Moparts

picked up a 1965 Sweptline

Posted By: Red383

picked up a 1965 Sweptline - 12/12/17 06:30 PM

So I picked up this 65 D200 Sweptline truck from northern CA. Non-running, non-rolling, 318 4-speed. 4.10 Dana rear. Really clean truck bought from the original owner's daughter, it sat for 20+ years. It does need a driver’s side floor pan for sure due to leaky master cylinders, and maybe passenger side. But the steps and rockers are in really good shape, along with the rest of the body.

I have since free'd up the front brake drums to make it a roller, and after draining about 2 gallons of water and muck out of the engine, I replace the points and coil, got her fired up and did a motor flush treatment. Changed the oil again. Killed the Black Widow spider in the bellhousing, replaced the clutch master and slave cylinder and now have a clutch pedal.

My main goal is to be able to start it up and pull it in and out of the shop while I work on other projects.

My plans for the truck are a 4 wheel drive conversion, I’m thinking a Dana 44 front since I don’t do any heavy wheeling, unless I come across a Dana 60 front for a decent price. This will also get rid of the drum brakes in front. Not sure how this affects the steering, what modifications I will need to make. Will a Chevy Dana axle fit? Or are the springs too wide?

I want to make this a semi-daily driver, but I am having a hard time deciding on what drivetrain I should go with. I really want to keep it a manual trans, so an overdrive tranny is a must. I’m thinking NV4500, or 5600.

For the engine, I’m looking for opinions on which direction I should go. I kind of like the look of the wide 318 that is in there, but is rebuilding it a good option? Parts availability? Are headers and intake manifolds available?

383/440? Would I be able to get a bellhousing to put the 5-speed behind it?

5.2/5.9 Magnum? 5.7/6.4 Hemi?

4BT or 3.9 Cummins would be cool, I don’t think I want a 6BT Cummins, I don’t want to mod the firewall.

I would probably go with an EFI kit on the gas engine. I have used the FAST EZ-EFI before, and really liked it.

Everyone has an opinion, so does anyone have any info to sway me towards one of these options?

Sorry for the long post, and all the questions, and thank for any input.

Attached picture 65 402.jpg
Attached picture 65 404.jpg
Posted By: Fat_Mike

Re: picked up a 1965 Sweptline - 12/12/17 07:36 PM

Man, that looks like a super clean truck. Good find! As for a drive train, I would look for a '94 - '01 Ram 1500 4X4 (5.2 or 5.9) donor vehicle and swap the entire drive train. I think you'd have your entire wishlist of upgrades in one package.
Posted By: larrymopar360

Re: picked up a 1965 Sweptline - 12/12/17 10:44 PM

I LOVE IT!

You sure are going to get tons of engine opinions. I would love to see you stay with the poly 318, but can't answer your questions on availability of parts. I had a poly 318 a long time ago in my '67 utiline, three-on-the-three and a 4.10 rear and it was stout!

I would consider keeping it gas powered small block to keep the weight down up front, mods to a minimum, and costs moderate. I think if parts are available rebuilding the poly 318 would be great! Looks great too just like you wrote, and just belongs. Otherwise, I'd consider a stroked 360. It would have plenty of power to move that beast, carburated or FI, fit nicely, sound great, and have tons of parts available. IF IT WERE ME, I'd keep it looking stock Mopar, or at least as much as possible, e.g. valve covers, air cleaner, engine paint, etc.

Again, I love the truck, great score, keep us posted please!
Posted By: larrymopar360

Re: picked up a 1965 Sweptline - 12/12/17 10:57 PM

One question has me curious; I thought this was the grille on the '65,'66, and '67?

Attached picture 1965 Dodge Truck _ Sweptline Truck.jpg
Posted By: Red383

Re: picked up a 1965 Sweptline - 12/13/17 04:30 AM

Thanks for the input so far guys. I do want to keep it stock looking, with comfort and drivability upgrades.

My truck is an early 65, mid 1965, they changed to a longer wheel base, the tail gate without the chains and the grille was changed.
Posted By: poorboy

Re: picked up a 1965 Sweptline - 12/13/17 04:36 AM

Yea, me too. 64 was suppose to be the last year for the quad headlights, but with it being a Dodge, it may have been an early production 65 and they had some left over 64 front panels.

I agree with the 94-01 donor truck to hijack the drive train from. Every thing you will need will be right there as well. Gene
Posted By: hosehead

Re: picked up a 1965 Sweptline - 12/13/17 05:51 AM

That thing is awesome! Nice score! Keep us posted on your progress!
Posted By: earlymopar

Re: picked up a 1965 Sweptline - 12/13/17 03:13 PM

The OPs truck is a 65 Series I, the blue 65 shown by Larry is a 65' Series II.

I cringe when I see a nice solid truck like this being planned as daily driver in an area with salty roads. Unless you plan to not drive it in snow or winter. Also, leave the Chevy parts out of the equation.

- EM
Posted By: Red383

Re: picked up a 1965 Sweptline - 12/13/17 05:35 PM

I have a 1992 Ford Taurus for the crappy weather/winter days.

I did get the master cyl rebuilt and bench bled last night, hopefully get it installed back on the truck in the next day or so.

I did modify the clutch and brake master cyl bolts to make them easier to install by myself. Worked out pretty good.

Attached picture IMG_6436.JPG
Posted By: Triggerfish

Re: picked up a 1965 Sweptline - 12/13/17 06:14 PM

Congrats on the super cool Swepty! Nice orig truck to start with for sure. My 71 W100 (orig 318 4wd), has 78 Dana 44 on the front with the disc brakes & the rear chassis is from a 78 3/4 ton W200 with in frame tank, etc. Front Dana width is perfect for my truck, so that's the route I'd go.
The 70 383 Magnum from my Challenger with forged higher comp pistons & mild cam works well with my combo, but am building a 450 hp 383 for better towing. Cummins conversions are cool, but there's a lot of fabrication required for the 1100 lb 6 cyl. A bumped up 4BT would get great mileage & power but a lot of $$ involved to make the Cummins conv. I'd go with a stroker B or RB built for torque.

Attached picture Buzz PW 1 small file.jpg
Posted By: CTD5.9

Re: picked up a 1965 Sweptline - 12/13/17 06:37 PM

Great looking truck, I have a fargo in the same color scheme

A Chevy Dana 60 will fit, the difference in spring pad widths isn't much. If you are swapping in a newer drive train/transfer case you will probably need a drivers side drop transfer case So Ford, or adapt a newer one.

Edit: I forgot its also 2" narrower, still better then accidentally buying a Dana 61

If it was me, I would wait until cummins announces a new repower the current 2.8 is probably a bit small. The easiest would probably be a 5.9 magnum, I like the idea of a gen 3 but I am not sure about getting a flywheel for the truck transmission to work.
Posted By: larrymopar360

Re: picked up a 1965 Sweptline - 12/13/17 06:51 PM

Originally Posted By earlymopar
The OPs truck is a 65 Series I, the blue 65 shown by Larry is a 65' Series II.

I cringe when I see a nice solid truck like this being planned as daily driver in an area with salty roads. Unless you plan to not drive it in snow or winter. Also, leave the Chevy parts out of the equation.

- EM
Thank you for your comment on excluding Chevy parts!!!! I was going to mention that too!!!

Also, I think your truck looks so cool the way it is right now, wheels, tires, paint, etc. I know there's always temptation for shiny big wheels, new paint and such, but I really do think it looks so good just as it is! the word Patina gets overused by sellers, but your truck has the perfect Patina. I don't know how you feel about the tires and rims, but those rims and center caps look so good to me, and a the tall utility type tires too. It fits the era of the truck and I love the look.
Posted By: Triggerfish

Re: picked up a 1965 Sweptline - 12/13/17 07:12 PM

I think they look good with a Mopar under the hood. I thought about a 5.9 Cummins conversion, but don't want to do the mods required. A stroker 360 would be a great option for your W200.

Attached picture PW 383 Magnum.JPG
Attached picture Towing the 64 426 Commando home small file.jpg
Posted By: larrymopar360

Re: picked up a 1965 Sweptline - 12/13/17 08:32 PM

Good looking truck Triggerfish! I like your unsilenced air cleaner and the stock radiator too. Nice Fury as well!
Posted By: Red383

Re: picked up a 1965 Sweptline - 12/13/17 09:56 PM

Sweet truck Triggerfish. I really leaning towards a gas engine. I like the idea of a 383, dressed up like a stock engine. I do want to consider gas mileage though so nothing too radical. I think a small block will just look too small in the engine bay. Your 383 looks great.

A Dana axle is manufactured by Dana, not Chevy. That’s just the application that it was cursed with when it left the manufacturer and went to the Chevy plant.

Cummins repower would be cool, but the 2.8 is going for 9K, out of my budget for now.

Larrymopar, I think we are on the same page. I like the look as it sits, wheels and all. The tires are junk and need replaced (I’m surprised they hold air), and I don’t know about the wheels, they are some kind of split rim, maybe I can find some newer one piece steel wheels to replace them.

The paint looks nicer in the pictures than it really is, but I want to leave it as is and get it driving before I even worry about paint. Just need to replace the floor pans. I have a 73 Dart in the body/paint stage right now, and it is taking forever.

Attached picture 65 300.jpg
Posted By: larrymopar360

Re: picked up a 1965 Sweptline - 12/13/17 10:51 PM

Seeing it with hood open brings back memories of my '65! Flipping that hood all the way back to windshield if I wanted and those huge inner fenders; great for resting tools smile

I hear what you're saying about filling the engine bay. The poly does that if you decide to rebuild that. If you are going big block, I would strongly consider a stroked 400. The 400 makes a great stroker engine. You could F.I. that for a little more mileage, and go with a reasonable rear gear for not too terrible mileage, yet still have plenty of off the line twist with the massive torque the stroked 400's make.

I'm glad you like the paint and wheels too! It really is a great looking truck as it sits, and I'm finding myself looking at them online now....damn you, lol. I have three vehicles right now, so I really don't "need" another.
Posted By: Triggerfish

Re: picked up a 1965 Sweptline - 12/13/17 11:03 PM

Thanks & you've got a great truck to start with & 383's are really plentiful. I rebuilt the 70 383 that was in my 71 W100 & put in in a 68 D100 that I did a frame off resto on. Added the chrome valve cvrs & bigger Lunati cam, so should be a great street motor for the D100. I put the D100's orig 383 2bbl on a stand & wish I'd built it up instead of leaving the W100 without a motor. Sure hope the new motor's done before the snow falls. These Sweptys have a lot of character & you seldom see them, so they get a lot of thumbs up at shows & on the road.

Attached picture 68 D100 with new 383 Mag.jpg
Attached picture 68 D100 ready to get lowered.JPG
Attached picture 68 w tuff wheel 1.JPG
Posted By: earlymopar

Re: picked up a 1965 Sweptline - 12/14/17 02:56 AM


"I think a small block will just look too small in the engine bay."

Keep in mind that the Poly 318 in your truck is physically larger than a 383-440. Also, you asked about parts availability. There are headers and performance intake manifolds available and as far as parts you can get anything for the Poly. The nice aspect of them is that they share a bunch of parts with the LA small block (but not camshafts, pistons or rocker arms).

For your floorpans, go to http://www.exlinecustomauto.com/custom-services.html

For the headers: http://ttiexhaust.com/ OR, http://www.manciniracing.com/tti318pohe.html

Manifold: http://chryslerpower.com/webstore/Poly/Poly-SS-X-Manifold
OR look through Craigslist for used Weiand, Offenhauser or Edelbrock (used) manifolds.

- EM
Posted By: earlymopar

Re: picked up a 1965 Sweptline - 12/14/17 02:57 AM

Sorry for the duplicate post. - EM
Posted By: basketcase

Re: picked up a 1965 Sweptline - 12/14/17 03:24 AM

nice score Red...maybe I'll see you out in it. Great looking trucks guys.
Posted By: Soopernaut

Re: picked up a 1965 Sweptline - 12/14/17 06:42 PM

Fitting headers in that truck could be a problem. The transmission crossmember is usually where most long tube headers would run. There was one company that made a run of long tube headers for Poly Sweptline trucks. I don't know if they are still available but Stan's might have them.

http://www.t137.com/dtapoly.bak/addpoly.php

There were 2 other companies that made long tube headers for 67-68 trucks with the LA and big block. One was Hedman and I don't remember the other one.
Posted By: larrymopar360

Re: picked up a 1965 Sweptline - 12/14/17 08:38 PM

It's great that TTI makes Headers for the Poly 318 because TTI has quality stuff (you do pay for the quality). It would be nice if you can fit them to your truck and stick with the 318. But if not, I still say a stroked 400 would be the big block way to go.
Posted By: earlymopar

Re: picked up a 1965 Sweptline - 12/14/17 11:50 PM

I can speak from experience that Soopernaut is correct even though I have mods on my Poly that required further messing around with the installed engine height.

I adapted ford 302-351 Windsor headers to my Poly because there was no way I was going to pay $750 to TTI for a set of mild steel headers and then have to add another $300+ for ceramic coating. I bought a pair of new stainless steel headers for the 302-351 Ford with 3/8" flanges for $200 and then machined adapters out of 7075 aluminum to mate them to my Poly.

I also had to mess with the installed height of my Poly to make clearance for the intake I have and the one that is coming. My engine is at least 4" lower than stock. This resulted in the headers fitting perfectly with the frame. I also mated a TKO-600 5-speed to my Poly so the lower engine height worked out perfectly for the transmission and driveline as well.

- EM
Posted By: Handygun

Re: picked up a 1965 Sweptline - 12/15/17 03:24 AM

Another vote for a stroker Poly here. Bruce Toth sells an adapter to bolt to the Poly ex. flange that lets you run a 331-92 header. I have your trucks twin but a 100 shortbed. Stroker poly goes in mine this spring.
Posted By: dogdays

Re: picked up a 1965 Sweptline - 12/20/17 12:17 AM

Very nice truck. Really clean and straight. Yes it's the first series 1965 which has a 122" wheelbase instead of a 128. That 6" of wheelbase makes a difference in towing. The 128 is more stable.
The in-cab fuel tank has to go. There is a better place for a fuel tank, like in the rear where the spare tire might go. There are also spaces along the framerails that might be useful.

Even though the truck is a stock color, which was from time to time called Turf Green, duffers will try to convince you the truck is Forest Service Green. But what do they know?

Here are some sore spots on this cab style:
1. Fuel tank, already mentioned. If it leaks or cracks, you're swimming in gasoline.
2. Door latches. These are a major pain in the bum. They have an aluminum star wheel and it is not reproduced. These are like car latches from the fin cars. Vintage Power Wagons used to reproduce them, but not for 10 years or more. When my star wheel wore out I had to cobble a workable latch from a rear drivers side latch from around a '59 car.
3. The hood hinges wear out and the hood sticks up at the rear. Nice thing about the hood is that it opens up wide enough that you can pull the engine without removing the hood. If your hood hinges work OK, keep them lubed.
4. The truck bed is single wall. That means that any dent that gets put on the inside shows on the outside. I had a crankshaft roll and bang!
5. The tailgate is supported by chains which bang on the body in rough going.
6. Wheelwells are not in the usual places in the bed so a "regular" mat won't fit. That bed is an odd duck. 122" wheelbase strikes again!
7. I've had trouble with the taillights. Also no backup lights.
8. Fortunately the front turn signals are easy to find on Ebay.
9. The brake and clutch master cylinders are basically the same unit, with exception of the residual pressure valve on the brake master cylinder. It sure would be nice to have a dual braking system.
10. Good luck getting power steering.

Now on to the frame: Unless you are used to trucks of the '40s and '50s you will need to do a bunch of studying. This truck is set up with four point mounting for the engine/transmission. There are two mount points near the front like "normal". There are two mounting points on the bellhousing. The crossmember that the bellhousing mounts to is massive and sits right in the way of any non-custom header's collector.
The transmission hangs off the back of the bellhousing. Emergency brake is a drum on the transmission. The rear axle has no provisions for emergency brakes, at least not on the 1/2 ton.
The hydraulic clutch slave cylinder on the passenger's side of the bellhousing is directly in the way of any noncustom header tube.
The bellhousing wraps around the flywheel in such a way that you cannot remove it before removing the engine. It weighs about 72 lb. It should have bolt patterns for flathead 6, slant 6 and A engine.
You cannot pull the engine and transmission out of the front of the truck. You remove the transmission first, either through the cab or down to the ground, then the engine will come up and out the front.
The frame is set up for a front sump oil pan.

Now we get to the engine. The 318 Poly is NOT larger than an LA engine, physically. It just looks that way. It has the same deck height and bore spacing. Crankshafts are the same. That means that 340 stroker cranks just drop in. Rods are the same. Oil pump is the same. Distributor is the same. What is NOT the same is pistons, camshaft, cylinder heads and valvegear, intake manifold, exhaust manifolds. IF you like to feed the weirdness you can build a big Poly motor. But it will cost you big bucks. There are about five intake manifolds that are not 2-barrel. None of the intake manifolds is currently available for less than $500.There is the Edelbrock P-600 3-2s, usually Stromberg base, the 2-4 barrel Fury manifolds, currently less expensive but take two carbs, the single 4-barrel stock intake, running around $600 last time I checked, the 7503 Weiand, not available new and usually getting around $500, and then the new one that currently retails for $670 or so, if they are actually making them. Camshafts are limited to regrinds except that Camcraft has a bunch of new cores, $185 apiece, but then you have to get the core ground, so I think we're looking at $300+ for a brand new cam. Regrinds of stock cams are not too bad at under $150.
Because the valves are in different places on a poly than on a Wedge, pistons are at least semi-custom. Sealed Power makes stock pistons in their antique line but I think they're about $400 a set.

Don't get me wrong, I like the Poly because it's weird. My engine was a stocker with Weiand 7503 and Holley 570 Street Avenger. I used a Direct Connection electronic distributor kit and finished off with dual exhaust. My truck got an honest 16mpg with a lot of rejetting of the carb because I live at altitude. The Poly heads are actually better than the 318 heads and the Poly in near stock trim has more power than a LA 318.

I swapped to a 1986 roller cam 318 and used the 360 hydraulic roller cam and a 1975 or so stock 360 four barrel intake with the 570 street avenger. I used the late model exhaust manifolds with the old exhaust system and picked up 6 mpg right off the bat. Put that in your Poly and smoke it!

If I was doing a ground-up reconstruction I'd look seriously at a GIII Hemi, take #200 off the front end and make steering easier.
A B/RB will bolt in and a B makes more sense for room especially as you can build them to 500 inches or more.
I didn't think the engine bay looked empty when I substituted the LA for the A.
One last thing,,,,,The NP420 transmission has only synchronizers in 3rd and 4th gears.

R.
Posted By: dogdays

Re: picked up a 1965 Sweptline - 12/20/17 12:19 AM

Feel free to PM me with questions.

R.
Posted By: earlymopar

Re: picked up a 1965 Sweptline - 12/20/17 03:43 PM

The A series block is mostly the same as an LA except in wall section of the casting so it is heavier and can usually take a larger re-bore than an LA. With heads attached however, the Poly IS physically wider than an LA.

- EM
Posted By: Soopernaut

Re: picked up a 1965 Sweptline - 12/20/17 11:27 PM

Originally Posted By dogdays
2. Door latches. These are a major pain in the bum. They have an aluminum star wheel and it is not reproduced.

10. Good luck getting power steering.

The transmission hangs off the back of the bellhousing. Emergency brake is a drum on the transmission. The rear axle has no provisions for emergency brakes, at least not on the 1/2 ton.
R.


The star wheels are being reproduced. The same guy can get you stainless steel lined brake and clutch master cylinders.
Quote:
I can re-build your door latches at $200.00 EA with new star wheels made of aircraft alloy aluminum. E-mail me or call at 651 653 0147 I also have new strikers. John cjlapham44@gmail.com


CPP makes a power steering kit for this truck.

The 65 and later trucks had a provision for emergency brakes on the rear axle. It was no longer on the rear of the transmission on light trucks.
Posted By: Red383

Re: picked up a 1965 Sweptline - 12/21/17 11:21 PM

Thanks for all the info Dogdays, I was already aware of most of it though.
Yes, the color is Turf Green.
This truck actually has three gas tanks with a selector valve on the driver's side floor. It has an extra tank in front of each rear wheel, that you would fill from the inside of the wheel well. see pic. (I'm just glad it had this style, instead of the others you see that have holes in the side of the bed to fill the aux. tanks.

The original owner towed a fifth wheel around the country with this 122" wheelbase truck. Scarey!

The Driver's side door latch "star wheel" is junk and needs replaced. I guess I'll be looking for one of these.

My hood hinges are in good shape and the hood closes/lines up real good, so I will lube up the hinges to keep it that way.

Headlights are the only lights on the truck that work.

I replaced the clutch master and rebuilt the brake master. I still have no brakes, I think it's rust in the lines, but at least I can start it and pull it in and out of the shop. Emergency brake stops it for now. Seems like the brake pedal swing arm needs lubed up, the pedal doesn't want to come back up when pressed.

My emergency bake is on the rear axle brakes, not on the back of the trans.

I've been doing some research on the Poly engine, and havn't made a decision on what I'm going to do long term for drive train. I needed to replace the passenger side exh manifold gasket, and I am attempting to remove three broken studs right now. Are just the top bolts in the water jacket, or are all of them? Want to make sure I put sealer on the correct ones.

Soopernaut, who is this guy? "The star wheels are being reproduced. The same guy can get you stainless steel lined brake and clutch master cylinders."

I saw some info about the CPP power steering, but I'll decide on that after I get it driving on the road. Manual steering never bothered me in my 70 Cuda.

Thanks again for the info guys.

Attached picture 65 315.jpg
Posted By: bboogieart

Re: picked up a 1965 Sweptline - 12/22/17 03:49 AM

Really sweet looking truck. up

[quote=Red383]
For the engine, I’m looking for opinions on which direction I should go. I kind of like the look of the wide 318 that is in there, but is rebuilding it a good option? Parts availability? Are headers and intake manifolds available?[quote]

I like the idea of the old poly.
A rebuild is no more difficult than any later V-8.
I believe the shortblock is the same.
Might be want to see if a stroker kit would work.

There is some progress being made with Hot Rodding the Poly.
https://search.yahoo.com/search?p=polysuperpac.com
Don't know about headers but the motors are getting some LOVE.
I've read a few articles in "Chrysler Power" magazine,

[quote=Red383]
Emergency brake stops it for now. Seems like the brake pedal swing arm needs lubed up, the pedal doesn't want to come back up when pressed.[quote]


I just went through this with my 77 van. It was the rubber hoses had gone soft insde and would act like a flapping rubber valve to keep the fluid from returning unless I manually pulled the pedal back up.

Not a bad idea to replace all the brake components including the lines.
Not too hard a job and well worth the effort.


The split rims gotta go.
They are considered to be dangerous.
I doubt you could find someone to mount anything on 'em.
I am no help in finding replacements.
I used 18"X 8" aftermarket wheels.
Great tire availability.

Your not going to find "new" tires in the 16.5 size.




Posted By: Soopernaut

Re: picked up a 1965 Sweptline - 12/22/17 02:55 PM

Originally Posted By Red383
Soopernaut, who is this guy? "The star wheels are being reproduced. The same guy can get you stainless steel lined brake and clutch master cylinders."


He is John Geidl aka PowerwagonJohn. He doesn't visit computer forums much, is not a member here and prefers to do business by phone or email. He has been in the Dodge truck hobby for a very long time.
Posted By: earlymopar

Re: picked up a 1965 Sweptline - 12/22/17 03:53 PM

" Camshafts are limited to regrinds except that Camcraft has a bunch of new cores, $185 apiece, but then you have to get the core ground, so I think we're looking at $300+ for a brand new cam. Regrinds of stock cams are not too bad at under $150. "

I just paid $70 for a regrind of my OEM camshaft but to a spec I wanted. This was at Oregon Cams and they have several patterns available.

- EM
Posted By: Twostick

Re: picked up a 1965 Sweptline - 01/20/18 06:51 AM

Don't be surprised if that manifold gasket turns out to be a cracked manifold. If you find a poly in a boneyard it will almost always have a driver side exhaust manifold but the pass side is almost always gone.

Bruce Toth makes adapter plates that allows you to bolt GEN3 hemi exhaust manifolds or headers to a poly. Anything would be better than the tiny log manifolds they came with.

.100" overbore and a 4.25" crank gives you almost 430 cubes.

Kevin
Posted By: OrangeProwler

Re: picked up a 1965 Sweptline - 01/22/18 04:35 PM

Congrats on the truck. Looks like a decent start to a cool truck.
© 2024 Moparts Forums