Re: 5.2 EFI swap into E body suggestions?
[Re: demon]
#918138
01/31/11 07:17 PM
01/31/11 07:17 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,670
Andrewh
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,670
|
Well, I didn't keep the original electonics. Wedgeman might help with some specifics there. but I did drop a 5.9 into my b-body. http://www.dodgecoronet.com/forum/showth...&highlight= some of that may or may not help you. won't say you will have less issues, just different. you need the 360 LA pan and LA gasket for it. I would recommend you find the van power steering unit/bracket to tuck it back in a little. will require a different belt. I got the shumaker mounts, but you could use spacers instead. There were a couple of people that cut the pump out of the truck and had it welded into the car tank as I recall. Allows for a returnless pump system. I didn't want to go that route. Wedgeman managed to just wire up power to it and left it an independent harness for the computer and I believe used his own gauges. I have no idea how you are going to cram truck gagues into an ebody. but more power to you.
|
|
|
Re: 5.2 EFI swap into E body suggestions?
[Re: roadrunninMark]
#918142
01/31/11 10:45 PM
01/31/11 10:45 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,179 Canada
demon
OP
super stock
|
OP
super stock
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,179
Canada
|
Quote:
Demon, can you please put up pics when you do this swap? That would be excellent. How much smaller is the 500 vs 518? Also what are the power limits between the 2? Mark
I will post pics but it might be a few months. I'm hoping to have a lot of it sorted out and engineered soon. Plan is to make it super simple so anyone can do it. Using donor vehicle parts wherever possible.
|
|
|
Re: 5.2 EFI swap into E body suggestions?
[Re: demon]
#918149
02/01/11 10:38 AM
02/01/11 10:38 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562 Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck
Not enough dumb comments...yet
|
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
|
Quote:
I plan on using everything I can. The entire harness, guages, etc. That way there is NO wiring mods to make it run. The Dakota even uses a cable speedo so that's a plus. Actually the Dakotas had a factory tach optional too.
yes I have a 95 Sport Dak w/ a 5.2. Seems like a lot of work that might not be needed. I'm guessing you'd swap the wheel out? The column is awfully fat. Not sure you could get it in the e-body w/ some cutting.
|
|
|
Re: 5.2 EFI swap into E body suggestions?
[Re: Mr.Yuck]
#918150
02/02/11 07:57 AM
02/02/11 07:57 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,019 Finland
mafo
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,019
Finland
|
I m working on a similar swap here, 318/a500 in a 55 coronet but my motor is out of a 94 grand cherokee and trans is from a van I believe.
anyhow, about power steering pumps, jeep has a different bracket that places the pump very close to the waterpump, maybe something to look into
another thing about jeeps, you can t use jeep exhaust manifolds with "normal" starter position, I guess GC has the starter on the other side?
-65 Valiant,420", all motor,2700#, dot tires, 8,42 @ 160,2
|
|
|
Re: 5.2 EFI swap into E body suggestions?
[Re: Mr.Yuck]
#918151
02/03/11 06:13 PM
02/03/11 06:13 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,179 Canada
demon
OP
super stock
|
OP
super stock
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,179
Canada
|
Quote:
Quote:
I plan on using everything I can. The entire harness, guages, etc. That way there is NO wiring mods to make it run. The Dakota even uses a cable speedo so that's a plus. Actually the Dakotas had a factory tach optional too.
yes I have a 95 Sport Dak w/ a 5.2. Seems like a lot of work that might not be needed. I'm guessing you'd swap the wheel out? The column is awfully fat. Not sure you could get it in the e-body w/ some cutting.
so today I placed the E body column and the Dakota column side by side and did some measuring. They are identical tube diameter. Overall tube length very close. Shaft is different but easily modified by combining the two or using an intermediate shaft like a 72-93 Dodge 4x4. The upper column and plastic covers etc all work fine. I test fit it into the dash too and only minor trimming to the Dakota plastic covers needed. This will be no problem putting the Dakota column in. Only thing I didn't do yet was pull the Dakota steering wheel off to see If the splines will accept the E body soup can.
|
|
|
Re: 5.2 EFI swap into E body suggestions?
[Re: demon]
#918152
02/03/11 06:24 PM
02/03/11 06:24 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562 Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck
Not enough dumb comments...yet
|
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I plan on using everything I can. The entire harness, guages, etc. That way there is NO wiring mods to make it run. The Dakota even uses a cable speedo so that's a plus. Actually the Dakotas had a factory tach optional too.
yes I have a 95 Sport Dak w/ a 5.2. Seems like a lot of work that might not be needed. I'm guessing you'd swap the wheel out? The column is awfully fat. Not sure you could get it in the e-body w/ some cutting.
so today I placed the E body column and the Dakota column side by side and did some measuring. They are identical tube diameter. Overall tube length very close. Shaft is different but easily modified by combining the two or using an intermediate shaft like a 72-93 Dodge 4x4. The upper column and plastic covers etc all work fine. I test fit it into the dash too and only minor trimming to the Dakota plastic covers needed. This will be no problem putting the Dakota column in. Only thing I didn't do yet was pull the Dakota steering wheel off to see If the splines will accept the E body soup can.
what did you do about the big plastic boxey mass that houses the key, hazards, wiper and turn signal switches???
|
|
|
Re: 5.2 EFI swap into E body suggestions?
[Re: Mr.Yuck]
#918153
02/03/11 08:29 PM
02/03/11 08:29 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,179 Canada
demon
OP
super stock
|
OP
super stock
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,179
Canada
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I plan on using everything I can. The entire harness, guages, etc. That way there is NO wiring mods to make it run. The Dakota even uses a cable speedo so that's a plus. Actually the Dakotas had a factory tach optional too.
yes I have a 95 Sport Dak w/ a 5.2. Seems like a lot of work that might not be needed. I'm guessing you'd swap the wheel out? The column is awfully fat. Not sure you could get it in the e-body w/ some cutting.
so today I placed the E body column and the Dakota column side by side and did some measuring. They are identical tube diameter. Overall tube length very close. Shaft is different but easily modified by combining the two or using an intermediate shaft like a 72-93 Dodge 4x4. The upper column and plastic covers etc all work fine. I test fit it into the dash too and only minor trimming to the Dakota plastic covers needed. This will be no problem putting the Dakota column in. Only thing I didn't do yet was pull the Dakota steering wheel off to see If the splines will accept the E body soup can.
what did you do about the big plastic boxey mass that houses the key, hazards, wiper and turn signal switches???
that plastic boxy unit fits just fine. Doesn't look stock for an E body, but does blend in reasonably well. Hoping the E body can and wheel fit right on
|
|
|
Re: 5.2 EFI swap into E body suggestions?
[Re: Dragula]
#918155
02/04/11 12:35 AM
02/04/11 12:35 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,179 Canada
demon
OP
super stock
|
OP
super stock
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,179
Canada
|
Quote:
Why not a FAST EZ efi?
I can buy a running Dakota for $500-$1500 and get every piece I need. All mopar and cheap
|
|
|
Re: 5.2 EFI swap into E body suggestions?
[Re: demon]
#918156
02/04/11 07:15 PM
02/04/11 07:15 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,404 Michigan
MarkZ
Worthy
|
Worthy
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,404
Michigan
|
As for the differences between the 500/518 case sizes, they're negligible. The overdrive section measures the same, and from that point forward you're talking the difference between a 904 and a 727. Both transmissions will require cutting the transmission cross member and welding a piece of fitted flat stock in its place. Make your decision based on the condition of the two, and intended use. Size matters not (obligatory Star Wars quote).
1987 Fifth Avenue - 512/518/D60
|
|
|
Re: 5.2 EFI swap into E body suggestions?
[Re: MarkZ]
#918158
02/04/11 11:19 PM
02/04/11 11:19 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,123 Grand Haven, MI
patrick
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,123
Grand Haven, MI
|
Quote:
As for the differences between the 500/518 case sizes, they're negligible. The overdrive section measures the same, and from that point forward you're talking the difference between a 904 and a 727. Both transmissions will require cutting the transmission cross member and welding a piece of fitted flat stock in its place. Make your decision based on the condition of the two, and intended use. Size matters not (obligatory Star Wars quote).
actually, there was a post here years ago for E and '71 up B's that put a 518 in them WITHOUT cutting the t-bar xmember, but by trimming some of the ribs on the OD case....dunno if anyone has the pics saved anymore...
1976 Spinnaker White Plymouth Duster, /6 A833OD 1986 Silver/Twilight Blue Chrysler 5th Ave HotRod **SOLD!*** 2011 Toxic Orange Dodge Charger R/T 2017 Grand Cherokee Overland 2014 Jeep Cherokee Latitude (holy crap, my daughter is driving)
|
|
|
Re: 5.2 EFI swap into E body suggestions?
[Re: patrick]
#918159
02/05/11 02:57 AM
02/05/11 02:57 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,668 Mi,U.S.A.
mike s
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,668
Mi,U.S.A.
|
A few of items to note:
1)The 92 5.2L was a return fuel system 40 psi with pump in the tank and a regulator on the fuel rail.93 up uses the returnless system with a bypass and pump in the tank.40 psi until 96.Switch the fuel rail to 93-95 type.
2)There is a very shallow Jeep tank that might bolt in.It has the pump and bypass in the tank.It will need to be modified slightly to fill it of course.
3)You can patch in the Magnum harness to the vehicle harness-8 wires
Leave the gun.......take the Cannoli's....Mike
|
|
|
Re: 5.2 EFI swap into E body suggestions?
[Re: mike s]
#918160
02/05/11 04:58 PM
02/05/11 04:58 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,179 Canada
demon
OP
super stock
|
OP
super stock
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,179
Canada
|
Quote:
A few of items to note:
1)The 92 5.2L was a return fuel system 40 psi with pump in the tank and a regulator on the fuel rail.93 up uses the returnless system with a bypass and pump in the tank.40 psi until 96.Switch the fuel rail to 93-95 type.
2)There is a very shallow Jeep tank that might bolt in.It has the pump and bypass in the tank.It will need to be modified slightly to fill it of course.
3)You can patch in the Magnum harness to the vehicle harness-8 wires
right on! Thanks. That's some good info
|
|
|
Re: 5.2 EFI swap into E body suggestions?
[Re: roadrunninMark]
#918163
02/07/11 12:05 PM
02/07/11 12:05 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,123 Grand Haven, MI
patrick
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,123
Grand Haven, MI
|
A500/42RH uses the low gear 904 setup: 2.74/1.54/1/.69 OD A518/46RH uses the standard 727 setup, 2.45/1.45/1/.69 OD
I'm running a 42RH in my 5th ave. mark is switching from a 42RH to a 46RH.
1976 Spinnaker White Plymouth Duster, /6 A833OD 1986 Silver/Twilight Blue Chrysler 5th Ave HotRod **SOLD!*** 2011 Toxic Orange Dodge Charger R/T 2017 Grand Cherokee Overland 2014 Jeep Cherokee Latitude (holy crap, my daughter is driving)
|
|
|
Re: 5.2 EFI swap into E body suggestions?
[Re: ralphie361]
#918165
02/11/11 02:01 AM
02/11/11 02:01 AM
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,130 Dayton, Ohio
wldtm
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,130
Dayton, Ohio
|
Quote:
I am beginning the same type of swap on a 68 fury 4door (why?) although I am not using the whole harness. I am going to splice the original harness with the underhood one from the Dakota. I have a friend with some experience in this, but he says there are only 5 or so wires to splice on OBD1. As for fuel system, I have a '71 tank in the car already so it has some vapor return ports. The LS1 corvettes use a fuel filter with a built in regulator, it has in, out and return, so I plan on using an inline pump. I was able to score a deal on a 95 dak with a 5.2 but a blown trans, but my car has a good 727 so I am going to use it for now. Sorry for the long post, but I thought I was the last one trying to do a EFI magnum swap!
Update on this car. Here is some progress pics of the harness. It is pretty easy to strip this harness down to what is not needed. It will use the ASD and Fuel Pump relay.
The three loops of wire are fo 12v feed, 12v run/ign feed, and 12 out to fuel pump (from relay)
Still need to finish wrapping it back up, and tie up a couple loose ends.
Justin
Interested in having you car wired? Drag car, street car, EFI swap?
PM for details
|
|
|
Re: 5.2 EFI swap into E body suggestions?
[Re: wldtm]
#918168
02/27/11 08:47 PM
02/27/11 08:47 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 95 Ohio
ralphie361
member
|
member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 95
Ohio
|
Update on the Fury, engine out, trans notched, but I need a different converter. The one in the car had 11inch bolt spacing and I need one with 10 inch to fit inside the magnum flex plate. Should be bolted together in the next few weeks.
Last edited by ralphie361; 02/27/11 08:48 PM.
|
|
|
Re: 5.2 EFI swap into E body suggestions?
[Re: RodStRace]
#918173
03/20/11 09:46 PM
03/20/11 09:46 PM
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,130 Dayton, Ohio
wldtm
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,130
Dayton, Ohio
|
The harness should be installed by the end of this week (time allowing). Hopefully some pics will be taken. If you want to build your own harness PM me if you need some help or I have another one done for this swap if you want to purchase one. It will be nice to see how this first one goes. This should be a very nice driver, that anyone can drive and start without setting the choke. Looks good Ralph!
Interested in having you car wired? Drag car, street car, EFI swap?
PM for details
|
|
|
Re: 5.2 EFI swap into E body suggestions?
[Re: Andrewh]
#918175
03/20/11 11:40 PM
03/20/11 11:40 PM
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,130 Dayton, Ohio
wldtm
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,130
Dayton, Ohio
|
the gentlemen with the fury in the pic wasnt going to do that. we made our own harness. we just posted pics to this thread because he was doing something similar to the 5.2 in the E body. this car (gold fury) used factory dakota wiring harness modified and the 5.2. he is trying to do this as simple as possible. justin
Last edited by wldtm; 03/20/11 11:43 PM.
Interested in having you car wired? Drag car, street car, EFI swap?
PM for details
|
|
|
Re: 5.2 EFI swap into E body suggestions?
[Re: ralphie361]
#918177
03/23/11 01:21 AM
03/23/11 01:21 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,179 Canada
demon
OP
super stock
|
OP
super stock
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,179
Canada
|
Quote:
Fired the car up for the first time tonight! Plugged in most of the harness, and tapped 12V off of the alternator and 12v ignition on source off of the old coil wire, temporarily. If you take out the ballast resistor and jumper the terminals you get full 12V on start and run position in the ignition switch. Still did not plumb a fuel system, just running it off of a pressurized tank for the moment. Now for permanent wiring since I know it works. Thanks to Justin (wldtm) for all of his help on this car
excellent! I'd sure like to know what wires are necessary for making the engine and computer function so I can retain my stock dash etc if I go that way. Nice job!
|
|
|
Re: 5.2 EFI swap into E body suggestions?
[Re: demon]
#918178
03/23/11 08:13 AM
03/23/11 08:13 AM
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,130 Dayton, Ohio
wldtm
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,130
Dayton, Ohio
|
Keep these PINs per a 94 dakota service manual
PINS 1 map sensor 2 ECT sensor 3 Battery feed 4 sensor return 6 5v supply 7 8v supply 9 Ignition feed 10 not needed with 727 11 Ground 12 Ground 13 Inj Driver4 14 Inj Driver3 15 Inj Driver2 16 Inj Driver1 17 Inj Driver7 18 Inj Driver8 19 Ign Coil Driver 20 Gen Feild Driver 21 Air Temp Sensor 22 TP Sensor 24 Reference Pickup 25 Data link 27 AC compressor (if keeping AC) 29 Brake sense (if keeping cruise) 30 P/N switch 32 MIL 33 VSS (if keeping dakota cruise) we got rid of) 34 AC WOT relay (if keeping ac- we got rid of) 35 EGR Solenoid (we deleted EGR) 37 Trans OD light (we got rid of) 38 Inj Driver5 39 IAC 40 IAC 41 Heated O2 Sensor 43 Tach (we kept) 44 CMP sensor 45 Data llink 47 VSS pick up (we kept for now) KEEP 47-50, 53 keep if using dakota cruise 48 VSS set/coast (we got rid of) 49 VSS on/off (we got rid of) 50 VSS resume/accel 51 ASD relay and fuel pump relay driver 52 Evap purge (we got rid of) 53 VSS vent (we got rid of) 54 EMCC solenoid (we got rid of) 55 Trans OD solenoid (we got rid of) (keep if using 42rh or 46rh) 57 ASD bat supply 58 Inj Driver6 59 IAC 60 IAC
The best thing to do is build a wiring harness using a 94-95 dakota schematic. You will need an ASD and fuel pump relay socket. This is the part where you will need to do a little modifying.
It depends on how much stuff you want to keep. You could keep AC, overdrive trans, and cruise if you wanted to...
Use the vehicles stock sending unit to run gauges ex) temp, oil psi, volts
I can make this harness for interested parties
Interested in having you car wired? Drag car, street car, EFI swap?
PM for details
|
|
|
Re: 5.2 EFI swap into E body suggestions?
[Re: ralphie361]
#918180
03/26/11 10:57 PM
03/26/11 10:57 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,670
Andrewh
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,670
|
Quote:
Found an oversight in my parts selection this afternoon. 5.2 and 5.9 magnums use the same oil pan, not like 318 vs 360 LA. When I first filled it with oil I had a leak and chalked it up to me screwing up the gasket install. After the second one this afternoon leaked I looked it up online and got conflicting stories. MP tech line confirmed that I need a 360 car pan instead of the 318 pan for the 5.2 or 5.9, and they said the one piece rubber gasket should work. Minor issue, but annoying!
the one piece does not work. I know. unless you adjust the pan, it will leave a gap at the front and back of the motor. you need to use the LA gasket set.
|
|
|
|
|