Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
505 back together with Mancini heads #56742
04/18/08 11:52 PM
04/18/08 11:52 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,264
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline OP
I Win
AndyF  Offline OP
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,264
Oregon
These are the Mancini ported heads that they sell for $2650. Basically MP '452' heads with a CNC port job by Modern. Nice deal for some really up to date hardware. I replaced the valve springs with Comp 26094's since I'll be running a .600 lift street roller cam.

Just waiting for the new Super Victor intake to show up and then we're off to the dyno.

4368548-505.jpg (1033 downloads)
Re: 505 back together with Mancini heads [Re: AndyF] #56743
04/18/08 11:54 PM
04/18/08 11:54 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,264
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline OP
I Win
AndyF  Offline OP
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,264
Oregon
Here is a close up of the retainers. These are the new tool steel retainers from Comp. Part number 1732, cost about $170 from Mancini Racing. They weigh 22 grams which is only 2 grams heavier than Ti retainers but they are a lot cheaper. Also, they hold up to flat wire dampers better than the Ti retainers. I'll probably start using these retainers in any motor that takes a dual spring.

4368553-retainers.jpg (864 downloads)
Re: 505 back together with Mancini heads [Re: AndyF] #56744
04/18/08 11:58 PM
04/18/08 11:58 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 279
hartsburg mo
B
biggerredz71 Offline
enthusiast
biggerredz71  Offline
enthusiast
B

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 279
hartsburg mo
looks nice.

4368563-IMG_0024.JPG (791 downloads)
Re: 505 back together with Mancini heads [Re: AndyF] #56745
04/19/08 12:06 AM
04/19/08 12:06 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,264
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline OP
I Win
AndyF  Offline OP
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,264
Oregon
Here is the top end kit ready to put on. Comp street roller cam, specs are 260/266 with .588/.597 lift. The MCH ported heads and I'll be using the Super Victor intake and a Dominator. Comp rocker arms with the 1.50 ratio but I might try a 1.60 rocker arm just for fun. The valve springs will handle up to .650 lift so I might do it, just requires a new set of pushrods and an extra hour or so on the dyno.
I think I'm going to try these Edelbrock head gaskets but I'm worried if the bore is big enough. If it isn't I'll have to come up with another plan. Maybe reuse my Cometics from the last dyno test since I know they work.
Compression is around 12.5 so she'll probably make some power. Should make plenty of torque with the tiny ports and the small cam!

4368571-top_end.jpg (817 downloads)
Re: 505 back together with Mancini heads [Re: AndyF] #56746
04/19/08 12:23 AM
04/19/08 12:23 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,716
Baltimore/Denver
64Post Offline
master
64Post  Offline
master

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,716
Baltimore/Denver
Boy, I really have to step up to a decent valley cover.

Re: 505 back together with Mancini heads [Re: AndyF] #56747
04/19/08 12:38 AM
04/19/08 12:38 AM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 6,257
gulfport, ms, west mi
rowin4 Offline
master
rowin4  Offline
master

Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 6,257
gulfport, ms, west mi
Andy , where did you get those rocker shaft studs?



it's ok to butt heads, just don't do it with a butthead
Re: 505 back together with Mancini heads [Re: AndyF] #56748
04/19/08 12:44 AM
04/19/08 12:44 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,488
SoCal
Brian Hafliger Offline
master
Brian Hafliger  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,488
SoCal
Quote:

Here is a close up of the retainers. These are the new tool steel retainers from Comp. Part number 1732, cost about $170 from Mancini Racing. They weigh 22 grams which is only 2 grams heavier than Ti retainers but they are a lot cheaper. Also, they hold up to flat wire dampers better than the Ti retainers. I'll probably start using these retainers in any motor that takes a dual spring.




I used those retainers in w2stroker's engine that made 685HP with a sizeable roller in it. Worked very good.
I agree, I think they are the only way to go.
Brian


Brian Hafliger
Re: 505 back together with Mancini heads [Re: rowin4] #56749
04/19/08 12:45 AM
04/19/08 12:45 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,264
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline OP
I Win
AndyF  Offline OP
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,264
Oregon
Quote:

Andy , where did you get those rocker shaft studs?




MagnumHP carries the standard rocker arm shaft stud kit but these are super trick studs from T&D with the turned down waist.

4368614-T&Dstuds.jpg (572 downloads)
Re: 505 back together with Mancini heads [Re: AndyF] #56750
04/19/08 12:47 AM
04/19/08 12:47 AM

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



Quote:

Quote:

Andy , where did you get those rocker shaft studs?




MagnumHP carries the standard rocker arm shaft stud kit but these are super trick studs from T&D with the turned down waist.




seems like you'd only need 2 turned down like that. i wonder why they do all of them?

Re: 505 back together with Mancini heads [Re: Brian Hafliger] #56751
04/19/08 12:48 AM
04/19/08 12:48 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,264
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline OP
I Win
AndyF  Offline OP
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,264
Oregon
Comp doesn't have a tool steel retainer yet for a triple spring but I bet it is just a matter of time. Another nice thing about these retainers is that they are quite a bit thinner which means more clearance for the rocker arm. I guess that Manley is also selling this same (or similiar) retainer now so it must be catching on.

Re: 505 back together with Mancini heads #56752
04/19/08 12:50 AM
04/19/08 12:50 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,264
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline OP
I Win
AndyF  Offline OP
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,264
Oregon
[quote
seems like you'd only need 2 turned down like that. i wonder why they do all of them?




Actually you need three turned down for adequate oil flow with the small T&D shaft but the end ones do not need to be turned down since the oil doesn't flow past them. I bet T&D provides the whole kit turned down since they don't trust their customers to assemble the setup correctly.

Last edited by AndyF; 04/19/08 12:51 AM.
Re: 505 back together with Mancini heads [Re: AndyF] #56753
04/19/08 12:55 AM
04/19/08 12:55 AM

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



Quote:

[quote
seems like you'd only need 2 turned down like that. i wonder why they do all of them?




Actually you need three turned down for adequate oil flow with the small T&D shaft but the end ones do not need to be turned down since the oil doesn't flow past them. I bet T&D provides the whole kit turned down since they don't trust their customers to assemble the setup correctly.




that makes sense. no way to mess it up with them all that way. i forgot about the smaller shaft of the T&D's.

Re: 505 back together with Mancini heads #56754
04/19/08 05:42 AM
04/19/08 05:42 AM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 12,132
Cleveland
sunroofgtx Offline
I Live Here
sunroofgtx  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 12,132
Cleveland
Andy, what distributor and ignition box are you running ?? We have your wires finally done. Taking pics of them today, and sending them off..How much do you think they would need to be added to fit them on an engine in a car ??


From: AndyF

Hi Rick,

I measured up the wires for the Jesel belt drive distributor. The following lengths should work pretty well with dyno headers and Indy heads. The wires will loop down under the heads which works great on the dyno but might not work in a car.

1 wire at 24 inches, 3 at 33.5 inches, 2 at 38 inches and 2 at 41 inches. The Jesel distributor has HEI style terminals. The wires need to have 90 degree boots on both ends. The measurements are from center to center of the boot. (center of the spark plug to center of the HEI terminal)


Join the quickest team in motorsports. Team FireCore. CustomWiresets.com
Re: 505 back together with Mancini heads [Re: AndyF] #56755
04/19/08 09:12 AM
04/19/08 09:12 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,095
Idaho
Runner Offline
master
Runner  Offline
master

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,095
Idaho
andy, i thought your valley plate wouldnt work with e-heads?. arent the 452 heads just e heads with straight plugs?

Re: 505 back together with Mancini heads [Re: Runner] #56756
04/19/08 09:48 AM
04/19/08 09:48 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,264
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline OP
I Win
AndyF  Offline OP
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,264
Oregon
Runner - I don't think the plate will work with the E heads. I mocked it up in the photo and decided to go with a standard valley pan.

Rick - cool deal on the wires. We run MSD ignition on the dyno with a Jesel distributor.

Re: 505 back together with Mancini heads [Re: AndyF] #56757
04/19/08 07:10 PM
04/19/08 07:10 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,264
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline OP
I Win
AndyF  Offline OP
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,264
Oregon
Here is the street roller cam going in. This cam is pretty close to the MP .590 in terms of 050 duration and lift. Specs on the cam are 260/266 at 050 and .588/.597 lift. The MP .590 is 265/265 and .590. But based on how these lobes look I've got to assume that this street roller has a ton more duration at .200 and .300. I'll measure it just to see.

4369829-roller.jpg (425 downloads)
Re: 505 back together with Mancini heads [Re: AndyF] #56758
04/19/08 07:39 PM
04/19/08 07:39 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 146
Wis.
R
rlm2268 Offline
member
rlm2268  Offline
member
R

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 146
Wis.
Hey Andy, What is the valve timing at .050 and what lobe center is it ground on?

Thank's

Re: 505 back together with Mancini heads [Re: rlm2268] #56759
04/19/08 07:50 PM
04/19/08 07:50 PM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,113
Lost in Pooler, GA
Gumbydammit Offline
super stock
Gumbydammit  Offline
super stock

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,113
Lost in Pooler, GA
Any pics of the cam button arrangement??


I'm Gumby dammit!
Re: 505 back together with Mancini heads [Re: AndyF] #56760
04/19/08 08:52 PM
04/19/08 08:52 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,591
Canton, Ohio
S
Sport440 Offline
master
Sport440  Offline
master
S

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,591
Canton, Ohio
Quote:

Here is the street roller cam going in. This cam is pretty close to the MP .590 in terms of 050 duration and lift. Specs on the cam are 260/266 at 050 and .588/.597 lift.



The MP .590 is 265/265 and .590.

But based on how these lobes look I've got to assume that this street roller has a ton more duration at .200 and .300. I'll measure it just to see.




Andy the mp 590 is actually around 271 to 272 @ .050 at .200 its 179* Both me and Porter got the same numbers. mike

Re: 505 back together with Mancini heads [Re: rlm2268] #56761
04/19/08 09:11 PM
04/19/08 09:11 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,264
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline OP
I Win
AndyF  Offline OP
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,264
Oregon
Quote:

Hey Andy, What is the valve timing at .050 and what lobe center is it ground on?

Thank's




The cam is ground on 108 centers. I'll probably install it 4 degrees advanced although Comp recommended 2 degrees advanced.

Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1