engine the peak power of both engines really aren't that much apart, but Dave's engine keeps going when the Maxie is winding down. That really sums up the differences between the two engines (when looking at them from a factory standpoint anyway). Aftermarket heads change the whole equation.

MB

Attached picture 7318183-edmaxwedge(Medium).jpg
Posted By: Mr.Yuck

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/02/12 02:00 PM

Quote:

Quote:

"I have $5499.99 invested in a lowly smallblock (wedge) MOPAR with factory heads, intake and block sitting in my barn door shaped 70' Dart, that I drive regularly on the street. Would you like to "line up w/me" with that.....for a few coins???
I don't care what you have as long as it's a registered, street driven car, on motor.
Is ya in???"

Sure I'll bring my heap... I guess my point is sure the Hemi is a better motor, but it's a more expensive motor. Today you have more financially practical options. If you are building a weekend warrior and looking to do it on a budget a wedge will do just fine. If you need to go really fast or like the WOW factor a Hemi is the way to go.


"Better" is a very subjective word.....one size doesn't fit all.

For some guys, the wedge is better and for others, the HEMI is. It's really no big deal in the grand scheme. My only point is, the HEMI has a higher ceiling....IMO.




Now, lemme know when you're comin' up.....I'll give ya directions to a real good spot.




I'll have to hang an OD unit on my trans for that drive... or get on the "autotrain"
Posted By: HPMike

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/02/12 02:01 PM

Quote:





I don't think that I would be "STUPID" enough to run a 600+ "street driven" Maxie against a HEMI that has TWICE the HP! Ain't gonna happen! I'll take my chances against Mikes' 12.5 to 1 comp HEMI Challenger.




Put as much as was put into my Challenger into ANY of the motors you mentioned with a similar car weight and you'd be likely to get your azz handed to you.. Then or now. Maybe a 427 Vette might make some noise, but not much else.

MB
Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/02/12 02:04 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

"I have $5499.99 invested in a lowly smallblock (wedge) MOPAR with factory heads, intake and block sitting in my barn door shaped 70' Dart, that I drive regularly on the street. Would you like to "line up w/me" with that.....for a few coins???
I don't care what you have as long as it's a registered, street driven car, on motor.
Is ya in???"

Sure I'll bring my heap... I guess my point is sure the Hemi is a better motor, but it's a more expensive motor. Today you have more financially practical options. If you are building a weekend warrior and looking to do it on a budget a wedge will do just fine. If you need to go really fast or like the WOW factor a Hemi is the way to go.


"Better" is a very subjective word.....one size doesn't fit all.

For some guys, the wedge is better and for others, the HEMI is. It's really no big deal in the grand scheme. My only point is, the HEMI has a higher ceiling....IMO.




Now, lemme know when you're comin' up.....I'll give ya directions to a real good spot.




I'll have to hang an OD unit on my trans for that drive... or get on the "autotrain"


So rent a Honda and come up for apizza.....I know a good "spot".
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/02/12 02:07 PM




"Better" is a very subjective word.....one size doesn't fit all.

For some guys, the wedge is better and for others, the HEMI is. It's really no big deal in the grand scheme. My only point is, the HEMI has a higher ceiling....IMO.

with ya! The end result is that the HEMI
has the BETTER (read also expensive) heads. Larger ports = HIGHER level of hp/torque at a HIGHER rpm level. Opposite of the WEDGE head motor. Different ranges of power between the two.

Posted By: HPMike

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/02/12 02:13 PM

Enjoy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMuzPHxIpAA

MB
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/02/12 02:19 PM

Quote:

Quote:





I don't think that I would be "STUPID" enough to run a 600+ "street driven" Maxie against a HEMI that has TWICE the HP! Ain't gonna happen! I'll take my chances against Mikes' 12.5 to 1 comp HEMI Challenger.




Put as much as was put into my Challenger into ANY of the motors you mentioned with a similar car weight and you'd be likely to get your azz handed to you.. Then or now. Maybe a 427 Vette might make some noise, but not much else.

MB





Mike..don't slip a tire off the line. You may get your backside I hope the "Roaster" works well for you!

Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/02/12 02:22 PM


Two points I'll make here:

I don't think that I would be "STUPID" enough to run a 600+ "street driven" Maxie against a HEMI that has TWICE the HP! Ain't gonna happen! I'll take my chances against Mikes' 12.5 to 1 comp HEMI Challenger. Running against a "HEMI" with a "aluminum lung" on top? You will be RUNNING
against YOURSELF!


Actually, it's 3 times the power, but who's counting......1200 is the tq number.

Besides, I was going to roll out my smallblock Dart out for this one. I'm selling my Cuda' to fund a good engine for my Dart and don't wanna abuse it.

And I agree that in the N/A world, the aftermarket has supported the ford and chevy engines to a faaaaaaar greater extent than the HEMI for obvious economic reasons.......but that's why we have screw blowers. It evens up the centuries of parts refinement and zillions spent in R & D making chevy and ford engines make real steam.
Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/02/12 02:25 PM

Quote:

Enjoy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMuzPHxIpAA

MB


I always liked this vid.
Posted By: Mr.Yuck

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/02/12 02:32 PM

Quote:

Enjoy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMuzPHxIpAA

MB




wasn't the buick using questionable heads or something?
Posted By: HPMike

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/02/12 02:35 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:





I don't think that I would be "STUPID" enough to run a 600+ "street driven" Maxie against a HEMI that has TWICE the HP! Ain't gonna happen! I'll take my chances against Mikes' 12.5 to 1 comp HEMI Challenger.




Put as much as was put into my Challenger into ANY of the motors you mentioned with a similar car weight and you'd be likely to get your azz handed to you.. Then or now. Maybe a 427 Vette might make some noise, but not much else.

MB





Mike..don't slip a tire off the line. You may get your backside I hope the "Roaster" works well for you!






Here is something else to ponder, while on the subject of brand X motors. I ran a 455 Pontiac in a Tempest in the early 80's. It was pretty high level for that time, SD rods, domes, Fully ported Nunzi prepped 722 round port(RAIV) heads, a Warrior intake, big Holley, etc. I wasn't a pimple on the asss of what my Challenger was running back then. And my car had way more, in terms of mods than my Challenger did at that time. And if I happened to miss a shift....

MB
Posted By: HPMike

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/02/12 02:36 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Enjoy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMuzPHxIpAA

MB




wasn't the buick using questionable heads or something?




Yes, among other stuff as well.. Didn't matter...Dave's 100% legal bird knocked them all on their assses.

MB
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/02/12 03:02 PM

Quote:

Enjoy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMuzPHxIpAA

MB




N-I-C-E clip, Mike. The Buick needed a "few more" cubes to STOP the HEMIS" top end charge, otherwise a good match F.A.S.T style.
Dave is Mopar "icon" in the New England/New York "Capital" Region. I remember his recent 'bouts against a Boss 429 Mustang. Both are running in the nines, battling it out now!
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/02/12 03:18 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:





I don't think that I would be "STUPID" enough to run a 600+ "street driven" Maxie against a HEMI that has TWICE the HP! Ain't gonna happen! I'll take my chances against Mikes' 12.5 to 1 comp HEMI Challenger.




Put as much as was put into my Challenger into ANY of the motors you mentioned with a similar car weight and you'd be likely to get your azz handed to you.. Then or now. Maybe a 427 Vette might make some noise, but not much else.

MB





Mike..don't slip a tire off the line. You may get your backside I hope the "Roaster" works well for you!






Here is something else to ponder, while on the subject of brand X motors. I ran a 455 Pontiac in a Tempest in the early 80's. It was pretty high level for that time, SD rods, domes, Fully ported Nunzi prepped 722 round port(RAIV) heads, a Warrior intake, big Holley, etc. I wasn't a pimple on the asss of what my Challenger was running back then. And my car had way more, in terms of mods than my Challenger did at that time. And if I happened to miss a shift....

MB




Nunzi...The Pontiac Legend from N.Y.C. Very nice guy and a heck of a racer "back-in the-days".
Built and tuned a LOT of super-hot machines!! I ran a 400 T-37 Tempest back in the mid-80's, out in West Texas. Fast car, just a bit of a problem to get it to "hook". Seriously, Mike that Challenger combo sounds almost like a "Pure Stock" type setup. Sounds like it was good for low 12's/high 11's with some fine tuning.

Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/02/12 03:52 PM






N-I-C-E clip, Mike. The Buick needed a "few more" cubes to STOP the HEMIS" top end charge, otherwise a good match F.A.S.T style.
Dave is Mopar "icon" in the New England/New York "Capital" Region. I remember his recent 'bouts against a Boss 429 Mustang. Both are running in the nines, battling it out now!


The quick Mustang running in F.A.S.T isn't a Boss 429 engine.

It's a very big Cobra Jet or something, built by one of the top engine shops around, BES. I could be wrong, but I think it's around 100ci bigger tham the Roadrunner's HEMI, with a few suspension tricks that I've heard were a tad questionable.

Good running car though.
Posted By: 383man

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/02/12 04:29 PM

Quote:






N-I-C-E clip, Mike. The Buick needed a "few more" cubes to STOP the HEMIS" top end charge, otherwise a good match F.A.S.T style.
Dave is Mopar "icon" in the New England/New York "Capital" Region. I remember his recent 'bouts against a Boss 429 Mustang. Both are running in the nines, battling it out now!


The quick Mustang running in F.A.S.T isn't a Boss 429 engine.

It's a very big Cobra Jet or something, built by one of the top engine shops around, BES. I could be wrong, but I think it's around 100ci bigger tham the Roadrunner's HEMI, with a few suspension tricks that I've heard were a tad questionable.

Good running car though.






That would be Lane Carey's Stang you are talking about. Last I heard it was a 557 wedge eng based on the 429 CJ I believe. Very nice looking and running 71 Stang. Dave's eng was like 496 cubes I think ? Isn't Dave going to run Pure Stock with his new Hemi Super Bee ? Ron
Posted By: JAKE68

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/02/12 04:47 PM

Quote:

Quote:






N-I-C-E clip, Mike. The Buick needed a "few more" cubes to STOP the HEMIS" top end charge, otherwise a good match F.A.S.T style.
Dave is Mopar "icon" in the New England/New York "Capital" Region. I remember his recent 'bouts against a Boss 429 Mustang. Both are running in the nines, battling it out now!


The quick Mustang running in F.A.S.T isn't a Boss 429 engine.

It's a very big Cobra Jet or something, built by one of the top engine shops around, BES. I could be wrong, but I think it's around 100ci bigger tham the Roadrunner's HEMI, with a few suspension tricks that I've heard were a tad questionable.

Good running car though.






That would be Lane Carey's Stang you are talking about. Last I heard it was a 557 wedge eng based on the 429 CJ I believe. Very nice looking and running 71 Stang. Dave's eng was like 496 cubes I think ? Isn't Dave going to run Pure Stock with his new Hemi Super Bee ? Ron



Daves motor was 484 cu.in. His new car is a pure stock.We just dynoed it and aligned it yesturday. That ford motor has canted valve like a big block cheby and hugh ports.
Posted By: HPMike

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/02/12 04:58 PM

Quote:






N-I-C-E clip, Mike. The Buick needed a "few more" cubes to STOP the HEMIS" top end charge, otherwise a good match F.A.S.T style.
Dave is Mopar "icon" in the New England/New York "Capital" Region. I remember his recent 'bouts against a Boss 429 Mustang. Both are running in the nines, battling it out now!


The quick Mustang running in F.A.S.T isn't a Boss 429 engine.

It's a very big Cobra Jet or something, built by one of the top engine shops around, BES. I could be wrong, but I think it's around 100ci bigger tham the Roadrunner's HEMI, with a few suspension tricks that I've heard were a tad questionable.

Good running car though.




Its a 429 CJ based engine. Those heads have tremendous potential, especially when coupled with big cubes. From what is known the engine is bigger than 600". Yes, its a Tony Bischoff engine with supposedly a very high $$ budget. How much its been teched, I dont know? I do know Dave's Hemi was torn completely downm for all to see.

Its all a moot point, though. From what I have been told, the Barton built FAST Hemi will blow everyone out of the water. Should be on the track very soon.

MB
Posted By: pittsburghracer

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/02/12 08:04 PM

Heading to PRP for Thursday night test & tune. HEMI guys please have some good stories posted for me to read when I get home late tonight. A good laugh always leads to a good night's sleep.
Posted By: bwdst6

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/02/12 08:35 PM

Quote:

Its all a moot point, though. From what I have been told, the Barton built FAST Hemi will blow everyone out of the water. Should be on the track very soon.

MB


Yup, stay tuned!

Interesting how we are not talking about someone building a wedge that will blow everyone out of the water! In any class!
Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/03/12 01:26 AM

Quote:

Heading to PRP for Thursday night test & tune. HEMI guys please have some good stories posted for me to read when I get home late tonight. A good laugh always leads to a good night's sleep.


I had to break up with my cross-eyed girlfriend.

I found out she was seeing me and another guy at the same time.
Posted By: bwdst6

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/03/12 01:38 AM

A man walks into a bar... OUCH!

BTW, sorry about ending the hemi vs. wedge debate.
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/03/12 01:39 AM

Quote:






N-I-C-E clip, Mike. The Buick needed a "few more" cubes to STOP the HEMIS" top end charge, otherwise a good match F.A.S.T style.
Dave is Mopar "icon" in the New England/New York "Capital" Region. I remember his recent 'bouts against a Boss 429 Mustang. Both are running in the nines, battling it out now!


The quick Mustang running in F.A.S.T isn't a Boss 429 engine.

It's a very big Cobra Jet or something, built by one of the top engine shops around, BES. I could be wrong, but I think it's around 100ci bigger tham the Roadrunner's HEMI, with a few suspension tricks that I've heard were a tad questionable.

Good running car though.




Fellas....Before the "Tech Sharks" start really pulling blood, my error the 429 SUPER Cobra Jet is the motor. NOT the BOSS motor. I got Laney's ride crossed up with some one elses. FYI, the cube different between the two, is WAY less than 100! So, my apologies to all!!

Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/03/12 01:52 AM



Its a 429 CJ based engine. Those heads have tremendous potential, especially when coupled with big cubes. From what is known the engine is bigger than 600". Yes, its a Tony Bischoff engine with supposedly a very high $$ budget. How much its been teched, I dont know? I do know Dave's Hemi was torn completely downm for all to see.

Its all a moot point, though. From what I have been told, the Barton built FAST Hemi will blow everyone out of the water. Should be on the track very soon.

MB




It IS a SUPER Cobra Jet based block that measures UNDER 600", 'nuff said. If you want find out the EXACT cubes, talk to Lane. You'll get an answer NOT guesstimation!

Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/03/12 01:56 AM


It's a very big Cobra Jet or something, built by one of the top engine shops around, BES. I could be wrong, but I think it's around 100ci bigger tham the Roadrunner's HEMI, with a few suspension tricks that I've heard were a tad questionable.

Good running car though.




Fellas....Before the "Tech Sharks" start really pulling blood, my error the 429 SUPER Cobra Jet is the motor. NOT the BOSS motor. I got Laney's ride crossed up with some one elses. FYI, the cube different between the two, is WAY less than 100! So, my apologies to all!!




Do you know what the "ci" is???

I've heard the newer engine is in the vicinity of 588ci.....while Dudek's under 500ci. I've never been to a F.A.S.T. race, but people who have, have told me there are also non-stock suspension parts visible that help with a certain ford front end issue.
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/03/12 02:04 AM

That would be Lane Carey's Stang you are talking about. Last I heard it was a 557 wedge eng based on the 429 CJ I believe. Very nice looking and running 71 Stang. Dave's eng was like 496 cubes I think ? Isn't Dave going to run Pure Stock with his new Hemi Super Bee ? Ron




Ron, Both Dudeks' and Carey motors are well into 500 inches. Dudeks is around 528", while Careys' is 588".

Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/03/12 02:28 AM

Quote:

That would be Lane Carey's Stang you are talking about. Last I heard it was a 557 wedge eng based on the 429 CJ I believe. Very nice looking and running 71 Stang. Dave's eng was like 496 cubes I think ? Isn't Dave going to run Pure Stock with his new Hemi Super Bee ? Ron




Ron, Both Dudeks' and Carey motors are well into 500 inches. Dudeks is around 528", while Careys' is 588".




Did Dudek build a new engine???

His last one was reported to be 4.310 x 4.250....or, were those numbers fudged???
Posted By: 383man

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/03/12 03:53 AM

It is true that Lane is building a Boss 429 car for FAST but I have not heard that it is done as he wanted the wedge Stang to kinda be a car just to use until the Boss car was done. But I think it may put the Boss car on the back burner. Ron
Posted By: RSNOMO

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/03/12 04:49 AM

There's been some playtime with some shotgun motors of late...

Posted By: HPMike

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/03/12 06:10 AM

Quote:



Its a 429 CJ based engine. Those heads have tremendous potential, especially when coupled with big cubes. From what is known the engine is bigger than 600". Yes, its a Tony Bischoff engine with supposedly a very high $$ budget. How much its been teched, I dont know? I do know Dave's Hemi was torn completely downm for all to see.

Its all a moot point, though. From what I have been told, the Barton built FAST Hemi will blow everyone out of the water. Should be on the track very soon.

MB




It IS a SUPER Cobra Jet based block that measures UNDER 600", 'nuff said. If you want find out the EXACT cubes, talk to Lane. You'll get an answer NOT guesstimation!






I know Lane for many years and we are considered friends. Good guy I thought that when the aftermarket block debate came up, he intimated that the motor he already had was over 600", and that the new block rule would put him at a handicap? .. If I dont have that right, then by all means I stand corrected. Yeah, everyone knows its a SUPER Cobra Jet. I was just giving the Cliffs Notes version.

MB
Posted By: HPMike

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/03/12 06:17 AM

Quote:

That would be Lane Carey's Stang you are talking about. Last I heard it was a 557 wedge eng based on the 429 CJ I believe. Very nice looking and running 71 Stang. Dave's eng was like 496 cubes I think ? Isn't Dave going to run Pure Stock with his new Hemi Super Bee ? Ron




Ron, Both Dudeks' and Carey motors are well into 500 inches. Dudeks is around 528", while Careys' is 588".








Dave D's motor is under 500 cubes. 496..
Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/03/12 01:25 PM

Quote:

Quote:

That would be Lane Carey's Stang you are talking about. Last I heard it was a 557 wedge eng based on the 429 CJ I believe. Very nice looking and running 71 Stang. Dave's eng was like 496 cubes I think ? Isn't Dave going to run Pure Stock with his new Hemi Super Bee ? Ron




Ron, Both Dudeks' and Carey motors are well into 500 inches. Dudeks is around 528", while Careys' is 588".








Dave D's motor is under 500 cubes. 496..


If Dudek's engine is 496ci and the Mustang is a 588ci BES deal, with what is probaby 15+ compression and a camshaft of epic proportions, including ALL the BES know-how throughout the rest of the assembly and he only has a tenth or so on the Roadrunner (and needs !!!AFTERMARKET !!! steering help to keep the car safe), maybe it's time to look into a max effort BOSS 429......just in case someone builds a HEMI with some current SS technology.
Posted By: HPMike

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/03/12 02:09 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

That would be Lane Carey's Stang you are talking about. Last I heard it was a 557 wedge eng based on the 429 CJ I believe. Very nice looking and running 71 Stang. Dave's eng was like 496 cubes I think ? Isn't Dave going to run Pure Stock with his new Hemi Super Bee ? Ron




Ron, Both Dudeks' and Carey motors are well into 500 inches. Dudeks is around 528", while Careys' is 588".








Dave D's motor is under 500 cubes. 496..


If Dudek's engine is 496ci and the Mustang is a 588ci BES deal, with what is probaby 15+ compression and a camshaft of epic proportions, including ALL the BES know-how throughout the rest of the assembly and he only has a tenth or so on the Roadrunner (and needs !!!AFTERMARKET !!! steering help to keep the car safe), maybe it's time to look into a max effort BOSS 429......just in case someone builds a HEMI with some current SS technology.




You got it, Jim..

Supposedly the Barton built FAST Hemi put enough power on the dyno that everyone is going to get ...Its a super high revving deal, too..Knowing what I know of Dave D's Hemi build it's surprisingly "low" tech. Credit to the Hemi's inherent design. He's even got a 440Source crank spinning in there

MB
Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/03/12 02:33 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

That would be Lane Carey's Stang you are talking about. Last I heard it was a 557 wedge eng based on the 429 CJ I believe. Very nice looking and running 71 Stang. Dave's eng was like 496 cubes I think ? Isn't Dave going to run Pure Stock with his new Hemi Super Bee ? Ron




Ron, Both Dudeks' and Carey motors are well into 500 inches. Dudeks is around 528", while Careys' is 588".








Dave D's motor is under 500 cubes. 496..


If Dudek's engine is 496ci and the Mustang is a 588ci BES deal, with what is probaby 15+ compression and a camshaft of epic proportions, including ALL the BES know-how throughout the rest of the assembly and he only has a tenth or so on the Roadrunner (and needs !!!AFTERMARKET !!! steering help to keep the car safe), maybe it's time to look into a max effort BOSS 429......just in case someone builds a HEMI with some current SS technology.




You got it, Jim..

Supposedly the Barton built FAST Hemi put enough power on the dyno that everyone is going to get ...Its a super high revving deal, too..Knowing what I know of Dave D's Hemi build it's surprisingly "low" tech. Credit to the Hemi's inherent design. He's even got a 440Source crank spinning in there

MB


That's what I hear, Mike......the Barton deal should be stout once it's dialed in.



Maybe BES can slip some "aftermarket" cylinder heads up there and spray paint em' "stock", to go with the "aftermarket" steering components that keep the ford from ending up on it's roof.

By the way, does anyone know the weight of these two cars??? I'd hate to think the ford is the same weight, or lighter and the ever-so-slight ET advantage rests in a few pounds when an almost SIX HUNDRED INCH BES powerplant resides between the framrails.
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/03/12 04:50 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

That would be Lane Carey's Stang you are talking about. Last I heard it was a 557 wedge eng based on the 429 CJ I believe. Very nice looking and running 71 Stang. Dave's eng was like 496 cubes I think ? Isn't Dave going to run Pure Stock with his new Hemi Super Bee ? Ron




Ron, Both Dudeks' and Carey motors are well into 500 inches. Dudeks is around 528", while Careys' is 588".








Dave D's motor is under 500 cubes. 496..


If Dudek's engine is 496ci and the Mustang is a 588ci BES deal, with what is probaby 15+ compression and a camshaft of epic proportions, including ALL the BES know-how throughout the rest of the assembly and he only has a tenth or so on the Roadrunner (and needs !!!AFTERMARKET !!! steering help to keep the car safe), maybe it's time to look into a max effort BOSS 429......just in case someone builds a HEMI with some current SS technology.




You got it, Jim..

Supposedly the Barton built FAST Hemi put enough power on the dyno that everyone is going to get ...Its a super high revving deal, too..Knowing what I know of Dave D's Hemi build it's surprisingly "low" tech. Credit to the Hemi's inherent design. He's even got a 440Source crank spinning in there

MB




Well, Mike the last 'bout that Dudek and Laney had, Dudeks motor was listed at about 528" HEMI. Laneys' motor CR is 14.7 to 1, 588" Ford BB. Dudek was in the 10.20's and BELOW with the 496 incher (and since the video shootout, he's in the nines). As far as a "new" motor for Dudek, I dunno about that at this time. And it isn't much for BES to build a FORD 588", just careful and SMART machining and attention to detail work. Laney did the final assembly. BES has built bigger motors than 588". Regardless, of who has the bigger or better motor, these two friends/rivals DO put on a GREAT showing!

Posted By: JAKE68

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/03/12 06:19 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

That would be Lane Carey's Stang you are talking about. Last I heard it was a 557 wedge eng based on the 429 CJ I believe. Very nice looking and running 71 Stang. Dave's eng was like 496 cubes I think ? Isn't Dave going to run Pure Stock with his new Hemi Super Bee ? Ron




Ron, Both Dudeks' and Carey motors are well into 500 inches. Dudeks is around 528", while Careys' is 588".








Dave D's motor is under 500 cubes. 496..


If Dudek's engine is 496ci and the Mustang is a 588ci BES deal, with what is probaby 15+ compression and a camshaft of epic proportions, including ALL the BES know-how throughout the rest of the assembly and he only has a tenth or so on the Roadrunner (and needs !!!AFTERMARKET !!! steering help to keep the car safe), maybe it's time to look into a max effort BOSS 429......just in case someone builds a HEMI with some current SS technology.




You got it, Jim..

Supposedly the Barton built FAST Hemi put enough power on the dyno that everyone is going to get ...Its a super high revving deal, too..Knowing what I know of Dave D's Hemi build it's surprisingly "low" tech. Credit to the Hemi's inherent design. He's even got a 440Source crank spinning in there

MB




Well, Mike the last 'bout that Dudek and Laney had, Dudeks motor was listed at about 528" HEMI. Laneys' motor CR is 14.7 to 1, 588" Ford BB. Dudek was in the 10.20's and BELOW with the 496 incher (and since the video shootout, he's in the nines). As far as a "new" motor for Dudek, I dunno about that at this time. And it isn't much for BES to build a FORD 588", just careful and SMART machining and attention to detail work. Laney did the final assembly. BES has built bigger motors than 588". Regardless, of who has the bigger or better motor, these two friends/rivals DO put on a GREAT showing!





Daves motor is (was) 497. You will not see that car compete in fast again. A friend of mine bought the car and it has been detuned so he could drive and race it in dragweek. Daves new car will be at the mopar nats next weekend racing in purestock. As for the mustang I had heard that it was like 619cu.in.
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/04/12 03:31 AM

I've never been to a F.A.S.T. race, but people who have, have told me there are also non-stock suspension parts visible that help with a certain ford front end issue.




You are right.
The aformentioned suspension parts (for the FORD)were allowed by F.A.S.T rules to correct an alignment issue with the stock manual steering setup.

Posted By: JAKE68

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/04/12 03:59 AM

Actually they did that to correct bump steer . Personally I dont think that should been allowed because they could have corrected that without putting that kit on. We had to watch that and make corrections when we aligned Daves car. They also had an issue with the ram air air cleaner that wasnt stock. Dave brought it to their attention that it may not be in the spirit of the class!!!!! Also it was not allowed by the rules because the rules state stock suspension but issue just wasnt pushed at the time.
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/04/12 06:06 AM

Probably a smart move to "overlook" the rule, in favor of safety issues (control), possibly? May not be in the spirit of the class, but better to be SAFE than sorry! Well, if the Ram Air air cleaner wasn't for that particular car, I agree, don't allow it.

Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/04/12 12:38 PM

Quote:

Actually they did that to correct bump steer . Personally I dont think that should been allowed because they could have corrected that without putting that kit on. We had to watch that and make corrections when we aligned Daves car. They also had an issue with the ram air air cleaner that wasnt stock. Dave brought it to their attention that it may not be in the spirit of the class!!!!! Also it was not allowed by the rules because the rules state stock suspension but issue just wasnt pushed at the time.


Sounds to me like that big ole' Roadrunner with that undersized HEMI, is the quickest "legit" car.
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/04/12 04:10 PM

Dudeks' combo is a PROVEN setup since the "first"
Street HEMI came off the assembly line. One of the MOST popular Mopar platforms to build a GREAT street/strip ride or all out race car. Did a GREAT job of strengthing the weaknessess and enhancing it's strengths. Wonder how much FASTER it would have ran with a "Big Inch" wedge motor!!

Posted By: 383man

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/04/12 06:45 PM

Ed Cooks sweet black 63 Maxie ran 10.30's in FAST last year and he said he is sure he will get in the 20's this year. Its great to see wedge in FAST only a few tenths behind the Hemi. And of course you all know I have a soft spot for 63 Max Wedge cars. Ron
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/04/12 09:54 PM

Quote:

Ed Cooks sweet black 63 Maxie ran 10.30's in FAST last year and he said he is sure he will get in the 20's this year. Its great to see wedge in FAST only a few tenths behind the Hemi. And of course you all know I have a soft spot for 63 Max Wedge cars. Ron






Posted By: HPMike

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/05/12 03:03 AM

Quote:

Dudeks' combo is a PROVEN setup since the "first"
Street HEMI came off the assembly line. One of the MOST popular Mopar platforms to build a GREAT street/strip ride or all out race car. Did a GREAT job of strengthing the weaknessess and enhancing it's strengths. Wonder how much FASTER it would have ran with a "Big Inch" wedge motor!!






At least 3 tenths slower...See Ron's post...

MB
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/06/12 01:59 AM


At least 3 tenths slower...See Ron's post...

MB




If the Big Wedge was 3 tenths FASTER than the HEMI, Mike, you know that you would be and "unfair"!!! Secondly, YOU'D be about the "cubes"!!

Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge *DELETED* - 08/06/12 02:11 AM

Post deleted by HYPER8oSoNic
Posted By: HPMike

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/06/12 02:37 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Dudeks' combo is a PROVEN setup since the "first"
Street HEMI came off the assembly line. One of the MOST popular Mopar platforms to build a GREAT street/strip ride or all out race car. Did a GREAT job of strengthing the weaknessess and enhancing it's strengths. Wonder how much FASTER it would have ran with a "Big Inch" wedge motor!!






At least 3 tenths slower...See Ron's post...

MB




3 tenths? Some "top-end" charge!!
If the wedge had WON, Mike you would have been about an "unfair advantage" - Too many CUBES!!





Nope.

Id love nothing better than to see Ed's Maxie take everyone down, but thats a tall order. I think were pretty happy where we are at considering the 50 year old 286 heads on Ed's motor (which were ported to the hilt), flow robably LESS than a typical street hemi head that is untouched. I do have a radically different cam that I want to try on the dyno before the fall swing. The motor is at my shop now undergoing a freshen up...We'll see...

Oh, and speaking of wedges , watch out for the white Firebird. Im hearing that its got some more smoke and has already gone 10.20's or thereabouts. Oh the humanity!

MB
Posted By: XXHEMI

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/06/12 02:45 AM

Mike,

I don't think that anyone with the exception of myself would have liked to see the wedge out run Dave's Hemi! Or even run with it?

The engine for the Maxie was just freshend up by Mike and I think I have found a little something in the car so maybe it will run a little faster this fall?

But there is no dought the Hemi just runs away from the Wedge upstairs.

Both where very close in power (within 10HP wedges advantage)?

Both cars weight the same?

Maxie runs 133 MPH and the Hemi 139MPH what am I missing???


Ed

Attached picture 7323681-Nastblack.jpg
Posted By: HPMike

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/06/12 03:10 AM

Quote:

Mike,

I don't think that anyone with the exception of myself would have liked to see the wedge out run Dave's Hemi! Or even run with it?

The engine for the Maxie was just freshend up by Mike and I think I have found a little something in the car so maybe it will run a little faster this fall?

But there is no dought the Hemi just runs away from the Wedge upstairs.

Both where very close in power (within 10HP wedges advantage)?

Both cars weight the same?

Maxie runs 133 MPH and the Hemi 139MPH what am I missing???


Ed




Eddie

If you compare the two dyno sheets the answer lies there..

The Maxie makes its peak power relatively early then falls off pretty hard. The Hemi, on the other hand, makes its peak power at a higher RPM and really doesnt fall off. I'd be willing to bet Daves head flows 30% or better than the wedge head. Its all in the design and flow characteristics. Thats my .02 anyway....

MB
Posted By: dannysbee

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/06/12 03:38 AM

Ed you must be forgetting about me. I am your biggest fan. I love your black Maxi. I would think with the displacment,cross section of the port combined with cross ram intake the torque curve is flat and broad. I would like to see how the car would do with a taller gear.
Posted By: XXHEMI

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/06/12 03:51 AM

Danny

Gear change is on tap. I let you know.
Posted By: 383man

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/06/12 05:11 AM

Quote:

Ed you must be forgetting about me. I am your biggest fan. I love your black Maxi. I would think with the displacment,cross section of the port combined with cross ram intake the torque curve is flat and broad. I would like to see how the car would do with a taller gear.





Uh I thought I was Ed's biggest fan of his awesome 63 ? I would love to see how the Maxie runs with a different intake other then the crossram. But of course thats not legal. Ed your 63 runs truly awesome. I honestly know a well prepped race Hemi can basically outrun anything. But I think the wedge can get very close as Ed has and many wedges can outrun Hemi's on the street because many people run better prepped wedges on the street then the way the street Hemi's are prepped. But even up most of us know the Hemi rules. I just like the fact that the Max Wedges run so good for less cash. And 63's never had Hemi's. Ron
Posted By: HPMike

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/06/12 01:36 PM

Let Jr. wheel that black beast. He'd knock off ten-oh's without breaking a sweat. That kid(James too) has some magic.

MB
Posted By: Sixgun

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/06/12 08:18 PM

Boy, I had no idea how this post would go when I started it! I know we all have some strong opinions, but WOW!
I sure have gained a lot of valuable insight from
the braintrust, while reading this over the last few weeks.Some stuff I knew, some I THOUGHT I knew,
some fresh info (for me at least).
I like how y'all are keeping it respectful, but competitive, (for the most part).
Great video of Daves Hemi trouncing GM.
Good discussion!
Case
Posted By: Mr.Yuck

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/07/12 12:46 AM

Six...what's it cost to build a 9.90 wedge and what's it cost to build a 9.90 Hemi
Posted By: XXHEMI

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/07/12 01:12 AM

Danny and Ron thanks for the support! I will do my best to get the numbers down in the fall at MIR

Mike as far as Eddie Jr he is stilled pissed I pulled the FAST motor out of the Black A12 (his ride) and for James we would have to get him out of his new ride.

james cook cecil county dragway 07022011 2011_07_04_09_44_58.avi

Ed
Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/07/12 03:28 AM

Quote:

Six...what's it cost to build a 9.90 wedge and what's it cost to build a 9.90 Hemi


If ya gotta ask......


What's it cost to build a 8.20 @160+ SS legal HEMI and what's it cost to build an 8.20 @160+ SS legal wedge.....both at 3200#???

What's it cost to build a 5sec legal Promod HEMI and what's it cost to build a 5sec legal Promod wedge???

What's it cost to build a 4.40 @339mph (1320ft) HEMI and what's it cost to build a 4.40 @339mph wedge???


Sometimes, cost isn't the factor.......reality is.



Posted By: quickd100

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/07/12 03:49 AM

Upstairs is where most Hemi's really shine. If you look at a dyno sheet the Hemi's just don't nose over like a wedge motor does. Yes, they tail off but they carry the hp alot longer. It's like night and day difference, if you've run both you'd know and there wouldn't be 10 pages of opinions on this post.Dave
Posted By: Mr.Yuck

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/07/12 03:10 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Six...what's it cost to build a 9.90 wedge and what's it cost to build a 9.90 Hemi


If ya gotta ask......


What's it cost to build a 8.20 @160+ SS legal HEMI and what's it cost to build an 8.20 @160+ SS legal wedge.....both at 3200#???

What's it cost to build a 5sec legal Promod HEMI and what's it cost to build a 5sec legal Promod wedge???

What's it cost to build a 4.40 @339mph (1320ft) HEMI and what's it cost to build a 4.40 @339mph wedge???


Sometimes, cost isn't the factor.......reality is.








right on... that's what I've been saying fast wedge OK...really fast HEMI, just depends on your goals.
Posted By: W.I.N. Racing

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/09/12 03:22 AM

cant beleive this is still going on...Maybe this will help sway the Wedge guys... Santa and the Easter Bunny arnt real either!
Posted By: Ari440

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/09/12 03:49 AM

Maybe this will help sway the Wedge guys



Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/09/12 04:32 PM

Quote:

Maybe this will help sway the Wedge guys








All jokes aside, the HEMI is a fine engine and a GREAT base for an "all-out" racer OR an "ultimate"
limited street ride. Sure, IF I had the cash - why not a HEMI? But economics and plain "common sense" to run "just-as-fast, for less" is my approach. Never knocking the HEMI owners/racers at all - I just the opposition on a "smaller scale" with less glamour.

Posted By: pittsburghracer

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/09/12 05:22 PM

I for one never had the desire to run a HEMI. If one fell in my lap I would sell it to buy more wedge parts. I prefer go to show so for my applications the wedge makes a cheaper more reliable build. The trend for years has always been that the older racers build the bigger, heavier cars and are usually happy running a high 9 second pass or in the 10's. There are some exceptions to the rule but this is what I have seen as a trend over the years.
Posted By: 6PKRTSE

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/09/12 08:57 PM

I have run both wedge & Hemi engines in the past. Cost for a HEMI is crazy for the same power but I have to admit the same exact car I would get twice the reaction from people looking at it & many more comments or questions asked when it had a HEMI over the wedge.
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/09/12 11:31 PM

Quote:

I for one never had the desire to run a HEMI. If one fell in my lap I would sell it to buy more wedge parts. I prefer go to show so for my applications the wedge makes a cheaper more reliable build. The trend for years has always been that the older racers build the bigger, heavier cars and are usually happy running a high 9 second pass or in the 10's. There are some exceptions to the rule but this is what I have seen as a trend over the years.





with you, EXCEPT that I wouldn't pass
a HEMI up if it fell in MY lap!! I'd build up to the point that I could run FASTER than the 9.0
index, comfortably and reliably. Anything slower than 9.90, the "Maxie" fits the bill!!

Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/09/12 11:49 PM

Sometimes, cost isn't the factor.......reality is.









Reality could be a MAJOR factor!! BUT... without cost, how can reality be brought to your garage or
trailered to the track? Cost sets the limit on dreams and ideas, which do turn to reality (if..the price is RIGHT!). Goes back to a ironclad statement: "Speed costs, how fast do you want to go?".


Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/10/12 12:32 AM

Quote:

Sometimes, cost isn't the factor.......reality is.









Reality could be a MAJOR factor!! BUT... without cost, how can reality be brought to your garage or
trailered to the track? Cost sets the limit on dreams and ideas, which do turn to reality (if..the price is RIGHT!). Goes back to a ironclad statement: "Speed costs, how fast do you want to go?".







Sometimes it is not a matter of how fast you want to go but how you want to show. I am building a blown 588" Hemi with a 14-71 and will be doing street/strip duty as well as just plain old fashion showing off. Some folks just want a Hemi because..... and if you can afford it go for it, remember... you can't take it with you so live a little. It does not matter to me wether you go fast on the cheap, in between or in high style it's hot rodding man.
Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/10/12 12:43 AM

Quote:

Sometimes, cost isn't the factor.......reality is.









Reality could be a MAJOR factor!! BUT... without cost, how can reality be brought to your garage or
trailered to the track? Cost sets the limit on dreams and ideas, which do turn to reality (if..the price is RIGHT!). Goes back to a ironclad statement: "Speed costs, how fast do you want to go?".





If you take the whole of my entire post, you will see that the combinations I listed are basically not possible with an inline valve, wedge head.

The reason I mentioned reality is because it is unrealistic to think one can build an inline valve, iron headed MOPAR....within a restricted Superstock rules package and think it could produce 8.20 elasped times, or crest 160+mph in a 3200# 40 year old body style.

Just as a legal Promod, deep into the 5 second zone at 260+mph, or a Fuel car running near 340mph in 1320ft is a job best left to a HEMI style engine.

Not to mention what happens at the local car show, cruise night, or burger joint when the hood pops and common folk notice the plug wires routed into the valve covers.

Realities all and no amount of money can dream the inline head into these territories.

This is not to say that the excellent MOPAR wedge engine doesn't have a huge place in the world of performance. They are strong...reliable...cost effective...powerful alternatives to the more exotic engines in the MOPAR arsenal.

There is plenty of room for both HEMI and wedge engines. My only point is this....as good as both style engines can be, in no way shape or form is the ceiling of the wedge equal to the HEMI....be it in max N/A iron headed form, or all aluminum with a $10,000 supercharger jamming exotic fules into it......PERIOD.

In the mid level and even into some very serious builds, the B1 selections (especially the PSO) are capable of outstanding numbers, but that's when the costs of the engines begins to narrow. Moreover, the technology of builds at this level, seem to favor the wedge engine in a number of build-ups I've seen, including those in this very forum. I have yet to see a Millennium headed engine be assembled with all the trimmings....dry sumps, lobe relocation, raw castings carved with the latest port design, state of the art ring stacks w/max vac......etc.

Bottom line, for most applications, a straight headed MOPAR will get the job done very nicely, but there are certain arenas when a HEMI head and ONLY a HEMI head will do.
Posted By: JAKE68

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/10/12 01:36 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Sometimes, cost isn't the factor.......reality is.









Reality could be a MAJOR factor!! BUT... without cost, how can reality be brought to your garage or
trailered to the track? Cost sets the limit on dreams and ideas, which do turn to reality (if..the price is RIGHT!). Goes back to a ironclad statement: "Speed costs, how fast do you want to go?".





If you take the whole of my entire post, you will see that the combinations I listed are basically not possible with an inline valve, wedge head.

The reason I mentioned reality is because it is unrealistic to think one can build an inline valve, iron headed MOPAR....within a restricted Superstock rules package and think it could produce 8.20 elasped times, or crest 160+mph in a 3200# 40 year old body style.

Just as a legal Promod, deep into the 5 second zone at 260+mph, or a Fuel car running near 340mph in 1320ft is a job best left to a HEMI style engine.

Not to mention what happens at the local car show, cruise night, or burger joint when the hood pops and common folk notice the plug wires routed into the valve covers.

Realities all and no amount of money can dream the inline head into these territories.

This is not to say that the excellent MOPAR wedge engine doesn't have a huge place in the world of performance. They are strong...reliable...cost effective...powerful alternatives to the more exotic engines in the MOPAR arsenal.

There is plenty of room for both HEMI and wedge engines. My only point is this....as good as both style engines can be, in no way shape or form is the ceiling of the wedge equal to the HEMI....be it in max N/A iron headed form, or all aluminum with a $10,000 supercharger jamming exotic fules into it......PERIOD.

In the mid level and even into some very serious builds, the B1 selections (especially the PSO) are capable of outstanding numbers, but that's when the costs of the engines begins to narrow. Moreover, the technology of builds at this level, seem to favor the wedge engine in a number of build-ups I've seen, including those in this very forum. I have yet to see a Millennium headed engine be assembled with all the trimmings....dry sumps, lobe relocation, raw castings carved with the latest port design, state of the art ring stacks w/max vac......etc.

Bottom line, for most applications, a straight headed MOPAR will get the job done very nicely, but there are certain arenas when a HEMI head and ONLY a HEMI head will do.



Amen.
Posted By: 383man

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/10/12 02:10 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Sometimes, cost isn't the factor.......reality is.









Reality could be a MAJOR factor!! BUT... without cost, how can reality be brought to your garage or
trailered to the track? Cost sets the limit on dreams and ideas, which do turn to reality (if..the price is RIGHT!). Goes back to a ironclad statement: "Speed costs, how fast do you want to go?".





If you take the whole of my entire post, you will see that the combinations I listed are basically not possible with an inline valve, wedge head.

The reason I mentioned reality is because it is unrealistic to think one can build an inline valve, iron headed MOPAR....within a restricted Superstock rules package and think it could produce 8.20 elasped times, or crest 160+mph in a 3200# 40 year old body style.

Just as a legal Promod, deep into the 5 second zone at 260+mph, or a Fuel car running near 340mph in 1320ft is a job best left to a HEMI style engine.

Not to mention what happens at the local car show, cruise night, or burger joint when the hood pops and common folk notice the plug wires routed into the valve covers.

Realities all and no amount of money can dream the inline head into these territories.

This is not to say that the excellent MOPAR wedge engine doesn't have a huge place in the world of performance. They are strong...reliable...cost effective...powerful alternatives to the more exotic engines in the MOPAR arsenal.

There is plenty of room for both HEMI and wedge engines. My only point is this....as good as both style engines can be, in no way shape or form is the ceiling of the wedge equal to the HEMI....be it in max N/A iron headed form, or all aluminum with a $10,000 supercharger jamming exotic fules into it......PERIOD.

In the mid level and even into some very serious builds, the B1 selections (especially the PSO) are capable of outstanding numbers, but that's when the costs of the engines begins to narrow. Moreover, the technology of builds at this level, seem to favor the wedge engine in a number of build-ups I've seen, including those in this very forum. I have yet to see a Millennium headed engine be assembled with all the trimmings....dry sumps, lobe relocation, raw castings carved with the latest port design, state of the art ring stacks w/max vac......etc.

Bottom line, for most applications, a straight headed MOPAR will get the job done very nicely, but there are certain arenas when a HEMI head and ONLY a HEMI head will do.





Very well said.
The only thing I might add is that alot of people seem to think the Hemi will awe everyone at a car show but I dont see this much anymore. I mean I used to see it all the time when Hemi's were scarce but I see so many Hemi's out there now that its not as big a deal as it used to be. It seems like there is always at least one or two or more Hemi's at my local cruise nite. Not like when I saw a 63 Ford with a 427 SOHC since they are so rare everyone was looking at it. Dont mean this to downplay the Hemi I just wanted to state that I see alot more Hemi's on the road now then I did 30 years ago or even 15 years ago. Myself I run to look when its a real factory Hemi car like a real 64 Hemi SS car or an original 68 Hemi Roadrunner. I guess we see so many more because they are alot of clones with Hemi's. And I also run when I see a real max Wedge car. Ron
Posted By: JAKE68

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/10/12 08:44 PM

Dave Dudek just went 11.38@123 with a legal pure stock hemi super bee. I know a pure stock wedge could not do that.
Posted By: HPMike

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/10/12 08:58 PM

Quote:

Dave Dudek just went [Email]11.38@123[/Email] with a legal pure stock hemi super bee. I know a pure stock wedge could not do that.






I was going to tell you to put a posting in the hemi vs wedge thread...And I agree...A wedge aint getting there...

MB
Posted By: bwdst6

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/10/12 08:58 PM

Quote:

Myself I run to look when its a real factory Hemi car like a real 64 Hemi SS car or an original 68 Hemi Roadrunner. I guess we see so many more because they are alot of clones with Hemi's. And I also run when I see a real max Wedge car. Ron


Yeah, what the fifth digit in the VIN happens to be is pretty spectacular!
Posted By: Triggerfish

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/10/12 09:15 PM

Quote:

Dave Dudek just went [Email]11.38@123[/Email] with a legal pure stock hemi super bee. I know a pure stock wedge could not do that.



That's awesome & hope it puts Mopar on top. Anyone have any info on
Barton's F.A.S.T. Hemi that's in the works?
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/11/12 03:13 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Sometimes, cost isn't the factor.......reality is.









Reality could be a MAJOR factor!! BUT... without cost, how can reality be brought to your garage or
trailered to the track? Cost sets the limit on dreams and ideas, which do turn to reality (if..the price is RIGHT!). Goes back to a ironclad statement: "Speed costs, how fast do you want to go?".





If you take the whole of my entire post, you will see that the combinations I listed are basically not possible with an inline valve, wedge head.

The reason I mentioned reality is because it is unrealistic to think one can build an inline valve, iron headed MOPAR....within a restricted Superstock rules package and think it could produce 8.20 elasped times, or crest 160+mph in a 3200# 40 year old body style.

Just as a legal Promod, deep into the 5 second zone at 260+mph, or a Fuel car running near 340mph in 1320ft is a job best left to a HEMI style engine.

Not to mention what happens at the local car show, cruise night, or burger joint when the hood pops and common folk notice the plug wires routed into the valve covers.

Realities all and no amount of money can dream the inline head into these territories.

This is not to say that the excellent MOPAR wedge engine doesn't have a huge place in the world of performance. They are strong...reliable...cost effective...powerful alternatives to the more exotic engines in the MOPAR arsenal.

There is plenty of room for both HEMI and wedge engines. My only point is this....as good as both style engines can be, in no way shape or form is the ceiling of the wedge equal to the HEMI....be it in max N/A iron headed form, or all aluminum with a $10,000 supercharger jamming exotic fules into it......PERIOD.

In the mid level and even into some very serious builds, the B1 selections (especially the PSO) are capable of outstanding numbers, but that's when the costs of the engines begins to narrow. Moreover, the technology of builds at this level, seem to favor the wedge engine in a number of build-ups I've seen, including those in this very forum. I have yet to see a Millennium headed engine be assembled with all the trimmings....dry sumps, lobe relocation, raw castings carved with the latest port design, state of the art ring stacks w/max vac......etc.

Bottom line, for most applications, a straight headed MOPAR will get the job done very nicely, but there are certain arenas when a HEMI head and ONLY a HEMI head will do.




Yes, I read your WHOLE lists of posts and I'll condense my post so you will understsand where I am coming from:

#1 In a comparision of reality and cost, cost dictates the level of speed you quest for 90% of the time. 10% is for ingenuity (free power gains).
#2 I agree that there are areas where ONLY a HEMI head will do, but... DON"T treat it as the "one engine that does it all"! It's raw power dictates it's longevity and unsurpassed power in the 8.90 and faster time brackets and upper racing classes, BUT remember.... the streets/slower bracket classes BELONG to the Wedges! Lower cost to operate. Period. Once again, speed COSTS - how FAST you want to go! Limited street/strip stormer/upper class competitive racer, go HEMI. Super hot "streeter/strip" machine, bracket/lower class racer, go Wedge.



Posted By: quickd100

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/11/12 03:31 AM

You don't have to have the net worth of a small foreign country to build a Hemi. I'm living proof, I'm a Millwright and probably make less than 3/4 of the people on this race board. It just takes a desire to do it. There are somethings in life that are worth the sacrifice. And once bitten by the Hemi bug it's terminal. Dave
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/11/12 03:38 AM

Not to mention what happens at the local car show, cruise night, or burger joint when the hood pops and common folk notice the plug wires routed into the valve covers.

Sure the "crowd" may galk and "twist" their faces in awe over the plugs going into those WIDE valve covers. And maybe the may "swoon" over the inline AFB's, or EVEN the cross-ram intake with those Holleys sitting on them. But.. it CANNOT draw attention to the likes of the MAX-WEDGE or SIX PACK.


Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/11/12 08:54 PM






Yes, I read your WHOLE lists of posts and I'll condense my post so you will understsand where I am coming from:

#1 In a comparision of reality and cost, cost dictates the level of speed you quest for 90% of the time. 10% is for ingenuity (free power gains).
#2 I agree that there are areas where ONLY a HEMI head will do, but... DON"T treat it as the "one engine that does it all"! It's raw power dictates it's longevity and unsurpassed power in the 8.90 and faster time brackets and upper racing classes, BUT remember.... the streets/slower bracket classes BELONG to the Wedges! Lower cost to operate. Period. Once again, speed COSTS - how FAST you want to go! Limited street/strip stormer/upper class competitive racer, go HEMI. Super hot "streeter/strip" machine, bracket/lower class racer, go Wedge.






But.....But......But.....the HEMI !!!IS!!! the one engine that does it all. In fact, it's the ONLY engine that does it all.

From 14sec stocker, to 3sec nitro hauler and anything in between. NOTHING else can do thaaaaaaaat.

Plus, if you bring a 440 sixpak car, or Max Wedge machine to the same venue I happen to be at with my HEMICUDA', don't get upset when people stand on those cars to take pictures of mine (once the crowd around it thins out enough to actually be able to see it).
Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/11/12 10:49 PM

And to all those who may have trouble recogizing sarcasm....I LOVE Max Wedge and sixpak cars.
Posted By: Winchester 73

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/11/12 11:01 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

They are both Mopar so I like them both. But I know the 63 Max Wedge cars were street legal as anyone could buy one. I honestly feel in stock trim the Max Wedge was the fastest Mopar street muscle car sold in the muscle car era. Sure the Hemi was a race eng and would kick but when setup right but on the street in stock form it was held back and the wedge carried the banner for Mopar on the street most of the time. You have to ask yourself.........how many Hemi's did you see on the street in the 60's ? A stock Maxie 62 Dart 413 went 13.44 @ 109 for M/T. Good mph for a stock eng in 1962. 426 Maxie in 63 ran 12.60's @ almost 112 mph with just the cutouts open and Atlas tires. The Hemi to me was like Fords Boss 429 as it was choked out in stock form but was the king of all race engines where it dominated. The wedge had its place in Mopar history for sure and even ran good when prepped out. I dont know if my 63 would go any faster with a Hemi equipped the same as my wedge and thats because of the good heads out there for the wedge today. And everyone knows how well the 440 six pack cars ran on the street. And the Hemi dominated the first 2 years of Pro Stock so much they had to restrict it so GM and Ford could catch up. Ron




Well put, Ron.. and I agree..

Here is something else to think about.

My 71 Hemi Challenger was bought new by a guy with limited skills.

All he did was.

-Install headers.
-12.5:1 pitons.
-A Rat Roaster(unmodified)
-Carter Competition series carbs
-A Holley Red pump.
-A Racer Brown solid cam
-4.88 gears.

Car went 10.30's@134MPH. All stock suspension. Stock unmodded 4 speed, No spool. No headwork. Other than a big block Vette there probably isnt any musclecar that could go that fast with such relatively minor mods. Even ran the stock dual point distributor. No Chrysler wedge could do that, that I am aware of.

The Hemi really had it..

MB




sorry but a a 12.5:1 440 w/ a good inatke and carb(s) would run just as well... That's more than just a few bolt ons and far from the hemi's "stock" build. I'd probably run less gear w/ a 440 thou


I would like to see a 440 with stock heads run those numbers not a chance IMO. However with as cheap as aftermarket heads head go for a wedge you should be able to build one cheaper then a hemi. Dollar for HP i would pick a wedge hands done but Iam building myself a 3rd Gen hemi as we speak




dollor per doller a wedge beats a hemi.how cheap do you think you could build both to make say 450 horsepower
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/11/12 11:09 PM

Quote:






Yes, I read your WHOLE lists of posts and I'll condense my post so you will understsand where I am coming from:

#1 In a comparision of reality and cost, cost dictates the level of speed you quest for 90% of the time. 10% is for ingenuity (free power gains).
#2 I agree that there are areas where ONLY a HEMI head will do, but... DON"T treat it as the "one engine that does it all"! It's raw power dictates it's longevity and unsurpassed power in the 8.90 and faster time brackets and upper racing classes, BUT remember.... the streets/slower bracket classes BELONG to the Wedges! Lower cost to operate. Period. Once again, speed COSTS - how FAST you want to go! Limited street/strip stormer/upper class competitive racer, go HEMI. Super hot "streeter/strip" machine, bracket/lower class racer, go Wedge.






But.....But......But.....the HEMI !!!IS!!! the one engine that does it all. In fact, it's the ONLY engine that does it all.

From 14sec stocker, to 3sec nitro hauler and anything in between. NOTHING else can do thaaaaaaaat.

Plus, if you bring a 440 sixpak car, or Max Wedge machine to the same venue I happen to be at with my HEMICUDA', don't get upset when people stand on those cars to take pictures of mine (once the crowd around it thins out enough to actually be able to see it).




Funny thing though, the SCORES of WEDGE owners tend think differently. And if you think that anyone going to stand on an A12 car to take a picture of a HEMICUDA, they WILL go home on crutches!! Not cool!! 14 sec Hemi stocker? It's a JOKE!! A tuned Magnum can crack the low 14-high 13 sec barrier. Don't EMBARRASS the HEMI, like that. A HEMI stocker with todays tires and nothing else should run 12.9's-12.5's, weight/chassis depending. Heck a 6-pack can do that and cruise comfortably on the road. I "respect" your HEMICUDA, it is after all a rare car (Plymouth nameplate gone - double rare) and it has "legendary status"! Compare it to a "MAXIE", I'll go with the "MAXIE" time and time again.

Riddle Me This: If the HEMI was or is the "one all" motor,
WHY are there so many options for the WEDGE motors (both big and small) and NOT the HEMI?

Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/11/12 11:17 PM






dollor per doller a wedge beats a hemi.how cheap do you think you could build both to make say 450 horsepower


I'd say whatever a stock HEMI with a dirty air cleaner and a fouled plug costs.

That should be about right to hit 450hp with a typical street HEMI.
Posted By: HPMike

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/11/12 11:36 PM

Quote:






dollor per doller a wedge beats a hemi.how cheap do you think you could build both to make say 450 horsepower


I'd say whatever a stock HEMI with a dirty air cleaner and a fouled plug costs.

That should be about right to hit 450hp with a typical street HEMI.




Thats good, Jim!!

There is just no end to the Hemi envy on this site...I guess the next comeback is that, "yeah, but my wedge motor is lighter"...remember guys, we are all on the same team...

I get sick and tired of people thinking only Arab Shieks and hedge fund managers can own hemi's..Plenty of regular folks own hemi cars including myself...

MB
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/11/12 11:51 PM

dollor per doller a wedge beats a hemi.how cheap do you think you could build both to make say 450 horsepower




RB engines ARE "no-brainer" builds for 450 hp.
A "warmed" over 440 Magnum or a "tuned" 440 6-pack
can reach that goal on the stock stroke with NO sweat. 383's can do it CHEAP also, you just got to "unlock" it's breathing restrictions (WITHOUT changing heads or performing headwork) with simple mods. Since they like the uppper end of the rpm dial, it's a bit more than the 440 to build. The HEMI already has this number factored in (since it's underrated from the factory) and you pay a PREMIUM for it in this form from the factory and let's not forget service replacement parts or upgraded performance parts factory or aftermarket. The BIG PLUS about the WEDGES is "tractable performance" and the ability to make decent power on pump gas in stock stroke form. May not be able to run 8's or faster (1/4 mi) or run in upper SS classes, however you got to respect it's "street/strip and bracket" credibility. WEDGES have it and the have it BIG in large and small sizes.

Posted By: pittsburghracer

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/11/12 11:59 PM

No HEMI envy here. I beat them weekly on the time slip were it counts. Just remember if you have a HEMI and a wedge ( both 500 hp) and they are both in cars weighting 3400# the wedge will win on the drag strip every time because because of wind-age ( Air catching the HEMI owners BIG HEAD. ) Put the same 500 HP engines on the dyno and the HEMI wins because everyone knows HEMI guys are the best bs'ers around. Just look on this site to see how many 1200+ hp blown HEMI"S we have running 10's.
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/12/12 12:20 AM




I'd say whatever a stock HEMI with a dirty air cleaner and a fouled plug costs.

That should be about right to hit 450hp with a typical street HEMI.




With the two "problems" listed above, even a 383
Magnum WILL walk by a HEMI off the line.


There is just no end to the WEDGE envy on this site...I guess the next comeback is that, "yeah, but my HEMI motor is much faster"...remember guys, we are all on the same team...

I get sick and tired of people thinking only "select few" or "all-out racers" can own hemi's..Plenty of "lucky" regular folks own hemi cars including myself...

MB





Again nothing wrong with that...it's just the "superiority thing" we DON"T agree with!!

Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/12/12 01:00 AM

Quote:




I'd say whatever a stock HEMI with a dirty air cleaner and a fouled plug costs.

That should be about right to hit 450hp with a typical street HEMI.




With the two "problems" listed above, even a 383
Magnum WILL walk by a HEMI off the line.


There is just no end to the WEDGE envy on this site...I guess the next comeback is that, "yeah, but my HEMI motor is much faster"...remember guys, we are all on the same team...

I get sick and tired of people thinking only "select few" or "all-out racers" can own hemi's..Plenty of "lucky" regular folks own hemi cars including myself...

MB





Again nothing wrong with that...it's just the "superiority thing" we DON"T agree with!!




Mr. "Sonic", have you no sense of humor??? Were you not blessed withe the gift of mirth & merriment???

"Shirley" you understand I often speak with tongue firmly planted in cheek....do you not???

Superiority, much like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder. It's ill-advised to believe one is superior simply because one pilots a HEMI, especially when my smallblock will bury an alarming number of 440s and HEMIs.

Like I've said......I like em' all.
Posted By: Ari440

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/12/12 01:11 AM

Quote:

Quote:




I'd say whatever a stock HEMI with a dirty air cleaner and a fouled plug costs.

That should be about right to hit 450hp with a typical street HEMI.




With the two "problems" listed above, even a 383
Magnum WILL walk by a HEMI off the line.


There is just no end to the WEDGE envy on this site...I guess the next comeback is that, "yeah, but my HEMI motor is much faster"...remember guys, we are all on the same team...

I get sick and tired of people thinking only "select few" or "all-out racers" can own hemi's..Plenty of "lucky" regular folks own hemi cars including myself...

MB





Again nothing wrong with that...it's just the "superiority thing" we DON"T agree with!!




Mr. "Sonic", have you no sense of humor??? Were you not blessed withe the gift of mirth & merriment???

"Shirley" you understand I often speak with tongue firmly planted in cheek....do you not???

Superiority, much like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder. It's ill-advised to believe one is superior simply because one pilots a HEMI, especially when my smallblock will bury an alarming number of 440s and HEMIs.

Like I've said......I like em' all.






"Shirley"


dont call me SHIRLEY
Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/12/12 01:13 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:




I'd say whatever a stock HEMI with a dirty air cleaner and a fouled plug costs.

That should be about right to hit 450hp with a typical street HEMI.




With the two "problems" listed above, even a 383
Magnum WILL walk by a HEMI off the line.


There is just no end to the WEDGE envy on this site...I guess the next comeback is that, "yeah, but my HEMI motor is much faster"...remember guys, we are all on the same team...

I get sick and tired of people thinking only "select few" or "all-out racers" can own hemi's..Plenty of "lucky" regular folks own hemi cars including myself...

MB





Again nothing wrong with that...it's just the "superiority thing" we DON"T agree with!!




Mr. "Sonic", have you no sense of humor??? Were you not blessed withe the gift of mirth & merriment???

"Shirley" you understand I often speak with tongue firmly planted in cheek....do you not???

Superiority, much like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder. It's ill-advised to believe one is superior simply because one pilots a HEMI, especially when my smallblock will bury an alarming number of 440s and HEMIs.

Like I've said......I like em' all.






"Shirley"


dont call me SHIRLEY


Atta boy.
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/12/12 01:45 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:




I'd say whatever a stock HEMI with a dirty air cleaner and a fouled plug costs.

That should be about right to hit 450hp with a typical street HEMI.




With the two "problems" listed above, even a 383
Magnum WILL walk by a HEMI off the line.


There is just no end to the WEDGE envy on this site...I guess the next comeback is that, "yeah, but my HEMI motor is much faster"...remember guys, we are all on the same team...

I get sick and tired of people thinking only "select few" or "all-out racers" can own hemi's..Plenty of "lucky" regular folks own hemi cars including myself...

MB





Again nothing wrong with that...it's just the "superiority thing" we DON"T agree with!!




Mr. "Sonic", have you no sense of humor??? Were you not blessed withe the gift of mirth & merriment???

Sense of humor I have, bordering on the "brink" of SARCASM!!

"Shirley" you understand I often speak with tongue firmly planted in cheek....do you not???

"Shirley" was an ex-girlfriend of mine. Great woman, but not marrying material.

Superiority, much like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder. It's ill-advised to believe one is superior simply because one pilots a HEMI, especially when my smallblock will bury an alarming number of 440s and HEMIs.

Like I've said......I like em' all.




That's great for you , but it's only an opinion, just like I have an opinion. So what's your point, besides stirring!!


"Shirley"


dont call me SHIRLEY


Atta boy.




You guys WATCH too much "daytime" tv. Must be NICE when you "own" a HEMI!!

Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/12/12 02:14 AM






You guys WATCH too much "daytime" tv. Must be NICE when you "own" a HEMI!!




I just knew ya had it in ya.
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/12/12 02:28 AM

Quote:






You guys WATCH too much "daytime" tv. Must be NICE when you "own" a HEMI!!




I just knew ya had it in ya.






Posted By: Sixgun

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/15/12 05:01 AM

Nice to own a Hemi?Oh Yeah!!!!
But at what point does the Hemi own YOU?
(kinda like my Cat...)
Again,just enjoying the info.
I actually cannot find anything said here I can violently disagree with.Very very good points, and well spoken.
I bet the Shivver-Lay boys don't have too many of these "spirited" discussions
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/16/12 12:33 AM

I bet the Shivver-Lay boys don't have too many of these "spirited" discussions




Now this is really small minded thinking, sorry.
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/16/12 04:06 AM

Quote:

I bet the Shivver-Lay boys don't have too many of these "spirited" discussions




Now this is really small minded thinking, sorry.




Shivver-Lay? That's a good one! "Small-minded", as in smallblock?

Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/16/12 04:11 AM

Quote:

Nice to own a Hemi?Oh Yeah!!!!
But at what point does the Hemi own YOU?

BEFORE the 7.90 index and FASTER!!

Posted By: Sixgun

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 08/28/12 06:58 AM

OK, one more detail,and will have enough info to keep me occupied until I can afford a Hemi, or I gack...whichever comes first.
On the basis of what I have been told here, (and it all seems to be pretty good mostly first hand experience),is it safe to say that my thinking bigger cubic inch is better with even a stock or "legend" Hemi head, up to a point?
Seems like the flow #s I've seen over the years support this (within reason),as it looks like you would be good up to 500" easily?
I often thought the Hemi really would have been even more spectacular in NASCAR at 500", without that pesky 7 liter limit.(And some incredibly violent and mortal crashes at upwards of 250MPH, no doubt)
Final thoughts,guys?
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 09/06/12 03:24 AM

Quote:

OK, one more detail,and will have enough info to keep me occupied until I can afford a Hemi, or I gack...whichever comes first.
On the basis of what I have been told here, (and it all seems to be pretty good mostly first hand experience),is it safe to say that my thinking bigger cubic inch is better with even a stock or "legend" Hemi head, up to a point?
Seems like the flow #s I've seen over the years support this (within reason),as it looks like you would be good up to 500" easily?
I often thought the Hemi really would have been even more spectacular in NASCAR at 500", without that pesky 7 liter limit.(And some incredibly violent and mortal crashes at upwards of 250MPH, no doubt)
Final thoughts,guys?





Yeah ... i agree with the flow #s supporting 500 cubes, maybe a bit more. 7 litre limit didn't stop the high speed handling/tire problems in the mid/late 60's, it magnified it. Motors were making power, chassis and tire science barely could keep up back then.

Posted By: Sixgun

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 09/06/12 04:01 AM

Thank you!
Posted By: LAD 524

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 09/12/12 08:27 AM

Guys, this argument is retarded.

They are different engine designs that were engineered from the outset for different reasons and have evolved (like just about any other Brand X engine) over the years with the growth/expansion of the aftermarket.

I love em all and am grateful to at least to be able to have the CHOICE to go either Big Cube Hemi or Wedge.

I had to contemplate both engines when deciding which way to go for my atreet/strip ride and decided to go with the Hemi

Why ?

First, the'yre thin on the ground down here in Oz. So the cool factor is thru the roof.

Second, I horse-traded to enable me to pony up the coin (which by the way was'nt that much more than a similarly equipped Wedge)

Third, spark plug access in my car was gonna be important.

Four, from what I saw of most decent cube Wedge builds, Hp/TQ wise on pump gas with street friendly roller sticks they were topping out at 720-750 HP on pump gas - the Hemi build made another 150+ more HP and TQ with an "easy on springs" ramped roller on pump gas.

Five, every MoPar guy has to at least own ONE Hemi in his lifetime ( and the planets aligned so I took the plunge.

Both are kool, build what ya want and have a blast with it. No wonder brand Xers rag on us MoPar guys - anyone reading this thread would think we were a buncha kids.

Lifre's too SHORT.

Race ?
Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 09/12/12 02:11 PM

Quote:

Guys, this argument is retarded.

They are different engine designs that were engineered from the outset for different reasons and have evolved (like just about any other Brand X engine) over the years with the growth/expansion of the aftermarket.

I love em all and am grateful to at least to be able to have the CHOICE to go either Big Cube Hemi or Wedge.

I had to contemplate both engines when deciding which way to go for my atreet/strip ride and decided to go with the Hemi

Why ?

First, the'yre thin on the ground down here in Oz. So the cool factor is thru the roof.

Second, I horse-traded to enable me to pony up the coin (which by the way was'nt that much more than a similarly equipped Wedge)

Third, spark plug access in my car was gonna be important.

Four, from what I saw of most decent cube Wedge builds, Hp/TQ wise on pump gas with street friendly roller sticks they were topping out at 720-750 HP on pump gas - the Hemi build made another 150+ more HP and TQ with an "easy on springs" ramped roller on pump gas.

Five, every MoPar guy has to at least own ONE Hemi in his lifetime ( and the planets aligned so I took the plunge.

Both are kool, build what ya want and have a blast with it. No wonder brand Xers rag on us MoPar guys - anyone reading this thread would think we were a buncha kids.

Lifre's too SHORT.

Race ?


1. 97.3% of all internet arguements are retarded.

2. 63.4% of all statistics are made up.

3. Who gives a flying f what brand Xers think???
Posted By: LAD 524

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 09/13/12 05:27 AM

Haha nice Jim....

My point is build what you like/want/can afford.
Posted By: HPMike

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 09/13/12 05:45 AM

Quote:

Haha nice Jim....

My point is build what you like/want/can afford.




Most of it is all in fun...really...If you have thin skin, then the internet isn't going to work for you...(I am not referring to anyone on particular)....

The thing that I dont understand is that whenever someone debates the Hemi vs wedge thing on this site it seems to have an underlying "have's vs have not's" tone... I dont get this. I know plenty of ordinary folks, including myself, that have hemi cars(yes, even "real" ones). Its not some special club with a secret handshake, you just have to want it!

MB
Posted By: quickd100

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 09/13/12 10:42 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Haha nice Jim....

My point is build what you like/want/can afford.




Most of it is all in fun...really...If you have thin skin, then the internet isn't going to work for you...(I am not referring to anyone on particular)....

The thing that I dont understand is that whenever someone debates the Hemi vs wedge thing on this site it seems to have an underlying "have's vs have not's" tone... I dont get this. I know plenty of ordinary folks, including myself, that have hemi cars(yes, even "real" ones). Its not some special club with a secret handshake, you just have to want it!

MB




I agree 110%! If most of you guys Hemi or wedge knew what I make a year and what my net worth is you'd wonder how I even put gas in the truck. I've owned a real Hemi car, built a 528 and now a 605.
It comes down to how much do you want it and what are you willing to give up to get it.Dave
Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 09/13/12 01:21 PM

Quote:

Haha nice Jim....

My point is build what you like/want/can afford.


I hear ya.
Posted By: LAD 524

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 09/13/12 02:49 PM

Im with ya Dave.

Like I said in my OP, I horse traded my way to a pump gas 850HP/770TQ Hemi and Im glad.

You have to WANT IT, like anything else.

No elitism here, I love big Wedges too.
Posted By: 67Satty

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 09/13/12 07:07 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:




First off, only 3 people on planet Earth have ever seen a 427 SOHC



I just found out that Im one of three people(I've seen three of them) AND a Hemi owner..and proud of it!
I must be truely special!


Next you're gonna tell me you've seen the elusive dinosaur!!!




There are two cars with the 427 SOHC in my area that I see. One is a 63 Galaxy that is done right as it looks like it came from the factory with it as the guy did a nice job with it. The other is an old hot rod as it looks to be about a 34 or so Ford with the Cammer. Let me tell you I was surprised to see that Cammer in that hot rod as thats the first time I have ever seen one in a hot rod and it got alot of attention. They did run strong when running right. Don Nicholsons Maverick in the 70 to 73 Era of Pro Stock could run with any of them when they had that cammer running right and not breaking parts. You gotta remember its a hemi with overhead cams. Here is a pic of the eng in the 63 Galaxy. Ron




Very cool car.




I used to work at MAS (Midwest Auto Specialties) back in the mid-'80s. Anyone rememeber them? They always had the full page ads in Hot Rod selling fiberglass hoods, scoops, and front ends. Anyway, the owner/boss Gary had a T-Bucket with a Ford Cammer in it. It just sat there for years in the showroom/front of store on Hennipen Avenue in Minneapolis collecting dust. So I guess I'm one of the three that has seen one in person. I wonder where it is now.
Posted By: RSNOMO

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 09/13/12 08:13 PM

JV probably has it...
Posted By: 67Satty

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 09/13/12 09:52 PM

Who/what is JV?
Posted By: RSNOMO

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 09/13/12 10:08 PM

His first name is John...

He is somewhat familiar with 'SOHC' engines...
Posted By: 1969 HEMI R-T

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 09/13/12 10:40 PM

I remember seeing the T bucket with the Cammer in it at MAS. I also like the cammers! It is a hemi to. I was wondering who ownes it now also?
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 09/13/12 10:46 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Haha nice Jim....

My point is build what you like/want/can afford.




Most of it is all in fun...really...If you have thin skin, then the internet isn't going to work for you...(I am not referring to anyone on particular)....

The thing that I dont understand is that whenever someone debates the Hemi vs wedge thing on this site it seems to have an underlying "have's vs have not's" tone... I dont get this. I know plenty of ordinary folks, including myself, that have hemi cars(yes, even "real" ones). Its not some special club with a secret handshake, you just have to want it!

MB





Thin Skin? Why the "transparent" conversation! Special club with a "secret" handshake? Is it this? - (while
looking in the rearview mirror) Meanwhile, Wedge guys do this while they the competition! In reality, THE HEMI got us both the top NHRA classes and NASCAR, so you cannot be "haters" all the time. The true fact is, if you can afford one (HEMI) why not be a PROUD owner!!

Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 09/13/12 11:11 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Guys, this argument is retarded.

They are different engine designs that were engineered from the outset for different reasons and have evolved (like just about any other Brand X engine) over the years with the growth/expansion of the aftermarket.

I love em all and am grateful to at least to be able to have the CHOICE to go either Big Cube Hemi or Wedge.

I had to contemplate both engines when deciding which way to go for my atreet/strip ride and decided to go with the Hemi

Why ?

First, the'yre thin on the ground down here in Oz. So the cool factor is thru the roof.

Second, I horse-traded to enable me to pony up the coin (which by the way was'nt that much more than a similarly equipped Wedge)

Third, spark plug access in my car was gonna be important.

Four, from what I saw of most decent cube Wedge builds, Hp/TQ wise on pump gas with street friendly roller sticks they were topping out at 720-750 HP on pump gas - the Hemi build made another 150+ more HP and TQ with an "easy on springs" ramped roller on pump gas.

Five, every MoPar guy has to at least own ONE Hemi in his lifetime ( and the planets aligned so I took the plunge.

Both are kool, build what ya want and have a blast with it. No wonder brand Xers rag on us MoPar guys - anyone reading this thread would think we were a buncha kids.

Lifre's too SHORT.

Race ?


1. 97.3% of all internet arguements are retarded.

2. 63.4% of all statistics are made up.

3. Who gives a flying f what brand Xers think???




With statement #3 ONLY!! So...
I guess your "first" statement has a 97.3% chance of being of "retarded" nature. ... And BOTH statements (#1 and #2) may have a 63.4% chance of the STATISTICS being made up. I guess what you are saying is that some internet users who post arguments ARE of the "remedial" imagination mindset? Sad, so sad!!

Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 09/13/12 11:20 PM




1. 97.3% of all internet arguements are retarded.

2. 63.4% of all statistics are made up.

3. Who gives a flying f what brand Xers think???




With statement #3 ONLY!! So...
I guess your "first" statement has a 97.3% chance of being of "retarded" nature. ... And BOTH statements (#1 and #2) may have a 63.4% chance of the STATISTICS being made up. I guess what you are saying is that some internet users who post arguments ARE of the "remedial" imagination mindset? Sad, so sad!!




You don't really think I know what I'm saying.......do you???
Posted By: Abodyjohn88

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 09/13/12 11:24 PM

Ill take a smallblock r4p5 hemi FTW!!!
Posted By: HYPER8oSoNic

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 09/13/12 11:58 PM

Quote:




1. 97.3% of all internet arguements are retarded.

2. 63.4% of all statistics are made up.

3. Who gives a flying f what brand Xers think???




With statement #3 ONLY!! So...
I guess your "first" statement has a 97.3% chance of being of "retarded" nature. ... And BOTH statements (#1 and #2) may have a 63.4% chance of the STATISTICS being made up. I guess what you are saying is that some internet users who post arguments ARE of the "remedial" imagination mindset? Sad, so sad!!




You don't really think I know what I'm saying.......do you???




Jim, nobody a good yarn like you!!


Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 09/14/12 02:00 AM

Quote:

Quote:




1. 97.3% of all internet arguements are retarded.

2. 63.4% of all statistics are made up.

3. Who gives a flying f what brand Xers think???




With statement #3 ONLY!! So...
I guess your "first" statement has a 97.3% chance of being of "retarded" nature. ... And BOTH statements (#1 and #2) may have a 63.4% chance of the STATISTICS being made up. I guess what you are saying is that some internet users who post arguments ARE of the "remedial" imagination mindset? Sad, so sad!!




You don't really think I know what I'm saying.......do you???




Jim, nobody a good yarn like you!!





I own a 55 gallon cauldren.
Posted By: hudsonhornet7x

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 10/23/21 07:51 PM

So did any of you guys ever settle this debate? lol
Posted By: gsmopar

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 10/23/21 09:40 PM

Originally Posted by hudsonhornet7x
So did any of you guys ever settle this debate? lol


Both! Same with the 45acp vs. 9mm. Both! Why limit yourself? Now, 9 in vs. Dana 60…. confused
Posted By: sogtx

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 10/24/21 11:05 AM

If Hemis were that cool
They woulda put them in A12’s !

Wish i still had a Heemi ..
wish they originally made them with six pack option ..

Then again , someone told me once Buicks were faster than
hemis ..
im getting a HemiKiller plate for my bee , just to piss everyone off , lol



Attached picture 29C9F16F-659D-4687-AF9D-FD3AE37559E2.jpeg
Attached picture 09B3F0D6-3ADC-4964-9929-13F0654AE279.jpeg
Posted By: Gtxxjon

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 10/24/21 01:31 PM

As we all know a Hemi 426 is a NASCAR engine!

Built to last on maximum rpm for 500 miles approx 3 hours.
Don’t think the 383 or 440 was ever built for that purpose?

Yes the 413 and wedge 426 was, but never ‘beefed up’ with decent main caps!

But in the fullness of time the 440 has survived drag racing duties.

So most serious racers have found after market blocks and solved that problem.

For the rest of us it’s after market main caps and the strongest rods we can afford.

Hemi heads are a similar price to trick 440 heads, but all the valve gear and extra bits will break the bank... fan

So it comes down to budget methinks?

25,000 for a hemi or 10,000 for a trick 440... drive

GOT to be a Hemi then lol... drinking
Posted By: hudsonhornet7x

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 10/24/21 01:36 PM

Originally Posted by sogtx
If Hemis were that cool
They woulda put them in A12’s !

Wish i still had a Heemi ..
wish they originally made them with six pack option ..

Then again , someone told me once Buicks were faster than
hemis ..
im getting a HemiKiller plate for my bee , just to piss everyone off , lol




I was born in 1981, but a good friend gave me the magazine with the Buick Vs. Hemi article. It's funny that it is still being referenced al these years later.
Posted By: sogtx

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 10/24/21 04:31 PM

Lol
I bought “that” Hemi that Dudek had .. thought it was gonna be
EZ to run 10’s … and kill Buicks .


It was a learning experience.. and fun and met the best people ..
i was a novice .. still am ..
coolest car Id ever owned ..


Ask skatpacktom if hemis are so awesome
How could he spank me with a Six pack car each time..
smile
Posted By: sogtx

Re: Hemi vs Wedge - 10/24/21 04:45 PM

Thought I was gonna be John Force
… actually it did John Force burnouts ..

Attached picture F3A8D940-DC93-48A4-9344-B733D2801D81.jpeg
© 2024 Moparts Forums