|
|
|
Re: Making my 67 Belvedere handle
[Re: MACDiesel]
#425873
12/31/09 04:21 AM
12/31/09 04:21 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 102
Virginia
MACDiesel
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 102
Virginia
|
I got my 1.12" FFI torsion bars in. Totally fixed the rubbing issue with the back tires. That's right, the stiffer torsion bars stopped the back tires from rubbing. Its easier to believe when you consider I went from 0.67" /6 bars (87 lbs/inch) to 1.12" (270 lbs/ich) bars. Its a completely different car now. Whats even better is I havent noticed any increase in harsh ride. If your running a BB b-body these bars are a must have!
I am keeping the /6 bars though, just in case I start drag racing more than cruising.
-1967 Belvedere II 440/4speed
|
|
|
Re: Making my 67 Belvedere handle
[Re: MACDiesel]
#425874
12/31/09 04:36 AM
12/31/09 04:36 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 27,347
Today? Who Knows?
1_WILD_RT
Management Trainee
|
Management Trainee
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 27,347
Today? Who Knows?
|
Quote:
The one above was wheels turned right.
This is left
Is that at full lock or does it get worse??
|
|
|
Re: Making my 67 Belvedere handle
[Re: MACDiesel]
#425875
12/31/09 08:09 AM
12/31/09 08:09 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,474
Answering the call of the wild
ThermoQuad
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,474
Answering the call of the wild
|
Quote:
Are the Edelbrock IAS shocks on par with the QA1, Koni an Billstein versions?
NO! NO NO!
Other than on the front of a late b body 73 & up the eddys are a poor choice. A shock is supposed to be a dampener not a helper spring. The eddys act like helper springs and when they get hot they "porpoise" just like the kybs.
Could we please have a handling forum??? I get tired of repeating myself.
|
|
|
Re: Making my 67 Belvedere handle
[Re: ThermoQuad]
#425876
12/31/09 12:48 PM
12/31/09 12:48 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,486
So Cal
autoxcuda
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,486
So Cal
|
Quote:
Quote:
Are the Edelbrock IAS shocks on par with the QA1, Koni an Billstein versions?
NO! NO NO!
Other than on the front of a late b body 73 & up the eddys are a poor choice. A shock is supposed to be a dampener not a helper spring. The eddys act like helper springs and when they get hot they "porpoise" just like the kybs.
Could we please have a handling forum??? I get tired of repeating myself.
Why were edelbrocks a good choice on the late B-body? Or was it the only choice?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
