Moparts

2206158 Crankshaft casting question

Posted By: Ebbsspeed

2206158 Crankshaft casting question - 09/12/17 02:43 AM

I have an elderly friend who raced a Max Wedge car in the 70's, and he collected a lot of MW specific parts when he ran across them. He asked me to sell the stuff for him, and I ran across one piece I'm a bit confused about. He has a crankshaft with a casting number of 2206158, with an 8-bolt flywheel flange. None of the info I've been able to find says that casting had an 8 bolt flange. Any idea as to what it may have been in originally would be appreciated.
Posted By: NachoRT74

Re: 2206158 Crankshaft casting question - 09/12/17 01:31 PM

Aren't Hemis with 8 bolts ?
Posted By: Ebbsspeed

Re: 2206158 Crankshaft casting question - 09/12/17 02:12 PM

Yes, the hemi has an 8 bolt flange. I guess the charts I've seen do say that casting was used in 426 cars from 1963 to 196, so that must be it. That casting was also used in 1971 to 1977 truck 440's, and I believe the trucks also used an 8 bolt flange, so it may have come from one of those as well.
Posted By: dogdays

Re: 2206158 Crankshaft casting question - 09/12/17 06:38 PM

There is NO Max Wedge crankshaft with a casting number!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Unless your friend had the only Max Wedge in history with a cast crank.

A casting number is part of the mold into which the molten metal is poured to form the casting. Thus, a casting number will always be raised above the surrounding surface.

A forging number is beat (pressed) into the metal being formed into a crankshaft sometime during the forging process and thus will nearly always be indented into the surface.

Let's keep the facts straight. Talking about casting numbers insults a forged crank.

R.
Posted By: John_Kunkel

Re: 2206158 Crankshaft casting question - 09/12/17 10:34 PM


The 2206158 forging was used in various RB motors from '62 until the end of production. The flange could have been drilled either 6 or 8 holes.
Posted By: Ebbsspeed

Re: 2206158 Crankshaft casting question - 09/13/17 06:06 AM

Originally Posted By dogdays
There is NO Max Wedge crankshaft with a casting number!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Unless your friend had the only Max Wedge in history with a cast crank.

A casting number is part of the mold into which the molten metal is poured to form the casting. Thus, a casting number will always be raised above the surrounding surface.

A forging number is beat (pressed) into the metal being formed into a crankshaft sometime during the forging process and thus will nearly always be indented into the surface.

Let's keep the facts straight. Talking about casting numbers insults a forged crank.

R.


Then maybe this is one of those rare forged cranks that has a "number" raised above the surrounding surface, instead of indented.

Like a casting would.

Attached picture Crank 2206158.jpg
Posted By: 6bblgt

Re: 2206158 Crankshaft casting question - 09/13/17 09:18 AM

yes, there can be "raised" forging numbers - the point was, A FORGED CRANK DOES NOT HAVE CASTING NUMBERS
Posted By: Ebbsspeed

Re: 2206158 Crankshaft casting question - 09/13/17 07:28 PM

Semantics. Valve covers would more accurately be called rocker arm covers. A Xerox copy may not have ever been near a Xerox manufactured machine.

I understand that the numbers on a forging are not literally "casting" numbers, however, they're called casting numbers on more reference sites than not.

In the future I'll try to be more anal when I ask questions.
Posted By: Supercuda

Re: 2206158 Crankshaft casting question - 09/13/17 08:18 PM

Don't ever say frame off around here or kitten will be shat out at prodigious rates.

Even if it's a truck
Posted By: John_Kunkel

Re: 2206158 Crankshaft casting question - 09/13/17 08:57 PM

Originally Posted By Ebbsspeed
Semantics.

I understand that the numbers on a forging are not literally "casting" numbers, however, they're called casting numbers on more reference sites than not.


Numerous wrongs don't make a right.
Posted By: 70HemiGTX

Re: 2206158 Crankshaft casting question - 12/31/23 06:31 PM

To revive an old post, I looked at a crankshaft this morning with the raised numbers on it. An old guy has it. He used to rebuild engines and would buy crankshaft kits. The box was marked Chrysler 426 Hemi and the part number 2206158 on the box and on the crank. It also was listed like that in a TRW catalog he had there. It had an 8 bolt flange and everthing else was a perfect match for a Hemi crankshaft. There was one problem, the flange end was about 1/2" longer than the crank I took along for comparison. The guy's daughter had sent me some pictures and I noticed something odd, but she was clueless and I talked to the man on the phone about it. He was positive it was for a Hemi. So I took an old crank along for comparison. I'm just curious as to what the application is for this crankshaft. The main seal surface is approximately double the width of a normal crankshaft. It was drilled for a 4 spd and had a pilot bushing in it. What the heck is this for ???? I will attach some pics.
Posted By: ruderunner

Re: 2206158 Crankshaft casting question - 12/31/23 06:50 PM

Didn't early big blocks have an extended flange? I think pre 62.
Posted By: Sniper

Re: 2206158 Crankshaft casting question - 12/31/23 06:52 PM

Pre 63? cranks had an extended snout. Probably was an RB crank, and if the holes were not threaded that is exactly what it is.

http://www.forwardlook.net/forums/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=26101
Posted By: A727Tflite

Re: 2206158 Crankshaft casting question - 12/31/23 07:29 PM

Pre 62
Posted By: IMGTX

Re: 2206158 Crankshaft casting question - 12/31/23 08:23 PM

Those are little before my time so how did the crank connect to the flywheel/ flexplate without threads?

Through bolts with nuts? shruggy
Posted By: Sniper

Re: 2206158 Crankshaft casting question - 12/31/23 08:25 PM

Originally Posted by IMGTX
Those are little before my time so how did the crank connect to the flywheel/ flexplate without threads?

Through bolts with nuts? shruggy


Yes, same as the old flatheads did. Not sure why they thought that was a good idea back then,
Posted By: 6PakBee

Re: 2206158 Crankshaft casting question - 12/31/23 08:43 PM

Originally Posted by Sniper
Originally Posted by IMGTX
Those are little before my time so how did the crank connect to the flywheel/ flexplate without threads?

Through bolts with nuts? shruggy


Yes, same as the old flatheads did. Not sure why they thought that was a good idea back then,


I'm guessing so you could check the torque converter/flywheel attachment nut torque without disassembling the whole assembly. Same kind of thinking that led to left hand lugnuts.
Posted By: Sniper

Re: 2206158 Crankshaft casting question - 12/31/23 09:03 PM

Well, on the flatheads, the nut was on the clutch side of the flywheel and the special bolts had a flat that rode against a ring on the crank to keep them from spinning. So I don't see that benefit there. As for the V8's, I dunno I looked in a 1960 Dodge FSM and parts manual, no real help figuring that out in either one.

Posted By: Cab_Burge

Re: 2206158 Crankshaft casting question - 01/01/24 01:58 AM

Originally Posted by ruderunner
Didn't early big blocks have an extended flange? I think pre 62.
Your correct on that, 1962 was the first year of all aluminum one piece BB 727 front case with the shorter crankshafts that had the threaded flanges that use bolts to hold the flex plate or flywheels to the crankshaft along with the converter flywheel alignment ring around the center of the crankshafts to align the flywheel s or flex plates, they didn't fit over the outside diameter of the rear crankshaft flanges like the pre 1962 motor used scope shruggy
The all aluminum case 727 1962 in Dodges and Plymouths and later cars were way better designed and lasted a lot longer with hard abuse than the 1961 and earlier cast iron torque Flyte did: up:
Posted By: IMGTX

Re: 2206158 Crankshaft casting question - 01/01/24 02:24 AM

Very interesting.

Learn something new every day. up
Posted By: 6PakBee

Re: 2206158 Crankshaft casting question - 01/01/24 02:30 AM

Originally Posted by Sniper
Well, on the flatheads, the nut was on the clutch side of the flywheel and the special bolts had a flat that rode against a ring on the crank to keep them from spinning. So I don't see that benefit there. As for the V8's, I dunno I looked in a 1960 Dodge FSM and parts manual, no real help figuring that out in either one.



IIRC, the flywheel/torque converter had studs and went through the crank flange. The nuts are on the engine side of the crank flange.
Posted By: 70HemiGTX

Re: 2206158 Crankshaft casting question - 01/01/24 02:47 AM

Very interesting indeed. I'm glad you guys shed some light on the subject. I know enough about this stuff to get myself in trouble. I really appreciate the information. I will pass it along to the gentleman. Thanks guys!
Posted By: TJP

Re: 2206158 Crankshaft casting question - 01/02/24 03:02 AM

Originally Posted by Ebbsspeed
Semantics. Valve covers would more accurately be called rocker arm covers. A Xerox copy may not have ever been near a Xerox manufactured machine.

I understand that the numbers on a forging are not literally "casting" numbers, however, they're called casting numbers on more reference sites than not.

In the future I'll try to be more anal when I ask questions.
🤣🍻🤣🤣
Posted By: Sniper

Re: 2206158 Crankshaft casting question - 01/02/24 03:19 AM

Originally Posted by 6PakBee
Originally Posted by Sniper
Well, on the flatheads, the nut was on the clutch side of the flywheel and the special bolts had a flat that rode against a ring on the crank to keep them from spinning. So I don't see that benefit there. As for the V8's, I dunno I looked in a 1960 Dodge FSM and parts manual, no real help figuring that out in either one.



IIRC, the flywheel/torque converter had studs and went through the crank flange. The nuts are on the engine side of the crank flange.


You know, I believe you are correct.
Posted By: moparx

Re: 2206158 Crankshaft casting question - 01/02/24 08:01 PM

the through bolts [converter or flywheel] were 7/16-20 thread for the crank's 1/2" [they were usually 29/64" for the 7/16" bolts] holes.
the early hemi's crank holes could be tapped 1/2-20 thread without re-drilling the crank flange.
one could do this by hand using a "tapping block", which is just a piece of steel that is parallel on all sides, having a 1/2" through hole that bolts to one of the crank flange holes, and another hole that accurately locates the 1/2" tap over the crank's through holes.
i have made a couple of these in the past, and i think i made them out of 5/8" square stock.
the main reason for using the "tapping block" was to keep the tap perpendicular to the crank holes when tapping them.
worked very well. just be sure to use a quality tap and lots of cutting oil when doing this operation.
after this is done, you will probably need to fabricate a locator plate for the flywheel or flexplate you plan on using.
the reason for this is the early flexplates and cranks located off of the crank flange's OD, and there wasn't a locating ring like the later crank's had.
just my personal life experience.
your mileage will vary.
beer
© 2024 Moparts Forums