Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 6 of 15 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 14 15
Re: 1964 Hemi hardtops [Re: 64Post] #595448
02/05/10 05:37 PM
02/05/10 05:37 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 42,714
Spokane Washington
ScottSmith_Harms Offline
Mr Wizzard
ScottSmith_Harms  Offline
Mr Wizzard

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 42,714
Spokane Washington
Quote:

Many guys have researched these cars and are unwilling to share what they know because they've spent years acquiring the proprietary information or tracking down the original drivers/cars. It doesn't mean that no one out there knows the answers. Open source info via TSB and books ( D.D's, DRFS, etc. ) are another story.





What could be "proprietary" about any of this? What would anyone have to gain by not sharing info about these cars? I don't see anyone trying to locate any of these cars with some type of financial gain in mind?


Re: 1964 Hemi hardtops *DELETED* [Re: ScottSmith_Harms] #595449
02/05/10 06:26 PM
02/05/10 06:26 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,716
Baltimore/Denver
64Post Offline
master
64Post  Offline
master

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,716
Baltimore/Denver
Post deleted by 64Post

Re: 1964 Hemi hardtops [Re: 64Post] #595450
02/05/10 06:48 PM
02/05/10 06:48 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 42,714
Spokane Washington
ScottSmith_Harms Offline
Mr Wizzard
ScottSmith_Harms  Offline
Mr Wizzard

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 42,714
Spokane Washington
As far as Galen, Daryl, or anyone elses business, I can't comment. As far as the question you pointed at me, no, I don't authenticate cars for free, that's a service I offer as part of my business and for the record is more involving than a simple sharing of information, public or otherwise. On the other hand I quite commonly share information and details for free here on Moparts and on the phone (no credit card required), in many cases this information is not public or commonly known, so what? It's not always about money or profit (IMO anyway) I suppose some think it would be better to hoard info they might have until they die off and the history dies with them?

Anyway, I'm not attempting to confront anyone here, just curious why everyone is so tight lipped about sharing some history? I really don't see how answering any of the questions posted so far would cause anyone to lose potential profits? If I missed something please feel free to let me know?

Still

Re: 1964 Hemi hardtops [Re: ScottSmith_Harms] #595451
02/05/10 08:29 PM
02/05/10 08:29 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 951
Temperance, MI
P
prochargedhemi Offline
super stock
prochargedhemi  Offline
super stock
P

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 951
Temperance, MI
Quote:

As far as Galen, Daryl, or anyone elses business, I can't comment. As far as the question you pointed at me, no, I don't authenticate cars for free, that's a service I offer as part of my business and for the record is more involving than a simple sharing of information public or otherwise. On the other hand I quite commonly share information and details for free here on Moparts and on the phone (no credit card required), in many cases this information is not public or commonly known, so what? It's not always about money or profit (IMO anyway) I suppose some think it would be better to hoard info they might have until they die off and the history dies with them?

Anyway, I'm not attempting to confront anyone here, just curious why everyone is so tight lipped about sharing some history? I really don't see how answering any of the questions posted so far would cause anyone to lose potential profits? If I missed something please feel free to let me know?

Still




Scott, You didn't know? Thats part of the mopar heritage. You know, when you own it, its nothing but when i have it, it's gold. I find it pretty sad when you have what could be THE FIRST HEMICAR EVER BUILT (yeah i said it) and everyones tight lipped because they are overwhelmed by there ego's It's ok i know what it is, I don't need some J,O, to tell me

Re: 1964 Hemi hardtops [Re: prochargedhemi] #595452
02/05/10 09:09 PM
02/05/10 09:09 PM
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 644
Minnesota
Barnstorm Offline
mopar
Barnstorm  Offline
mopar

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 644
Minnesota
A few of us have been around since these cars were brand new. Front clips interchange and were dirt cheap then. Unless you class raced[most didn't] aluminum fronts were so dent prone, some traded them for steel. We knew factory workers back then but when you ask them what color crayon they used to OK stuff they[and rightly so] said "who cares...we were either drunk or irritated at the company". Makes documentation even more of a guess than.......These cars are big fun and "special info" will always be debated.

5785232-mopar_resize.jpg (138 downloads)

The little old lady from Pasadena is back!
Re: 1964 Hemi hardtops [Re: prochargedhemi] #595453
02/05/10 11:30 PM
02/05/10 11:30 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 881
currently on moparts.
R
Race&Resto Offline
super stock
Race&Resto  Offline
super stock
R

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 881
currently on moparts.
Quote:

I also spoke with Darrell Davis this morning and he didn't have much info other then what has been collected here already. He did say it should be an interesting story though




prochargedhemi, I'm sure Darrell Davis has a wealth of information that he's found by going through Chrysler's old records and writing some books on it, but it looks like he couldn't answer your question either?

Although you did get some information on you dads 64 Plymouth hardtop by sending in your VIN info and getting an IBM card from Chrysler, and found out the build & shipping date and got some other specific info from DD. I sure hope you find out more info on that early mystery car of yours.

And yes we all know of people out there that hoard their info & facts that they've found themselves over the years. But I guess that's their right if they don't want to share or help out. Well that's fine with me because I've been through all that BS before with people like that, and I'm not going to lose any sleep over it.

Yes we all know about the first four 2% cars that were built and their race heritage because they were the first Hemi mule cars built, but what were their build & shipping dates? I would really like to know that info myself as well, anyone?

Yes we've all seen the black & white photo the front-end shot of the 64 Hemi Dodge sedan with the two guys from the factory standing beside it, but I wouldn't mind seeing some other factory photo's.

Yes the 64 Hemi production figures state there were 110 sedan's built, (55 Dodges, and 55 Plymouths). Along with the 70 hardtops built, (35 Dodge's and 35 Plymouth's), for a grand total of 180 units built, (supposedly).

The earliest build & shipping dates that I've read about was from the owner of the Landy 64 Hemi sedan, with a scheduled production date of May 21/64 and shipping date of May 27/64. He goes onto say that all of the surviving or remaining 64 Hemi sedan's have higher build & shipping dates. But I guess that's up for debate as well.

I would be interested myself in helping you find out more info about the early Hemi cars too. I did do some research myself over 20 years ago on these early Hemi cars, but sometimes life has different plans for you. Well after a long hiatus, the interest in these old Hemi cars is back! So this is what I would like to find out:

What was "the exact date" the last max-wedge motor was installed into a car from the factory?

And what was "the exact date" of the first production 426 Hemi motor installed into a car from the factory?

So any other info & help would be appreciated!

Re: 1964 Hemi hardtops [Re: ScottSmith_Harms] #595454
02/06/10 12:16 AM
02/06/10 12:16 AM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 609
Sometimes Northern California,...
L
LO23M8B Offline
mopar
LO23M8B  Offline
mopar
L

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 609
Sometimes Northern California,...
Quote:

As far as Galen, Daryl, or anyone elses business, I can't comment. As far as the question you pointed at me, no, I don't authenticate cars for free, that's a service I offer as part of my business and for the record is more involving than a simple sharing of information, public or otherwise. On the other hand I quite commonly share information and details for free here on Moparts and on the phone (no credit card required), in many cases this information is not public or commonly known, so what? It's not always about money or profit (IMO anyway) I suppose some think it would be better to hoard info they might have until they die off and the history dies with them?

Anyway, I'm not attempting to confront anyone here, just curious why everyone is so tight lipped about sharing some history? I really don't see how answering any of the questions posted so far would cause anyone to lose potential profits? If I missed something please feel free to let me know?

Still


Scott, I gotta agree with you. I have called you and you were very upfront with me about that WO car here in California. You gave me great information and didn't charge me a dime and I respect and appreciate that. Greg Lane was an unbelievable source of information to me and also provided help in locating correct parts. I have talked to him much about these cars and you know, he would just talk for hours and the wealth of information he gave, just because he loved them, and wanted to share it. Darrell Davis I have talked to as well and he was very much the same. I don't mind paying for any of that stuff, because I know it does have value to the right people. But share it, if you have some top secret documentation about an individual car, well then go ahead and charge, no problem with that. I would gladly pay for any info on the history of my individual car, that could be documented. Give us some idea that you have that knowledge. But general stuff, like, why the cars were built, were they raced? were they just max-wedge replacements? In my opinion should be shared. Why hoard that information? Get it out there before all the guys that are in the "know" about these cars die- off. Is there any harm in that?


64 S/S Hemi Plymouth, 1963 4-Door (13.5-1) Max Wedge Savoy, 69-440 Dart 10.20 et 132 mph on the footbrake, 2012 Dodge Ram 2500 turbo diesel, 69-440-6 Roadrunner, 05 Hemi Magnum, 2003 Dodge Ram 2500 P/u, 2005 Viper, 98' Town & Country.
Re: 1964 Hemi hardtops *DELETED* [Re: ScottSmith_Harms] #595455
02/06/10 12:22 AM
02/06/10 12:22 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,716
Baltimore/Denver
64Post Offline
master
64Post  Offline
master

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,716
Baltimore/Denver
Post deleted by 64Post

Re: 1964 Hemi hardtops [Re: 64Post] #595456
02/06/10 12:28 AM
02/06/10 12:28 AM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 609
Sometimes Northern California,...
L
LO23M8B Offline
mopar
LO23M8B  Offline
mopar
L

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 609
Sometimes Northern California,...
Thanks for chiming in Dave, you and I have talked much about these cars as well. Hopefully if we keep it going (and I agree 2000 posts) someone will chime in. Are you going to the MATS?


64 S/S Hemi Plymouth, 1963 4-Door (13.5-1) Max Wedge Savoy, 69-440 Dart 10.20 et 132 mph on the footbrake, 2012 Dodge Ram 2500 turbo diesel, 69-440-6 Roadrunner, 05 Hemi Magnum, 2003 Dodge Ram 2500 P/u, 2005 Viper, 98' Town & Country.
Re: 1964 Hemi hardtops *DELETED* [Re: LO23M8B] #595457
02/06/10 12:44 AM
02/06/10 12:44 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,716
Baltimore/Denver
64Post Offline
master
64Post  Offline
master

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,716
Baltimore/Denver
Post deleted by 64Post

Re: 1964 Hemi hardtops [Re: Race&Resto] #595458
02/06/10 03:31 AM
02/06/10 03:31 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,058
Dallas, Texas
F
FC7cuda Offline
super stock
FC7cuda  Offline
super stock
F

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,058
Dallas, Texas
Quote:

Quote:

You have to remember as well that the Hemi's had the inverted shock towers where the Max Wedges did not, so they could not be "leftover Max Wedge" bodies. This wouldn't even be possible if you think about it. The cars came down the line with every other Slant 6, 318, 361 and etc. They were not sequentially tagged.

The only reason I could see these cars being built is to sway Nascar, since the teams were running hardtops in '64.




Maybe I wasn't clear enough when I said these cars were left over max-wedge bodies, perhaps I should have said they were "max-wedge ordered cars". The reason I said this is because it is a known fact that some customers that had placed a order for a new max-wedge car, but they received a new Race Hemi instead! So technically wouldn't that now mean that the max-wedge ordered cars were now modified with the shock towers, hemi hood scoops, etc. Does that make any more sense now?

There may be something to your other point though, does anyone out there know if the 64 Nascar rules said anything on the total number of cars needed to be build before you were allowed to race, (just like the 69-70 wing car rule.)




I believe the first part of your statement is true if I'm understanding the story of the Ferguson car. He ordered a Max Wedge and they built him an early hemi car. He drove it home from the factory.

Regarding Nascar rules on production, I believe that refers to models and not specific engines in those models...so the 64 hardtops are eligible for Nascar.

Enjoy the thread, some of the 2000 hits are mine...

Tom




68 Charger
70 Cuda
Re: 1964 Hemi hardtops [Re: Race&Resto] #595459
02/06/10 11:23 AM
02/06/10 11:23 AM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 840
Southeastern MI.
Q
QuickSilver Offline
mopar addict
QuickSilver  Offline
mopar addict
Q

Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 840
Southeastern MI.
Here is a shot of the Ramcharger's 330 2% car at Detroit Dragway. I don't believe for a minute that this car ever had a max wedge motor in it. I also have a shot of Dave Stricklers '64 330 and it also has the max scoop and two headlight grill and yes it has the Hemi engine.

Re: 1964 Hemi hardtops [Re: QuickSilver] #595460
02/06/10 11:35 AM
02/06/10 11:35 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,668
South Dakota
hotairballoonpilot Offline
master
hotairballoonpilot  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,668
South Dakota
hairbender out of Sioux Falls SD. Was an aluminium front end car. If I remember right dad said it was an auto and the guys that ran it after Dick hansen/Gordan Stewart(owner of stewarts school of hir styling) put a 4 speed in it or it was the other way around. Ron Roddel owned it then sold it and it went somewhere in Ia then last I heard it was in Fl.

Last edited by hotairballoonpilot; 02/06/10 11:41 AM.
Re: 1964 Hemi hardtops [Re: hotairballoonpilot] #595461
02/06/10 11:44 AM
02/06/10 11:44 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,668
South Dakota
hotairballoonpilot Offline
master
hotairballoonpilot  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,668
South Dakota
2


Contact Me about AMD Prices
Re: 1964 Hemi hardtops [Re: hotairballoonpilot] #595462
02/06/10 01:39 PM
02/06/10 01:39 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 764
NW Pa.
KD800X Offline
super stock
KD800X  Offline
super stock

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 764
NW Pa.
According to 'We Were The Ramchargers" book. The original reason for moving the rear wheels on the Dodge was to compete with the Plymouths which had a shorter wheel base.
According to the book, the first new Hemi Car was there car and it was built in there garage with the F/X enhancements.
Then it goes on to say that eventually 3 other cars were built, a Dodge for Strickler, and Plymouths for the Commandos and Tommy Grove.
They went to Lions to test before the Winter Nat's and the Hemis did not run any better than the Wedges, so they decided not to run the Hemi's at Pomona instead they brought the Wedges back out for that race. The first race with eh 64 Hemi was at Detroit Dragway, (with Holleys).
This car according to the book, was the "worlds first and fastest 426 Hemi car", and it was sold to Eddie Smith (West Virginia Hemi.
The book does not mention anything about 2dr Hardtops, or how many hemis were built in 64. All it shows is 330 sedans with Max Wedge Hood scoop then in another picture it has the Hemi Scoop so I'm guessing they changed scoops in the middle of the year.
There is one picture with a 64 Plymouth way in the back ground. It's hard to see but it's a hard top with a Max Wedge Scoop and it looks like it has only two head lights instead of 4.
Maybe if someone knows Tom Hoover could call him and possibly shed some light on the subject.

Re: 1964 Hemi hardtops [Re: KD800X] #595463
02/06/10 02:12 PM
02/06/10 02:12 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 951
Temperance, MI
P
prochargedhemi Offline
super stock
prochargedhemi  Offline
super stock
P

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 951
Temperance, MI
I thought those 4 cars were built by the alexander brothers?

Re: 1964 Hemi hardtops [Re: prochargedhemi] #595464
02/06/10 02:50 PM
02/06/10 02:50 PM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 840
Southeastern MI.
Q
QuickSilver Offline
mopar addict
QuickSilver  Offline
mopar addict
Q

Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 840
Southeastern MI.
According to some info in Jim Schilds 1964 Hemi booklet, there were more cars than the four 2% cars that everyone is familiar with delivered to the Alexander bros shop for work prior to Pomona. He does mention that some received more mods than others. A recently uncovered 1964 magazine article speaks of this in detail and pretty much says the same thing. Is this were Jim got his info?

Re: 1964 Hemi hardtops [Re: QuickSilver] #595465
02/06/10 03:44 PM
02/06/10 03:44 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 764
NW Pa.
KD800X Offline
super stock
KD800X  Offline
super stock

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 764
NW Pa.


Ok, here it is. Page 140, "We Were The Ramchargers" Thorton says, The construction of the new Hemi Cars was performed with heightened security at the Ramchargers garage. It was not only the first new Hemi drag car built but aslo incorporated chassis enhancements for the Factory Experimental class. (I'm quoting from the book". Then Thorton goes on to explain how he come up with the idea of moving the K member forward 3" etc etc.
Then in the last paragraph on page 140 I think this is still Thorton talking.... " At this point, we had a lot of confidence in the Alexander Brothers, and they did a lot of work for us. Eventually, three other cars were commissioned - another Dodge for Strickler and Plymouths for the Commandos and Tommy Grove - which probably tells you something about the pecking order nationally."
Judging from the rest of the book, the Alexander Bros, did all of the Ramchargers paint work. They talk about the in 1963 painting there car, and they talk about them painting the T/F car. They are not real clear but maybe they did some body work for them? Hey what do I know.... I was 5 years from being born.

Re: 1964 Hemi hardtops *DELETED* [Re: KD800X] #595466
02/06/10 03:49 PM
02/06/10 03:49 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,716
Baltimore/Denver
64Post Offline
master
64Post  Offline
master

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,716
Baltimore/Denver
Post deleted by 64Post

Re: 1964 Hemi hardtops [Re: 64Post] #595467
02/06/10 04:00 PM
02/06/10 04:00 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,668
Mi,U.S.A.
M
mike s Offline
top fuel
mike s  Offline
top fuel
M

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,668
Mi,U.S.A.
" At this point, we had a lot of confidence in the Alexander Brothers, and they did a lot of work for us. Eventually, three other cars were commissioned - another Dodge for Strickler and Plymouths for the Commandos and Tommy Grove - which probably tells you something about the pecking order nationally."

I believe this should say Plymouths for Grove and Eckstrand (post car). GC's,CMG etc built their own 2% cars.


Leave the gun.......take the Cannoli's....Mike
Page 6 of 15 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 14 15






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1