Moparts

Mig Welders which one?

Posted By: flatiron

Mig Welders which one? - 12/23/09 02:33 AM

I'm currently shopping for a welder Mig and gasless
115/120 volt for body work and frame repairs/patching. I've narrowed it down to the hobart 140
century 140
lincoln 140

Any input good or bad would be greatly appreciated
Posted By: joedust451

Re: Mig Welders which one? - 12/23/09 02:55 AM

I just got a Hobart 140 mig for 476.10 shipped off e-bay (sgweldstore), it works great. came with a 3 yr. warr.
Posted By: DAYCLONA

Re: Mig Welders which one? - 12/23/09 02:59 AM

Although I'd recommend you use gas, you can buy a conversion kit, remember to reverse the polarity settings in a gasless machine when converting to gas use,....I highly recommend the Hobart as the transformer, wire drive, handle will be Miller items, easily repaired or replaced,although unlikley to fail, plus the wiredrive is far superior to the Lincoln wiredrive, which is a POS IMHO

Mike
Posted By: Crizila

Re: Mig Welders which one? - 12/23/09 03:19 AM

HTP 140 - and don't bother going gasless. You won't like the welds.
Posted By: jcc

Re: Mig Welders which one? - 12/23/09 03:22 AM

Hey mods, I don't mind chiming in on these often repeated welder requests, but lately (last 3? years) nothing new is shared, any chance of going back and picking a well covered welder thread and getting it to archive status, nothing personal here directed to the OP.
Posted By: Stanton

Re: Mig Welders which one? - 12/23/09 04:18 AM

Didn't this get beat to death a week ago ?!?!?!?!?
Posted By: joedust451

Re: Mig Welders which one? - 12/23/09 04:42 AM

Quote:

Didn't this get beat to death a week ago ?!?!?!?!?




I think it did, i do know i had started a thread not to long ago, but a week on Moparts Q&A is long gone or a good 18-20 pages away, maybe more, i think a "sticky" would be a good thing, or a "welding" section.
Posted By: Scott Carl

Re: Mig Welders which one? - 12/23/09 06:02 AM

Quote:

Quote:

Didn't this get beat to death a week ago ?!?!?!?!?




I think it did, i do know i had started a thread not to long ago, but a week on Moparts Q&A is long gone or a good 18-20 pages away, maybe more, i think a "sticky" would be a good thing, or a "welding" section.



It did in deed get discussed at nauseum. That being said, one consensus was that if you EVER consider doing anything heavier than body or exhaust work, you'll regret the 115/120 volt units. Even if ALL you do is body work, if you do a lot, plan on a gouge in your electric budget. I don't understand all I know about electricity, but I do know the 220 volt units are much cheaper to run. Also, as was stated previously, if you go strictly gas-less, you won't be happy. I have a gas-less 110 Lincoln and a gassed 220 Hobart. I tried using the Lincoln on body repairs because I had to work outside and didn't want to deal with the headaches of breezes and gas shield. The flux core wire, even at the lower voltage heats the metal too much and distortion was hard to control, not to mention the slag and excess splatter. I finally got fed up and scrounged a large piece of cardboard for a wind break and drug out the Hobart. I was a much happier camper.
Posted By: jcc

Re: Mig Welders which one? - 12/23/09 10:10 AM

This is not the end all, be all recent welding thread, but its a start:

https://board.moparts.org/ubbthreads/show...rue#Post5636933
Posted By: maximus

Re: Mig Welders which one? - 12/23/09 10:58 AM

I have a Century and use it quite often. It has never failed me. When I bought it 15 years ago the salesman (who I trust) of a large welding supply company said it was better because it has copper windings instead of aluminum. The duty time is a lot longer than the others at the time. Compare the duty cycle of each you are looking at, I know things have changed over the years since I bought mine. The good thing about aluminum windings it's lighter, mine is heavy.
Posted By: flatiron

Re: Mig Welders which one? - 12/23/09 12:23 PM

Quote:

Didn't this get beat to death a week ago ?!?!?!?!?


Sorry for the question but I have been without a computer for alittle over 2 weeks
Posted By: DAYCLONA

Re: Mig Welders which one? - 12/23/09 02:37 PM

It's like any other posts on Moparts, what classic car insurance to use, my car won't start, how to bleed brakes, who makes the cheapest....., how do I paint mt car with a brush and roller,...now thats one dead horse that rears it ugly head all the time ......some people are new, or never explored that facet of the hobby until they need to, don't know why people get their undies in bunchies over a simple question, even if they've seen it a hundred times
Posted By: DoctorDiff

Re: Mig Welders which one? - 12/23/09 03:01 PM

The solution is pretty simple. If you dislike duplicate questions, do not read and do not post on the thread.
Posted By: hemirdrnnr

Re: Mig Welders which one? - 12/23/09 03:16 PM

Good answer DoctorDiff you ought to change your name to MakesaDiff :iagree
Posted By: jcc

Re: Mig Welders which one? - 12/23/09 04:28 PM

Quote:

The solution is pretty simple. If you dislike duplicate questions, do not read and do not post on the thread.




Duplicate is one thing, but 20? a year?
There is a better solution, just archive it.
Posted By: flatiron

Re: Mig Welders which one? - 12/23/09 05:52 PM

Quote:

It's like any other posts on Moparts, what classic car insurance to use, my car won't start, how to bleed brakes, who makes the cheapest....., how do I paint mt car with a brush and roller,...now thats one dead horse that rears it ugly head all the time ......some people are new, or never explored that facet of the hobby until they need to, don't know why people get their undies in bunchies over a simple question, even if they've seen it a hundred times


Thank you I have been really thinking about signing off due to some of the know it all members on here. Some of use have only been at it for a short while and we have questions. I belive thats what forums are designed for. But I do think maybe a tool section would be very helpful.
Posted By: 70blackfish

Re: Mig Welders which one? - 12/23/09 06:03 PM

MILLER......
Posted By: DAMOPARS

Re: Mig Welders which one? - 12/23/09 06:17 PM

Quote:

The solution is pretty simple. If you dislike duplicate questions, do not read and do not post on the thread.




Well said Cass

Hobart or Miller
Posted By: whitemtnelf

Re: Mig Welders which one? - 12/23/09 06:21 PM

The reason that 220v welders are cheaper to run:

A welder is basically a step down converter. This means that it takes a high voltage (110/220v) and low amperage (15A-50A) and converts it to low voltage (17v-45v) and high amperage(190A-590A).

The power company charges us by the amount of kilowatts of electricity (1000 watts) that we use.

If I'm welding using 110 Amps I'd be using 1 watt of power (110A/110v = 1w). However if I'm using a 220v welder then the equation changes to 110A/220v = 0.5w

That's why 220v welders are cheaper to run.
Posted By: flatiron

Re: Mig Welders which one? - 12/23/09 06:31 PM

Quote:

I have a Century and use it quite often. It has never failed me. When I bought it 15 years ago the salesman (who I trust) of a large welding supply company said it was better because it has copper windings instead of aluminum. The duty time is a lot longer than the others at the time. Compare the duty cycle of each you are looking at, I know things have changed over the years since I bought mine. The good thing about aluminum windings it's lighter, mine is heavy.


Could someone explain Duty cycle and what it means
Posted By: Pacnorthcuda

Re: Mig Welders which one? - 12/23/09 07:10 PM

Quote:

Quote:

I have a Century and use it quite often. It has never failed me. When I bought it 15 years ago the salesman (who I trust) of a large welding supply company said it was better because it has copper windings instead of aluminum. The duty time is a lot longer than the others at the time. Compare the duty cycle of each you are looking at, I know things have changed over the years since I bought mine. The good thing about aluminum windings it's lighter, mine is heavy.


Could someone explain Duty cycle and what it means




Duty cycle is the time that the unit can work vs. the time it needs to rest. A 20% duty cycle means that if its worked for two minutes continuous (meaning striking an arc) it should then rest (in cool down mode) for 8 before being cycled again. Of course there are thermal protection devices to shut it down if the operator overheats it, but it not good practice to do so.
So a 30% duty cycle is more robust than a 20
Posted By: Pacnorthcuda

Re: Mig Welders which one? - 12/23/09 07:18 PM

Quote:

The reason that 220v welders are cheaper to run:

A welder is basically a step down converter. This means that it takes a high voltage (110/220v) and low amperage (15A-50A) and converts it to low voltage (17v-45v) and high amperage(190A-590A).

The power company charges us by the amount of kilowatts of electricity (1000 watts) that we use.

If I'm welding using 110 Amps I'd be using 1 watt of power (110A/110v = 1w). However if I'm using a 220v welder then the equation changes to 110A/220v = 0.5w

That's why 220v welders are cheaper to run.




Your calculator is broken. Lets say you need 100amps at 30VDC. Thats 3000W. From 110VAC transformer, with no loss, that would be consuming 27 amps (again 3000W).
From 220VAC it would consume 13.5 amps (again 3000W)

A watt is a watt. And watts = volts x amps. Now a 220V welder may have less heat loss than a 110, but its not due to the math you describe.
220V machines are FAR more capable in terms of total output and are disreable for the work they can do, not for economy of power consumption.
Posted By: joedust451

Re: Mig Welders which one? - 12/23/09 07:31 PM

Like said earlier, don't just settle on a gasless unit, flux alone will burn through sheet metal (from what i was told) even at low settings, its just too hot, i found out the hard way, the price of the bottles will kick your azz, but its worth it in the end, now i don't know about just being able to do body panels & exhaust with a 110, i don't believe that, mine is rated for up to 1/4" steel max, most SFCs & roll bars aren't that thick. I welded up a piece of 1/8" pipe just playing around & it did great.
Posted By: jcc

Re: Mig Welders which one? - 12/23/09 07:43 PM

Quote:

Quote:

The reason that 220v welders are cheaper to run:

A welder is basically a step down converter. This means that it takes a high voltage (110/220v) and low amperage (15A-50A) and converts it to low voltage (17v-45v) and high amperage(190A-590A).

The power company charges us by the amount of kilowatts of electricity (1000 watts) that we use.

If I'm welding using 110 Amps I'd be using 1 watt of power (110A/110v = 1w). However if I'm using a 220v welder then the equation changes to 110A/220v = 0.5w

That's why 220v welders are cheaper to run.




Your calculator is broken. Lets say you need 100amps at 30VDC. Thats 3000W. From 110VAC transformer, with no loss, that would be consuming 27 amps (again 3000W).
From 220VAC it would consume 13.5 amps (again 3000W)

A watt is a watt. And watts = volts x amps. Now a 220V welder may have less heat loss than a 110, but its not due to the math you describe.
220V machines are FAR more capable in terms of total output and are disreable for the work they can do, not for economy of power consumption.




Tread lightly, you might get labeled a "know it all"

Anybody tell me how to search old threads on which mig welder is best?
Posted By: sthemi

Re: Mig Welders which one? - 12/23/09 07:50 PM

I will add that the duty cycle only will affect your work if you are welding near full capacity. Sheet metal needs short bursts or short welds at very low settings.
Welding structure like angle iron, will require longer welds at higher setting, and may get into the duty cycle.
I have a older Lincoln 100 (110v) with gas and have welded up to 3/16 mild steel, with multiple passes and yes, I did find the duty cycle and thermo protection limits..
98% of my weling is outer panels of rusty Mopars or brackets etc..
Posted By: Snoopy

Re: Mig Welders which one? - 12/23/09 07:54 PM

I would think that the limitation with a 110 volt welder would be the supply voltage and current available. The highest amperage 110v outlet in a garage is usually a 15-20 amp, whereas the normal 220v outlet is 30-50 amp.

110v @ 20-30 amps = 2200-3300 watts.
220v @ 30-50 amps = 6600-11000 watts.
Posted By: Pacnorthcuda

Re: Mig Welders which one? - 12/23/09 07:54 PM

Quote:

I will add that the duty cycle only will affect your work if you are welding near full capacity. Sheet metal needs short bursts or short welds at very low settings.
Welding structure like angle iron, will require longer welds at higher setting, and may get into the duty cycle.
I have a older Lincoln 100 (110v) with gas and have welded up to 3/16 mild steel, with multiple passes and yes, I did find the duty cycle and thermo protection limits..
98% of my weling is outer panels of rusty Mopars or brackets etc..




I agree--duty cycle really means nothing to me in terms of a welder. Now an air compressor is a totally different animal!!! I want 100% duty cycle (oiled unit) for that.
Posted By: joedust451

Re: Mig Welders which one? - 12/23/09 10:00 PM

Quote:

I will add that the duty cycle only will affect your work if you are welding near full capacity. Sheet metal needs short bursts or short welds at very low settings.
Welding structure like angle iron, will require longer welds at higher setting, and may get into the duty cycle.
I have a older Lincoln 100 (110v) with gas and have welded up to 3/16 mild steel, with multiple passes and yes, I did find the duty cycle and thermo protection limits..
98% of my weling is outer panels of rusty Mopars or brackets etc..




also
© 2024 Moparts Forums