Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Re: 383 Quench Question [Re: JohnRR] #926007
02/12/11 02:25 AM
02/12/11 02:25 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 27,347
Today? Who Knows?
1_WILD_RT Offline
Management Trainee
1_WILD_RT  Offline
Management Trainee

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 27,347
Today? Who Knows?
Quote:

Quote:

Do your RESEARCH on ALL of these routes (ideas)for more
compression. Then decide which is feasible to you in effectively giving the compression you need for the LEAST amount of cash outlay.






it's going to end up costing alot whether he gets a diamond or a flat top KB , with the KB you have to cut more off the block and the heads because of that canyon ...




Which is why I think a stroker makes so much sense... zero deck & decent C/R are easy to achieve, you actually need the flow good heads will provide & I wouldn't be surprised if it costs less than trying to accomplish the same quench & C/R with a stock stroke in a 383....

Re: 383 Quench Question [Re: 1_WILD_RT] #926008
02/12/11 04:02 AM
02/12/11 04:02 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,782
USA
J
JoesMopar Offline OP
master
JoesMopar  Offline OP
master
J

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,782
USA
Ok, but the bottom line is this is a half ass budget build. I wasn't aware that there were such crappy piston choices for 383's and that 906's were essentially useless.

My setup, with the parts I listed, with a block that's been zero decked, KB flat tops (with the 5cc or whatever size valve reliefs), closed chamber 84 cc Edelbrock heads and a .039ish head gasket sounds like it should make decent compression and quench. Does that sound about right? I'm just hoping for a decent street motor.

Re: 383 Quench Question [Re: JoesMopar] #926009
02/12/11 07:58 AM
02/12/11 07:58 AM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 528
N.W. Indiana
DblOJoe Offline
mopar
DblOJoe  Offline
mopar

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 528
N.W. Indiana
I'd just go with the KB 400's and 84cc Eddy heads. I think on a budget build the extra compression is gonna do more for you than quench and you can save from having to cut up your heads.

Re: 383 Quench Question [Re: JoesMopar] #926010
02/12/11 08:17 AM
02/12/11 08:17 AM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 797
arizona, usa
L
lokalik Offline
super stock
lokalik  Offline
super stock
L

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 797
arizona, usa
this is my combo. stock rods and crank, 162s, eddy rpm performers cut to 72cc, the block was cut so that 162s were .005 in the hole (iirc), 6pk for carbs, tti exh. rear wheel hp 325, trq 350. i found out later that the 162s were so unpopular. have had no problems with the pistons or the motor, been together going on 5 years now. at next rebuild i will stroke it.

Re: 383 Quench Question [Re: DblOJoe] #926011
02/12/11 09:44 AM
02/12/11 09:44 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,041
Lincoln Nebraska
R
RapidRobert Offline
Circle Track
RapidRobert  Offline
Circle Track
R

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,041
Lincoln Nebraska
Quote:

I'd just go with the KB 400's


there's a set of em for sale right now in the parts section . For sure cheaper than full retail


live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
Re: 383 Quench Question [Re: RapidRobert] #926012
02/12/11 10:03 AM
02/12/11 10:03 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,647
IL
7
71383beep Offline
top fuel
71383beep  Offline
top fuel
7

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,647
IL
I am using the 162's with a fair amount of block decking and upsized 516s. The CR is an actual 9.2:1 with the felpro gasket. With a street dom intake and 650 mighty demon and the nostalgia plus .474 cam she is dyno'd at 396/430. It runs great so yes you can get the 162's to work.


'73 GK6 Challenger Rallye - 340 4-Speed
Re: 383 Quench Question [Re: DblOJoe] #926013
02/12/11 10:22 AM
02/12/11 10:22 AM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 843
Suffolk,VA
I
ireland383 Offline
super stock
ireland383  Offline
super stock
I

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 843
Suffolk,VA
Quote:

I'd just go with the KB 400's and 84cc Eddy heads. I think on a budget build the extra compression is gonna do more for you than quench and you can save from having to cut up your heads.




I agree, that's what I'm running with an 80cc head. 9.9:1 compression ratio with no detonation and no quench really (.063). Let's say it's enough to through you back in the seat and leave 50 foot slabs down the road.

Without power braking.

Last edited by ireland383; 02/12/11 10:24 AM.
Re: 383 Quench Question [Re: ireland383] #926014
02/12/11 01:09 PM
02/12/11 01:09 PM
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 587
IL . usa
C
cjs69mope Offline
mopar
cjs69mope  Offline
mopar
C

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 587
IL . usa
The KB 400 is a dome top i told you this in the first post earlier .
I slapped together my dads 383 with the kb 400 edelbrock heads ,rpm intake ,comp cams 275 hl .525 cam and the cheapest headman headers summit sells . The car is a 68 charger with 727 trans and 3000 stall from PTC with 3:55 sure grip . I put a out of the box Holley 750 hp vacuum secondary , never tuned anything except the normal carb and timing adjustments .
I think i built the engine under 3 grand and the performace is awesome the car is a fun street car with unbelievable top end power .
IF you build it like this you will be happy ! you will be able to burn the tires with out brake tourqeing at will .
I would not buy the 162 pistion unless you want to take alot off the deck and heads . to get 9.0 to one compression !
the kb 400 will easy get 10to1 .


1969 Dodge Charger 1969 Dodge Superbee
Re: 383 Quench Question [Re: JohnRR] #926015
02/12/11 09:19 PM
02/12/11 09:19 PM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,275
Desert Tracker
H
HYPER8oSoNic Offline
top fuel
HYPER8oSoNic  Offline
top fuel
H

Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,275
Desert Tracker
Quote:

Quote:

Do your RESEARCH on ALL of these routes (ideas)for more
compression. Then decide which is feasible to you in effectively giving the compression you need for the LEAST amount of cash outlay.






it's going to end up costing alot whether he gets a diamond or a flat top KB , with the KB you have to cut more off the block and the heads because of that canyon ...




There are other avenues of approach to get to the
anticipated compression ratio, than just the pistons.



"Stupidity is Ignorance on Steroids"
"Yeah, it's hopped to over 160" (quote by Kowalski in the movie Vanishing Point 1970 - Cupid Productions)
Re: 383 Quench Question [Re: cjs69mope] #926016
02/12/11 09:24 PM
02/12/11 09:24 PM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,275
Desert Tracker
H
HYPER8oSoNic Offline
top fuel
HYPER8oSoNic  Offline
top fuel
H

Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,275
Desert Tracker
Quote:

The KB 400 is a dome top i told you this in the first post earlier .
I slapped together my dads 383 with the kb 400 edelbrock heads ,rpm intake ,comp cams 275 hl .525 cam and the cheapest headman headers summit sells . The car is a 68 charger with 727 trans and 3000 stall from PTC with 3:55 sure grip . I put a out of the box Holley 750 hp vacuum secondary , never tuned anything except the normal carb and timing adjustments .
I think i built the engine under 3 grand and the performace is awesome the car is a fun street car with unbelievable top end power .
IF you build it like this you will be happy ! you will be able to burn the tires with out brake tourqeing at will .
I would not buy the 162 pistion unless you want to take alot off the deck and heads . to get 9.0 to one compression !
the kb 400 will easy get 10to1 .




Good combination!!



"Stupidity is Ignorance on Steroids"
"Yeah, it's hopped to over 160" (quote by Kowalski in the movie Vanishing Point 1970 - Cupid Productions)
Re: 383 Quench Question [Re: ireland383] #926017
02/12/11 09:25 PM
02/12/11 09:25 PM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,275
Desert Tracker
H
HYPER8oSoNic Offline
top fuel
HYPER8oSoNic  Offline
top fuel
H

Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,275
Desert Tracker
Quote:

Quote:

I'd just go with the KB 400's and 84cc Eddy heads. I think on a budget build the extra compression is gonna do more for you than quench and you can save from having to cut up your heads.




I agree, that's what I'm running with an 80cc head. 9.9:1 compression ratio with no detonation and no quench really (.063). Let's say it's enough to through you back in the seat and leave 50 foot slabs down the road.

Without power braking.




Nice!!



"Stupidity is Ignorance on Steroids"
"Yeah, it's hopped to over 160" (quote by Kowalski in the movie Vanishing Point 1970 - Cupid Productions)
Re: 383 Quench Question [Re: JoesMopar] #926018
02/13/11 10:34 AM
02/13/11 10:34 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,326
A gulag near you.
JohnRR Offline
I Win
JohnRR  Offline
I Win

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,326
A gulag near you.
Quote:

Ok, but the bottom line is this is a half ass budget build. I wasn't aware that there were such crappy piston choices for 383's and that 906's were essentially useless.

My setup, with the parts I listed, with a block that's been zero decked, KB flat tops (with the 5cc or whatever size valve reliefs), closed chamber 84 cc Edelbrock heads and a .039ish head gasket sounds like it should make decent compression and quench. Does that sound about right? I'm just hoping for a decent street motor.




What is your definition of DECENT COMPRESSION ?

Re: 383 Quench Question [Re: HYPER8oSoNic] #926019
02/13/11 10:37 AM
02/13/11 10:37 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,326
A gulag near you.
JohnRR Offline
I Win
JohnRR  Offline
I Win

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,326
A gulag near you.
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Do your RESEARCH on ALL of these routes (ideas)for more
compression. Then decide which is feasible to you in effectively giving the compression you need for the LEAST amount of cash outlay.






it's going to end up costing alot whether he gets a diamond or a flat top KB , with the KB you have to cut more off the block and the heads because of that canyon ...




There are other avenues of approach to get to the
anticipated compression ratio, than just the pistons.






That goes without saying, but a better designed piston makes the other avenues less costly.

Re: 383 Quench Question [Re: JohnRR] #926020
02/13/11 11:31 AM
02/13/11 11:31 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,782
USA
J
JoesMopar Offline OP
master
JoesMopar  Offline OP
master
J

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,782
USA
Quote:

Quote:

Ok, but the bottom line is this is a half ass budget build. I wasn't aware that there were such crappy piston choices for 383's and that 906's were essentially useless.

My setup, with the parts I listed, with a block that's been zero decked, KB flat tops (with the 5cc or whatever size valve reliefs), closed chamber 84 cc Edelbrock heads and a .039ish head gasket sounds like it should make decent compression and quench. Does that sound about right? I'm just hoping for a decent street motor.




What is your definition of DECENT COMPRESSION ?




I think you know more about it than I do, but I was thinking 9.5-1?

Re: 383 Quench Question [Re: JoesMopar] #926021
02/13/11 12:16 PM
02/13/11 12:16 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 27,347
Today? Who Knows?
1_WILD_RT Offline
Management Trainee
1_WILD_RT  Offline
Management Trainee

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 27,347
Today? Who Knows?
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Ok, but the bottom line is this is a half ass budget build. I wasn't aware that there were such crappy piston choices for 383's and that 906's were essentially useless.

My setup, with the parts I listed, with a block that's been zero decked, KB flat tops (with the 5cc or whatever size valve reliefs), closed chamber 84 cc Edelbrock heads and a .039ish head gasket sounds like it should make decent compression and quench. Does that sound about right? I'm just hoping for a decent street motor.




What is your definition of DECENT COMPRESSION ?




I think you know more about it than I do, but I was thinking 9.5-1?




That number is obtainable but the thing is the aluminum heads pull so much heat out of the combustion chamber you really need another ,5-1.0 points of compression to start taking advantage of them....


"The Armies of our ancestors were lucky, in that they were not trailed by a second army of pencil pushers."
Re: 383 Quench Question [Re: 1_WILD_RT] #926022
02/13/11 12:26 PM
02/13/11 12:26 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 843
Suffolk,VA
I
ireland383 Offline
super stock
ireland383  Offline
super stock
I

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 843
Suffolk,VA
That number is obtainable but the thing is the aluminum heads pull so much heat out of the combustion chamber you really need another ,5-1.0 points of compression to start taking advantage of them....

I'm on the border with 9.9:1.

Re: 383 Quench Question [Re: JohnRR] #926023
02/13/11 02:24 PM
02/13/11 02:24 PM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,275
Desert Tracker
H
HYPER8oSoNic Offline
top fuel
HYPER8oSoNic  Offline
top fuel
H

Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,275
Desert Tracker
Quote:

Quote:

Ok, but the bottom line is this is a half ass budget build. I wasn't aware that there were such crappy piston choices for 383's and that 906's were essentially useless.

My setup, with the parts I listed, with a block that's been zero decked, KB flat tops (with the 5cc or whatever size valve reliefs), closed chamber 84 cc Edelbrock heads and a .039ish head gasket sounds like it should make decent compression and quench. Does that sound about right? I'm just hoping for a decent street motor.




What is your definition of DECENT COMPRESSION ?




Ah, like 100% PUMP gas friendly. BUT will make
great power with the highest allowable compression
for the octane used in HIS area!!



"Stupidity is Ignorance on Steroids"
"Yeah, it's hopped to over 160" (quote by Kowalski in the movie Vanishing Point 1970 - Cupid Productions)
Re: 383 Quench Question [Re: ireland383] #926024
02/13/11 02:29 PM
02/13/11 02:29 PM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,275
Desert Tracker
H
HYPER8oSoNic Offline
top fuel
HYPER8oSoNic  Offline
top fuel
H

Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,275
Desert Tracker
Quote:

That number is obtainable but the thing is the aluminum heads pull so much heat out of the combustion chamber you really need another ,5-1.0 points of compression to start taking advantage of them....

I'm on the border with 9.9:1.




Still do-able!!



"Stupidity is Ignorance on Steroids"
"Yeah, it's hopped to over 160" (quote by Kowalski in the movie Vanishing Point 1970 - Cupid Productions)
Re: 383 Quench Question [Re: JoesMopar] #926025
02/13/11 02:29 PM
02/13/11 02:29 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,326
A gulag near you.
JohnRR Offline
I Win
JohnRR  Offline
I Win

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,326
A gulag near you.
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Ok, but the bottom line is this is a half ass budget build. I wasn't aware that there were such crappy piston choices for 383's and that 906's were essentially useless.

My setup, with the parts I listed, with a block that's been zero decked, KB flat tops (with the 5cc or whatever size valve reliefs), closed chamber 84 cc Edelbrock heads and a .039ish head gasket sounds like it should make decent compression and quench. Does that sound about right? I'm just hoping for a decent street motor.




What is your definition of DECENT COMPRESSION ?




I think you know more about it than I do, but I was thinking 9.5-1?




The specs you give above ASSuMEing a 4.280 bore , 6cc valve canyon and a .041 head gasket , not sure what gasket is .039 , gets you 8.85 , .039 gasket is 8.88, 5cc/.041 - 8.92, 5cc/.039 - 8.96, you need to cut the heads to 76cc to get your 9.5, the 162 just plain sucks for the intended application.

Re: 383 Quench Question [Re: JohnRR] #926026
02/13/11 07:49 PM
02/13/11 07:49 PM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,275
Desert Tracker
H
HYPER8oSoNic Offline
top fuel
HYPER8oSoNic  Offline
top fuel
H

Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,275
Desert Tracker
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Ok, but the bottom line is this is a half ass budget build. I wasn't aware that there were such crappy piston choices for 383's and that 906's were essentially useless.

My setup, with the parts I listed, with a block that's been zero decked, KB flat tops (with the 5cc or whatever size valve reliefs), closed chamber 84 cc Edelbrock heads and a .039ish head gasket sounds like it should make decent compression and quench. Does that sound about right? I'm just hoping for a decent street motor.




What is your definition of DECENT COMPRESSION ?




I think you know more about it than I do, but I was thinking 9.5-1?




The specs you give above ASSuMEing a 4.280 bore , 6cc valve canyon and a .041 head gasket , not sure what gasket is .039 , gets you 8.85 , .039 gasket is 8.88, 5cc/.041 - 8.92, 5cc/.039 - 8.96, you need to cut the heads to 76cc to get your 9.5, the 162 just plain sucks for the intended application.




The 162's are out of the question as you stated, unless used with an UNDER 78cc closed chamber type head (516's or early 60' 413's - non M-W's). The kb 400
works well with an 80 - 86 cc aluminum head, OR the "516" iron head (with larger valves) depending on how "strong" of a 383 you want!! The 375-400 hp level is easy, it's
when you break the 475-500 hp level things start to get lot tougher (for streetability).


Last edited by HYPER8oSoNic; 02/13/11 07:54 PM.

"Stupidity is Ignorance on Steroids"
"Yeah, it's hopped to over 160" (quote by Kowalski in the movie Vanishing Point 1970 - Cupid Productions)
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1