Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
How about a FWD drive-train ...?? #83854
07/04/08 04:29 AM
07/04/08 04:29 AM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,247
Florida STAYcation
dIc dOc Deity ! Offline OP
The village idiot's idiot
dIc dOc Deity !  Offline OP
The village idiot's idiot

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,247
Florida STAYcation
.... I have a Bud that would like to join the street-rod crowd but NOT with a 10 mpg engine. Anyone ever think about a 2.2 or 2.5 moder ?

Re: How about a FWD drive-train ...?? [Re: dIc dOc Deity !] #83855
07/04/08 08:05 AM
07/04/08 08:05 AM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 19,237
north of coder
moparx Offline
"Butt Crack Bob"
moparx  Offline
"Butt Crack Bob"

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 19,237
north of coder
the thing that would concern me would be the width of any FWD setup fitting under the front sheet metal of most rod candidates. what about considering an EFI system for a conventional rear drive setup ? with od. and a reasonable [mild] engine/trans combo, i don't think 20+ mpg would be out of the question. and you would get much more performance than a 4 cylinder could provide. just my 2cents.............

Re: How about a FWD drive-train ...?? [Re: moparx] #83856
07/04/08 08:36 AM
07/04/08 08:36 AM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,247
Florida STAYcation
dIc dOc Deity ! Offline OP
The village idiot's idiot
dIc dOc Deity !  Offline OP
The village idiot's idiot

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,247
Florida STAYcation
You DO have a good point about the width .. how about putting the 4 banger in the rear ?

About the EFI - are there any reliable systems out there ? ... I have heard horror-stories about the Eddy system.

Re: How about a FWD drive-train ...?? [Re: dIc dOc Deity !] #83857
07/04/08 12:24 PM
07/04/08 12:24 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 833
Marietta, GA
Joatha Offline
super stock
Joatha  Offline
super stock

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 833
Marietta, GA
Yes, actually I've been thinking about something like that. And, there's a guy over at turbododge.com that was selling adapter plates to put a small block transmission behind a 2.4L - which is fairly plentiful. I was considering dropping one in my 69 Cuda to make it a good gas mileage car and maybe a daily driver.

You should be able to put one in with that adapter plate and make it a rear wheel drive car. The 2.4L will easily handle the weight of a rod and making it RWD will negate the issues of putting a FWD chassis in.

Last edited by Joatha; 07/04/08 12:25 PM.

1966 Barracuda 1968 Barracuda convertible 1930 Ford Model A (soon to be hemi equipped) 2006 Dodge 3500 4X4 CTD Quad Cab
Re: How about a FWD drive-train ...?? [Re: Joatha] #83858
07/04/08 06:29 PM
07/04/08 06:29 PM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 743
East Brunswick New Jersey
N
NoFrills Offline
super stock
NoFrills  Offline
super stock
N

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 743
East Brunswick New Jersey
you could put a 2.2 or 2.5 turbo and make it rear wheel drive with a 2.5 dakota trans and bell I had plans of doing this but never got around to it

Re: How about a FWD drive-train ...?? [Re: NoFrills] #83859
07/04/08 10:19 PM
07/04/08 10:19 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,089
Sorrento, BC, Canada
4speeds4me Offline
master
4speeds4me  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,089
Sorrento, BC, Canada
The early Dakota is a great candidate for this, and as evidenced in many threads here, is a good frame choice already for alot of these cars.


2 Demons...no, not my kids!
Re: How about a FWD drive-train ...?? [Re: 4speeds4me] #83860
07/05/08 02:24 AM
07/05/08 02:24 AM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,295
Hawley, Texas
shinnery Offline
super street
shinnery  Offline
super street

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,295
Hawley, Texas
The LH series drivetrains with the engine fore and aft would not be as wide as the transverse FWDs. They definitely have the rack and pinion mounted in an interesting place, above the tranny.
I allways remember seeing a 65-69 Corvair with a 455 Toronado drivetrain setting midships.
Bryce


Every electronic device is manufactured with smoke stored deep inside... only a true genius can find a way to set it free. The most terrifying words in the English language are: "I'm from the government and I am here to help!"
Re: How about a FWD drive-train ...?? [Re: shinnery] #83861
07/06/08 01:14 AM
07/06/08 01:14 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 70,126
Here
DirectSubjection Offline
Tacohead. The First and Only
DirectSubjection  Offline
Tacohead. The First and Only

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 70,126
Here
Quote:


I allways remember seeing a 65-69 Corvair with a 455 Toronado drivetrain setting midships.





I built my own 66 Toronado - 425 with a reversed TH400 connecting the convertor to the trans by a heavy duty chain. Motor was offset 3" to the right.

I think the LH setup is an excellent idea.


Ride eternal, shiny and chrome
Re: How about a FWD drive-train ...?? [Re: DirectSubjection] #83862
07/06/08 02:13 AM
07/06/08 02:13 AM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
DaytonaTurbo Offline
Too Many Posts
DaytonaTurbo  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
The dakota 4cyl trans is not noted for it's strength. All the serious guys use the dakota bell but bolt it up to a toyota supra trans which happens to bolt up to the dakota bell. A guy is making the adapter plates, and a 2.2/2.5 run the same bolt pattern as a 2.4 with the exception of one bolt being different. You'd have to either skip that bolt or bend up a L bracket if you wanted to run a 2.2/2.5. The 2.4 with it's DOHC makes as much power as a T1 2.2/2.5 anyway, and has more HP potential when you boost it. You could chop up a factory harness out of an 80's turbo mopar to work or run an aftermarket EFI controller. Or if you really want to keep it simple, run a carb 2.2L bolted up to a 904 w/ that adapter plate.

Re: How about a FWD drive-train ...?? [Re: dIc dOc Deity !] #83863
07/06/08 07:39 PM
07/06/08 07:39 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,802
Between Houston & Galveston TX
SattyNoCar Offline
Smarter than no class Flappergass by a mile
SattyNoCar  Offline
Smarter than no class Flappergass by a mile

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,802
Between Houston & Galveston TX

Back in the late '80's, early '90's, there was a magazine article on one. If I remember correctly, it was a kit, or it was going to be a kit. Used a fiberglass Merc body, and a LeBaron floorpan/drivetrain. Even used the stock LeBaron dash.

Anyone remember the car? I think the article was in Street Rodder magazine.


John

The dream is dead, long live the dream.......😥
Re: How about a FWD drive-train ...?? [Re: SattyNoCar] #83864
07/06/08 11:36 PM
07/06/08 11:36 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,992
Escondido, CA. Ron Podsiadly,...
Mopar Ron Offline
master
Mopar Ron  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,992
Escondido, CA. Ron Podsiadly,...
Quote:


Back in the late '80's, early '90's, there was a magazine article on one. If I remember correctly, it was a kit, or it was going to be a kit. Used a fiberglass Merc body, and a LeBaron floorpan/drivetrain. Even used the stock LeBaron dash.

Anyone remember the car? I think the article was in Street Rodder magazine.





I remember seeing that car in the magazine

Last edited by Mopar Ron; 07/06/08 11:37 PM.
Re: How about a FWD drive-train ...?? [Re: Mopar Ron] #83865
07/12/08 08:01 AM
07/12/08 08:01 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,122
Grand Haven, MI
patrick Online content
I Live Here
patrick  Online Content
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,122
Grand Haven, MI
like others have said, the LH cars already have their engines mounted fore-aft, what about yoinking a 3.2 or 3.5L and using an adapter plate for a RWD tranny?

heck, check out hotroddave's super duper MPG thread in the Q&A, he built up a simple 318 that has good power and is getting ~20-23city and 26-29 highway. it's basically a 0 deck 318 (using KB167's), 273 mechanical cam, and 302 heads, Tquad (I think), lockup 904 and a 2.76 rear. you could do a slight variation on that for more power and less maintainence with probably no sacrafice in economy by starting with a magnum 318, use the same pistons, and run the smallest comp or hughes hydraulic roller with the stock roller lifters. if you wanted a manual, I'd use an A833OD and 2.94 or 3.23 rear.


1976 Spinnaker White Plymouth Duster, /6 A833OD
1986 Silver/Twilight Blue Chrysler 5th Ave HotRod **SOLD!***
2011 Toxic Orange Dodge Charger R/T
2017 Grand Cherokee Overland
2014 Jeep Cherokee Latitude (holy crap, my daughter is driving)
Re: How about a FWD drive-train ...?? [Re: patrick] #83866
07/12/08 01:28 PM
07/12/08 01:28 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,089
Sorrento, BC, Canada
4speeds4me Offline
master
4speeds4me  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,089
Sorrento, BC, Canada
Quote:

like others have said, the LH cars already have their engines mounted fore-aft, what about yoinking a 3.2 or 3.5L and using an adapter plate for a RWD tranny?

heck, check out hotroddave's super duper MPG thread in the Q&A, he built up a simple 318 that has good power and is getting ~20-23city and 26-29 highway. it's basically a 0 deck 318 (using KB167's), 273 mechanical cam, and 302 heads, Tquad (I think), lockup 904 and a 2.76 rear. you could do a slight variation on that for more power and less maintainence with probably no sacrafice in economy by starting with a magnum 318, use the same pistons, and run the smallest comp or hughes hydraulic roller with the stock roller lifters. if you wanted a manual, I'd use an A833OD and 2.94 or 3.23 rear.




That whole thread warrants a good read for those who haven't yet. There is really good info for putting together ANY package for it's most optimum fuel economy.


2 Demons...no, not my kids!
Re: How about a FWD drive-train ...?? [Re: 4speeds4me] #83867
07/12/08 03:20 PM
07/12/08 03:20 PM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 19,237
north of coder
moparx Offline
"Butt Crack Bob"
moparx  Offline
"Butt Crack Bob"

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 19,237
north of coder
more cubes also makes for more fun when you want it !

Re: How about a FWD drive-train ...?? [Re: moparx] #83868
07/12/08 05:26 PM
07/12/08 05:26 PM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 12,481
Chino Valley
RodStRace Offline
I Live Here
RodStRace  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 12,481
Chino Valley
The guy that did the Merc body over a Lebaron was Gene Winfield. He was concerned that they were going to do stuff like they did to Boytd with Kit cars (IE, it had to have modern equipment).
Otherwise, I think a FWD drivetrain in a rod is a square peg in a round hole, unless you stuff it in the back. There was a rodder (Lived in So Cal) that did one years ago, then built OHC conversions for Chevys and Harleys. Forget his name .

I agree that if you want a MPG rod, you can go with a modern 4 or 6, or even an optimized V8 and just drive the rear wheels, rather than try to design a cradle, suspension, steering and exhaust that fit an early body. Take a look under the hood of a PT to see the issues with a FWD drivetrain in a narrow nose.

Re: How about a FWD drive-train ...?? [Re: patrick] #83869
07/12/08 05:37 PM
07/12/08 05:37 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,247
Florida STAYcation
dIc dOc Deity ! Offline OP
The village idiot's idiot
dIc dOc Deity !  Offline OP
The village idiot's idiot

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,247
Florida STAYcation
Quote:



heck, check out hotroddave's super duper MPG thread in the Q&A, he built up a simple 318 that has good power and is getting ~20-23city and 26-29 highway. it's basically a 0 deck 318 (using KB167's), 273 mechanical cam, and 302 heads, Tquad (I think), lockup 904 and a 2.76 rear.






What is the exact title of that thread ? .. I remember back in the 90's - a Bud of mine set up his FIL's Dippy with a 318 (just simple bolt-on stuff(no internal mods) ....he was getting 26 or so with that.

Re: How about a FWD drive-train ...?? [Re: dIc dOc Deity !] #83870
07/13/08 01:01 AM
07/13/08 01:01 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,089
Sorrento, BC, Canada
4speeds4me Offline
master
4speeds4me  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,089
Sorrento, BC, Canada


2 Demons...no, not my kids!
Re: How about a FWD drive-train ...?? [Re: dIc dOc Deity !] #83871
07/18/08 07:41 AM
07/18/08 07:41 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,728
places
7
79powerwagon Offline
Too Many Posts
79powerwagon  Offline
Too Many Posts
7

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,728
places
I like the idea of using a FWD Mopar engine for a hot rod. But just the engine.

There is a rod that graced the cover of Summit's catalog that was built on an S10 4x4 chassis, and they modded the driveline to act as an AWD sport suspension (versus off road capable). Kind of a neat idea, really!

FWD in the rod? Nah, no good. But a 2.5 as a power plant? That'd be great!







Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1