Moparts

Dougs D452 on a low deck? (383/400)

Posted By: mrob

Dougs D452 on a low deck? (383/400) - 02/02/23 07:52 PM

Hi,
Just wondering if anyone is running the Dougs D452 headers (2 inch primaries, 3.5 inch collectors) on a low deck (383/400)? According to the website, the D452's are made for the RB engines (413, 426, 440), but I don't see why the can't be used on a B engine. I know the RB has a taller deck height, so maybe that's a problem when using these headers on a B engine? Maybe the tubes would hang lower on a low deck vs the tall deck? Don't know ...

The main reason that I'm asking is because I'm planning on building a 512 low deck stroker that should put out around 600HP. At that HP level, I think a 2 inch primary tube is the right size.
Posted By: Stanton

Re: Dougs D452 on a low deck? (383/400) - 02/02/23 08:05 PM

They'd hang a little lower, would be tighter to the starter (not a big deal with a mini) and might hit the bellhousing (I had to grind the scattershield some for fitment on my RB)
Posted By: topside

Re: Dougs D452 on a low deck? (383/400) - 02/02/23 08:31 PM

If you can find photos of them installed on an RB, you can likely see if they'd clear everything on a B engine.
I'd look (left side) at front motor mount, dipstick, steering column, starter, clutch linkage, and torsion bars.
Rt side, I'd look at the fndr apron & torsion bar, but usually the right side is the easier side.

I did the opposite with some Hedmans on an RB in an early B, and had no issues except the collectors were higher than the T-bar crossmember.
Solved that with some S-bends for the exhaust.
Posted By: 67mprfan

Re: Dougs D452 on a low deck? (383/400) - 02/03/23 01:29 AM

I. called and asked a tech guy about fitment. He told me they would but hang lower than they recommend. And don't want the bad rap about why there scrapping the ground. I haven't tried it yet because I'm taking their statement with a grain of salt
Posted By: StealthWedge67

Re: Dougs D452 on a low deck? (383/400) - 02/03/23 02:38 AM

The other option in the same price range is Hooker SuperComps. They are notorious for poor fitment, but they are tuned length, whereas the D452ā€™s are not. Something to consider. My Hooker Comps fit real nice on my low deck 67 B-Body combo. I would recommend them for fitment. But they are a 1-7/8ā€ / 3ā€ setup. Iā€™m about to tug on the 700hp lever with them.
Posted By: fourgearsavoy

Re: Dougs D452 on a low deck? (383/400) - 02/05/23 02:25 PM

I have the D452 on my RB and they are very close to the Pitman arm. I had to remove the grease fitting to get the clearance I needed. A low deck will probably move the tube even closer to the arm. twocents

Gus twocents
Posted By: skicker

Re: Dougs D452 on a low deck? (383/400) - 02/06/23 04:03 AM

For WIW I've had the 452's on my 70 Satellite with a 383 with zero issues for about 12 years and 24K miles...

My car sets a little higher than most but they do not seem to hang down to far to me...

To my knowledge I've never hit anything with them...

Attached picture 4 Carlisle 2013.jpg
© 2024 Moparts Forums