Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: W.A.R.P performance Tube Front end Anyone have one? [Re: chryco] #847147
11/07/10 01:59 PM
11/07/10 01:59 PM
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,646
Plymouth Meeting, PA
bigtimeauto Offline
Trophy Winner
bigtimeauto  Offline
Trophy Winner

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,646
Plymouth Meeting, PA
Alterkation here. great piece put it in and forget about it. I drive mine on the street as well as race it.



BB, TT5,Procharged 3300lb Street Car 4.79/154
Re: W.A.R.P performance Tube Front end Anyone have one? [Re: chryco] #847148
11/07/10 07:42 PM
11/07/10 07:42 PM
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,502
SOUTH JERSEY
HEMIFRED Offline
master
HEMIFRED  Offline
master

Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,502
SOUTH JERSEY
Quote:

MagForce for me.........

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YsmLj-Z44mo




I have one one my Cuda. There i a good example of race vs. street. In my opinion for racing it is overdone. There's no reason to convert the lower A arm into one using three attachment points. It winds up with spindles that must weigh twice of a stock unit,The tubing is too thick and there's just too much of it.Also the lack of any stops upper or lower puzzles me. I have to manufacture something on mine to limit the travel. With sstops they would just need some changes to pads. I am not passing judgement on it as an all around unit or for the street.

.


home of the
Sox and Martin Hemi Duster


Re: W.A.R.P performance Tube Front end Anyone have one? [Re: atoetly] #847149
11/08/10 10:24 PM
11/08/10 10:24 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 24
Iowa
9
9second_bottle Offline OP
member
9second_bottle  Offline OP
member
9

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 24
Iowa
Quote:

I'm running one and now that its adjusted right works great!



Could you please list what the problems were? I like the looks of this front end but does not seem to be many of them out there.


66 Coronet 3720lbs. 9.80 @ 138mph on a bottle
Re: W.A.R.P performance Tube Front end Anyone have one? [Re: HEMIFRED] #847150
11/08/10 10:39 PM
11/08/10 10:39 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,330
Lynchburg, VA
Leon441 Offline
master
Leon441  Offline
master

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,330
Lynchburg, VA
raising the rear mounting point of the upper control arm seems to work greatwhen the strut rod is made up level at ride height. At proper ride height a mopar torsion front end has the front mounting of the strut rod higher than the mounting to the lower control arm. As the spindle travels into the fender the caster stays the same. It is not until you screw with ride height or jack the rear of the car this becomes a problem.

But, rules in most street classes state that the geometry must remain stock. Well that would techniqly blow that rule.

Swapping the lower ball joint steering arms is not a good way to convert to a rack. The steering arm needs to connect to the tie rod very close to the wheel to have a correct ackerman angle. This way the proper tire makes the sharper turn when turning. Ole mopars were rear steer and had the arm bent inward not outward as it needs to be for a front steer. You can bend them but there are better products out there.

One way to notice a botched front end job is when the tires turn in while backing up.

Bob pretty much showed the Mopar world he has the stuff when he had a video of the front suspension driving down the road.

I have a great working front suspension but if I were going to buy one BOBSPROFAB is where I would go.

Leon


Career best 8.02 @ 169 at 3050# and 10" tires small block power.
Re: W.A.R.P performance Tube Front end Anyone have one? [Re: Leon441] #847151
11/09/10 12:18 AM
11/09/10 12:18 AM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 485
Raleigh, NC
J
j.mcconnell Offline
mopar
j.mcconnell  Offline
mopar
J

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 485
Raleigh, NC
just a little more info from an email i sent
Quote:

yes the K-member i do is something i do regularly but does not use factory lower control arms or torsion bars it is a coilover conversion to eliminate the torsion bars. it saves about 45lbs off the front of the car. The k-member and lower control arms is $949 you will also need tubular upper control arms to clear the new coilovers i sell them for an additional $400 which includes new ball joints. everything is tig welded and built from 4130 chromoly.

thank you,

Justin Kill
www.OverkillRaceCars.com
full line chassis shop in Loveland, CO (970)-581-8134






http://www.streetlegaltv.com/forum/overkill-race-cars-puts-slick-k-5374.html

Re: W.A.R.P performance Tube Front end Anyone have one? [Re: j.mcconnell] #847152
11/09/10 01:48 AM
11/09/10 01:48 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,418
Mcallen, TX
SB449VALIANT Offline
pro stock
SB449VALIANT  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,418
Mcallen, TX
here is mine... BOBPROFAB

6292530-DSC00772.JPG (59 downloads)
Re: W.A.R.P performance Tube Front end Anyone have one? [Re: 9second_bottle] #847153
11/09/10 08:53 PM
11/09/10 08:53 PM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,442
LOWELL IN
Q
QWK_ENUF Offline
top fuel
QWK_ENUF  Offline
top fuel
Q

Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,442
LOWELL IN
h0me made front end

6293672-4.JPG (85 downloads)
Last edited by QWK_ENUF; 11/09/10 08:55 PM.

WAXER
Re: W.A.R.P performance Tube Front end Anyone have one? [Re: 9second_bottle] #847154
11/10/10 07:24 AM
11/10/10 07:24 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,699
Newport, Mi
Evil Spirit Offline
master
Evil Spirit  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,699
Newport, Mi
I'm not an engineer, but I don't care for any of the aftermarket K's that only use a single crossbar. IMO it doesn't give enough support to keep the frame rails from twisting. Now granted, most race cars can get this support back by running tubes from the firewall to the ends of the frame rails - which adds some of the weight saved back, and higher up than it was before. Not every car adds these bars, and many aren't correctly designed or installed to support the ends of the rails both up-down and side to side. I'm not bashing any ones product; this is my opinion and why I don't like the single crossbar K's.


Free advice and worth every penny...
Factory trained Slinky rewinder.........
Re: W.A.R.P performance Tube Front end Anyone have one? [Re: Evil Spirit] #847155
11/10/10 07:29 AM
11/10/10 07:29 AM
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,502
SOUTH JERSEY
HEMIFRED Offline
master
HEMIFRED  Offline
master

Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,502
SOUTH JERSEY
Quote:

I'm not an engineer, but I don't care for any of the aftermarket K's that only use a single crossbar. IMO it doesn't give enough support to keep the frame rails from twisting. Now granted, most race cars can get this support back by running tubes from the firewall to the ends of the frame rails - which adds some of the weight saved back, and higher up than it was before. Not every car adds these bars, and many aren't correctly designed or installed to support the ends of the rails both up-down and side to side. I'm not bashing any ones product; this is my opinion and why I don't like the single crossbar K's.




your fears are negated by the use of good motorplates


home of the
Sox and Martin Hemi Duster


Re: W.A.R.P performance Tube Front end Anyone have one? [Re: HEMIFRED] #847156
11/10/10 07:44 AM
11/10/10 07:44 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,699
Newport, Mi
Evil Spirit Offline
master
Evil Spirit  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,699
Newport, Mi
Quote:

Quote:

I'm not an engineer, but I don't care for any of the aftermarket K's that only use a single crossbar. IMO it doesn't give enough support to keep the frame rails from twisting. Now granted, most race cars can get this support back by running tubes from the firewall to the ends of the frame rails - which adds some of the weight saved back, and higher up than it was before. Not every car adds these bars, and many aren't correctly designed or installed to support the ends of the rails both up-down and side to side. I'm not bashing any ones product; this is my opinion and why I don't like the single crossbar K's.




your fears are negated by the use of good motorplates




Again, adding weight back higher in the car, and requiring more engineering to install properly.


Free advice and worth every penny...
Factory trained Slinky rewinder.........
Page 2 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1