AMD Bumpers vs Rechrome
#793227
09/05/10 10:29 AM
09/05/10 10:29 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 352 Arizona
69rrgrabber
OP
enthusiast
|
OP
enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 352
Arizona
|
Looking at rechroming a rear bumper for my 69 Charger. It is not dented but one of the bumperetts has rust. The cost of a new bumper is the same as rechroming the old, minus the hassel. Anyone have experience with the new AMD bumpers? Whats the quality like?
Thanks CAC
"It takes a Mopar to catch a Mopar!"
1969 Charger R/T 440
1969 Road Runner 383
1970 Cuda 440
|
|
|
Re: AMD Bumpers vs Rechrome
[Re: 69rrgrabber]
#793228
09/05/10 10:35 AM
09/05/10 10:35 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,854 Georgetown Ontario Canada
anlauto
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,854
Georgetown Ontario Canada
|
If the cost is truly the same then go with your original bumpers. The reproduction Cuda ones are nice, but the chrome is never perfect I've used three sets. The only reason I chose AMD bumpers is because the cost of re-chroming ones in Ontario Canada is absolutely crazy!
CHECK OUT MY NEW WEB SITE !
|
|
|
Re: AMD Bumpers vs Rechrome
[Re: Deuces-Wild]
#793230
09/05/10 12:48 PM
09/05/10 12:48 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,158 God's Country - Etowah, TN.
A34
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,158
God's Country - Etowah, TN.
|
If it's a driver, repro is fine. If you want super duper high end quality, then redo an original set, but finding a good shop to do it can be tough.
God Bless America, Our Troops and Their Families !
DEO VINDICE
|
|
|
Re: AMD Bumpers vs Rechrome
[Re: A34]
#793231
09/05/10 01:07 PM
09/05/10 01:07 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,277 West Coast, USA
jbc426
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,277
West Coast, USA
|
From what I've read and been told if you want the best, there's only one shop to consider. Keystone Automotive is the new name. They used to be called Northstar bumpers or something like that. They are in Wisconsin, (920)731-3030.
1970 Plymouth 'Cuda #'s 440-6(block in storage)currently 493" 6 pack, Shaker, 5 speed Passon, 4.10's 1968 Plymouth Barracuda Convertible 408 Magnum EFI with 4 speed automatic overdrive, 3800 stall lock-up converter and 4.30's (closest thing to an automatic 5 speed going)
|
|
|
Re: AMD Bumpers vs Rechrome
[Re: Rosco]
#793234
09/05/10 02:42 PM
09/05/10 02:42 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,277 West Coast, USA
jbc426
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,277
West Coast, USA
|
Quote:
Northstar is/was in Minn. has been bought by Keystone as far as I've been told.
I'm sending mine here:
Keystone Automotive(Northstar) 5085 Wren Dr. Appleton, WI 54913 (920) 731-3030
On a side note, I just got my OE 1970 e-body chrome racing mirrors and some other parts back from Paul's Chrome. The quality is breathtaking! Jules "the wiperman" Daddo was king enough to have his glass guy cut and bevel some replacement mirror glass for them. I don't have the repops available to compare them to, but they are truely beautifully done.
1970 Plymouth 'Cuda #'s 440-6(block in storage)currently 493" 6 pack, Shaker, 5 speed Passon, 4.10's 1968 Plymouth Barracuda Convertible 408 Magnum EFI with 4 speed automatic overdrive, 3800 stall lock-up converter and 4.30's (closest thing to an automatic 5 speed going)
|
|
|
Re: AMD Bumpers vs Rechrome
[Re: 69rrgrabber]
#793237
09/05/10 10:30 PM
09/05/10 10:30 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,157 Mass
DAYCLONA
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,157
Mass
|
Carl,...some of the guys are talking about the AMD E body bumpers here,...which had some fitment/chrome issuses, even on the second re-tooling,...but your interested in the CHARGER rear bumper,...I too was faced with the decision of spending $800 for triple plate, I already had about $3K invested in rechroming everything else ....So I chose to go with the AMD Charger rear bumper,...It really is a nice piece, the plateing was done rather well,....better than original/NOS,...although not as nice as triple plate,...but I was more interested in a "factory" appearance,...the bumperettes are included, everything lined up perfectly, and the bumper fit all the contours very well,...I used Stainless Steel bumper bolts, polished out, rather than chromed steel, the bumper has been on the car for about 6 years, seen plenty of miles on Hotrod Power Tours/ driven to cross country show tours, seen plenty of wet wether,...no signs of rust, or chrome fade/peeling Mike
|
|
|
Re: AMD Bumpers vs Rechrome
[Re: DAYCLONA]
#793238
09/06/10 01:47 AM
09/06/10 01:47 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 352 Arizona
69rrgrabber
OP
enthusiast
|
OP
enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 352
Arizona
|
Everyone, thanks for the replys. Before I do anything I need to find a reputable chrome shop in Tucson. There are only 2 and I have heard bad things about one. Shipping the bumper and other parts needing rechroming really dosen't appeal to me but thanks for the reference. Chrome plating has gone up quite abit since the 80s when I last did chrome!
If I'm really impressed with the quality on my mirriors, door handles and 1/4 glass frames, then I'll let them do the bumper, otherwise the AMD bumper sounds like a bargain.
Mike, where did you find stainless steel bumper bolts? Thanks Carl
"It takes a Mopar to catch a Mopar!"
1969 Charger R/T 440
1969 Road Runner 383
1970 Cuda 440
|
|
|
Re: AMD Bumpers vs Rechrome
[Re: 69rrgrabber]
#793239
09/06/10 08:17 AM
09/06/10 08:17 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,144 wellington ohio
68-scatpack-rt
In thin ice
|
In thin ice
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,144
wellington ohio
|
i'd rechrome the original. i tell my plater to keep all the original detail instead of polishing the crap out of my stuff and robbing it of it's original look. overpolished bling is cool for a street rod or harley but i would think replicating the original appearance of a musclecar item would take precedent over bling.
unions....the folks who brought you the weekend!
|
|
|
Re: AMD Bumpers vs Rechrome
[Re: 68-scatpack-rt]
#793240
09/06/10 09:40 AM
09/06/10 09:40 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 417 Caledon, Ontario
smac77
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 417
Caledon, Ontario
|
This question really depends on the plater.... I was doing a buick GS and had to have the bumpers re-chromed since no one makes them, I used cambridge custom chrome and paid $800 for the rear and $1250 to do the front as it was bent... when they came back, I compared them to an AMD repo I had on the shelf and they were no better in appearance... in fact my AMD repo looked a bit nicer... the rechromed one was a slight bit wavy looking and had some low spots... It looked ok but,for the price I paid (no choice) I was not happy with the rechrome... Another customer brought me parts done by the bumper boyz that were still all rusty and crusty under the chrome on the back side of the peice... horrible job !
choose your plater wisely and let them know up front, in writing that you will not accept anything but top quality work...
Restoration, Sales and Canadian Distributor For: AMD Sheetmetal Wizzard Direct Fit, Bolt In Aluminum Radiators Legendary Interiors SSBC & Wilwood Brakes Control Freak Suspensions Fine lines Tubing and many more... www.macleanclassics.com
|
|
|
Re: AMD Bumpers vs Rechrome
[Re: 68-scatpack-rt]
#793242
09/06/10 05:07 PM
09/06/10 05:07 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,583 SE Pa.
LimeliteAero
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,583
SE Pa.
|
Quote:
i'd rechrome the original.
i tell my plater to keep all the original detail instead of polishing the crap out of my stuff and robbing it of it's original look. overpolished bling is cool for a street rod or harley but i would think replicating the original appearance of a musclecar item would take precedent over bling.
youre talking about a chrome bumper that might be too shiney? what looks bad about a shiney chrome bumper? Id rather have a too shiney bumper than one that I can see gring marks in through the crappy thin plating. I had the bumper on my bird triple plated in 1986 for a boat load of money and it still looks perfect.
|
|
|
Re: AMD Bumpers vs Rechrome
[Re: 68-scatpack-rt]
#793244
09/06/10 05:59 PM
09/06/10 05:59 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 21,814 Kirkland, Washington
Pacnorthcuda
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 21,814
Kirkland, Washington
|
Quote:
i'd rechrome the original.
i tell my plater to keep all the original detail instead of polishing the crap out of my stuff and robbing it of it's original look. overpolished bling is cool for a street rod or harley but i would think replicating the original appearance of a musclecar item would take precedent over bling.
and some people stare lovingly at orange peel because, after all, the factory produced it that way...
|
|
|
Re: AMD Bumpers vs Rechrome
[Re: Pacnorthcuda]
#793245
09/06/10 07:04 PM
09/06/10 07:04 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,583 SE Pa.
LimeliteAero
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,583
SE Pa.
|
Quote:
Quote:
i'd rechrome the original.
i tell my plater to keep all the original detail instead of polishing the crap out of my stuff and robbing it of it's original look. overpolished bling is cool for a street rod or harley but i would think replicating the original appearance of a musclecar item would take precedent over bling.
and some people stare lovingly at orange peel because, after all, the factory produced it that way...
|
|
|
Re: AMD Bumpers vs Rechrome
[Re: 69rrgrabber]
#2617856
02/06/19 03:13 PM
02/06/19 03:13 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,562 Motor City
6PKRTSE
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,562
Motor City
|
I bought the AMD repros for my Challenger fit & finish were great. Much better looking then my 40+ year old bumpers that came off. I am not concours show poodle kind of guy so they suit my car just fine.
1963 Belvedere 440 Max Wedge Tribute 1970 Charger R/T S.E. 440 Six Pack 1970 Challenger R/T, 528 Hemi 1970 Charger 500 S.E. 440 4 BBL 1970 Plymouth Road Runner 383 1974 Chrysler New Yorker 440 1996 2500 RAM 488 V-10 4X4 2004 3500 Dually Cummins 4x4 2012 Challenger R/T Classic.
|
|
|
Re: AMD Bumpers vs Rechrome
[Re: 6PKRTSE]
#2617874
02/06/19 03:53 PM
02/06/19 03:53 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,019 MN
JERICOGTX
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,019
MN
|
I bought the AMD repros for my Challenger fit & finish were great. Much better looking then my 40+ year old bumpers that came off. I am not concours show poodle kind of guy so they suit my car just fine. Not a show poodle, but would probably be the favorite car at most shows it attends. LOL.
69 GTX
68 Road Runner
|
|
|
Re: AMD Bumpers vs Rechrome
[Re: 69rrgrabber]
#2617883
02/06/19 04:06 PM
02/06/19 04:06 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,087 New Mexico
JMCFAN
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,087
New Mexico
|
I used Ogden on my original 70 RR bumpers.... awesome job
68 Charger 383/ AT Green/Green VT 70 Roadrunner 383/4sp Purple/Black VT
|
|
|
Re: AMD Bumpers vs Rechrome
[Re: robertop]
#2618996
02/09/19 11:56 AM
02/09/19 11:56 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 768 Dry Heat AZ
AAR#2
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 768
Dry Heat AZ
|
Ogden did my bumpers few years ago and I am very happy with them. Less than $400 each and they pick up and deliver! Not to mention they are perfect....(69 roadrunner). I contacted Ogden a little over a year ago, they quoted me $700 a bumper and free shipment . . . As a starting point, anything less than perfect would be an upcharge. While I agree they do great work I wasn’t willing to sent a front and rear Cuda bumper for a starting price of $1400, God forbid they find anything that needed attention, I could have been at 18-2k in a hurry Needless to say I went elsewhere
|
|
|
Re: AMD Bumpers vs Rechrome
[Re: 69rrgrabber]
#2619249
02/10/19 12:10 AM
02/10/19 12:10 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 18,582 Rust Belt, SW PA
Silver70
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 18,582
Rust Belt, SW PA
|
I use amd or goodmark, when I checked on going with rechroming, it was more to do 1 bumper than buy 2 new, plus the wait. I know you can do exchanges also, but last time I did that, I got a bumper that looked like someone took an air hammer to on the backside to straighten.
68 Road Runner, 69 Belvedere, 71 Challenger Vert 340 barracuda, 01 Ram CTD, 95 Ram, 04 Ram, 85 Daytona turbo Z 66 GTO, 06 Magnum RT AWD. 07 Ram CTD, 07 Ram
|
|
|
Re: AMD Bumpers vs Rechrome
[Re: Silver70]
#2625263
02/23/19 10:57 PM
02/23/19 10:57 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,606 Pgh, PA
Bull1tt
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,606
Pgh, PA
|
I use amd or goodmark, when I checked on going with rechroming, it was more to do 1 bumper than buy 2 new, plus the wait. I know you can do exchanges also, but last time I did that, I got a bumper that looked like someone took an air hammer to on the backside to straighten. Sure, you get some marks on the inside of rechromed bumpers. They (most) have been straightened! As long as the outside finish is good. Who sees that once on a car? I have bought quite a few bumpers from Tri-City Plating, and always very happy with price and quality. If I have a real nice core, I will get that one back. I’ve put my name on the inside, that’s how I know. I think they are the best buy! I had an early Pontiac that Paul’s plated the front bumper, it looked like a piece of jewelry! No waves, or defects, perfect, over the top showcar, just beautiful... but $1700 dollars for that look. I honestly am not impressed with most of the reproduction bumper chrome, look a bit cheap to me. And of course, this is just my personal opinion...
|
|
|
Re: AMD Bumpers vs Rechrome
[Re: Bull1tt]
#2625298
02/24/19 01:45 AM
02/24/19 01:45 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,157 Mass
DAYCLONA
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 18,157
Mass
|
I honestly am not impressed with most of the reproduction bumper chrome, look a bit cheap to me. And of course, this is just my personal opinion...
Repro bumpers are just nickel and chromium, just like OEM, hence the production (cheap) look, we've all been spoiled over the decades with OCD quality triple chrome (copper/nickel/chromium) finishes on restored vehicles, we've forgotten what OEM "production" vehicles of the era really had for finish quality...
|
|
|
Re: AMD Bumpers vs Rechrome
[Re: DAYCLONA]
#2625421
02/24/19 01:45 PM
02/24/19 01:45 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,160 DELAWARE
TONY_DAGOSTINO
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,160
DELAWARE
|
I honestly am not impressed with most of the reproduction bumper chrome, look a bit cheap to me. And of course, this is just my personal opinion...
Repro bumpers are just nickel and chromium, just like OEM, hence the production (cheap) look, we've all been spoiled over the decades with OCD quality triple chrome (copper/nickel/chromium) finishes on restored vehicles, we've forgotten what OEM "production" vehicles of the era really had for finish quality... great point, but i do notice that oem chrome lasts longer then the triple rechrome. maybe the nickel + chromium is thicker??
|
|
|
Re: AMD Bumpers vs Rechrome
[Re: moparjohnnycuda]
#2632968
03/15/19 11:19 AM
03/15/19 11:19 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,535 Canuckville
68Cbarge
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,535
Canuckville
|
I agree it is up to the skills of the rechromer. The better the core,the better the end results. Since nobody repops any C body schtuff I got my bumpers done by Sandy's Bumper Mart.been dealing with them for about 10-15 years. http://www.sandysbumpermart.com/Cost was half of Cambridge Chrome even with the CDN/U.S. dollar exchange rate. I am two hours away from their shop so I drove there to avoid shipping and any damage from shipping. High quality street chrome-not Pebble Beach but my car still took home trophies from Carlisle and Mopar Madness shows last summer.
Last edited by 68Cbarge; 03/15/19 11:23 AM. Reason: sphellng
'68 Newport Custom Barge on a Budget!! BOAB 1973 Satellite WAGON! 318- 3 on the tree!! 2008 Chrysler 300c HEMI!
|
|
|
|
|