Never been to dyno with turbos
#678005
04/23/10 09:46 AM
04/23/10 09:46 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,932 Finalnd, Perkele
jyrki
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,932
Finalnd, Perkele
|
...until now. We went to a local dyno today. To get some reference one of the Europes quickest pro stockers having run low 6.7's on European tacks made 1290 hp there. I'm not going to refer any maximum numbers or so because they are kind of useless here since it mademore than we can use and the things re pretty relative anyway.
Our car weighs a bit under 3600 lbs and it has run a best of 7.89/174 mph on DOT tires. It has never really been tuned either chassis or engine wise, and I think it worked pretty good. Now that we put it to the dyno we first got the EFI tuned so that it runs almost like a stock 440 at idle, no fumes and good throttle response. That alone would have been worth the visit.
I took the engine apart during the winter, but theshort block was put together with the same regular moly rings and same bearings etc. Only change was the well served cam to a new slightly different grind and Harlan Sharp rocker arms replacing the well served Ersons. The engine is a 478 RB wedge with a 8.6:1 cr, twin garrets with A/A intercooler, Autronic SM 4 ECU, Weldon fuel pump and regulator etc. etc. The ignition is MSD 7 AL2 and the coil a MSD blaster 2. This is our first turbo build up, and we have run it for three years now, maybe some 50 "passanger" runs, really just driving it without any "program" to try to tune it.
Now today at the dyno we got to fix the cold operation, and now the car starts and runs great without sooting the plugs. It was VERY VERY rich at part throttle, and propably the savings in gas consumption alone will pay for the dyno. We got what we wanted, and proved the things we already knew. The vital theory numbers were very good, but the engine peaked out way lower than we had thought. It really didn't loose much power even above that even though the boost came down and the exhaust pressure came closer and even crossed the boost.
We have wound the engine up to 7500 at the track, the stall with 2/3 SAE 80 trans fluid is about 6200 at full boost and we have shifted at 7100. Well, the engine made peak power at 6100! In the first run the tune up was like it was in the record run and it made 996 hp at 4000 and 1260 hp at 5500. When we had made the adjustments it made 1100 hp at 4000 and 1513 hp at 5500! And that was with 8psi less boost than in the beginning. Should be in time to get some more brewages until the shop closes!
The greates thing in my opinion is that the engine didn't need anything mechanically during the about 10 dyno pulls during the three hours in the dyno.
Plynouth VIP '67 TT IC EFI
|
|
|
Re: Never been to dyno with turbos
[Re: BigBlockMopar]
#678011
04/23/10 12:11 PM
04/23/10 12:11 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,932 Finalnd, Perkele
jyrki
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,932
Finalnd, Perkele
|
Was far from it. The dyno operator, NOT a mopar guy was happy and the guy that tuned the EFI was happy too, he's very theoretical and he calculated that the engine makes over 100nm torque per litre naturally aspirated which is a good figure.
Plynouth VIP '67 TT IC EFI
|
|
|
Re: Never been to dyno with turbos
[Re: hemi-itis]
#678013
04/26/10 12:46 AM
04/26/10 12:46 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,932 Finalnd, Perkele
jyrki
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,932
Finalnd, Perkele
|
No. It's run in a street car class and is completely street worthy, but because of our traffic legislation and to avoid costs we haven't had the car inspected or insured. The things "wrong" for the registration are too big rear tires, according to the law here you can increase the tire size max 100mm (4") from stock both in diameter and width. And the other one is that the power output of a modified car mustn't be more than 25% above the highest factory offering. Other than that, all the street equipment works etc. Of course we could get it properly licenced and inspected with smaller rear tires and proper dyno papers or even different engine, but have seen no reason to do that. But perhaps someday we will, especially after the tune up nothing prevents the street driving. Earlier the tune up was extremely rich at part throttle and cold starts using a lot of gas and fouling plugs, but now that's corrected too.
Plynouth VIP '67 TT IC EFI
|
|
|
Re: Never been to dyno with turbos
[Re: The Shadow]
#678015
04/26/10 08:15 AM
04/26/10 08:15 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,932 Finalnd, Perkele
jyrki
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,932
Finalnd, Perkele
|
160 lbs injectors. We used VP109 in the dyno to be safe.
Plynouth VIP '67 TT IC EFI
|
|
|
Re: Never been to dyno with turbos
[Re: RodStRace]
#678018
04/27/10 01:08 AM
04/27/10 01:08 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,932 Finalnd, Perkele
jyrki
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,932
Finalnd, Perkele
|
I think we are going to drive with the current converter and rear gear this summer. I made some inquieries about a tighter converter, or more temptating option might be a lock up converter/trans. We really don't need much more speed, already pretty close to having to install double chutes. One problem is, that we have a Dana 60 with 4.10 pro gears, and I have no idea about longer pro gear availability for the Dana.
Plynouth VIP '67 TT IC EFI
|
|
|
Re: Never been to dyno with turbos
[Re: joshking440]
#678021
04/28/10 05:49 PM
04/28/10 05:49 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 66 SRQ, FL
8valves
member
|
member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 66
SRQ, FL
|
Pretty good results. At what boost level does the car cross the 1:1 pressure ratio threshold? And then what boost do you run at WOT in high gear?
There is a tremendous amount of power left if you can keep the drive pressure on the turbine wheel lower than the intake pressure, or equal.
In regards to the D60 gear setup... we've already been through this. The numerically lowest setup we could find is the Uber rare 3.33 ratio from the LeMans Viper's. Unitrax is a company you can contact to try to source them.
However... the integrity of them is questionable, seeing as they are used parts. In a 3550 lb raceweight vehicle making between 1300WHP and 1700 WHP depending on fuel we had one set last about 45 passes, then the next set last 2 launches. Then the next set lasted 4 launches.
Go figure.
Also, that's good power on VP109... why the unleaded fuel though? European restricitons of some sort, or just easily available? It's rather expensive when C12 will offer better detonation resistance with the lead content.
I guess that only matters if your timing is rather agressive though.
AM
Aaron M
|
|
|
Re: Never been to dyno with turbos
[Re: 8valves]
#678022
04/29/10 12:48 AM
04/29/10 12:48 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,932 Finalnd, Perkele
jyrki
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,932
Finalnd, Perkele
|
We have run at about 1.5 bar, with that amount the exhaust pressure still stays below the boost. We don't have any electricity to control the boost at the moment, just the throttle. Here are some boost/exh press numbers. rpm, boost, exh press 4000, 1.44, 0.64 4500, 1.5, 0.72 5000, 1.56, 0.8 5500, 1.57, 0.89 6000, 1.55, 1.02 6500, 1.49, 1.12 7000, 1.38, 1.22 The unleaded is because of the rules. We could also use E85, but no one has really tested the local stuff and I believe it could also test our fuel supply taking it to the edge. Now we have only one Weldon pump there and 160 lb injectors (I think they should be anough for E85 too though). The lambda numbers were around 0.83, so it's still on the safe side.
Plynouth VIP '67 TT IC EFI
|
|
|
|
|